CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS REPORTERS CONTACT US
Connect the World
October 9, 2009
Posted: 1121 GMT

U.S. President Barack Obama failed in his bid to win the Olympics for Chicago when he traveled to Denmark last week. But Scandinavia gave him an unexpected consolation prize Friday - the Nobel Peace Prize.

Barack Obama is only the third U.S. president to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Barack Obama is only the third U.S. president to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that Obama had won the illustrious award for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."

Obama is the first sitting U.S. president to win the award since Woodrow Wilson in 1919 and only the third occupant of the White House to be recognized with the award. But Obama has only held the presidency since January this year - just eight months. Already the award has drawn both praise and criticism from around the world.

Click here to read more about Obama's award

The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded 89 times to 119 Nobel Laureates between 1901 and 2008 – 96 times to individuals and 23 times to organizations.

In his last will and testament, Alfred Nobel, who invented dynamite,  indicated that the prize for peace should be dedicated to "the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

What do you think? Are Obama's attempts to change U.S. political direction and renew diplomatic engagement enough to merit award of the prize?

What is "extraordinary" about Obama's efforts for peace since the start of the year?

Or is awarding a prize to a leader who has yet to reach the end of his first year simply too premature?

Let us know what you think and we will use some of your comments in the show.

Posted by:
Filed under: General


Share this on:
Mike Kuyel   October 9th, 2009 11:29 am ET

This is a joke.

Milind   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

I don't agree to this award. He may prove to be a deserving candidate later but certainly its too early to make this judgement now.

Lindis   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

As a Norwegian I am not very proud of the committees choise. Nothing on Obama as president, but many Norwegians feels that it is way too early, he has great visions and ideas, but they have yet to be prooved. I feel that the committee is loosing its grip, it feels more like they want a "big shot" as Obama to our meek, tiny, obscure little contry. Mabye the Nobels Peace price should be awarded every five years, and not so often. It seems to loose its value.

William Tregoning   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

He does not deserve it since he has not accomplished anything toward peace. Just saying you want peace is not enough. This year the Peace Prize is a popularity contest.

Josh   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

NO

Michael Tadjer   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

He desreve it very much. He is the only one who deserved it. I am so happy that Norwegian Nobel comite has realised it.

morris   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

He maybe will deserve it in the future, but now he's sending 40.000 more troops in Afghanistan. Isn't it too early for a Nobel? He could get Nobel for Hope and Good Will, not for Peace. Not yet.

vandecappelle guido   October 9th, 2009 11:30 am ET

Dear sir

despite the respect i have for the president, i think it's to early to have this price.Everything is in process and isn't realised.

va

RoseMary   October 9th, 2009 11:31 am ET

No way, I think a person needs to spend thier life promoting peace to get it (mother teresa for example) not just 'try' to change stuff for a few months...

Maria   October 9th, 2009 11:31 am ET

What is extraordinary is the fact that he is invoked a sense of hope amongst different peoples. Perhaps that in itself is the first step to peace – hope that people can co-exist. and not fear and hate for others who are different!

Jim   October 9th, 2009 11:31 am ET

No. I voted for him because I wanted a change in the war policies of the last 8 years. However, he has been in office less than a year. While he has done a great deal to improve the respect other countries have for the US, I think it is too premature to award him the prize. If he continues the way he has, then it would deserve it, but not yet.

Athanasios   October 9th, 2009 11:32 am ET

I think that the Nobel Prize Committee saw great potential in Obama and by awarding him the coveted prize challenges him to prove that he is worthy of their choice.

Sharon Kepcia   October 9th, 2009 11:32 am ET

yes definately.

PeaceWisher.blogspot.com   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

100% yes

Khin Win Myint   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

Absolutely he deserves this prize. He is peace -maker.

Mahmoud Mroueh   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

No I do not think he does. I think Obama won this prize for who he is, and not for what he has done. Some might argue that he would not be who he is had he not done what he had done, but I believe there are numerous people in the world who might be more qualified to receive this prize. I stood by Obama all through the presidential campaign and I was elated when he became president, but I believe he has yet to show “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

Wisdom   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

No Obama doesn't deserve it...This clearly shows that being the President of United States has worked in his favor...He has not even travelled to BRIC nations till date and he has only been making attempts to do few things...Not a Nobel Prize effort...This also shows the Norwegian commitees scrupulousness in awarding someone with an award even before he did something commendable...

Sandra in Ireland   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

For the first time in a long time people around the world are starting to feel positive about the US because we see a president who doesn't want to bomb all opposition back to the stone-age. A man with a vision for a nuclear weapon free world is something we long ago stopped hoping to see in the US. Also now that someone who is capable of understanding the science of ACW is in charge of the country that adds most to the problem maybe we have some chance of preventing world catastrophe.

Perhaps it is too soon for this prize but maybe it will give Americans a sense of the despair the world felt at the actions of the the US before Obama was elected. This is a man who everyone should be supporting because if even a fraction of his vision for the US and the world comes to pass it will improve life for all of us. This prize is the world saying to conservatives – stop your foolish bickering and get behind your country and the world. Every man is not an island.

michael   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

Absolutely Obama deserve the award, every thing he said, he is making effort to accomplish it. He said we should live in a world without nuclear weapons and he is doing exactly that.

Mohsen Afouna   October 9th, 2009 11:33 am ET

If he doesn't, who else dose?

Leonardo Galligani   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

Yes Mr Obama deserves the Nobel Prize exactly for the reasons given.
Great the choice of the Committee. I am extremely happy today and I see that there is hope.

Christiane Horn   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

Yes, he definitely deserves the prize, might make some people opposing his efforts to create a fairer world think again! The international community is obviously behind him as he tries to establish peace in some of the conflict areas he inherited.

Ahsan Javed   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

i don't think so, he has done nothing which could be extra ordinary achievement. He is getting much attention because of the fact that he is the first black person to lead the biggest economy of the planet.

Malele   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

He probably deserves it, problem is, it's way too premature.

Mårten (Sweden)   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

If it was this easy for the other winners in physics, medicine and so forth, why bother working hard for years providing us with new scientific breakthroughs. Or for peace for that matter. Maybe I'll get it next year if I claim that I would like to discover the cure for cancer. It seems to be enough to talk the talk without walking the walk nowadays.

Asim Ahmed   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

Absolutely, this man has done more for World Peace in the short time he has held the job of President then Bush did in his his 8 years of office. You could say that Obama is clearing up Bush's mess.

James Tapp   October 9th, 2009 11:34 am ET

What a joke. Deliver results and get the prize, don't get it for the speeches. He must have been nominated in his first few days in office! I hope he donates the $1.4m prize to charity, now that would be worth a prize...

Abe   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

I like Obama... but no.

The US still has troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. Daily remote bombing inside of Pakistan. Guantanamo is still open for business.

Where is the "peace" in this Peace Prize?

What a joke.

Amit Srivastava   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

When Gandhi was not awarded nobel peace prize , how come president obama get one so soon, its not only premature but also diminishes the importance of such a prize , keeping well in mind that he is the leader of a nation that is fighting wars for one reason or other, pretty much all over the world.......

Kunal   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

It is a joke. The Norwegian authorities should hang their head in shame. Nothing against Obama, he is a great guy doing a great job but Nobel peace prize is a altogether different thing. He hasn't done anything to deserve this (yet). Do the nobel committee realise how big a blunder they have done and undermined the honour attached to the prize? Shame ! there were many more deserving candidates. It all looks a PR stunt to me.

Wisdom   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

Obama may be a good man, but the award is too early for someone who has made any commendable effort in making the difference...In fact late Ronald Reagan deserved a Nobel Prize and all the ex-Presidents of the United States if Obama gets the Prize...Obama all hyped up DRAMA nothing else....

Marc T   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

YES - Obama dared to show the world an America that we all can be proud off, an example for us all -.that offers hope and balance

Malele   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

He might deserve it one day in the future, I think it's premature at
this stage.

Josh Shrier   October 9th, 2009 11:35 am ET

The president has shown his desire to pacify the Muslim nations who simply laugh behind his back as a weak leader with no understanding of how their real agenda works.

In the process he has sold out Israel and has placed them as the "bad guy" and positioned himself as a lawyer for the other side. That may be "nobel" but that isn't the job of the president of the United States.

Evil people respond to one thing, and that is a gun to the head. If WWII didn't show us that evil can not be pacified or negotiated with, than nothing will.

George Bush might have been to hasty with Iraq, but at least he showed the world that evil will not be tolerated. Obama as shown the world that evil will be praised and good will be condemned. This is the worst decision that this panel has made since Arafat won for the "peace accords." Isn't it funny that Obama and Arafat are pursing the same agenda. Just a thought.

de   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

What have he done?

B Lewis   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

There are so many organisations (like UNICEF or UNCHR) who have done so much for peace and helping others... Mr. Obama has only been in office for 9 months. This kind of option only takes out value from the once prestigious Nobel award.

Dilip Murthy   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

No. I think it's some kind of joke if 6 months of talk can give you a Nobel prize for peace. The award should be for achievements and not rhetoric.

Its all the more surprising when you have the winner leading an army of thousands to a bloody, futile battle.

Dilip
India

Levi J Attias   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

The Norwegian Nobel Committee must be obtuse and senile to have awarded the peace prize to Barak Hussein Obama. What has he done to deserve this award? Nothing....and the component members of the Committee daintily swoon at the mere mention of the word 'Obama'. This is an Obamination of the Nobel Peace Prize!

Brian   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

Yes. Yes. Yes. President Obama is the ideal person for this award.

Kojo Ansah-Pewudie   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

I think he deserves the prize, probably not much of what he has acheived (not to say that he has inspired a whole world which in itself is a huge achievement) but to encourage him to continue the path he has started on. I believe the prize is equally a restrainning weapon to remind him that the world depends on him to carry on with diplomacy rather than military might to work towards peace. He surprisingly deserves the prize.

Paul   October 9th, 2009 11:36 am ET

This is ridiculous. He hasn't done anything so far. Lots of promises and eloquent speeches and no action... Sheer madness – makes the Nobel prize meaningless.

Tobi   October 9th, 2009 11:37 am ET

YES HE DOES!!! Congratulations...President & Michelle Obama

Marcelo Silva   October 9th, 2009 11:37 am ET

Yes, very good.

Rajeev Nair   October 9th, 2009 11:37 am ET

Now, that was too quick an achievement.
Possibly he will have to now live up to the honour and show that he was indeed worthy of the prize. That's original thinking from the committee!
Now Obama can't afford a bad move. Good Luck!

J.P. Scherz   October 9th, 2009 11:37 am ET

They could have waited for a few more years – until it's obvious that Obama really made the changes he promised for the world.

Alicia   October 9th, 2009 11:38 am ET

ABSOLUTELY!! I am tremendously proud of him and to call him My President!!

Larry J. Dozier   October 9th, 2009 11:38 am ET

Name someone within the last year, that have given hope to all that peace in this world is attainable his dreams are the dreams of all people in this world – WORLD PEACE. In the short time that he has been on the national/world scene his impact on PEACE is truly deserving for him to awarded the price. The world is a better place just by him winning the White House.

Nigel H   October 9th, 2009 11:38 am ET

Personally I don’t thick he deserve to win the prize. As he was only in the office lest then Year and he didn’t make any significant contribution for world peace yet.

Michel Rotterdam   October 9th, 2009 11:38 am ET

I think he should be judged on his actions rather than his words. Obviously the committee has fallen for his words only
He shouldn't be awarded yet. This award gives me a bad taste in the mouth and to the nominees wich accomplished real actions for peace.

Obamamania has gone too far

pedro b   October 9th, 2009 11:38 am ET

absolutley not!!! What a political sham.. Now lets see if he delivers troops as requested.. Now that he is a most peaceful person on earth.. What a laugh.. Kiss rings and dictators and you will be rewarded..

chappy   October 9th, 2009 11:38 am ET

Congratulations, the american people should be proud of this president

ahmed, egypt   October 9th, 2009 11:39 am ET

Yes, President Barack Obama has inspired the world to believe more in the international community and was able to retain some of the lost faith in the United States diplomatic efforts. He is capable of bridging the cultural gap between the international community and to inspire its youth to demand a better future. His efforts in engaging with Iran and North Korea has earned him the trust and respect of the world. He has proven to the extremists of the west and the east the words are more powerful the echo of explosives. For all the believers in the nuclear disarmament , its great to know that the President of United States is on your side...

Winda   October 9th, 2009 11:39 am ET

Congratulation mr. President!!

Andrew   October 9th, 2009 11:39 am ET

Absolutely not. This is an award whose recipients have shown extraordinary effort in bringing about peace and prosperity to their respective nations and throughout the world. President Obama has not been in a position long enough to have made such a global contribution to the pursuit of peace. Every armed conflict that was active at the time he took office is still active today. So I ask: What has he done to bring peace to our world? By awarding Barak Obama the Nobel Peace Prize, they have diminished the significance of the award.

Rev   October 9th, 2009 11:39 am ET

Congrats to Mr. Obama, but honestly I think its too premature. He is still in the process of trying to make things happen and hasn't yet achieved much so far to deserve such an award. I think it should have been appropriate to see some concrete achievements first.
Are there really very few people working for peace in the world? I personally think the Scottish justice minister who endured every criticism to release a prisoner on humanitarian grounds deserved it better than Mr. Obama for his courage and conviction.

Saiki   October 9th, 2009 11:39 am ET

I think people are forgetting that the Nobel Peace Prize is a WORLD prize, not an American prize. This has nothing to do with what he has achieved politically in America, but for the role he has played on the world stage. As an American who lives in the world beyond the United State's borders, I can say with certainty that no matter the political climate within America, Barak Obama has made an incredible and positive impact on the world as a whole.

Marius Redelinghuys   October 9th, 2009 11:40 am ET

Yes, to echo Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and Nobel Laureate:

Archbishop Tutu on President Obama – extraordinary perspective. "“What wonderful recognition of someone who has already made such an impact on our planet with regards to the Muslim world, nuclear disarmament, climate change and, to some extent, ...the Middle East. He has reached out to the Arab world, including Iran, and North Korea. In a way, it’s an award – coming near the beginning of the first term of office of a relatively young President – that anticipates an even greater contribution towards making our world a safer place for all. It is an award that speaks to the promise of President Obama’s message of hope." Via Ray Hartley at Times.

Larry Cisar   October 9th, 2009 11:40 am ET

What did he do to deserve the prize? All other recipients have had a positive effect on the world. He might be a great guy, but I do not see what he did to achieve this prize.

Staffan   October 9th, 2009 11:40 am ET

A bit premature you might say. Although shifting global policy and and winning the election on the message that the last 8 years was big a mistake is probably the most important thing for World Peace in a long time. But then the prize would go to 52% of the US-population, not to Obama.

He is still the president for a country involved in two offensive wars, but for the hope of peace and just for a US president to talk about a nuclear free world is a fantastic change to the darkness of recent times.

/Staffan, Sweden

Joost from the Netherlands   October 9th, 2009 11:40 am ET

Obama gave the Americans a new chance to be accepted. In the past, US foreign affair policy has made both friends and enemies with other states as a result of the dominant position the US has in recent history. With that position comes a great responsibility. The Bush administration did not grasp that concept – or if they did they were very unfortunate in executing diplomacy. With a new face and a new slogan Obama gave the whole world hope for a new, better future with improved relationships between the US and its allies and the Middle East and Russia. He realizes that wars have never been solved with battles, but only with talks (diplomacy). He reaches out to the states that were declared ashes of evil by Bush and creates a lot of goodwill by doing that. The challenge he faces is not only to get Iran and Northern Korea to the negotiating table, but to give them sufficient reasons to cease developing nuclear warfare and become respected members of a new world order. Obama deserves the price for trying to change the world, but if he will succeed is something we will only know in future

Kevin Pillay   October 9th, 2009 11:40 am ET

All i can say is well done Mr President !

S.England   October 9th, 2009 11:41 am ET

I think many are surprised by this award. What exactly has Obama done to promote peace in the world? Visits to Africa, the Middle East (for his first overseas interview) and soon Japan; not one of these were to expand the message of peace. Let's be honest, he travels to promote America, its strength in manufacturing and exports, in hopes of gaining foreign investment. As we all know, America needs money, more than peace at this moment.

Bill   October 9th, 2009 11:41 am ET

I think this award at this time is far too premature. He should have been judged on longer term results.

Herman Safin   October 9th, 2009 11:41 am ET

Whilу I do think that President Obama has made a significant effort to re-start numerous peace efforts and utilize new approaches to old problems, he has accomplished just that so far. I do think that he will deserve the Nobel Peace prize if he accomplishes even 30% of what he set out to do, however I do believe this year's win is premature.

Franca Serrau   October 9th, 2009 11:41 am ET

YES!!!!!

Adnan Gul   October 9th, 2009 11:41 am ET

Well, I guess it was too early to know if Mr.Obama really deserve the prize, but I guess I it will put him under pressure to do more to spread peace specially in the Muslim World.

Jan Ivarsen   October 9th, 2009 11:41 am ET

Yes he does- he and Hillary Clinton does a great job for the peace
in the world and this should encourage them further to creat peace in the Middle East as well as in Afghanistan and with Iran

Santanu   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

Unless defeating the Clintons can be considered as significant contribution towards world peace, Obama has had precious little time to contribute enough to deserve the biggest award on earth. If anything, this premature recognition would set a level of expectations more appropriate for epic heroes.

Jimmy   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

yes, of course he deserves it. Congratulations Obama.

Christopher Lynch   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

Although I did not know he was in the running, I am proud that he was chosen. President Obama continues to make me a proud American.

Maurice   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

He would win it anyway in the next few years for the efforts that he has undertaken this year but handing it to him this early might distort those efforts. Anyway, there are very few people this year that have stood out in initiating peace initiatives so just for the luck of good competition in this area.. he is might just be the best choice.

Amterdam, The Netherlands

salem   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

Of course he deserves it .Who else around the globe deserves it if not him.
I really don't see any political figure in the world who really can get the prize.At least he is showing good faith and maybe this prize will push him to seriously act towrds planet peace .

Mark   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

What??!! The man hasn't done anything specific, other than "hope" that people could talk and get along, sort of like Rodney King. Couldn't the Nobel folks wait until he has actually done something quantifiable before knee-jerking on this. I have lost respect for this group.

Sam Patterson   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

It is an absolute outrage. Obama should turn this down. What has he done to deserve the nobel peace prize. This will just give more fodder for the republicans to attack him. It is becoming all about Obama. The issues are getting swallowed in Obama's bloated ego. Enough Mr. President, we care for USA more than the brand image OBAMA.

Clive   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

This is a joke, right ? They cannot be serious !!
There are far more deserving folks out there for this.
Guess winning a Nobel Peace Prize no longer means much any more.

BKN   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

Absolutely. Within 6 months of taking office (and arguably even before), Obama has done more to reach out to mistaken adversaries and old allies alike to strengthen ties and rebuild relationships that were so severely damaged by the negligent policies of the Bush administration.

Let's hope, however, that this doesn't affect his resolve to defeat Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan or give Israel, the sole Middle East democracy, the solid support it needs in her efforts against Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, Syria and Iran.

Major Sridhar Menon   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

this news has come as a complete shock to me.
He does'nt deserve to win the prize at this moment.
He should have tangibly contributed to world peace in some significant manner other than by giving speeches calling for world peace.
He has not done this and so there is no locus standi for him to win this prize.
This is just a joke, and a big joke.

david   October 9th, 2009 11:42 am ET

No he did not. I haven't yet seen any specific action from Obama to improve multinational cooperation and diplomacy. No movement on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict....nothing. No real action in Iraq. Sabre rattling toward Iran. Nothing towards N. Korea. So what diplomatic action is the Nobel committee talking about? Seems like lame pandering to the "rock star" Obama crowd....I voted for him but this is lame.

Diangello   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

yes he deserves it. Yes we can!

Thomas R Johansen   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

As a Norwegian I am emberessed by the comitees choice of winner. I think the Chairman (former prime minister Jagland) whises to meet Obama.

The President has good intentions, but has still to make his changes (after only 9 months)
.
The prize has been a joke since it was received by Arrafat....

Niels L.   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

This is an excellent choice. Obama has really sparked hope and renewed confidence in the US among people elsewhere in the world, and in his first months he has already made a sea change in the way the US engages with the rest of the globe – well done!

Jareer   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

I think this is an outstanding move by Nobel Committee. A very cunning one I must add. This will endow him with much deserved support at home for his initially announced policies. In my opinion it is rather a mandate than an award.

Congratulations America.

Cheers.

Hos   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

Absolutely he has done enough work of unitin people in the world.His an angel of peace.

Mohsen Afouna   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

If he doesn't, who else deserves it?

southside_bruce   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

Obama is the best thing that has happened to the United States of America in a VERY LONG time. It is amazing how much distrust and hatred there is of him and what he is trying to do to get the country back on track – yet here we see him win a most prestigious award. Good onya Obama!! You go dude!! Keep up the most amazing work. There are many very proud of you and what you stand for and what you are doing.

J Degraff   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

I didn't know rhetoric alone would qualify a person... let alone win the Nobel Peace Prize... come on people... I'm sure someone, somewhere has done concrete efforts to bring peace somewhere in the world... now, it's all about talk?

Shae   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

I think it was well deserved and I am proud to be an American.

Elke, Germany   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

Obama is in power as US president since 10 months. What has he achieved? Some results? I´m sure not for sending more troops to Afghanistan. What has he done for the world peace? With all respect to Obama, to say it frankly: He has got the prize for a vision.

platformation   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

I am an American who lives abroad, and am not in opposition to his administration. However, I have not heard of anything so extraordinary in his presidency that would deserve a prize. All I have heard is that the economy is horrible, his health care is under extreme opposition, and that he has not come through on a lot of his promises....

I would rather have seen Bill Clinton get the award. Obama is still wet behind the ears, and to me has not done much worthy of a noble prize. The funny thing is that when he spoke at a University graduation in Arizona last Spring he did not get an honorary degree, but he just got a Noble Prize....

I am just wondering how I will explain to my European friends the reason why he was awarded the prize during my weekend get togethers...

Tom – an American in Greece

nancy   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

no too soon

Ruud   October 9th, 2009 11:43 am ET

NO – I really like the guy, but nothing is achieved by him yet. Maybe one day in the future he will deserve it, in fact, let's hope for that.

Peter B   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

I feel this award is a more futuristic award, an award to build on. I like the idea, and Obama could be and is sending out very good vibration all over the world.

I think it's great!

maria requena   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssss!!!!!!!!
congratulations!!!!!!

Josh   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

Nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize were due on February 1st. Do we really think Obama did anything during his first 11 days in office worthy of one of the most respected awards in the world? He did not deserve to be nominated.

I also find the timing ironic. Wasn't it only 6 days ago that SNL blasted him for inaction? Hilarious.

Cleopatra   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

a bit premature... so if I had to vote, I would have waited one more year.. the message sent is: we give this to him so that he continues to fight for peace, and to give him credibility towards the 'enemies'. Problem is: the enemies think the Nobel prize is Western... so, difficult for me to say congrats. from a human rights activist

Edan Geller   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

What a shame! on what ? he just talk and talk..no real achievements in any front ! world peace? common
The Nobel committee has made a big mistake on this one..
same like they gave it Carter and Arafat...

Maureen   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

Absolutely! What he's done to change perceptions about the U.S. and to alter ways of thinking by calling everyone to accept responsibility for world peace and world survival cannot be overstated. He is a remarkable man with remarkable talents.

Suchitra Davenport   October 9th, 2009 11:44 am ET

Changing the tide of the nation's thought and emotional stance is no small feat. This alone moves us toward a greater Peace, that is a greater sense of acceptance of our differences, as well as our shared humanity. E pluribus unum...out of the many, One. This is the basis of all Peace, and Obama has embodied this concept in his actions, in his words and in his Being. He has given us Hope for what is possible. In this Hope we rest, we come to Peace within ourselves. He has called us to power, to empowerment, to do what we each can do to help one another, to heal the Earth. This empowerment brings us individually to a realized participation in our own future. There is Peace in this. Yes, he deserves this. And most importantly, he is not one then to rest on his laurels...this will only serve to fuel him to greater service in the world. And I hope inspire us all to do the same and to have an uplifted feeling about our nation, not based on inflated pride, but on values that are true, and real. We can hold our head high, knowing that we are leading the world to Brotherhood and Peace for all. .

John Walton   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

What exactly has he done to deserve this honour. The Nobel Peace Prize lost its aura and honour the day it was awarded to Yasser Arafat. Sure Obama talks the talk, but he has not been around long enough to walk the walk. I would gladly stand corrected if someone could list his achievements in this area (measurable achievements, not just talk and promises) and who else was in the running for the award?

Geoff   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Nothing of any significance achieved apart from the highest budget deficit since World War II.

He is handsome and is a good talker though. Bravo Obama! Proof all you need to be is a good salesman and people will offer you everything.

Andy   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

I like Obama and think he is doing a great job. But I think they should have waited for him to complete what he has set out to achieve.

Michael   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Ha, ha what a joke. How can you even ask the question? Do you think he deserved it? NO! And sadly, there were some people who actually did deserve the award. Politically this will hurt him more than it will help. Most American's will see this for the stunt that it is. Only the far left thinks he has done anything or think he deserved it. I assure you this did not and will not help his standing here at home.

Servet   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Mr. Obama has certainly deserved this honour. We hope that the American people will stand behind their President and lead the world towards greater fraternity among the inhabitants of this planet.
Congratulations to the US for having chosen a visionary President – Congratulations to the Obamas!

Pieter   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

In the political arena, during the last years I cannot think of other individuals or organisations that have made bigger efforts. With George W. Bush's "Either you're with us, or you're against us"-approach, there wasn't much else happening in the arena than the exchange of threats. It was as if the only thing that mattered was to see who had the biggest muscles. Besides W, Putin and Ahmadinejad come to mind. The UN (Security Council) may have been working under the same principles as they always have, their power to change things has become weaker over the years. Even Tony Blair, in his important mission as envoy to the Middle East, has not accomplished memorable results.
With Obama's unique speaking style and his wish for dialogue, it was as if he cleared the air and let everybody start a fresh. He may not have created peace (yet), he sure has made huge efforts.

Janise Gomes   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

I think he deserve it, because the world needs someone who dares to take steps, I’m just saying even though he hasn’t achieved much he is getting close, at least he is trying. I think everyone he tries to change the world for the better on such a level deserves a Nobel price.

Richard   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

He deserves it a million times

Valrie Wallace   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

I think Barak Obama deserve this award just as much as everyone else who have already gotten it.
He is for peace, he seek to make peace among nations and people, therefore no one deserve it more than he does.

sadiq Yusuf   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

My initial reaction was WHAT!!!
But after reading the explanation of the chairman, I think the committee is right. Obama deserve the award

Suraj   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

First I would like to say that I am from India. I am a big fan of Obama, supporter and well wisher.

However I feel that Obama did NOT at all deserve the prize, if it he would have been nominated say after 4 years and if things which he did did result in a major positive action, then it would have been fine.

He should refuse the award and say that my time is not now for it.
I am disappointed by the Nobel committee on what has happened.Its shocking.

Is he been compensated for losing the Olympics -Denmark, Sweden, Norway : Nordic Country????
rgds
Suraj

Piotr   October 9th, 2009 11:45 am ET

This is some kind of a joke.

Sylvia   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

Obama?Nobel Peace Prize?
well he gave hope to the world...that is true....and he is TRYing to change the US diplomatic engagement in world affairs....that is also true.....
but a Nobel Prize?????too soon, and too scary for me....too much pressure on his shoulders...the world should not rely on one person, even if that one person is the President of the United States of America....he CANNOT be the fixer to all problems, and he definitely hasnt done anything extraordinary to promote world peace....I am a strong supporter of Barack Obama, the night of his election i danced along with my fellow "H" students to the music of his words...believing that "there is nothing wrong with hope"...well i am still hoping.....

Fried Platt   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

Even in this violent time he continues to show compassion with strength.

Wahiduddin Mahmud   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

Barak Obama may not have yet achieved much for world peace, but he is the best chance we have got for a better world.

Fahad Hussain   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

I could be that winner if I was Latino First American President.
Rest you know.

Katherine   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

Without doubt, we may applaud president Obama for the remarkable change that he has brought, particularly in US foreign policy, making it more engaging and effective. However, less than nine months into his presidency we have yet to see the concrete results for Obama's efforts. Perhaps awarding him the peace prize was a little premature.

Mark Geurts   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

You have a great new president! But I think he does not deserve the price because he is fighting 2 wars in Iran and Afganistan. Apart from that he is head of a nation wich is overconsuming and therfore depleting the natural resources in the world leading to poverty death and destruction in other parts of the world.
Mark Geurts Netherlands

Veronica   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

Obama's triumph in the last U.S. election gave hope and aspiration to people belonging to the minority not only in the U.S. but all over the world. He has showed us that we too can overcome!

john   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

Though I am a great fan of obama, this is too premature. Makes the this years prize look like a joke

John P   October 9th, 2009 11:46 am ET

I do not think Obama deserves the Oscar. USA was weary about a president who spoke only about war for last 8 years. Obama, in order to win had to speak everything in reverse of what Bush said/practised.

Obama has yet to show progress in any significant foreign policy or domestic policy initiative till date. The Nobel Prize is a bit premature. Maybe could have ben considered in later years, if he had acheived mIddle east peace and lessened problems with N. Korea.

Altaf Hirani   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

Absolutely, the last 8 years have been filled with fear globally, hence , a voice of hope, reconciliation and outeach deserves to be awarded, I commend the Noble committee for a very bold decision.

Tawanda, Harare, Zimbabwe   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

President Obama is a good person but not to the extend of winning Nobel Peace Prize. Tsvangirai should have won but has been robbed of yet another election. In Zimbabwe we say Tsvangirai is jixed (translate cursed) because here he lost presidential elections through rigging, now the the Nobel Peace Prize election has been rigged and he has lost again. Lord have mercy.

Mike Morgan   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

No, he does not deserve the peace prize, or any other. Being conciliatory to our enemies is easy. Anyone could do it. The hard thing is to promote peace from a position of strength without giving up our honor or our values.

Kunal   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

CNN forum moderators: Why don't you create a poll to see what % approve of the peace prize to Obama. Comments are great but a parallel poll also show in a nutshell what people think.

Cristian   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

I personally think that this prize is beside for his past work most for his future work as President of the US .
As a european I would prefer to see the US more involved in the process of Peace around the world than the invasions and wars from the past few years , I see this Nobel Peace Prize as a first step in the peace process ... peace in relation with other nations and peace in the heart of the great american nation .
Con gratulations Mr President !
Cristian C ( Romania )

Citizenoftheworld   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

He clearly deserves the Prize. His first television interview as President of the United States was given to Al Arabiya, with a message of outreach to the Muslim world. In nine months, he has restored America's world popularity, on the strength of his policies and initiatives, and his personal charisma.

I understand the Committee's choice. They are right.

An American residing in Dubai

Chris JOUS   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

It is a very surprisingly solution but I think it's a good mean to put President OBAMA under pressure. During his campaign, he promissed to relly change American Politics. He said he wanted to deeply moove the US diplomacy. Closing Gitmo, prohibiting torture, stoping the Iraq War, defending a World Without Any Nuclear Bomb or Missile... And we long for these changes to happen...

Many think that he did not deserve this Nobel Prize because he did nothing. I hope this encouragement will make him take the good way to these new Perspectives.

"Not Peace at the expanse of freedom but both Peace and Freedom". President John F. KENNEDY

A French citizen aged 35 who was and still is an "OBAMAnian" but who begins to fear that this President will not go as far as he promised it...

Fahad Hussain   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

This is the Joke of the Century.

Isela Muñoz   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

Still too early for Obama, I guess in a year as violent as this one...HOPE is better rated than RESULTS.

Luz Maria   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

Yeah, sure. President Obama deserves to earn the Nobel Peace Prize. His attempts to create peace may be too high minded to some but someone has press for it, better that it come from a national leader than a single voice on the bus. But let it be said that all the talking in the world will not bring positive changes unless there is a concrete path to secure lasting peace world-wide.

angela   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

I understand and agree completely with the reasoning behind the decision of the Nobel Committee. Obama has opened a new era in diplomacy based on mutual respect for nations. Doors are being opened for bilateral and multi-lateral discussions. He is an inspirational figure worldwide and for me personally. But in concrete terms, his goodwill and intentions have yielded no practical results yet and this Prize may even work against his achieving his goals. However, I say congratulations Mr. Obama!

lissa   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

Yes he fully deserves the Nobel prize based on my judgement. I don't understand and also amazed how Nobel Commitee arrived at this decision in so short a time from President Obama assumed office. Also, as mind says, Had Hillary become the President, will it be for sures Obama would have been honoured with this award.

I'm writing what my mind says.

Obama really deserves this prize. No doubt about that.

alex   October 9th, 2009 11:47 am ET

yes, if he would tell the truth that is.
keep em dumb like sheep in a herd thats what he should be getting awards for.

Joss Biabiany   October 9th, 2009 11:48 am ET

Obama is a promising new figure on the international stage but I'm afraid that it might be too soon to offer to him such a prestigious award.

At this time the Nobel committee is taking the risk to lose its credibility by literally gambling on Obama's hope. The prize is usually given to people based on their actions and concrete results toward peace and not based on hope and an energetic drive to build peace that is always commendable.
Way too soon I believe albeit I like and respect the man.

valerie   October 9th, 2009 11:48 am ET

I voted for him really, I don't think he deserves the Noble prize.
Couple speeches and good intentions are not even close to be enough and I actually think it is an offense to previous laureates whose prize was the achiement of years or a life of dedication and action.
How can you compare Obama's "achievements" to those of Nelson mandela, Elie Wiesel, or Mother Theresa to just name a few... this is shameful...

Victor Silva   October 9th, 2009 11:48 am ET

Congratulations to President Obama and to the American people!

This Nobel Prize is fully deserved. President Obama not only gave hope to the American people, but also to the entire World. He is a man of values and principles. The future of the World is to a large extent in his hands and this Nobel Prize will contribute to encourage President Obama to continue the excellent job he has done so far.

Eric   October 9th, 2009 11:48 am ET

Most Definitely. He has a beautiful heart. Sometimes to accomplish peace, you need to inspire people to do the right thing. When the right thing is done, there will be peace.

masao saiga   October 9th, 2009 11:48 am ET

Yes, very much I do think that Obama derserves to Nobel Peace Prize.

Nick   October 9th, 2009 11:48 am ET

As a Swede I'm ashamed. Nothing wrong with Obama, he's great, but to award somebody a Nobel peace prize with such a short history is simply not right.

Yes, perhaps Norway wants great world attention and certainly they got it. The sad part is that the peace prize might not be taken so seriously the more this crazy stuff they do.

It's not about visions, it's more about accomplishments.

Sabine Verschoor, Netherlands   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

The Nobel peace prize has always been an "encouragement" prize. The nobel committee rewards Obama's clear break from the Bush policies that have been loathed around the world. By awarding it so soon in his presidency, it increases the pressure on Obama to continue on this road and deliver on his promises.

adilson   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

yes he deserveted it.

TSgt C   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

As someone who voted for, supports, is employed under (I'm military) and even endears our current President - I think this was a bad call by the Nobel Foundation. Pres. Obama is a wonderful person, but he hasn't accomplished anything (yet) deserving of such a prestigous award.

I believe that this may actually be politically motivated. Was it to possibly sway his upcoming Afghanistan decision? Another push for Israeli/Palestinian concilation? Or maybe a long-term motivator to encourage his administration to "amount to" this example?

Anita L   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

With all respect to Him, I guess it's too premature to have given him such a Prize, unless he had brokered a Middle East peace deal that I had not been aware of during the past few hours that I had skipped reading the news!

Phil Young - Charlotte   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

I equate this to Alan Arkin receiving the Best Actor award for "Little Miss Sunshine"

George Rupp   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

Yes, I certainly agree with the Nobel Prize Committee' s pick, though it's a risky one. Needless to say that it is also motivated by a commonly felt need to reinvigorate Obama' s Herculean efforts in bringing peace to the Middle East. Moreover, it may also curb the vicious and hateful attacks on Obama by the USA far right, Fox News included.

mike   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

No, because he has not done anything to deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. He has done nothing but make things worse since he has been in off Illegal so to me he should get it. If he would do something that would benefit everyone except hisself then he might deserve one.

Daniyal   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

It may be too soon for too little done so far, but Obama has so far made all the right moves with sincereity towards resolution of key issues that brought the world misery, war and deep mistrust under Bush / Cheney administration. I beleive Yes He Can make the world a more safer place before the end of his first term.

Daniyal Jafarey

Gregory Kamugisha   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

Because he is the first American president to openly talk about the need for nuclear – free world. Before him, American presidents talked about preventing other nations from acquiring or expanding nuclear arsenal, which does not help much!

Badr   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

Alfred Nobel would be turning in his grave right now. Obama definitely does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize simply because of the fact that he has not achieved anything so far. Of course he has been talking a lot in Egypt and other countries, but everybody is talking, and I'm sure that so many talk more about bringing people together than Mr. Obama ever did or ever will do. Furthermore, let us not forget the fact that Obama is the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, yet he's still waging two wars in two different countries.

Neo Sin Huat   October 9th, 2009 11:49 am ET

"Obama, don't accept the prize and more people will respect you".

Tiffany   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

Our President absolutely deserve to win. What he did during his Presidential campaign was pheonomenal. He gave people around the world Hope. He gave people a chance to believe in something again!

John   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

there have to be people more peaceful than him..it doesn't seem nice to give that award to the president of the U.S....

Braham Singh   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

Delighted and proud. What a fabulous choice. If anyone deserved it more, it has to be the American People who voted for him and showed the world their true colors.

fishcurry   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

I dont think his words or plitical orientation is the simple reason to have unanimous decision by 5 Nobel judges :

As an europien I see the folloing :
1. Nuclear treaty he signed
2. War on Terror and related subjects; although he is having pushes and pulls from several sides ... he is doing what all he can to support the people's will ...
3. See what all he is doing to get people around engaged
including searching for bipartisan support for anything he is doing in your own country (without looking for the political risk he might have)

Its very rare : A person in such a position doing such jobs; which is logically matching to the vision of having peaceful world ...

He earned it ; sure this will be a great push for him to succeed for the world !!!

DJ   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

Give positive feedback and recognition on positive messages. Why wait for later. The man has a strong message, is intelligent, witty and charming. A people man, with recognition he will make the extra miles needed to catch.
Well done, Committee – Thanks

Nathan Freeborn   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

This must be a joke.
Conditions in iraq and afganistan have only detoriorated since he took over as commander in chief. He has not achieved anything and many promises he made obviously will not be fulfilled. Still we only have hope… but little change except for a president that is 4 times more fiscally irresponsible than the last!

Mike   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

No, he hasn't really done anything like Carter or Desmond Tutu from SA. If he were to get Iran or North Korea to get rid of their Nuclear programs then he should get it.

Zarak A. Khan   October 9th, 2009 11:50 am ET

At this time, the US is fighting two major wars, namely in Iraq and Afghanistan. People are blown into pieces almost everyday due to the presence of American forces in these lands and yet, Obama has been awarded this prize.

Why has Obama been awarded this prize when more than two hundred thousand of his troops are fighting at this very time? Does anyone see any logic here? If so, please give me a call and help me understand!

Kenneth   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

We are so lucky to have HIM as President ! This is great that the rest of the world is showing us how lucky we are to have such a LEADER!
Now let’s get behind him to back him on health care reform, so that maybe one day we can join in with the industrialized, civilized nations (such as Norway) that provide health car for their people, all their people without exception. Health is a right, not a luxury! And why be so reticent to let “Government” manage health care? Government already “manages” schools, roads, AND the military. I guess the same people protesting against government management of health care are also protesting against government sending THEIR children to War? Are they?

EThorne   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

No. His presidency may eventually lead to peace between Israel and Palestine, or any number of other issues. Then I would agree that he deserved it. But just because he has run around making pretty speeches and hugging other world leaders....give me a break. I am not upset with the President, I am upset with Nobel Committee who seem to believe that they want to meddle in our politics by awarding a President simply because he isn't GWB. I didn't vote for Bush, but I strongly dislike this committee involving themselves in our politics.

Yesh   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

Hello ...What has he done to deserve this ?

thomas   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

So what? Name previous nobel winners that made a difference, at least a lasting one? Jimmy Carter, Woodrow WIlson, and long list of has-beens even liberals want to disown. Like Obama, it's all talk and no show.

Kamara   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

I think he deserve it.Obama has started his strugle for peace years back befor elected has a president and for the short time in office he has deceided closing Guantanamo and extend the American dream of life ´´Peace ´´ around the world.
The issue Afganistan . Obama is fighting an Ideology of the ruthless Alkaida.
No man is burn ruthless.
If this guys deceided embrassing freedom and justice ,Obama will end the war with in weeks
Bassy Kamara
Hamburg Germany

Skeptic   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

No, no, no, this is totally a joke. He helped the U.S. to bankruptcy, is still fighting a war, is loosing grip on Iran endangering the people in Israel.
It's really risky to give him a peace price. What if Iran is using its nuclear power? Is he still the 'prince of peace'?

otero   October 9th, 2009 11:51 am ET

yes

kusotate1972   October 9th, 2009 11:52 am ET

Nobel peace awards should go to people that have achieved results that represent peace on a grand scale. While Obama is starting down the path to success, he is still in his infancy as President. The results of his presidency will not be known for several years to come. Let's review his strategies or outcomes in a decade to see if he should qualify for such a distinguished award.

hal   October 9th, 2009 11:52 am ET

no, he is an idiot

Huihui Wang   October 9th, 2009 11:52 am ET

Great choice!

George Gabriel   October 9th, 2009 11:52 am ET

Why couldn't they wait a year or two?
Why not allow his good intentions to flower into a proven track record?

Joshua   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

This may have been a bit premature....but i am waiting for Kanye West to grab the mic and tell us who he thinks should have won....

Jose   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

It's a joke!!! moreover, the nobel peace price is also a joke. you kill people in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine and you win a peace prize!!!

Sudhakaran Jampala   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

Yes, Barack Obama did deserve it. For many people in different parts of the world outside the USA, it is evident that Barack Obama is trying to break the ideology of mistrust and the hatred for the 'Other' that has unfortunately become staple in American political discourse. It required great courage to stand up as an American president and deliver a honest monologue in the middle of the muslim world as he did in Cairo, Egypt. There may be many in the USA who want Barack to fail, but there are undoubtedly millions in different parts of the world who want him to succeed for the sake of America and for the sake of the world.

Dag Svihus   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

He deserves this. Maybe this will open up the eyes of the American public to the fact that you cant solve anything in this world if you don't have values that reach longer than USA. I think this is was Obama has don.

m wright   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

Absolutely! He has inspired the world to actually have the audacity to hope for a better future.

brijesh joshi   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

Mahatma Gandhi work his entire life for peace but never got the Nobel Peace prize.Barack Obama got it so fast.What a irony.Probably country of location inflences a lot .

Anita L   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

With all respect to Him, I guess it’s too premature to have given him such a Prize, unless he had brokered a Middle East peace deal that I had not been aware of during the past few hours that I had skipped reading the news!

Swedish   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

Personally I think it was greatly premature as we haven't seen any real results in any issues related to peace where Obama has been involved. I however think this might have been a smart move from the Norwegian Nobel Commity as this will surely put great pressure on Obama to really do something for the World Peace during his remaining years in office.

Sztraka   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

Yes, definately.
Congratulations!

Roy Carumba   October 9th, 2009 11:53 am ET

I think He deserved it . And through that He can move on forward in leading the world towards Peace.

Filipe Loureiro   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

I don't think Barak Obama deserved to win the Nobel. As happened with Al Gore, it seems that whoever has a good publicist might just win something as important and symbolic as a Nobel. It used to be something to be dazzled with, not handed to people who honestly don't deserve it. But I don't know if giving the Nobel to Obama was actually worst than accepting it...

Filipe Loureiro (Portugal)

futureishere   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

I don't see how Obama can accept this. If he is as honest a man as I believe him to be, he will decline this prize.

Arvind Shah   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

It is a joke. what has Obama actually done other than lectures to deserve Nobel Peace prize. person like Gandhi who gave his entire life in the cause of non-violence, peace etc was not awarded any noble prize and who the hell is Obama whom no one knew just one year ago!!!!

kostas karapanos   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

no.

Per   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

As a Norwegian I am really embarrased, I have nothing against Obama but it's to early way to early considering that this is all about his intentions and not about achievments which it should be about.

Ben   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

Yes
He has held an olive branch out to countries that Bush pushed to extremism. Invading and bombing to destruction some countries and calling others evil led those to seek nuclear deterrent and caused so much hatred in the world. At least the world is talking now, his actions havent brought peace to the world but which Nobel peace prize winner hasd?> Has the Dalai Lama brought peace to the world? nope, but he has talked about the desire for it, so too has Obama and as a result of his diplomacy and efforts the world is now talking about coming away from the brink of more wars and instead of marching headlong into it, they are seeking routes away from further escalations

Anne Marie   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

Although I admire President Obama and really hope that he succeeds, with respect to the Nobel Peace Prize I have to say this is over the top. Clearly he has been rewarded for making amazing speeches. I myself have been moved to tears by his words but that is not sufficient to win such an award. Bill Clinton who worked tirelessly for Middle East Peace during his presidency and came ever so close had it not been for Arafat didn't win the award. Barack Obama hasn't even been part of any talks for peace and hasn't solved the problems in Afghanistan and Iraq, so I don't get it. Clearly the rest of the world has been won over by his glow and promise but this not sufficient. Barack Obama is not the second coming of Christ as some like to think. Enough with the glorification.

Salah   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

Congratulations President Obama for winning the Nobel Peace prize. You have won this prize for your vision (to pring peace) not for your achievements.

Raashid   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

He just refused to meet another Nobel Peace Prize winner (Dalai Lama) a few days back, in the economic interests of his country.
Didn't the committee take this into consideration while making their decision?

Lindeka   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

He deserves it.It's great news.Congratulations Mr President.You are a beacon of hope for Africans.

Gopal   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

I think its too early to award some one with that...I think it degrades the value of nobel peace prize.

There are many people who are speaking the same as him and have the same mindset.... so do they also get the same prize????

So, No.. I think its too early.

Ban Ki Moon would have been right

ronny   October 9th, 2009 11:54 am ET

yes.he shows the difference between a trigger-happy president and a diplomat with peacevisions.his attitude as politician is what the world need.i only wish that more politicians in usa would join his way and help him convince israel to back down a little.israel-palestina conflict is the most important to solve,and can only be solved with humanistic means,which i think obama has lots of.

Tim E.   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

It looks like the Nobel Committee wanted to offer the carrot in the beginning of Obama's presidency so that the US can focus the efforts more on diplomacy and peace rather than starting wars with the countries like Iran and bomb them like what Bush(s) did during their presidency. The humanity has already suffered a lot with all these wars and bombing people are not helping the countries which are already struggling with giving their people the basic service and rights they need and deserve.

I praise the Nobel Committee for their choice to give the prize to Obama and I hope this improves the peace in the world and that the US can work to stabilize and improve the existing horrific environments people live in the devoloping countries and negate the damage that the US has already done in the past.

Raquel Fernandez Garcia   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

Narcisist, egocentric, in foreign policy his work is created by others and is United States of America a model for peace and love??,
USA is a model for business and hawks, few doves and insensitive people. Other fellow adviser playing ball with the President again. Democratic style, few intelligence and bad attitudes like this. AFTER GANDHI, TERESA DE CALCULTA AND DALAI LAMA,NO ONE MERITS IN THIS WORLD THE NOBEL PRIZE. Hitler started in Germany with the same idolatric figure and attitude. I am really deceived of this American Presidency. Rep boys and girls, could you hear me????, because i don,t.

Dan - Brazil   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

I agree with many who have commented, to say its is very premature to hand out any acolades to Obama. We saw Jimmy Carter get one for brokering peace in the Middle East, at least he actually concluded the negotiations. I would like to see him actually accomplish something, up to this point it has been all talk and no substance.

Michael Griffindor   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

Obama represents hope, not only for americans, but to all people and countries in the world. As president of the most powerfull country, he represents the idea of future cooperation among nations. That's the spirit of this prize: not what he did untill now but an encouragement for what is ahead.

raman sawhney   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

with all due respect, the current US president is riding a on his rock star like following and has done nothing of note to deserve the award. while last year he was seen as the biggest hope for the planet ,ten months into the hot seat he turned out to be nothing but a charismatic orator .
What is “extraordinary” about Obama’s efforts for peace?
compared to him i feel lucky to come from a country (INDIA) where our leader is a "DOER" and not a "TALKER"

raul recio   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

oh yes,,,, great

Robert Janusko   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

President Obama has, in the short time that he has been in office, proven himself to be a true statesman, not a politician ignorant of the place of the United States in the World Community and its responsibility to act for the betterment of the human race. He is a good person and deserves the respect of all.

Thabo Khumalo, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

This makes a mockery of the Nobel Peace Prize won by Nelson Mandel. May be Mandela should renounce his medal or throw it in the river in protest. Morgan Tsvangirai PM of Zimbabwe should have won fair and square.

Mike Lewis   October 9th, 2009 11:55 am ET

It is far too soon for this award, nothing has been achieved yet, in anyway. Where has he achieved this peace? if it's just for 'efforts' then divide it between many who are trying for peace, not just someone with a powerful position, and who's country is at war anyway.

Aloy Uba   October 9th, 2009 11:56 am ET

of course he does deserve the award

tony   October 9th, 2009 11:56 am ET

Two illegal wars and a threat to attack Iran.......This just discredits those whove won the award before.

Col White   October 9th, 2009 11:56 am ET

A peace prize to the President of the most warmongering and military aggressive nation in the world?
And I thought that military intelligence was a oxymoron.

Richard Simpson   October 9th, 2009 11:56 am ET

It is always very interesting to hear President Obama’s critics, they still don’t get it and probably never will. The man represents a paradigm shift from business as usual with its bipartisan politics and clandestine agenda, the world can recognise greatness, it’s about time America does too. Congratulations President Obama on your well deserved achievement.

John 2   October 9th, 2009 11:56 am ET

What a joke

Myer   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

Obama has not achieved anything yet. He spoke a lot ...... Does he deserve a price for speaking?

9/11 did not happen when Obama was president. If it would ,he would of acted the same way as Bush. He wouldn't be forgiven by the American people if not. If Bush would come in after 9/11 he would do the same as Obama is doing today. Its all a matter of what time you come into office. Imagine the Iranian regime under some cover organization will attack the USA while Obama is in office. Do you think the same diplomacy will continue? I think this prize before any of Obama's tactics had time to work is downgrading the whole value of the Noble prize at least the prize for peace. It's been enough downgraded after Arafat won this prize and continued to incite for Jihad. It's time maybe to abolish this prize at least on a yearly basis and give it only once a decade.

Ruby J   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

Ha ha ha... Of course he would be the chosen one...it was a done deal long before the announcement. I think he is going to be the downfall of America...maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow...but mark my words....he is going to change the one thing that has kept America safe...Israel...

Florian   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

It is a good decision to encourage Obama to stay on his curse. I hope he will!

Rick Wilder   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

Absolutely not, with over a Trillion in Debt, Unemployment reaching double digits, Health care for Illegal Immigrants. Paying more taxes for his Free Health Care. He is no poster child for America.

Its time to fire everyone in Washington!!!

Dwan   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

YES 100% he deserves it. he shares the value of majority of this world.

joriz   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

i think, as symbol of unity, Pres. Obama can be praised. But for achievement towards peace, he has not delivered yet.

Rita Ferrelli   October 9th, 2009 11:57 am ET

I am glad that he was awarded the price. I appreciate his efforts for improving people's life and the attention he pays towards the environment and green economy. I do wish all his efforts will be successful.
Rita Ferrelli

Maybe Not Yet...   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

Maybe in a few years time, but in reality he really hasn't done anything concrete yet outside of some reconciliation, a few pretty speeches and lots of good intentions. I think he will achieve greatness in time, but the Nobel Prize should not be awarded for deeds that are yet to occur!

I think this is more to do with the fact that he is the Anti-Bush, in which case the award should really go to the American Voter for deciding that they no longer wanted their highest levels of government to be run in a manner of fear, hostility and intolerance.

Franklin Umunna   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

It seems President Obama has Shown the whole world that conflicts could be solved diplomatically not only by war as of the time of the t5hen President Bush,the juniors 9years in the most powerfull office in the world.United States of America should be proud of theri present president as we are over here in Europe-Sweden.

Steve Blesson   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

He deserves it to some extent; but I'm afraid the world is still keeping a heavy pressure on President Obama's shoulders to force him into being 'The Messiah" we've been waiting for over 2000 years now. I'm sure he can handle it, but time passing I feel really bad for the man as nobody will forgive any of his mistakes just because of this stature. And now I dare him to start any war againts NC or Iran after pocketing that coveted Nobel Peace Prize...God bless Obama, America, Africa and the whole World!

Steve Blesson
Citizen of Ivory Coast, Guinea/Canada permanent resident
From Montreal, Oct 9 '09

Michael   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

You are reading too much into this.

It's Friday in Norway. The Nobel prize committee members wanted an early weekend. So they settled on a safe bet. Unanimously.

I suspect the same happened with Al Gore.

Vee-TEC   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

It is inappropriate to give him the Peace prize so soon. It goes to show what the prize is all about. It is politics and nothing to do with peace.

anonymus   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

To be honest, the president is aiming to improve the most importants things in life, such as the right to have better healthcare insurance for ordinary Americans. That means that he is of major importance to the overall american intrest and in particular their health. Which is according to me amongst the most important things in life. Furthermore he is not lending his country out to solve every single subtile fracture of world conflict, he has not an arrogance in regarding other states as inferior (although they are in their respect to human rights) which previous presidents implicitly did. By improving cooperation, he causes trust among countries, which is much needed to tackle our climate challenges. Furthermore he is encouraging his country via incentives to buy ecological friendly vehicles so he well deserves it. He very well encourages people to change in their lifestile and worldvision, he is a visionair, a calculative well doing person. With respect to this U.S. president I will only say:
well done Barack Obama.

Clive   October 9th, 2009 11:58 am ET

How much did the USA pay the Nobel organisers for this ?
It must be they way they want to recover the USA's popularity in the world.

Sudra Goswami   October 9th, 2009 11:59 am ET

Yes, Obama deserve this. All these years America couldn't or didn't play an honest impartial broker role beacuse of various lobby and pressure. Atleast he is trying to be honest, transparent and impartial. I said trying his best despite all the pressure. He dared to do so. This prize will give him much courage and recognition and he will be able to go forward.

Siba629   October 9th, 2009 11:59 am ET

He should absolutely not get this. It is worse than Al Gore getting it. The things he is doing like cozying up to facist dictators in Central America and the Mideast make it likely that in the long run he will cause more unrest than good. Now the Nobel Peace Prize is really in the dustbin for me.

samual   October 9th, 2009 11:59 am ET

I believe Pres. Obama has a special "charisma" about him that draws people to himself, especially when he speaks. His personal style is similar to that of a Baptist minister and he has many God given talents. Although I admire him and respect him I don't think it was time, yet, for him to win the Nobel Peace Prize. It is the beginning of his "public ministry". His charismatic words have travelled the world but we have yet to see these words be put into action. He probably needs more time and I believe this prize should have been rewarded to those who have the actions behind them, which speak louder than their words!

Goutap   October 9th, 2009 11:59 am ET

I believe Barack Obama deserves the peace Nobel Price. And I agree 100% with the choice of the Nobel Committee. For all the people who dissagree, I'd say... "It is never too soon".

Menno   October 9th, 2009 11:59 am ET

For me this is far too early.

I have not yet seen any concrete piece achievements

mathieu prevost   October 9th, 2009 11:59 am ET

obama deserves this, absolutely. what a breath of fresh air to have a president, our leader, who talks of peace and understanding as opposed to what we've had for the last decade. finally.

camilo   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

I think he did´nt deserve it.

alfred   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

of course the president obama is the best candidate has been in the white house since a long time ago he is like clinton administration perfect.
regards

jone 16   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

iI think Barak Obama deserve this award about seddnig of newe peace dipolmacey note about the frute
maru from swedne

Andrew in DC   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

This is a sham. It's bad enough when Al Gore won the award for his "work on the environment", but this? The man was nominated about a week after he took office! This isn't the Rookie of the Year award. It's not about who's got the POTENTIAL. It's supposed to be an award to go to those who've actually done something.

As for his attempts on denuclearizing the world? Iran and North Korea are laughing at him. All denuclearizing the US would do would be to destabilize the world and lead to less peace in the long run.

Wrongheaded rationale. Terrible choice. What a crock.

anonymous   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

Zimbabwe's prime minister, Morgan Tsvangirai, deserves the prize more than Obama.

J WAGGU   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

Yes 100%

Jan (Germany)   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

The committee has now at least for once followed Alfred Nobel's will, to award a person who has done a lot for "fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses" ..."DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR".
Because the overall legacy of his presidency is not clear yet this poses a risk, but it's right nevertheless.

Austin Martina from Curacao, the Netherlands Antilles   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

Yes, yes and yes!

What's wrong with you people? It's not only about changing the U.S political direction but all has to do with the way this president stimulates the inter relationship between nations world wide to improve the quality of life for the ordinary people. By the way......... do we have our doubts about the integrity of the prestigious Norweigan Nobel Committee?

certainly not
Austin

Eric Bidonnet   October 9th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

I think he has the potential...but it's too early for such prestigeous price.

Greg T   October 9th, 2009 12:01 pm ET

I believe he should get the Nobel prize.Congrads MR. President keep up the good work that your doing.

Sujeevan   October 9th, 2009 12:01 pm ET

I'm from Norway. This is a joke. Most of the Norwegians agree. I'm a Obama fan, but he got the prize to early! He got the prize because of his name. Obama should achieve something first. It's all about PR this year. Obama is a fancier name for the world press and Norway would be in the center of the attetion.

Jonathan   October 9th, 2009 12:01 pm ET

I think it's a degradation of the nobel peace price to abuse it for the personal sympathies of left-wing orientated Obama enthusiasts. Norway (to which I travelled last summer) is (mainly thanks to its oil reserves) a very wealthy nation and consequently very left in its political orientation. The left, especially outside the United States, absolutely adore Obama for being both 'ethnic' and a 'socialist'. However it is almost painfully embarrassing to see the nobel committee be swept away by its personal sympathies for the man and lose all objectivity in it's decision. Obama has talked the talk but has yet to walk the walk. I'm sure he will be almost awkwardly, or unpleasantly surprised by this news, as it shows that his favourable perception abroad is not due to facts or deeds, but more thanks to unconditional love from the left, undermining his credibility.

Zsolt   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

Yes he deserves it 100%

Frederick MK   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

Wow! That's good for Obama, people will not like " that his been awarded such a prize at this time in his Presidency. Every one has some kind of critisizim and surport.

tnyo   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

I like Obama, but I don't think he deserves it, not yet. Giving a Nobel Peace prize to a president who has been in office for less than a year is too early. Let the president finish his term at least..

Paul Montero   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

Although his mandate as president of the U.S. is relatively young and the ultimate results of his efforts unknown and perhaps unpredictable, President Obama has fulfilled the criteria of the Nobel Peace Prize to an extraordinary degree.

Ivan Luciani   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

President Obama deserves this recognition and I am pleased for him and for the americal people. The US is a great country, but it had lost its way. Obama can restore his great country to its former glory.

Rob   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

I can't believe this. I seriously thought it was a joke until i went to CNN to see if it was true. This is like giving Beyonce an award for what Kanye said about her...LOL!!!!

Ulrik   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

What a joke!
To give the Peace Prize to the leader of a nation who is at war with two countries. The Nobel Peace Prize Committee has lost all credibility.

And to Kunal who commented earlier; the Nobel Peace Prize is NOT awarded by Norwegian authorities. The Nobel Peace Prize Committee is an independent committee located in Oslo, Norway.

vir lauzon   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

what has Obama done to deserve as Nobel Peace Prize winner. he has done nothing at all. I don't see one. maybe the Nobel panel are blind, deaf...

Yash   October 9th, 2009 12:02 pm ET

I am extremely, extremely surprised by this announcement. I mean, a guy with 9 months into job has convinced the Nobel Committee for the award......... either President Obama has one heck of a presence or it is politically motivated........ anyways I personally think there were better deserving candidates than him???

nils håkansson   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

if anyone can make a difference , he´s the one . this may boost his efforts finding a solution to the middle east conflict – awsome !

Dan   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

Far too premature. Maybe years down the road, but as of now, it's been all talk. It's a shame they've made this award into a joke and political/media stunt.

Amin D.   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

of course he deserve it ..... DIPLOMACY strted to have a place under his leadership

Mike   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

I think Yes, Well deserved ...
Economic reforms / Per capita income / job for all / Education for all / Food for all / He just started working about basic things , and he got a peace price .

At-least he has other important issues to talk about . Not only running after this " 0 " ( Oil & Osama ) .

Which has destroyed the world economic situation .

Wish for a peaceful world, where every one is a deserving candidate of Nobel peace prize..

May god bless us all !

olukoya   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

He does deserve it.thinking could also mean doing at least if He thinking and trying to stop something they should encourage him.olukoya writes from nigeria

Julie   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

No, I do not believe Obama deserved this award and he should graciously decline it.

Sadly, by selecting Obama over other more eligible candidates the committee has damaged the Nobel brand.

Their decision was entirely political and not based on merit.

gvilardi   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

its a sorry day for the nobel price history and for america. no he does not deserve it, there are many people that do diserve it and have done more then people can think of and merit it, president obahma has not done nothing for it and he is not ewen president for one year and he has demonstrated that he is a faliure and if he has nay carater he would not accep it and do us and him self a big favore and be honorable.
wath a disgrace for Mr. Nobel.

Tom Nygen   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

Only Americans (Republicans) hate Obama. People all over the world have respect for Obama.

Amarildo Correa   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

Not yet, I think He needs to be more matured in his position.
It is so premature to delivery a Award like Nobel to him right now.

American ex-pat   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

I have nothing against Obama... but to be rewarded for intentions rather than achievements sends a warped message. And this coming so soon after the SNL skit is rather ironic.

The prize includes $1.4M. What's the likelihood he'll pocket it? If he really wants to show that American capitalism is corrupted and people's welfare is his top priority, he'll do something with that money... like donate it to various charities or hey, how about dividing it up among all American citizens? Even if it's only a penny per person, it sends a clear message that PEOPLE are his main concern. Besides, without the American public he wouldn't be in office in the first place.

Aneta   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

He has got the potentian. But shouldn't the prize is given for the actions that have already been done not promises and plans?
I think the prize is loosing on it's importance thanks to decisions like this one.

If I say: in five years of time I will find an ideal treatment for cancer. Will I get Nober Prize in biology. I made the promise, didn't I? so I should get it.

tseesuren   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

Yes, of course, he start changing international political climate and just by being himself (black man) as the president of USA results in many changes and good possibilities in terms of cooperation between different people different races.

Michael Hardware   October 9th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

It is a sad day for the world – the Nobel Peace Prize should be awarded for actual achievements, not just for good intentions. The strength of someone's convictions has to be measured by results not rhetoric.
Michael, London UK

Moody   October 9th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

Obama must have donated a huge amount of money to the Nobel Committee. Unless how come he gets a Nobel prize this early? Seriously, didn't they have any better candidate in the whole world? This is stupid and hilarious.

Godwin   October 9th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

The whole world is almost certain that the president Obama no resoudra not no the crisis in the Middle East. But it is the first president who risks his political future by daring solve this huge problem from its first mandate. He defuses a crisis with Russia. He engages the dialogue with Iran... It is a proof of its willingness for a calmed world. Finally, some did not wait on one year before criticizing him, they should accept that the others recognize his charisma and the hope that he creats all over the world.

Regina Navarro de Andrade Barbedo   October 9th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

I want to congratulate to Mr. President Barack Obama.

He has deserved it.

Congratulations also to the American People for having made a excellent choice.

Regina Navarro de Andrade Barbedo

Pedro   October 9th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

Although it is true he's been helping to re-stabilize international diplomacy at a point when everything was going worst, it also seems that the job is far from being finished and this price seems a bit precocious.

Andre   October 9th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

Mr. Obama and Mr. Arafat make a good couple!
The whole world is in love with this man, who is doing nothing to stop Iran's nuclear programme. If a second Holocaust ensues, Mr. Obama bears a big chunk of the responsibility. They might as well award Dwight Chamberlain the Nobel Peace Prize posthumously.
I have to add though, that the Nobel committee's choice is in line with their previous decisions, like awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Mr. Arafat or some random woman who plants trees in Africa, while stating that the US government has developed the AIDS virus to wipe out the black race. Shame on the committee.

Austine   October 9th, 2009 12:05 pm ET

Well, whatever people say or think is nothing but, what is important is that he has won the Noble! Dam it! You all talking mess against him. He has done so much and even more than all the previous winers of this Noble. Who can name me what others have done in the past for winnning the Noble. Congratulations! Congratulations !! Mr President Barack Obama.

Sanjiv T Lall   October 9th, 2009 12:05 pm ET

No I do not think Mr Obama, deserved to get the Nobel Peace prize. The reason attributed is, "“his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” I really must have missed something here, I am unable to name a single "Peaceful" thing Mr Obama has done of worthy mention or note. He has not withdrawn US troops from Iraq & Afghanistan. He has won the Nobel Peace prize for "Cooperation between peoples". In a world where "conflict" is markedly on the increase, a Nobel Peace Prize is being given for "Cooperation". If as a President of USA and as the most powerful man in the world, Mr Obama is given the highest & much lauded "peaceful" accolade for simply promoting "cooperation", which essentilly & simply put is his job, then I do thnik, this does give "peace" & discord, all that troubles the world today a different meaning. A politicians job is to promote cooperation with peoples, I do not agree with this accord at all.

jay   October 9th, 2009 12:05 pm ET

hell no!

Michiel (Netherlands)   October 9th, 2009 12:05 pm ET

So far so good for Barack Obama, lets give him the benefit of the doubt and lets hope he still deserves this price next year and the year after...

Jonathan   October 9th, 2009 12:05 pm ET

Still haven't seen any fruits from his efforts so far. He still got more than 3 yrs to go... He only weakened the face of the USA

Shahrukh Pathan   October 9th, 2009 12:05 pm ET

Obama deserves an award (not Nobel) for creating peace between Sergeant James Crowley (Cambridge Police) who arrested Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr at his home. Other than that, he deserves nothing.

I am from Tanzania and we have great respect for him and his vision in our country/region. BUT, having said that, 1) the vision needs to come alive 2) it needs to be effective and 3) everything is easier said than done. How realistic is it to have world nuclear disarmament? But of course, if anyone can do it, perhaps its Mr.Obama only, in the times we live in.

Mr.Obama should actually decline the award, and give it to Mr.Morgan T of Zimbabwe, or another candidate who has had a long fight for peace.

Hridi Rahman   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

This is the joke of the day....:@

tim cramer   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

President Obama winning is because he displayed a charachter of mindfullness that world has been waiting for from the leader of free nations for many many years. A glimmer of hope in the could lead to shining light to bring needed peace on this planet.

Andy   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

Too early. Is the committee too eager to please the masses? Wait and see what he accomplishes at the end of his term not at the beginning. Then he can be judged. Let's see some more results first.

Yngve Sjølset   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

This came as a bit of a surprise, but I think this is well deserved, albeit maybe a bit presumptive.
At least this will give president Obama great incentive to work for peace and pretty much cements his need for engaging in peace talks and involvement peacekeeping operations in volatile regions in the world.

Congratulations from another Norwegian.

Thandi   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

Watch out guys, CIA might send a package of internet virus to your mail for negative comments. lol. just kidding.

d.bosch   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

more than anybody else.................

Bimla Narayan   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

There is no body better then Presdient Obama to ge tteh Noble Prize

David S.   October 9th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

Think about what he can do in the future not only what he has done in this short period of time!

Djeretke   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

he's the president of a country involved in two wars and a standoff with two other countries concerning their nuclear program. no, i dont think that he shouldve won, it ridiculous to me that he can spent millions on a space program designed to crash a probe into the moon while facing a severe financial crisis at home. totally irresponsible of the nobel committee.

Denis   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

While President Obama has within less than a year restored hope for peace amongst nations I think he does not have any results to talk about. Perhaps he is more embarassed than humbled.

As an Australian I respect America more today since it elected this extraordinary visionary but I have to say to you yanks that your president doesnt deserve it....(more so especially after Harry Coniks behaviour on Hey Hey two days ago)

N.S. Rajaram   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

No, but it could have been worse. It could have gone to Osama bin Laden, like it did to Yasser Arafat.

N.S. Rajaram

Jack   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

This is completely confounding. Perhaps the majority of people have a misunderstanding as to how the award is given. Most of us thought it was on merit and a lifetime of service to peace, but now they want to give it out to "encourage" the winners to continue doing what they've only started?

The Nobel committee has successfully diminished the value of every previous Nobel laureate with this much too premature choice.

Marcos Astorga   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

Yes, I thinh President Obama deserves 2009 Peace Nobel Price award. He has intended in every way to dialogue with Northe Korea, Iran, Venezuela , Cube and so many other contries to seat and talk searcheing the better way to acomplish peace betwin all contries.
He is a Man of Peace and has been critized by his own party for being tolerant.
Thank God America has Obama as president.

wayne bossard   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

About as bad as awarding the 2016 Olympics to Rio.

William   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

No! Prize should be awarded on accomplishments and the intent to achieve.

JEAN   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

Way too much of a political prize. Nobel Prize of literatura dn Nobel Prize of peace seems everytime more ideological rather than realistic. Here in Europe this Prize is playing against Obama. The reaction in Spain was "WTF" and in France a poll shows 86% thinks pretty much the same spaniards does. Germans are usually more rational, 90% thinks its a rather extrange decision.

Some has to bee too american, too much of a fan, not to see Obama doesnt deserve it, nevermind how cool he can actually be. He is just 10 months in power! What will this Prize do? Will it condition a soft policy against Iran? Will it bring deception around the planet if he actually acts hardly against North Corea?They should have wait untill he ended his job to value upon his results, not upon his efforts... otherwise, i deserve the Nobel Prize too!!

Anene   October 9th, 2009 12:07 pm ET

Yes absolutely.

JD   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

I think it's a bit controversial given that it is his first year as President.Although I am an Obama supporter it should have been given more time before a decision like this was made.The Palestine/Isreali conflict comes to mind as one would of looked 4 years down the line and see if any progress was made by Obama.Then there is the conflicts in Iraq and Afganistan which also seemed to getting out of hand.What peace efforts is being made there?

A person deserving of such an award is Jimmy Carter.

mok sin jee wan   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

What i feel like saying is whether or not Mr Obama is an African American or any kind of our human being, it is really too early to praise and honour him.
He has just became a world leader, he hasn't shown or done any honesty great or even the level of goods for this world yet.
most of all he has not proof his worth to this world of our with his integrity toward peace and love ,may he achived toward his family and a small portion of americans.
mpk sin

Patrick Tucker   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Abosolutely, he has brought new hope for world peace and tolerance and reduced the tension that previously charactrised world politics

Joe   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Honestly NO. Morgan Tsangarai should have been the winner to reward his effort to bring peace to Zimbabwe and give some publicity on the suffering of the Zimbabwean people.

Obama has just talked but has not done anything concrete. May be he should be awarded the prize in 2-3 years.

bimalesh   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

I don't think he deserves the peace prize but he will certainly have to work for peace after getting the award. I think, it was a good idea as he will be motivated and even obliged to promote peace during his term, which will at the end be better for the world.

Bryan Gibby   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Is this a joke? Peace - where?

Nils   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Obama, congrats.
However, I feel he didn't deserve the price. He has lots of intentions, but accomplishments?
The explanation of the Nobel committee, that the price is seen as an encouragement, is a lame argument.
Should we also give Netanyahu an Nobel prize to encourage him to come to peace in the Middle East?

Jacob Hibbard   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

No, I don't think he does. He really hasn't done anything big to help international cooperation, let alone anything worthwhile in his own country.

Michael   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

if it is a joke, it is a very bad taste. If not – it is a unbelievably bad
choice.

Walison Natalicio Silva   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Not yet!

Brian   October 9th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

I think it is much too early for this, Obama has a lot of reforms that would perhaps make him deserve it, BUT he first has to get those to actually work. Right now he has accomplished very little overall, maybe by the end of his presidency he would deserve it, but right now we can only take home at his word and hope his reforms actually do work, whether at home or abroad.

It should have been given to someone that has accomplished something that promoted peace. After all, its meant to recognize outstanding contributions made by individuals, not to "encourage" people in the process of doing something.

SHL   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

Not now. Maybe in time to come.

Akin Alufa   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

Yes, I think President Barack Obama deserves to win the Nodel Peace Prize. The whole world has watched with admiration his handling of international issues, particularly his respect for people of all races, religion, and culture. i quite understand his philosophy that the things that unite us are much more than those that divided us.

Tad   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

I think becoming the first black American president, closing down gitmo, and using his celebrity, as the most famous/powerful man in the world, to constantly bring the message of tackling relevant global issues, is deserving.
I ask those who say he does not deserve it to explain who else and why some else deserves it more than president obama. I pretty sure 99% of the people in the world, myself included, couldn't name 2 more nominees for the award. Furthermore, no one could probably make a valid or coherent claim as to what anyone else has done to positively affect peace in the world than Obama. It was served up to him, being in the position he is in. So, my opinion, yes he deserves it, if not for the fact I couldn't tell you who deserves it more.

Martin   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

How much money does the committee owe him?

Prasar Sharma   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

I don't think this was deserved at all! I agree with his approach, but where are the results? So many people have given so much of their lives to bring real peace to humanity. And here we have a man who has been in the international public consciousness for a mere 3 years and is yet to show any results winning such a huge reward. I am shocked to bits. By all means, if the man achieves what he has set out to, he deserves this award. But to decorate him with an award which is the pinnacle of achievement is a farce. Remember – more than 20% of this planet's population is living life in free democracy because of a man who never won this prize...

Shane   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

I am absolutely shocked that President Obama won this prize. He has done nothing to promote peace except speeches. I have lost all respect for this award and in my opinion is now irrelevant. Think about it. The final nominations have to be in by February the year before so this means that he was nominated a whopping two weeks into his presidency...That is just amazing. This is nothing more than anti-Bush propaganda. Congratulations Mr. President on winning this irrelevant, I mean "prestigious" award.

Suan   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

I admire Mr Obama.
But he does not deserve to win Nobel Prize yet..it's too early.
The only people in the world who think Obama deserves to win Nobel Prize may be Norbel Prize committee.

Musleh Rezvi   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

There was no candidate more deserving than Barack Obama for 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. Bravo & Congrats to the President.

European   October 9th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

How is it possible, that Obama received a NOBEL PRIZE for talking much, and doing really nothing. That's ridiculous!!! His policy is very shortsighted, and very irrisponsible!!! It will stregthen positions of Russia and China, is this what he wants??? That's not the way you play the game. The effects will be terrible, but it will be too late...You know Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush -they had certainly more guts....I'm dissappointed

Jeffrey Joib   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

I think a lot of people just dont get it.Yes I was surprise to learn he has won the nobel peace price in only a short on the world stage,but I think is what he represent that won the admiration of the nobel panel and made it point blank in the released statement.
Obama is an inspirational figure that cuts across all divides,which western leader has ever been to an arab country for the people to shout WE LOVE YOU?as it did in Egypt!Its always shoe throwing or nasty demonstrations.
That is what the nobel panel recognises and that the sort of person we need in the world.He may not have achieved anything yet with his policies,but its his presence and the message he carries that makes him such an outstanding character.
So I will definately say He more than deserve.Congratulations Mr President.

Amir Biglari   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

He really deserve this prize.

mohsen khatami   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

I think what mr. Obama has down in his presidency period , has been
a great support for peace on our planet. But I hope he wont expect very much respons from Iranian president in this issue. It is very important to support Iranian human rights activists for their fight for justice in Iran. And donnot forget that this activists are in the frontline against " blind religious extremism " which Iranian goverment represent.

congratulation mr. Obama

Binu   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

NO WAY......NO WAY........NO WAY.........Its funny, but rather apt for a committee that could thought that Gandhi did not deserve it, but people like Arafat, Peres,Rabin, Kissinger deserved it!!!!!!!!!

Nithin Francis   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

Obama has hardly delivered or changed the attitude of americans towards the world peace. All he has done is move the demoralised american forces from iraq to Afganistan and Pakistan. What he did is tactical and what any sensible american president would have done. Probably this Nobel Prize is because of extremely low standards set by the prior president.

sharif   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

yes , he deserved that !!

It will make his work now more easier as well as he have more responsibility now !!!

sharif

Mg. Germany

Vishal Salgotra   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

I personally believe this will make President Obama more softer.... I am not sure if this good for US or the world but this can be worrying......

Norwegian   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

"The Norwegian authorities should hang their head in shame" said Kunal.

Listen, the norwegian authorities has nothing to do with this award, so please know what you`re talking about before putting it on "paper".

Anyway, this came as a shock for everyone, he has been given a prize for ONLY visions, even I have those visions.

george   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

yeah, sure....
...and the Mets won the World Series...
what else?

Ada   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

How much did Mr. Obama pay for this prize? I think the Nobel prize is not what it used to be. I don't believe in the Nobel prize anymore.

Mark Carpenter   October 9th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

The Nobel committee's decision recognizes Obama's extraordinary peacemaking initiatives even at this early stage, and apparently wishes to empower him and give him a reputation to live up to. Bravo. A courageous and spectacular choice.

Gert Vogelaar   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

When I look at the significant change in the US policy regarding the relationship with Iran and the actions towards the final abandonment of nuclear weapons, I certainly think Mr. Obama leads the way to a more peaceful world. Also his more balanced approach of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict gives me more hope for a solution than the unilateral confrontational approach of his predecessor.

Bill Baxter   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

Perhaps "Peace" is a mistranslation from the Norwegian word meaning "Good intentions". He hasn't done anything yet!

Gideon Asfaw   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

Yes !!!

john thade   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

YES, absolutely.
President Obama is a ray of light in a world filled with darkness and gloom.
He offers the hope of peace, understanding, cooperation and help for those who need it most.
The President represents the finest in American public service.
God, Bless our President.

Mark Mostow   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

It's much too soon to judge whether Barack Obama's efforts have advanced peace.

Jonathan Henslow   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

Ladies and gents,

If we comprise our efforts to mobilize the substantial investment that is likely to occur, we will not only bestow, but come to honour Barack Obama for the relentless pursuit and hard work for world peace. In our darkest days we have seen the terror and diabolical deeds take hold in our world. Our president has withstood the imense structure of populized wvil in this world, and has set goals for a different, and more hopeful future. For this I am genuinely happy for this bestowment. It is well deserved.

njsul   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

The nay-sayers are already out in force I see, citing that there Obama’s presidency is in its infancy (he’s only within the first year of his tenure), that the U.S. is heavily involved in many wars, and there are more deserving candidates.

But despite this almost pavlovian anti-Americanism that is rampant among the world, this signals a fresh break and a signal of change from the Peace Committee. And one that I believe is important to take a closer look at.

Obama does not have an easy road ahead of him, and people tend to forget that he is dealing with a plate full of problems that he did not create. The wars in Iraq (which he was from the get-go against) and Afghanistan; the financial crisis; a plate full of domestic issues including health care reform; and an increasingly global world in need of cooperation on a global scale.

These, like it or not, are some of the main problems that face our generation today. And I cannot think of any figure in the world who has more of an ability to make a positive change on all of these issues. Change does not come immediately. Can any of you honestly name someone who has the potential to make a positive impact on so many issues?

Political scientists talk about soft power, or the power a person’s personality or reputation can do to move or change politics. By giving Obama this award, it only increases his political clout, and gives him a much needed boost when people are starting to think his vision and ideas are waning. This is one of the main reasons for giving Obama the award.

Increasing and encouraging Obama’s reputation will promote changing these visions and ideals of hope into a reality. Obama is deserving of this award, but with it he gets a greater responsibility to pursue the vision he created when he started on his presidency campaign. Hopefully Obama steps up to the challenge.

Swede   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

I agree that this came a little early in Obama's Presidental career, but sometimes timing is Tricky. The european society really feels like the US is back to have a serious role in keeping the world a safe place, in stead of "that crasy texas cowboy" as the swedish foreign minister called Bush a few years ago.

A big relief for the world. A clear change. This deserves the Nobel prize.

Piotrek   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

It is a shame. For all this people who was nominated before.

Patrick Rosario   October 9th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

Too early. His efforts have been sincere and with his views is changing how worldwide politics is discussed. Other nominees like Bono should have been the recepient due to his many years of uninterested efforts with the poor around the globe and his support to many causes.

Maikata   October 9th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

NO! Too early, hasn't done anything for the world peace! 2 wars are still going on and they give him a Nobel peace prize?!???!?!?!

Xihui CHEN   October 9th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

He actually did a good job in last eight months. But I think it is a bit abrupt to give him such a honor. From my point of view, what Obama has done is what his position demands him to do.
It is his obligation and work.

dan   October 9th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

No he didn't deserve to win. People spend their whole lives working in their profession and may be selected for something like this. He has been president for less than a year and people want to think he has accomplished something that amazing to be awarded the Nobel Prize. No way..

RITA   October 9th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

Of cource Not – not yet at least (knowing that i have nothing against the Obamas!!). Nothing has been achieved, and too soon anyway to give anyone a PEace Nobel prize for such a short time of efforts/ speeches...and good will... Intentions are good indeed, but ...come on!

HERMAN   October 9th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

WHAT DID HE DO FOR PEACE? NOTHING. IS THIS BECAUSE HE IS THE FIRST AFRICAN AMERICAN PRESIDENT OF THE USA.

Heluo   October 9th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

For one, it is most seldom that we see any 'character' emerge the global stage as we have seen Barack Obama. The man is a relieve I think. Secondly, I gather Obama himself would be the one surprised most and having raised one or both eyebrows over this 'manoeuvre'.

It can't be no other than that, a blind 'bet' on the chess board, and a 'downgrading' one if you ask me.

Nobel Price for physics should be based in solid achievements done on account of physics, I see no global peace movements here, let alone peace achieved.

Just being a President as per definition makes one a player in the game of diplomacy, that's not an achievement. Peace was not established anywhere and they'd be Nobel Price winners all of them, even our Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende would be eligible.

This may be not the first time we see Nobel Price up for grabs, they just seem to be getting faster about it each time.

I think this is more of an insult to mr. Obama and an insult to the spirit of peace.

Laksiri Fernando   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

I think he deserve it,

ERIC SADDLER Jnr.   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

It might be a little soon in his presidency ,but on the other hand he as shown that he is for peace, and so why not ,better soon than never.

Roberto França Aguiar   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

sure he deserves. He has a strong intention to distent the relationship among adversaries in the world.

Elias S. Antonakopoulos   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

Did he deserve it? Why don't the millions of people in Iraq and Afghanistan decide...BETTER yet, how about the U.S. Military in Iraq and Afghanistan and their families? EVEN BETTER would be to ask the thousands of troops ready depart for Afghanistan, and the families of the deceased ones.

Yosef   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

I am from Ethiopia. Obama desrves the Prize.

Their is a saying in our country "A satisfying bread can be recognized from the size of the baking Machine" meaning Obam shouldn't stay in office for a long time to prove himself for the Nobel Prize. What he does is more than enough for the Nobel

Leo Clarke   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

I believe that President Obama absolutely deserves the Nobel Prize award. There is no one who has had a greater positive impact on world affairs thatn he has. He has ushered in a new spirit of optimism in global affairs that was totally absent over the last eight years or so. The rest of the world sees America today as being open to dialogue as the primary approach to solving global problems and that is a major step in creating the platform for negotiating world peace.

Probably the most significant achievement of Obama's short period in Presidential Office is to reduce the degree of animousity which the rest of the world had against America and American Citizens. Efforts to make that feeling endure will provide much greater safety for Americans than coded alerts on levels of terrorist threats. If for nothing else he desrves the Nobel Peace Prize for that achievement.

Asif Maskeen   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

He Himself Has The Qualities Not Sure About His Rest Of Associated People Will Allow Him To Go Ahead Towards Peace I would Say It Was Too Early To Judge Him

Faustino Gomez   October 9th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

He has transformed the U.S.'s relationship with the world from of confrontation to one of cooperation.

Jens   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

He definetly deserved it... He is one of the best leaders in us history of course there is stil war in afghanistan but think about that alternative. Taliban comes back more dictatorship the man is trying to create peace down there and so are the troops... It might not be perfect, but creating a new democracy takes 50 years...

He is trying to cooporate with iran also... but most people just complain, and bitch look at what the man is doing then write something.... there is a strategy behind his actions they are not just random...

I could go on....

The man deserves it....

John in Chile   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

As an American living abroad for 35 years in service to our nation, I find this recognition to be profoundly gratifying. This president brings to the office an uncommon sense of wisdom. May God protect this man and his family and prosper projects which benefit society equitably and justly. He would also make a superb Secretary General of the United Nations when that position (in due and proper course) is vacated. But we certainly want to keep him at the helm in the USA for the full 8 years.

Ken Nak   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

I think this is a pressure for the USA to decrease nuclear power.

Lucy   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

Yes!! Sometimes you need someone to reenergise the mass for something to happen. You may not see the wind but you see the trees sway. Its the hope that Obama has initiated and the fact that he has managed to set the stage for peace and reconciliation within such a short time ( tell me someone else who has achieved that) that makes me support his winning. The world can not wait for Obama to "make the change" but pick the pace he is so passionately trying to set and run with it! It may lead to greater things than winning a nobel peace prize for Obama.

Jane   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

Here is a man with a HEART!
God Bless President Obama and his family.

saurav kashyap   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

He seems to be a nice person and might have deserve it but yet a award like Nobel should be confer only after through review. And to review,it seems to be too short a tenure.

Fran Semel   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

Yes, I do because in the short time he has been in office and what baggage was left for him he deserves to be noted as someone who is trying his best to bring about peace all over the world. Can anyone do a better job? I guess if you say yes then you should have gone into politics and we you be judingng you.

Pawel   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

OMG! I Thoght that's joke! So Putin or other terrorist deserve to nobel prize!!!

bob schoos   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

The fact that you have to ask this question says a great deal about Americans today. The opposition to President Obama comes primarily from ignorant individuals and racists. The fact that he is admired and respected overseas only make those rabid Americans more fiercely anti Obama. That level of ignorance based on lack of decent education, racism, and bigotry is best reflected on the FOX channel; the home of the knaves who have no clue that they are turning America into a losing nation.

Eyhab Algosaibi   October 9th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

US president Barack Obama sure deserves the prize because he is looking for different ways to bring peace to whole world and not only to specific countries.

Peter Ventevogel   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

He has regenerated our hope for this world. Much needs to be done to seek solutions for the worlds most pressing problems. With Obama in the White House the world can be confident that the superpower of the world will have responsible policies.

Hussain from Maldives   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

Yeah. This is a joke. What he did and what he has actually achieved in bring peace to the world.

DAVIS   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

ALFRED NOBEL MUST BE SAYING TO HIMSELF, THIS IS INDEED, A MAD MAD MAD WORLD..

Sam   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

It is a funny joke. So many people has risk of losing their lives for protecting the human rights in the world and Obama without doing anything wins it.
I think is was a big mistake taken by the Nobel organization the leads to deacreasing the value of this prize.

Sam, Sweden

Jean, Paris   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

PREMATURE

The Nobel Peace Prize is meant to be an AWARD,
not an encouragement to do better.

Obama is an excellent president, but he has not yet qualified himself for this prestigious prize. Unfinished business: Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Palestine/Israel, cooperation with Russia, and more.

Max Shaker   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

Of course he deserves it. His speech to the muslim world in Cairo, his declaration that the US aspires to a non-nuclear world, his intention to close down infamous Guantanamo, his request to Israel to halt settlements in occupied Palestinian land, his ordering a halt in combat missions in Iraq within a year from now, his overtures to Russia (scrapping the anti-missile basis) and to Iran (current G5+1 talks), the much improved relationship with Europe compared to his warmonger predecessor, all these are actual accomplishments in of themselves towards a more peaceful world. In addition there is all the promise of things to come in the future, unless he is stopped by the isolationist, war hungry, clique in the US. Let's wish him well on a deserved award. Go Obama, yes you can beat the evil forces ganging up against you.

J. M. Kittleson   October 9th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

What a disgrace. The Nobel Peace Prize is not a popularity contest, it is an award for hard work in the face of adversity.

It is given when when you are able to facilitate making enemies into friends and then spend your life trying to bring peace–Jimmy Carter. It is given when you have spent you life trying to rid the earth of landmines–Jody Williams. It is given when you stand with your patients looking into the face of evil and never abandon them because you have a belief in human dignity–Medecins Sans Frontieres. It is given when you turn your back on comfort and spend your life with the poorest of the poor and minister to them–Mother Teresa. It is given when you help others make a better life for themselves–Muhammad Yunus.

It is not given as a popularity prize, it is not given because someone mentions that they are will to speak with others. It is given for actions not for talk. I await the awarding of the prize each year with excitement and anticipation. I try to guess out of all the worthy people and the worthy organizations in the world, who it will be.

Never again will the Nobel Peace Prize hold such esteem with me. It has been awarded unjustly and at the expense of others more deserving.

Bartoff   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

Absolutely not! He hasn't done anything to deserve it.

Dave Baron   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

What's he done internationally (or domestically for that matter) in nine months on the job? Other than some empty rhetoric at the UN and loosing out at the Olympics, what has he accomplished? This is baloney on the same order of magnitude as the Jimmy Carter award.

Valerio Puggioni   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

In a world where a man like Obama, who had massive potential, reneges on his campaign pledges (such as pulling out some troops from Iraq and continuing a secret war in Afghanistan or attempting to empower insurance companies with his "universal" health care plan) and wins the Nobel Prize is a world where something has gone horribly wrong.
In a world where a man like Noam Chomsky, who has dedicated his entire life for furthering peace, is not even considered for the Nobel Peace Prize is a world gone mad.

slaw   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

just hilarious; the best joke i have heard recently

After Carter, it is just funnier

pillal   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

hello there is one thing that iam only gona say obama is the best thing that happend to all of the world and the best president united state of america .he is peace lover so i think he should have.and thanks to norway

Racil   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

I din't think, he deserves the Nobel Peace prize, as he has not done
anything tangible during his short stay at the White House. May be the people in the committee felt that they needed to give the prize
to a black man. I really don't see what are his real contributions to
the society at large, especially towards peace. I would love to be
enlightened.

racil

Hal   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

Henry Ford once said: "You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do." Obama has not done anything yet to deserve a NPP. To give a supposed honor in advance is a farce, degrading to original purpose and a capitulation to politics in the worst way.

Christophe Serrien   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

I'm European, so perhaps also biased. I am not directly aware of who the other possible candidates were, but I can't imagine they were any "good". I am a big supporter of Barack Obama and as a European I am very grateful he won the elections in the US. I am sure he will do great things in the future as President of the USA... BUT I find it very early for him to even be considered as a possible winner, never mind actually win it. This is all a little premature, and I have a feeling Obama himself will be a little embarassed by it... what has he actually done so far? He has tried, but so many of us have... Had he won this award later in his carreer I am sure it would have meant a lot more than it does now!

Charles Linden   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

it´s incredible what a lame decision has been made by the Nobel Comittee. Where´s the "PEACE?" Iraq, Iran, Afghanistant, North Korea, a still collapsing economy, the environment in free fall, getting worse. My children fighting in Iraq and in Afghanistan, more troops to go to Afghanistan. So many catastrophies around the world, natural and man-made and he still hasn´t proven himself yet.
Frankly, I can´t "finger it" but he makes me nervous. Why doesn´t he take some of that Nobel money and help out some folk who don´t have jobs?

nel   October 9th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

yesss he deserved it because of his love of mankind

Walter Archie   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

Of course he should win it, who else in the world has reached out like
President Obama. certainily not Jack O'Rielly, Ben Beck or what's his name Dean Hannrity.
Hail to the President!

Frans Vanhove   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

I believe the motivation of the Nobel Committee is totally correct. Barack Obama, in just a few months of time, has managed to change the face of the earth and has made it a better and safer place. Dialogue instead of violence, involvment of all parties and not just friends, recognizing mistakes, being humble but at the same time forceful, ... these qualities will help him in his quest for making this world safer and your country more civilized.
At the same time, this is a message to all right wing, conservative Americans that the entire world disagreed with George W. Bush and his methods. The day he left office, the world became a better and safer place. This prize helps us remember that, now that the world has become accustomed to Obama and he faces his first tough challenges.

Petter Jensen   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

I think he should legalize marijuana and bring peace to the drug wars. He should take the people's number one question seriously, and at least let the states decide on legalization. This is the last vestige of discrimination, institutionalized in an otherwise humane UN.

Willie   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

Yes, He had do a lot in a short period of time. Now if we can just get the Democrats to have a back bone!! Then we as a country can move forward and really get some tine done to help the poor and disenfranchise!!

I'm just saying!!

V   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

it's like getting a promotion on the first day of your job ! :)

Santosh   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

Yes, Mr.Obama deserve this Noble prize.
Hope other leaders too follow his path for better and safe world.

We the people of India appreciate your effort.

Regards

Santosh Vasudevan

Salman Qholizadeh   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

It genius. Period.

Obama is the most powerful politcal figure in the world with great ambitious to bring the people of the world togheter and create a better future for us. This will give him the strength and will to fit the new shoes he's been given along with creditability.

Tommy Manning   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

No he does not deserve the award. He is one of the most spineless Presidents we have had and in my opinion he is selling out the US to the Muslim world. Who would ever think that a US president would bow down to a Muslim King and he has yet to do anything he promised in his campain. He is nothing but hot air talking.

Lise Girard-Burkart   October 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

I am so happy that Obama has won the Nobel Prize for strengthening international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.
Frankly, he deserves it and for sure, it will make a big change in the world and at the same time , change the bad image that Bush has created of the United State.

I hope Fox news will get ridd of this Hannity guy who spend all of his time bad mouthing the Democratic Party. To me, he is a depicable and stupid man. I find that he looks like a big bully, a person who harrass constantly the Democratic Party and the President and he doesn't know how to handle politics in a fair manner. I don't understand why Fox news doesn't engage a brighter person to talk about politics at night.
Congratulations to Obama!!!

Darwin Marx   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

NO. Obama does not deserve a Nobel Peace Prize after less than a year in office and with no accomplishments in foreign policy, much less in the area of world peace. And I say this as one who preferred Obama over McCain, and would like him to succeed. And make good on his promises.

Unlike the Nobel Peace Committe, which seems too charmed by Obama's speeches and personality, let's examine Obama's record on "peace" soberly.

Obama has not yet pulled U.S. troops out of Iraq as he promised in the campaign. And if he does next year, those troops would simply be re-routed to Afghanistan in which he stubbornly and foolishly vow to continue Bush's occupation. No war is going to be lost under his watch.

Obama has not shut down the shameful Guantanamo gulag which violates human rights and the Geneva Convention flagrantly and massively. Ironically, Fidel's Cuba has more moral ground to chastise Obama and the U.S. on human rights than vice versa.

If there is an easy change Obama should have brought by now to merit even a little the Nobel Peace Prize, it is the cold-war economic sanctions against Cuba which he should have ended by now. But here too, he has not shown any profile in courage at all. Only cynical political calculations about whether he needs the anti-Castro zealots to keep Florida when he runs again.

On Iran and North Korea, there is no new wind or dynamic or strategy. The unsupported claim that Iran has "hidden" nuclear facility sets the U.S. on a course with serious possibility of blundering into a catastrophic conflict with Iran. One that will sink the economy even deeper.

Is making a speech about how he wants to eliminate nuclear weapons from the world enough? Then let's start writing and practicing and making speeches like that. And make sure to polish our "charisma." And next year we should get the Nobel Peace Prize too.

What is the point of awarding Obama the Nobel Peace Prize for a "peace" that he has not brought the world yet?

Stanislava Ilarionova   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

That appears to be more of a cry out to the States to stop further attempts to control every profitable part of the world. The award itself is a great responsibility and a reminder to the person it's been awarded to. Obama's actions from now on would be thought twice, because of the Peace award "burden" and taking actions against other countries, regimes and politics won't be as aggressive. It's a shout out to America, rather than Obama, it represent the Worl's desire for Peace to a powerful country and it's chief in command. Get the message, Obama and live up to it!

Lord Schwarcovtie   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

ofcourse he does.
his infinite effort for this country will never end.

Darrin   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

I absolutly believe he should have won... not only is he far reaching in just nine months into his Presidency, but he has planted seeds that will come to Harvest long before the end of his first term... Too many people are detracting from the leg work he has put in so far...Yes Yes Yes... let him work

Robert Brackney   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

Of course, he does. (So does Jimmy Carter, whose track record is longer, but who has been repeatedly denied.) Either way, he is in excellent company. Teddy Roosevelt also won it, in 1903.

Nitin Jain India   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

Yes, he deserves it. In a world full of politicians going crazy after Models, Booze, Money and Stupid Racist comments, Obama is the only one that seems to make sense in this global madness.

Its a pity some people are doubting his intentions and actions.

jason   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

yes i think he deserve it

Tony P. Rabon   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

It is only fitting and proper that the United States of America be honored by having the President of the United States, Barack Obama, be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his stewardship in placing once more in the fore-front the mission of Peace on the Global Table for all world leaders to work towards achieving. Freedom, Liberty, & Justice for all continues to be the precept of the USA that is why we continue to be recognized as the leader of the free world. I am glad that the president has brought us all back on track. I do hope that we achieve complete world peace in our lifetime. I congratulate Mr. Obama, the Secretary of State, Mrs. Clinton, the leadership of both parties in Congress for their continued efforts in working towards achieving world peace for the sake of all humanity. God Bless America!

Arne Lie   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

We all need hope and we strongly need a dedicatet leader to bear it. My only concern is that we, may be too early,- put a monstereus weight upon him.

Grenada   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

Yes he deserves to win................ He is a hard working person, an inspiration to the world. May God continue to bless him, his family, his dog and America. Obama you are a great man and continue the good work. May God BLESS YOU.

Grenada

George   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

Deserve it ? If he got it, yes. It shows, however, how important the Nobel prize has become. What has Obama achieved in world peace so far, specifically ?

Odette Bouari Hereiki   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

Absolutely premature ! What a farce !

Raf   October 9th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

No, he hasn't done anything nearly enough to deserve it... way too early, way too irrational of a choice... just because he is an upgrade to W. doesn't make him a Nobel Peace Prize winner by default... poor choice... very disappointing, also considering there are people dedicating their life to others and they never get recognized... and despite that, they continue their job year after year...

Maikata   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Seeing the different opinions here, maybe the Nobel prize committee should be eliminated. Why should a handful of old geezers from some Nordic country bestow this great honor? Yes, I know about how it was set up, but now the Nobel Prize has grown to a world renown and I think all the people free people in the world should vote.

Michel Andermann - Mexico   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Obama's award for the Nobel Peace price seems to have come too early. To me, words are not a strong enough argument to win a Nobel prize, otherwise we would need to rename the Prize "The Speech Peace Nobel Prize"

Kay Lee   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

I don't understand what anyone thinks he did. What peace has he accomplished? So he said speeches with platitudes. So what?

Tom Pappas   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Why People always rushing to criticize everything? Why you can’t accept that the Nobel committee knows better.

Aneta   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

What about Chineese dissidents? If the had made any promises maybe they would have got the prize. If...

WisconsinHunter   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Did Obama deserve this award? No way! In a couple of years, perhaps. The Obama administration has not fulfilled many of their campaign promises and I don't feel the work he has done has enough substance in it to be considered for this award. This has now become a "prop me on my soapbox" award that could sit next to the Soap Opera TV awards. The economy is in shambles, the Afghan war is not going well, medical care is ridiculous, and he gets an award? Give me a break!

miltos   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

why guantanamo is still open? why Obama Send more soldiers to Iraq? is this for peace? no

Pradeep Patnaik   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

The Nobel Committee should be commended for recognizing President Obama's vision, commitment and sincere efforts for a better and peaceful world. The President of the United States being the leader of the free world sets the agenda for the world and President Obama has set a positive agenda that will serve the world well.

Ramagopal Netrakanti   October 9th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

The Nobel committe is always known for controversial decisions.
They never awarded this prize for the biggest apostle of peace, Mahatma Gandhi who waged a long battle of non-violence.

They awarded the peace prize to Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin who after fighting for years suddenly stopped the war and became 'eligible' for Nobel Prize .

The Nobel prize is full of Politics

Hugh Phillips   October 9th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Absolutely....finally someone has come along to restore the world's faith in the USA. He has been working to show the entire world that we can begin to work together...and accept the challenge to do just this.
What a shining example!

David   October 9th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Obviously given to someone the Nobel committee agrees with politically. He hasn't done anything to deserve it.

Vincent Alati   October 9th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

There has been no person I can think of that has been more open to the idea of looking at the human condition from the past, present and into the future with the conviction of empowering people to be mindful and thoughtful of the benefits we all gain to live in harmony in a global community that is becoming more culturally homegenized with each day that passes for the sake of all humanity.

Anne Coghlan   October 9th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

The best thing that has happened on planet Earth in a long, long time!
His positive attitude is so, badly needed ....long may he continue to inspire us. Thank you.....United States of America for allowing Barack and his awesome wife give us what we all need!

Phil   October 9th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

He did not deserve it. He has not done anything to deserve it. He has made all these promises of what he wants to do, and if done, they are deserving of the prize. But until he fulfills these promises, he should have been left without the award.

Leena Persoon   October 9th, 2009 12:21 pm ET

President Obama is genuinely interested in making peace in the world and just for that he deserves this Noble Prize. About contributing to the war-efforts in Afghanistan/Pakistan, he has to do this out-of-necessity, because you can't make "peace" with Al-Kaida or the Talibans. They don't know what it means to have peace – they only know how to kill and destroy innocent lives and they have to be stopped at all costs.

rachel e barbosa   October 9th, 2009 12:21 pm ET

Absolutely the best choice – no doubt about it.

Priyachari Chakravarti   October 9th, 2009 12:21 pm ET

I have two points. One is that I expected Zimbabwean Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, who really stood to lose (and probably still does) everything in trying to right the despotic and ruinous Mogabe regime. And so Barack Obama's selection really surprised me.
Secondly, having won the presidency on very lofty promises (which he is already struggling to deliver), the Nobel Peace Prize will put him on too much of a pedestal – an untenable "Gandhification". The Nobel citation was for his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation. What is the bet, that he will get no one to blink on these?
The Nobel committee has mostly got the peace prize winners very wrong in recent generation except for Muhammad Yunus, the Grameen Bank founder.

David Natanel   October 9th, 2009 12:21 pm ET

NO. He hasn't actually done anything yet, and the directions he suggests are standard, hackneyed non-starters, and anyway he needs to tend his own American garden which is in a mess.

romeno   October 9th, 2009 12:21 pm ET

well hes planning to sent more troops to afghanistan and to attack iran... maybe a nobel for warmongering

Esan   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Over 20,000 innocents were massacred during May this year in the northern part of Sri lanka, by the Sri lankan armed forces. The last plea of those people were directed at Obama hoping he would save them. Nothing happened.

Ann   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Those who say Obama doesn't deserve it are missing the committee's stated point. They are recognizing and rewarding the premises and attitudes of Obama's leadership: leadership through shared values, inspiration, respect, cooperation and negotiation–rather than through piggish force and threats and a dogged lack of vision, which characterize far too many of the world's governments. He moreover really inspired hope for a better world amongst a huge majority of mankind globally. Many previous winners never accomplished that gift: giving hope and inspiration to humanity, for a better world with good governance without prejudice and without force. It is a controversial pick, but I believe an inspired one, and I think they are right-on in their judgment, though many may not perceive it.

louise hansen   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

No, he does not deserve. He needs to prove things first.
Last week he stood by Egypt by getting a resolution trough in UN. A resolution that condems religious stereotypes – the first step towards eliminating Freedom of Speech.
- Obviously he does not know what is going on in Europe. He does not know the great challenges that Europe faces concerning the millions of muslims who want to divert the existing Europe.
Well thanks Obama for helping muslims get a step closer to make Europe an islamic state.....

Tayo   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

People may have legitimate reasons for opining he should not get it because he has not achieved anyting tangible on peace yet and that his presidency is less than 1 year..

But that is not the criterion for awarding him as did anounced by the Nobel chairman. If any other person think it is easy contesting and winning election as the PRESIDENT of the united states, let alone as a person of colour, they should try to contest. The OTHERSIDE just want to frustrate this gentleman efforts and they want him to be seen as a man of words and less actions.

Many of us do not understand that the 8 years under Bush was not only a period of DARKNESS to the US, but also to the WORLD. This guy is slowly reparing US standing in the world and countries are willing to work with US again. He has breathed a fresh sense of hope into the world.

This guy has inspired people around the world with hope, promoted better understanding between all peoples of all nation, reached out to the muslim world, effectively persuaded and brought iran to dialogue after decades of enmity, reached out to North korea and they are already responding, improved relations with Russia, got China and Russia to cooperate and stand against Iran and N.Korea which has never happened before, worked on the firmost nuclear non proliferation bill when he was in the senate and the only sitting US President to propose a world without nuclear weapons. The deadliest threat to world peace are Iran and N.Korea developing nuclear weapons and he has made significant progress in cutting them to size, not violently but with tact and wisdom after many years.

If all these were easy, let anyone who can achieve them come forward! I believe he wud achieve all he has set to accomplish despite the stern opposition from the other side.

J.Dit   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Of-course Obama deserve Nobel peace prize because he willing to reorder all the messes caused by former president W.Bush.

MJ parakeet   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

yes!!!!!
of course!!!!!!
great job obama!!!!!!!!

matthew Lee   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !
Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yes !

H. Myhra   October 9th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

As a norwegian citizen i applaude the descision to honour President Obama with the Nobel prize. He has brought hope on the international arena like no other and he is the ONLY person right now that has the abilitity to change the world into a better place like no other in the present situation. Hurra for Obama og welcome to Norway :)

Don Goss   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Absolutely not! This is a bad joke, and I think it was just a way for an ultra-liberal organization that's been mesmerized by the Obama charm and his teleprompter speeches and his empty-suit promises to try to tell the 50+ % (and growing daily) of Americans who have come to see this charlaton for what he really is to get on board. Well, Nobel Committee, we were on board, and we know this man. He is not the Savior you think he is. He's a disaster, a thug-polititian right out of Chicago-style mafioso politics, and a liar with a lot of charm. And the Nobel Committee has lost any credibility it had left by choosing this man, unless, of course, they too (like a lot of the world), think it's a great thing that America weakens by the day and becomes just another Belgium or Norway for the good of the world.

DonLeon   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

I am a strong Obama supporter but..
To win the Nobel peace price....excuse me..for WHAT? If Obama deserves to win this price more than anyone else, then it shows what an extremely poor state this planet is in. If he would have succesful 8 years of a presidency of REAL progress, then maybe he would deserve a mere nomination. This is an insult to previous winners and dilutes the importance of the Nobel Peace Prize.
What a shame!

Sarah in Oklahoma   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Congratulations, President Obama. He is certainly most deserving of the award. As the selection committee stated, President Obama has captured the world's attention in a way few U.S. Presidents, let alone world leaders, have been able to. The President's stature in the world community and in the domestic arena combined with his unwavering committment to nuclear disarmament, promoting the education and rights of women and girls, and to diplomacy, engagement and dialog as integral to any U.S. foreign policy situate Obama to create lasting, peaceful change. We should all be proud.

Doron Sieradzki   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

This is mockery of the Nobel Prize!
President Obama seems like a good man and is full of optimism and good intentions, but he has not done anything to deserve this honor.
Did the Swedish Nobel Prize committe suffer from lack of candidates?
Dissapointing!

Cory Dudley   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Our President in spite of what many out here are posting has brought more good news to the world in so many ways and has shown that a "portion" of the United States has finally grown up.
Bringing about Peace comes in many forms, this President is 180 degrees from our former administration.
Many who constantly find fault in our President are doing so for personal reasons, I'd say their views on him are "Jaded" and"Colored" for the most part.

Saurabh   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Its very interesting to read the comments by different people. All the people who says "he deserve it" do not want to elaborate upon why he indeed deserve it. They have simply congratulated him and/or said "yes he deserve it a million times " in a single line.

Means even the supporters of this decision are clueless as y did he get it ??

I really respect Obama for being a symbol of change, but his plans and efforts are far from being fulfilled, and thus this is a very premature and unjustified decision.

Yes he may deserve it in future (conditional) but NOT NOW.

Saurabh

Renee Grobler   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

President Obama absolutely deserved this award he is another Nelson Mandela!!!!!!

JT   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

I think this award to President Obama is very misplaced due to the fact that Peace has not been achieved yet through his efforts. As a man of honour he knows he does not deserve this award and should very respectfully decline it. I doubt this will happen and if he does accept it, the respect I have for him will be gone. I think the Norwegians are celebrity struck and have let themselves down and have cheapened this award for anyone after Obama.

Muhammadou Jallow   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

President Obama certainly deserves the award considering the effort he is making in promoting peace in the world amongst other things.

Muhammadou Jallow

mahanama   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

I think he will be the next Nelson Mandela.
He deserves it more than anyone. Nobel Committee made the right choice.

james garwood   October 9th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Finally a positive.. So many of my friends seem only to bash him and blame him for the direction the United States has taken. I truly believe what he's doing is trying to clean up the mess..At 76 the mess can't hurt me for too many more years, but I worry about my children and their off spring. It is early to award this honor but if it helps gain him respect throughout the world we can use that. Too bad he can't have the support of the deadbeats in Washington...Whom some by the way are to me nothing more than traitors. Where are the Patriots. God I wish some of our forefathers could speak out at the podium just so I could watch some of those jerks crawl under their seats. Jim

louise hansen   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

Before this resolution I was a fan of Obama

Yuko Suzuki   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

He definitely deserves it – I think his life, his achievements, his presence – it's all even greater than the Prize. I can only imagine the amount of hardship he had to go through to achieve the place where he is now. His presence gives the world Hope, what we all need so desperately to live through our lives. I am no religious, but I do pray that he will live a long life and lead us to a better world where the racism will find itself just humiliated, where people care for one another, because we are all equal humans.

Santosh   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

Surprisinly Obama lost the race for 2016 Olympics for Chicago.

More surprisingly he WON the Nobel 100metres race in less then 9 seconds even without running and created a new Nobel world record.
Is it possible to give Nobel prizes in Physics and Chemistry just in anticipation that in near future a scientist will come up with a medicine that will cure cancer without actually achieving anything till prize is awarded. Nobel committee needs to to put its house in order.

Jose MAzo   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

Maybe not yet???

Gideon Asfaw   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

His intantions,dreams and vision to change the world for the best of man kind.I say very loud yes he diserve it,even though i wait for his achievements.

John   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

It's just a prize...some people are taking this way to seriously. They can give the prize to whomever they want. What's most important is how a person lives there life and by that account, Barack Obama deserves this award according to the only opinion that matters...

Sanjib Sharma (Ghimire)   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

He is the man who can actually think and bring 'change'. Nobel committee members have not just picked him for any kind of US political stunts, they know that they have to face the world when picking anyone and they know that they have to get it right. The prize is actually for good work for fraternity between nations and he deserves it.

Rogier   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

Unbelievable. A president from a country that has bombed half the world in the past 50 years, and still is bombing innocent people wins peaceprice ? This world is amazing.

Lana   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

I do like Obama, that's why I really hope that he realizes that he's got the prize either for being black or for being the president of the States. In both cases it has nothing to do with a Peace award! Ridiculous decision indeed!

alex de la paz   October 9th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

Its the Europeans' way of throwing the gauntlet on Obama so he will pressure Israel to return land it took during the Yom Kippur and at the same time stop building new structures in the West Bank. What the Europeans can't and won't do, they want President Obama to do. Its a politically ploy at the highest order. Nobel Prize for Peace? What about Afghanistan?

Sabrina   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

I know someone who'll be delighted over this news...not!!! Mr Clinton.
if there's one US President who deserved the Nobel Peace Prize it was Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, while in office got the Israeli Palestinian Agreement signed, played a key role in bringing the official conflct between Jordan and Israel, and was a principal Character albeit behind the scenes in the Northern Ireland Peace Process – and has been a great humanitarian since leaving office and there is no Nobel Prize for him. So why Mr. Obama and why now?

Vaibhav Joshi   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

No I dont think he deserves. He has acted as if he is doing great things in life but his real performance is zero.

LAU HOK KEUNG   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

No, not yet. Obama is indeed very very good in terms of his aversion of the US diplomacy from that of Bush's(which, I think, was heading for disaster for US and the World). But, his presidency is only a few months old and the Nobel Peace Prize is the biggest if not the ultimate recognition of such contribution to global peace. His award has somewhat depreciated the Prize values, I think.

Florin Toader   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

For what? Peace? Come on! They are really funny! Unfortunately, there is no hope for a better life worldwide! I would like to ask the Americans to keep home this "jungle" boy in order to avoid unpleasant situations in the near future!

kayode   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

Yes.What is extraordinary is the fact that he is invoked a sense of hope amongst different peoples. Perhaps that in itself is the first step to peace – hope that people can co-exist. and not fear and hate for others who are different!
He certainly deserved this honour. I hope the American people will stand behind their President and lead the world towards greater fraternity among the inhabitants of this planet.
Congratulations to the American's were evry man's vission is possible having chosen a visionary President
I love America

Carlos Gomez   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

I believe this award will empower Obama to carry on the changes needed, not only in the US but also in the international arena of diplomacy and politics. The world needs new ways of leadership. The International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and even the United Nations were solutions for the problems of the 1950's now we need new solutions. Think of Climate, Oil in hands of terrorist countries, Neo-Communism in hands of people like Chavez. Is not as simple as it used to be.

Go for it Obama!!!

kc   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

This is absurd. Someone who gives false promises of peace, and has made his way by developing a cult of peronality around himself should in no way be given this award. This is the result of neo-spiritual Western values of positive thinknig and we can make the world change. Sadly, this is not reality and you would think the human race would take a simple look back into history which is riddled with false peace promises and personalitie such as Mr Obama who never can deliver..

ken baldwin   October 9th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

President Obama is still in the early stages of "courtship" as a world leader, best foot forward for good impressions. But a being a figurehead of "hope" for the future is not the same as an actual record of accomplishment to deserve the prize at this time.

There have been many leaders who has been ushered in as "New Hope" only to be cast on to the heap of dissapointment with the test of time and history.

Fabio   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Yes, he does.

Ummah   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Well he is a dreamer and ideologist will he succeed or not that another story at lease it will give him recognition & hope he will do more:) for Peace in ME & Afghanistan

asiri   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Not at all. he has not yet shown the work as he talks. it is a wrong, bias decision of scandinavians

E Marques   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Yes I absolutely agree to this award.
Today the United States are looked at as a more reliable, trusted and important partner than before.

Only wish the Americans themselves could look at President Obama the same way as other people in the world look at him. He does deserve it.

bsd   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Everyday I pray for world peace. I should be given the Nobel too...given that intentions and prayers are as good as actions and performance. What a joke! This prize has effectively taken away his ability to do good things...assuming he can do more that he talks...

Aditya   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

I never thought the joke of the century would be announced so soon into the century.

Joe   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Some of the people reacting to Obama winning the prize seem to think that his being a nice man or a good speaker is apparently enough for him to win it. If one looks at what he's actually done, however, one can only be absolutely gobsmacked at this whole thing. Sure, he gave a speech to "the Muslim world" in Cairo but the widespread feeling among Muslims in the Middle East was: "Let's wait what he's going to do." What has he done? He insisted on Israel stopping its settlement-building but when Netanyahu went on with it anyway, the US administration accepted it and left Palestinians in the cold. George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush have each put much more effort in the Palestinian-Israeli peace process than Obama has so far but they didn't get this prize. Moreover, Obama hasn't done anything substantial on Iran, even though that country has become arguably even more dangerous.
Sure, he's trying his hand at health care reform but it's currently bogged down in Congress with no end in sight.
Sure, he's promised to close Guantanamo Bay but Bush also wanted to do that. The latter, however, did not naively assume that either Americans or others would willingly take in the inmates and allow them to reside in their countries. Last time I checked, Gitmo was still up and running.
Sure, Obama fought the recession but he used so much money to do it that America's future generations will be paying the price.
Sure, Obama sounds multilateral and diplomatic but he cancelled the missile deterrent in parts of Eastern Europe (a slap in their faces if I ever saw one), is not making good on his promises to fight the "necessary" war in Afghanistan properly and he's already annoyed quite a few Europeans by his caving in to union demands on American car tires.
Obama, great speaker and likeable guy that he may be, has done absolutely nothing yet to make him deserve this prize. Some people believe that he may do great things in the future. Fine, let's hope so, but that's no reason to give him such a prize now. If anything, Obama has mostly shown that, when push comes to shove, he's as rubber-spined as any president we've had. And that's certainly no reason to give him a prize.
It seems to me that the Nobel Committee has clearly been hit with an overdose of Obamania and has not thought very clearly about its decision but has allowed its adoration of the president to cloud their judgement. Shame on them.

Jens   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

In short, Im from denmark, Backin the old days when Bush was in charge every dane I knew hated the american goverment. Not the people of US. When Barack was elected that changed overnight... And a new confidence and hope was created.

In short everybody loves the Obama.

For creating such a trust between us alone I think he deserves the prizes

Phil Jonas   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

President Obama has done more to restore America's international standing in his first 8 months in office than any other President in my long lifetime. He is an internationalist by both background and disposition. He is, by nature, a man who seeks to bridge gaps and engage others. He has an excellent chance to be regarded one day as one of our greatest Presidents despite the enormous problems he inherited.
This morning I am especially proud to be an American.

Farhad AKM   October 9th, 2009 12:26 pm ET

Congratulations to President Obama.
I think it's too early to award him such prestigious award.
He has yet to show any specific result what world people expected.
Afganistan & Iraq still in war and there is no effective solution yet.
In middle east Israeli and Palestinian problem no breakthru yet.
American economy still in dark.
President obama take initiative to make world free of nuclear weapons. All these just on the way and this stage we cannot judge
him as a contributor world peace.
If atleast after three years of his presidency, he could show some positive results then it could be justified.

Farhad
Nagoya, Japan

Dan Brewer   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

For what? a campaigne slogan? "Yes we can." Can what? what has he done to date? we are still fighting two wars, Guantanimo is still open, the deficit is higher then ever, no universal health care Etc Etc

Oh i am wrong he has accomplished something. He chose a pet dog.
(even that took a month of Front page news to get accomplished)

...my tax dollars at work...

Dan Brewer
Germany

Marianne in Norway   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

Hello United States. I think it might be difficult to understand the reward to president Obama. From our part of the world we see a president that for (almost) the first time see that the United Nation is THE foundation the world needs.

He is reaching out a finger to the middle East, included Israel. He wants to, and are in dialog, about atomic weapons and wanting to avoid this kind of war.

He has a dialog with Russia, stopped the weapon shield in Europe. Might be something distant for you in US, but for us in Europe we saw that the former president was about to start the cold war again.

He is asking the world to respect different religion and had a fabulous speach in Egypt about that.

He is the American president that wants to join into the rest of the world instead of isolating USA from the rest of the world.

You might not see this is US, you might not be told, but it is a fact that USA have been making a distance between US and the rest of the world.

I remember a speach from former president Bush, – telling that the people of US were God's chosen people. That was interesting, – and (hopefully only Mr. Bush) telling that the only people worthy were in US? That is very strange thinking of a religious thinking! ? Hopefully the everyday people in US understand that that is not how our God see the world.

The people of United States should be proud today! At last you have a president that wants to work together with the rest of the world. And President Obama has saved you in this economic crises by using European methods! And surely, – Europe, or say Norway, are not communists! We are very liberal, dicide what we want and what to to or buy or learn or work with – or what ever!

Still Norway is the best country to live in, that is not because we are brainwashed, on the contrary – we think, – but we thing also about our neighbors, we think welfare fore everybody, we mean every human being are in the right of living and having education and healthcare, – rich or poor (hardly any poor here).

Congratulation United States of America – you have a president who has seen THE LIGHT. There is still hope in this world.

PS Remember that the Peace Pricce is not a political choice, but a commitee handling the will of Mr. Alfred Nobel. Our priminister was just as surprised as us when the price was annoounced.

Love to you. :)

Das   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

Dear citizens of this world
Congratulations. This is the day we should celeberate. We are really happy that President Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. He deserves it. This shows to the world that his visions are valued at the heighest level.
The world is yearning for peace, even though some smaller groups want to have it the other way. Hope they will also see that their path doesn't lead them any way.
President Obama has, by his proper approach to the matter, given the subject the topmost priority, and we wish him all the best, so we, our children and theirs and so on, can lead a peaceful life in a lesser polluted atmosphere.
Mr. President, should you read this, we just want to say that you have just lit the hope in many hearts all over this world, and we hope that we will succed working together achieving this coveted goal – peace and a healthier atmosphere for all communities on this earth. We pray that you will also succeed in your Health program for the people of USA – as we are enjoying it here.
A fellow citizen and his family.

Menachem Weiss   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

He absolutely deserves the prize just like Arafat deserved the prize. Arafat was of course responsible for the killing of many innocent civilians as the leader of the PLO. I wonder if Obama will be following in his footsteps...

Toby   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

Premature, maybe, but I don't know of anyone in recent years who has changed the spirit of the world for the better as much as Obama.

Michael Gillett-Chambers   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

How can someone who is at war receive a peace prize? I am more deserving the he is, I am not at war... nor am I attempting to bend anyone to my will... or threatening anyone. The Nobel Peace prize is a joke and has always been. Like the UN...

Phil - Dominican Republic   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

Reading through the comments, I am amazed just how many people seem to forget the huge mess this man inherited in the wake of a President & Vice President who together did so much to destabilize the world as we know it. Obama has worked tirelessly this past 9 months to repair the damage done by right wing war mongering crusaders whose beliefs were and still are fueled by greed and self interest. I'm happy that Obama's efforts have not been ignored with regard to the Middle East, Russia, North Korea & now it seems that Iran are closer to the negotiating table than ever before. All of this achieved with bigots, racists & morons climbing all over his back at any and every opportunity. You want this guy to fix the worlds problems in just 9 months? Get real and give this man some encouragement...Congratulations Mr. President, keep up the good work!

Dragan R Savin   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

Yes !!

Mohsen Afouna   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

Although I am not big fan for "standards" of all Noble Prizes, all I can say now " .... Congratulation Mr. President and I wish you well.

James Smith   October 9th, 2009 12:27 pm ET

I do not think that Obama, even though I am a supporter, deserved the Peace Prize. These are my reasons:

The USA is still at war in Iraq, Afghanistan, and truth be told, Pakistan.

The Prison at Guantanamo is still in place.

The warlike moves against the USA citizens initiated by Bush have not been reversed. The "Patriot" Act is still in force,

Really what has he done other than travel and make a few speeches?

Maybe when he does a few substantial things, he'll deserve a Nobel. So far, it's been all a mouthful of "thank you" and a hand full of "gimme".

Anders   October 9th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

I am amazed how much this decission upset people.
Personaly i was stunned when the announcement that President Obama got the peace-price, but after heard the explanation from the committy I can understand why.
After all there is a fact here: Obama is the president that gives hope after 8 years of right wing retoric and a total crash of the economy that was created and maintaned by the Bush administration.
But fact is that the Nobel Commity for the Peace prize had a different approach then the rest of the Nobel prizes.
From Wikipedia:
"Unlike the other Nobel Prizes, which recognize completed scientific or literary accomplishment, the Nobel Peace Prize may be awarded to persons or organizations that are in the process of resolving a conflict or creating peace. "
In other words they don't have to have done anything YET, but are working towards peace and conflict resolving.
I am sincerely happy for President Obama and hopes this prize won't create an even heavier burden on his work.

/A

Wael   October 9th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

I heard the news driving home after the Israelis prevented me from praying in AlAqsa Mosque in Jerusalem for the second week in a row because I am 42 years old. To be honest, I thought it was a joke! Obama asked the Israelis to "freeze" the settlements to give peace in the Middle East a chance, yet they simply blew him off! The next thing you know he gets the Nobel Prize for Peace???
This world is becoming weirder by the minute!

Peter Wilhelmsson   October 9th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

No, Zimbabian should have got it. He has scars to prove it and has helped to turn the tide of dictatiorship, torture and poverty.

Too early for Obama. He stills need some more achieving to do.
Lots of promises to deliver. Economy, disarmament, middle east peace, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, north Korea. He should at least get a victory in one or two of these.

it is like giving the Washington Capitals the stanley cup because they have had a good first couple of games in the season .

CG Dominguez   October 9th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

Yes, President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize as he is the person who had the greatest impact this year on improving the international environment conducive to tolerance & understanding. It is for all nations & peoples now to explore & concretize what Obama has made possible.

Geeorge Athanasiou   October 9th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

Congratulations to Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Yes he can, yes he did and yes he does deserve it!

Poem for Obama written on the night he won the Presidential Election.

"YES WE CAN"
© 2008
The votes have been counted
“Change has come to America”
The people have spoken
“Yes we can”
All races and creeds
Black and white
Jewish, Hispanic, Asian
Rich and poor
And those against war
And more
Together…
“Yes we can”
The mood was glorious
After eight years of bad policy
And incompetence
That left the economy bleeding
The country reeling
He came with a message of bipartisanship
Hope united under one flag
Red white and blue
One nation
“Yes we can” he roared
As the children of slaves
Took the reins of the land of the free
For the first time
To elect a black man for President
As it was predicted to be
Some forty years earlier
By a man who said “I have a dream”

By George Athanasiou Melbourne Australia

Anis Rahman   October 9th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

I am surprised but equally happy. It will encourage him to continue his work for the world peace through dialogue & negotiation.

sum   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

No. He hasn't accomplished anything to this point. This was a anti Bush award.

Dr. Steven Kyushin   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

I like Obama, think he is a good man though misguided on some issues. Having said that, the fact he was nominated was itself premature. The fact that he has won, is a joke.

However, none of us should be surprised, the Nobel Peace Prize has lost much of its luster, with past winners including Yasser Arafat (terrorist) and Al Gor (what did he do for peace?).

It's just another in a long line of odd choices.

Hannah, Germany   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

"I didn’t know rhetoric alone would qualify a person…" I don't agree, that it's just his rhetoric. BUT Nobel's last wish was to give this to a person who "renders the greatest service to the cause of international fraternity" and that's what Obama has done since his election- also through his rhetoric. On an emotional level he reaches people and gives hope. Especially to people from around the world who doubtet that a world power like the USA uses it's power to make the world a little better. The statement the committee gave was a good one!

mokhtar al Maleh   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

i absolutely feel that President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. he is a highly intelligent person that is motivated to serve his country with no hidden agenda. he never seises to amaze us all by his honesty and patriotism. i truly believe that he is the only politician in the world, as absurd as this may seem, who is doing his job to serve the people and not to serve himself. if other leaders of our world only do half of what he does the world would be a better place.

Frans   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

It is absurd that the president of a country that bombs and kills innocent people, keeps prisoners in Guantanamo, supports the Zionist occupation and oppression of the Palestinian people and shows no respect for fundamental human rights, should be awarded the Nobel peace prize.

rachel   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

Absolutely the best choice.

yo   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

I hope it's a joke!

lizzie   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

yep!he definitely deserves it and he must win more.

Twaij   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

By all mean he deserve it.

FEP Sugaba   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

ABSOLUTELY. Show me which president in recent times has brought to mankind so much hope. For the first time in many years, the sense of security and oneness in the human family which evaporated following the sordid events of 9/11, is graduall creeping back into our lives. Thanks to his vision.

Gabriel Omokhoa   October 9th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

Very well deserved even thoughhe has only been in office for 9 months. Obama's humily, civility and candor is exceptional.Congrats Mr. President!

Makcolm   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

I am a West Indian. I have always been a very big fan of Barak Obama; however, I do think it is somewhat premature to bestow such an accolade – the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama at this primordial stage of his presidency.

In trying to arrive at the reason(s) why the Norwegian Nobel Committee made such a decision I highly suspect that it is hoping that by bestowing such on Obama that (a) he realizes the expectations that the world has of him and (b) by accepting such Obama will be forced to grow into the role of an International peace maker – second to none past or present.

I sincerely wish President Obama all the best – for the sake of we the people who inhabit planet earth – in succeeding in making this world a safer place over the next seven years of his presidency. And what would be an even greater legacy is if this peace lives on long after he has departed the Oval Office in January 2017. 和平

ramsap   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

I agree Obama has initiated positive steps towards improving diplomacy and has generated hope. That in itself is not enough to award him the peace prize. Way too premature !!!

At the sametime, the Peace Prize would pressure him to perform & live upto the standards of Nobel.

In short, I would NOT have awarded him this year !

paul   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

Proud to serve Obama as my Commander in Cheif, but he absolutely does NOT deserve it...what a disgrace...

ADEJOH MONDAY   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

You can think of anything better for the young man who is focused and dedicated to the course of bringing lasting peace to the plannet earth.

Obama is God's sent. He deserves whatever prize given to him.
I challeng all the world leaders to wake up to the dream of making this world a better place.

African leaders espacially nigerian leaders should wake up to chaalenges and copy from focused leaders like Obama.

i wish the world a peaceful moment every moment.

Usman   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

What has he achieved to deserve this? I thought it was hard to get such a prestigious award.

paul   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

of course he deserves it! and now he really has to show the world that it was the right decision.this can be seen as a real incentive to change things and to promote peace around the globe!!!

Sam Owiredu   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

Due to his excellent display of competency in the pre-election, his continued effectiveness in Government including international cooperation and hope for the people in USA and worldwide.

Denise   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

No; at least not yet. After all, what – exactly has Obama actually, specifically and definitively done to make the world a better place..besides being a fountain of flowery oratory?

I would have give the Nobel Peace Prize to someone from – say, Doctors Without Borders, or some such ACTIVE, WORKING, MEASUREABLE global peace maker, who is – often quite literally, up to their armpits in the blood, sweat and tears of hapless victims, as THEY, really and truly...seek to MAKE this world a better place. Not just TALK about it.

Hey! Can't say "TALK IS CHEAP" any longer. Appears the PRICE just went up.

Margaret   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

I think the Nobel Committee should have waited until Obama had actually accomplished something for peace. Good intentions merely pave the way – and sometimes, as the saying goes, it's the wrong way...

Andrew   October 9th, 2009 12:30 pm ET

We had 8 years of a US President and Vice-President (i.e. Bush and Cheney) who spent their entire time trying to break the world apart. I, like the Nobel committee, am refreshed that we now have a President who is willing to open dialogue with even the most objectionable regimes on the planet and at least try to solve some of the issues peacefully. Bush and Cheney proved that using guns and bombs just doesn't work. It's also good that we now have a President who can actually talk inteliigently about these complex issues.

Dharmendra Singh   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

i dont think ... he deserves it at this time .. he has to do more to earn it ... who knew him 2 years back ... frankly i dint knew him ..a anyways he has got the award now ... so enjoy mr OBAMA .. have fun .

Amrit   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

Yes he's made the effort but Obama has yet to deliver on his promises. Till he delivers he does not deserve this award for the award is meant for achievement and not good intention.

Juju   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

He's an exceptional human being...
Who else was on the list?? and who else could therfore possibly have won?

RN   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

He does not deserve. Thats part of his job. Also its too early to see if his efforts are enough or fruitful.

Nitin   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

How can a man like Mahatma Gandhi not get the award after being nominated 5 times and President obama gets the award within the first year of his office? It does not make sense to me...

Lizz Holmes   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

Believe it or not many many of us have lived long enough to see someone "we" can identify with bring what we believe is the best of what America has to offer back to the world. As President Obama IS carrying the torch lit by President Wilson: certainly he deserves to win. As to CNN's coverage – you people are horrid rating mongers... to see EVERY one of your reporters, anchors, and correspondents connect minor domestic matters (Fox News type DRAMA) to this prestigious surprise honor was DISGUSTING! As usual, I am switching to BBC. Can't you have ANY respect for the office??? You certainly PROTECTED President Bush Jr. from negative press for years! You guys can't get through a White House lawn telling of this honor without bringing up "talking points." Ugh! Report the news. Please allow us a MOMENT of AWE & PRIDE before you begin your selfish silly gossipy tripe about nothing as yet even newsworthy! Disappointed and tuning out, Lizz

Jem   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

The Nobel Committee recognizes Obama as a completely different kind of world leader - one who extends the olive branch instead of brandishing a big stick, one who demonstrates actual skills in diplomacy and intelligent persuasion rather than grunting in threatening monosyllables, and one whose time has come in what has become a very precarious world. This prize will serve as a huge encouragement to Obama to stay the path. Congratulations!!

Jonathan Borock   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

This is not a Nobel prize *FOR* Obama’s peace.
It is a Nobel Prize AGAISNT Bush’s War.
It was not given for, it was given against.
This is an anti-prize, and anti-gift.
This will hurt Both Obama and The Nobel Foundation unless we work hard to force Obama to earn it with substantial peacemaking.

Kristijan   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

Hi calling from Prague here.

I am a big Obama supporter and fan. When he gave his speech here in Prague, I was in the first row to see him, and listen to him. I do believe that he would do changes in the US and in the world, and electing him as president was one of the best things America did.

But winning the Nobel Peace Price!?!?! I understand the arguments of the comity for the reasons why they decided to give him the price, but all of those arguments are for actions he never did, but said he would do.

I didn't know that words without actions (well no actions yet) will win you the Nobel Price of Peace.

He didn't deserve it, and all of this seems like a cheap marketing plot. It would be the same as Lindsey Lohan and Paris Hilton getting an Oscar.

Thanks

Veritas   October 9th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

In Sweden we have special "Norwegian jokes" for things and persons that are really stupid and this takes the gold medal....ever!!

The last decade the Norwegian Nobel Committee has turned the Peace Prize into a real joke....and one had thought they couldn't match the silliness of giving the prize to amateur film maker Al Bore, but I was obviously dead wrong there.

I wonder what the pc left-wing liberal "chattering classes" in the US and Europe will say when "Mr Peace Prize" escalates the war in Afghanistan, and when he responds to the next major Islamist terror attack and finally how they will react when he is voted out of office in 2012 because of semi-socialist welfare programs and a collapsing dollar. Personally I will open one of my best vintage champagnes then, but certainly not on December the 10th.

Kate   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

To know that the vote was 2 weeks after President Obama took office leads me to believe that this more wishful thinking regarding his capability rather than any actual accomplishment. As we sit nearly 10 months into the new administration, I would be interested in learning specifically he has accomplished worthy of the Nobel Peace prize (much more interested if anyone can cite the specific accomplishments completed in the first 2 weeks of his administration worthy of this prize). Is this more of a dig on Bush than a celebration of the accomplishments globally of Obama?

Eyvind Gilde   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

Obama was the right choice, and it was the right decision to give him the reward sooner rather than later. The Nobel committee clearly understands that Obama is a symbol of hope all over the world, and awards him the prize to reinforce that hope. I'm proud to be Norwegian.

John Smith   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

not yet, it's way too early.....

Solange   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

yes I do

Rashmin Perla   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

Yes, I think he deserves the prize. The people back home in America as so obsessed with themselves and their little issues that they have forgotten what the world is going through with the various wars, failed diplomacy, climate change. President Obama brings hope and he has 4 more years apart from a possible reelection to change the world for the better. Congratulations...you richly deserve it Mr. Obama

idigo Onyeka   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

Yes, is an understatement . I would rather say A deserved Winner & the Prize is worth the Attention attached to it .

Sunil kaushik   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

Does the Nobel comitee think that the impact created on world peace by Obama is atleast close to what was done by Al Gore, Rajender Prachori or Mother Theresa?........ I really feel this is unfair. Nobel prize is given to people based on the impact of the results, not the effort. I appriciate Obama's role in strengthning international diplomacy, but what is the impact that has been created out of that? Nil. We might or might not see a result in future, but as of today he really dosent deserve it. Ok, even if i try to agree with the fact that Obama's effort has to be rewarded, you be the judge and tell me is his effort even comparable to that of San Suu Kyi?

Stephen Dietz   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

Absolutely deserves the win. He represents the better angels of our nature!

Michael   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

I tend to say he deserves the nobel peace price for clearly stating his aim to change US politics and especially US foreign politics, and acting according to it. Possibly, that's something better observable from outside the USA, and hence the surprise today. However, it will put some pressure on his government due to increased expectations and the possibility that handling some of them could be more disappointing than without such early appraisal. It's not clear to me whether the Nobel commitee is awarding or experimenting.

Natalie   October 9th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

It's nice that Obama is take relations between the U.S. and other countries in a different direction, but it might be a little premature to give him this award. I don't think he's done enough to deserve this. No matter how much people love him, it cheapens the award to give it out based on popularity rather then true merit.

Susana   October 9th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

No, definitely not. At least, not yet!
It's to soon.

Architectstudent in Sweden   October 9th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

US President Barack Obama deserve Nobel Peace Prize 2009, the world needs Obama. Hopefully Obama will have the time to meet our King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden.

aRtFuL   October 9th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

I think Nobel Prize NEEDS someone like Obama, that's why he was awarded.

It is all good to give the prize to some activist or someone who already sacrificed a lot to try to achieve peace. However, on the other hand it is also a lot easier to protest for change and against "the man" when you are not the in power.

To be in power and to still hold true to the original vision is the hardest. Obama so far has shown himself to be incorruptible in his goals, while holding the most powerful office in the world. I think that alone deserves credit.

People are tired of paper tigers and dreamers with vision but without means. They need something real to believe in. An activist who is promoting a movement for freedom and justice from afar is nothing more than a paper tiger and dreamers. A PoTUS that promotes peace and reason is something real.

Tom   October 9th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

He should decline it. He has not yet done anything of the magnitude to receive this award. For Carter it was the brokering of a historic Camp David accords. When he had truly brought peace to a place of conflict then it would be appropriate. But the hope and promise of some future peace is inadequate. Omaha, please do not belittle the award by accepting it now.

N P DASS   October 9th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

shocking with so many troops fighting in other countries and he bieng the commander ordering them to fight .....
Michael Jackson bought the world together even after his death why didnt they think about him
How come he in the peace prize....

sridhar   October 9th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

Obama is the best candidate to win Nobel Peace Prize. It is my opinion that when people say he does not deserve I think they don't know the difference between Geroge Bush and Obama. They can't give any value for "peace" in talk and action. He is

Mehran   October 9th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

As an Iranian, I beilive Mr. Obama deserves the Nobel peace prize more than anyone. He has brought alot of hope into the world and especially to the Iranian people with his wise policy of engagment towards the countries with which the US traditionally has had problematic relations. For instance in dealing with Iran, he has made it impossible for the Iranian regime to blame the US for its own mistakes when he reached a hand of peace towards that country. His hand of peace started a green wave in that country in a way that 8 years of empty threatening rethoric of Bush administration never managed to do.

herman   October 9th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

For years ago a black Rev. told the whole world that he had a dream,
earlier this day I saw that Mr. President got the price and the words of
the black Rev. with the Mars on Washington just seems te be the dream that came out and the only way is to support him with his own words:"Yes He Can"

Terence   October 9th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

President Obama derseves the award and much more!!

Jon   October 9th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

No way does Obama deserve this; but then again, neither did Al Gore for making a movie. Honestly, is what realm does a guy who just snubbed the Dalai Lama (someone who actually deserved his Peace Prize) get awarded the Prize himself? What a love affair. I'm surprised it wasn't co-awarded to Michelle, too, for all the work she has done (note sarcasm).

Abhijit   October 9th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

I do commend Obama's efforts towards better world, but to award him the most prestigious award denoting achievement in this field, is something beyond me. Maybe he has done a whole lot, that the jury sees, not the common man. Now that he has won it, he better does MORE, for the common man to see and believe.

Jay Sheth   October 9th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

Obama absolutely does not deserve the nobel prize. They are making a mockery of the whole concept of Nobel prize and its value.

Highly disappointed – in my view degrades the acheivements of all past winners !

Magda Pagan   October 9th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

Though too early on his presidency and not to many accomplshisments yet achieved, I feel very proud that he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. He has been an inspiration to all of us. He has given us hope that things can change and he has made the world believe again in a time when it was needed the most. For that along, he deserves the award.

Evelyn   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

Congratulations America. Barack Obama is a light of hope to the World.

klemesu laryea   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

If not Barack, Who?. if not now, when ?
klemesu laryea
Ghana

Larry   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

No. What has he done to earn it? I think it's just another bias to anyone displaying leftist tendencies. Remember that the committee didn't award Ronald Reagan the prize even though he played a major role in ending the Cold War. I also believe the white man's world is trying to right the wrongs of the past. To me this smacks of condescension and diminishes the prestige of the award.

Soraya Islam   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

I am pleased for him & his family,especially the girls,but OMG,what a burden and a huge responsability to prove he deserved this award.Good Luck to him. I fully support his ways.

Adam   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

I think we are in a time when hope and vision is an important as the end result. We are amid a global economic crisis couples with an unwaivering terrorist threat in many parts of the world which is like no time before and calls for an approach like never before. It's true that Obama has only been in office a short time but from the moment he was declared the winner of the presidency, a feeling of hope for the future resinated throughout not only the citizens of the United States, but people in countries all over the world. What he stands for trumps any possible results from his term thus far that would be inconceivable to expect at this point given the circumstances we find the world in today. I feel quite strongly that if someone can sway the attitudes of a nation and the rest of the world in such a short period to he extent that he has done, then he is a deserved recpient of this years Nobe Peace Prize.

Daniela S   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

Yes ! I think he has inspired people around the world to go in the direction of peace, and the simple fact that he has broken down walls with nations which we considered as enemies, that in itself is enough to deserve the prize. You can't change the world overnight, and not everyone wants peace either, but what's important is the impulse to get things moving.

the Nobel Peace prize is an international acknowledgement and strong symbol which should help give him support to achieve these goals, and inspier other leaders and people towards peace too.

Marcello - Italy   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

Nobel Prize Committee has read in the harths of the people of the World.
God bless Osama!

akira yamada   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

too early to get a prize.

MIckey   October 9th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

Obama wants to do some good things, but until he does, it is just words. I am afraid politicians promise a lot.

By the time the politics start, there will be the same old games. Health care will be reform of insurance industry's profits with business as usual. Closing Guantanomo bay and stopping "enhanced techniques" are all low hanging fruit that appalled many conservatives.

Unitl he does something more than say a lot of pleasing things, it seems like a black man in office award.

Look at Desmond Tutu. He acted on his causes and is an excelent example of someone deserving of the award. Or Jimmy Carter, he worked hard when he didn't have to to change people's lives.

wilfred wembe   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

Yes, he is bringing people to gether and making the whole world to think alike.

Thank You.

FEMI OSUNTOKUN(NIGERIA)   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

Why not?He more than anyone on the planet earth does especially in this century when despots in the facade of democracy rule their peoples with less compassion and without recourse to seacrhing their minds and cautioning their actions to be in tandemn with peaceful co-existence with oppositions and opinions on the other side of the divide.Obama deserves this noble nobel as he has so far shown in his policies to be a advocate of peace over war unlike his precdecessor and cotemporaries.

Zeyna   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

I believe he deserved the prize even though change has yet to come as he has been only president since january. The president is working very hard and needs tobe recgnized forhis efforts.

sonia   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

I'm happy that president Obama was won the Nobel Prize. I think that is a signal and a recogtion for what he has done as politician, and could be a reinforce to the actions and plans that he might do to the Peace in the world.

Richard Vastenhouw   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

He certainly did !

Terence Thomas   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

Congratulations to the President from all the humane people of this planet. Especially the people of the US territories!

Robert in denmark   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

Yes.. He deserves it.

He has the intention to work towards world peace. He found a way to "bottle" the intention and serve it during his campaign. Since becoming president, albeit only for a a few months, he has backed it up in presidential speeches that show that he sees both sides to any peace debate.

That tired old conservative counter-intuitive cliche lyric of not talking to "enemies" has now been hopefully put to eternal rest. If you won't talk to enemies who should you talk to to get a chance for peace in this world? Your friends? Obama realizes that. He not only blames the hawk for catching the chicken, he also blames the chicken for not taking pre-cautions and for dancing flamboyantly knowing that this might provoke the hawk and make it an easy prey. The fact that he sees both sides to a conflict is a great thing for the world!! Thats how peace can be found!

He has not made peace.. Not yet. But he comes with a refreshing mindset that ups the chances for it. The Nobel committee seems to have realized this! good work!

Sometimes the prize should not wait till delivery of the job. Sometimes its necessary to urge intentions along into deeds!

Darlene McGee   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

It is amazing what he has done in his first 9 months! The climate towards the USA and a general feeling that people of all nations matter is a feeling we have not had for a long time (8 years to be exact)! He does deserve it and for being brave enough to take that thankless job!

jaime   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

i agree to some extent with some of the comments about being premature for a prize, although, there have been many of efforts from his years before president that truly give him credit for a peace prize.

John   October 9th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

YES!!

Lennart L   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

Absolutely brilliant
It was very brave and wise by the Nobel Preace Prize Committee to take this decision

narayanan   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

Obama mirrors Gandhi in many ways....He is got all the makings of the modern era Gandhi...a man who symbolises hope to millions in these tough times ...
his stress on dialogue over intimidation and war..
His steadfast support to the groundbreaking health reforms
His sincere efforts on mideast peace ...the list goes on
He truly deserves the noble peace prize for making the RIGHT CHOICE inspite of infinite opposition and odss

Lim Wun Wha   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

whatever they saw as to give Obama this award is stunning, this only show how the world is so hungry or deprived of a leader that can be a sign of hope, among those who were nominated or part of this process have not, obviously been very strong to beat Obama, it's good for him, maybe for America, and hopefully the world. Just imagine, he just started working on the peace process, but he still beat all those others, it only shows how the world is now empty of other leading personality that could be an example, a hope for peace...

Fernando   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

I submit that it is a push by the prize givers to push or nudge our President to deliver what the world is looking for....peace. But, I do believe that peace comes with a price...and, who is willing to pay it?

Kent Andersen   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

This is embarasing!!! If Obama is a man of honour he should say no thanks to the price. There is so many people in the word that are trying to improve the world and are risking their life for it and are paying a high price doing it. Obama hasn't sacrificed anything, he is not risking his life, he is not doing anything worth any cind of price. He is just doing what he should do, and he is already getting more honour than he deserve for it.

This price should have been given to some unknown person, that are working hard in a selfsacrificial way. A person that are not already on the front page of Time, a person with no political agenda, a person that are not giving my fellow norwegians a political gain. A person that is actually doing something and is an example worth following. Not just a person saying what people like to hear.

lekan   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

yes indeed he deserve the award

Jerry   October 9th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

NO

Chris   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

Maybe I am not as sharp as the rest of you people, but what exactly did President Obama do to promote peace in the last 8 months. Was it the whole "beer at the White House thing?"

President Roosevelt I can understand as he helped mediate an end to the Russo-Japanese war. President Wilson I can also understand, he helped create the League of Nations, a predecessor to the United Nations. Jimmy Carter was instrumental in the creation of the Geneva Accord to better Israeli-Palestinian relations.

But seriously now...a beer?

With all due respect, I think there were better nominees amongst the 172 candidates. Looks like we are still caught up in the first black president thing. Yeeha!

i th

micheal lamin   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

yes absolutely he deserves that. and he has shone more enthusiasen and effort in bringing despite all the hateors attack.

Michael Cali   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

Yes he does.
Michael
Malta

Ivar   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

I realize the war in Iraq is a legacy handed down to Mr. Obama from his predecessor, but I feel that the president of a country currently invading another country should, as a matter of principle, not be awarded a the Nobel Peace Prize.

Lillian   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

Well this is certinly a shocker! In as much as obama may have been making "strides towards" greater peace, diplomacy and reconciliation in the world since he took office, I think that it is premature to award him this prestigious award! In my opinion he hasn't earned it yet. I think there are other candidates like Morgan Tsvngirai of Zimbabwe who are much more deserving of this award considering what they have clearly achieved and the cirumstances under which they have acheived.

nisheeth tak   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

It seems a bit premature and calculated,to influence his future policy directions. In the longer term,it will restrict his hands,in dealing with the troubled regions.

This award is hardly based on his 9 months in office. When did the deliberations take place? Whom he defeated for this honour ?

Silvia campos   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

What a shame!!!!!
Our troop, each soldier deserve the Nobel Price for fighting and giving their lives for our country so we can have freedom.
Not Mr.Obama,

Anand Natarajan   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

I do not think he has a body of work at this point of time that justifies being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Even his policies for peace are not fully clear yet, and so, this unfortunately seems to be just the latest in a line of decisions taken based on the Obama phenomenon.

Jonathan Borock   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

Only if we force him to earn it.

Until then, this is not a Nobel prize *FOR* Obama’s peace.

This is a Nobel Prize AGAISNT Bush’s War.
It was not given for, it was given against.
This is an anti-prize, and anti-gift.

This will hurt Both Obama and Norwegian Nobel Committee unless we work hard to force Obama to earn it with substantial peacemaking.

Emmanuel   October 9th, 2009 12:39 pm ET

I dont think so.
He is new in office, and never achieve any peace or anything. Having more than two third in both houses, is enough to achieve lots before midterm election. Can somebody tell me what he has achieved. Only speeches and promises. Guantanamo, Healthcare reform, Afganistan, Iraq, etc. With what he has on the back he supposed to finish all this and be in his own presidency. May be he won it, because the first black to rule U.S.A. That is the only thing they can say.

Karel Frielink   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

I certainly hope the President will honor the obligations that he now owes the world. The Nobel Peace Prize may be given too soon, but certainly not too late to be effective. The Prize comes with a huge responsibility.

Baybars Örsek   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

While Barack Obama has inspired the world with his inaguraiton i believe that this non deserved yet prize will damage his charisma in all over the world.I hope he will deserve this price with his actions like closing Guantanamo and stop the war in Iraq in short term.

Otieno Omondi   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

Congratulations Mr. President. On the flipside, you can be sure the expectations of the world is ernomous. Yes You Can!!

Alex, Scotland   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

I'm a fan of Obama, but will analyse this objectively. The Nobel committee argues Obama deserves it for his efforts in international diplomacy and advocacy for peace in the last 9 months. I get that. The names of nominees for a Nobel prize are submitted February 1 of every year. When Obama's name was submitted he was only 11 days in office and all he had was his rhetoric. Inasmuch as I think the award boosts Obama efforts, I thought the Nobel committee awards prizes on merit and not campaign for prospective nominees. This prize would been more credible if this was 2010. Nonetheless, I hope this prize comes with success for Obama and the world, and that the prestige of the Nobel body is not diminished.

diana loehn   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

no, i don't think he deserved to win the nobel peace prize because he hasn't done anything. yet. i'd like to believe he will but it's very premature to award him such an honor when he's accomplished so little

Marie Swanepoel   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

YES he is deserving of the Nobel Peace prize!!
He is like a second Jesus on the Planet and will unite all nations!

mauske udo   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

yes, he merited the price. He has helped already in improving
understanding with other people. He has stated his intention
to reduce armement and he has fostered peace already by talking
to adversaries.This price is as well an encouragement for him
to continue on this path.

Peter   October 9th, 2009 12:40 pm ET

I think Mr. Obama deserves the Nobel Prize especially as it concerns Israeli Palestine initiative, moving away troops from Iraq and against the missile shield programme (as formerly agreed by Bush) from the eastern europe and above all, the closing of Guta. base in Cuba

Jeff   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

No matter how much one may like this man, he has not yet had the time to do anything worthy of this award and his selection, unfortunately, makes a mockery out of the award. And this does not even get into his policy to continue, and possibly escalate, the war in Afghanistan.

Mark Lis   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

Obama deserves it very much. Only a few months ago he was being ridiculed for suggesting he would "negociate with the enemy". He has reached out to Iran and brought them to the table of international diplomacy. Whether this works or not is yet to be seen, but he has reached them where few have managed.

Nuclear war is one of, if not the biggest threat, to world peace right now.

On the home front, he has brought people together and changed their way of thinking.

Perhaps now America will be a force for international good.

Killey   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

Absolutely not. JOKE !!!!!!!!!

Paul N.Y. U.S

Richard Wu   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

he is awarded the prize because he is Obama. That is the most ridiculous thing of 2009. May be he should be awarded another kind of Nobel.

james lake   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

I do think he earned it for his courage to tell the truth and face down the lies and theft of the Bush admin. Our consumer price index went up 24% under bush and his congress, costing each one of us 24% of our paycheck. Compound that by all of his other failed financial policies and childish family world feud, and it is amazing that this president has held up so well. The message he sends of peace is one the world needs to hear.

Paula Sarovic Mira   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

Hi, i'm from Chile, South America. I think it's too early to give him that award. He do it too much, but not enought.
Mandela win this award in a few years ago. It is not the same circunstances, It is not to compare, and it is not in the same label booth, and give him this award the Commite is saying that.
Regards
Paula

Aina   October 9th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

This is way too early!

Steve   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Although Obama's diplomatic efforts have so far proven useful, they can only be measured as part of his legacy – which, at this point, is far from complete.

Cartsey   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Yes.
The Nobel Peace Prize recognizes Obama's legitimacy as a leader ready to work for a nuclear free and sustainable world where conflicts are resolved through peaceful, intelligent negotiations.

MCl   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Lots of talking but what has he done ?????
This is the most ridiculous choice ever.

Simbarashe Dziruni   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Morgan Tsvangirai, Zimbabwe's Prime Minister has suffered more than slings & arrows in his struggle for peaceful resolution to the problem of the bloody tyrant Mugabe. Mr. Tsvangirai, despite the violence & abuse meted out to him and his members, has not resorted to guerilla war, freedom fighting or terrorism. He continues to pursue a peaceful path against the odds. I like Obama a lot but there are many others who are far more deserving.

MarcoMaria Freddi   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Yes. He has to have the feeling the west democracy support him in the huge effort to change global roles and relationship beetween countries. Many time, the Nobel Prize, has been assigned to "deserving people" . The Obama ones is an important marks, really farseeing.

KIMANI . Nairobi   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

What has he done to deserve it? bein popular does not make him the best as far as am concerned . we have people who have done much more than him. its too early to crown him

OP   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Obama has certainly brought back a sense of cool among world leaders at a time when hostility was at its peak. He deserves this award for sure.

Jay Prakash Goit   October 9th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

No.
Even I say (almost everyday) world should be free of Nuclear weapon, world need to unite against Global warming and talk about global peace. Only the difference is he is a pesident and I am a student.
I am completely against awarding him Nobel Peace prize.
Let him do something and then Nobel committee can think.
If Obama is getting Nobel prize then I should get the share too because we have done equal amount of work at the moment.

elissa Schreiner   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

Because of his determination to foster a world based on peace, which unfortunately is and has been one of the hardest tasks to achieve. He is looking out for the future of our planet earth, our future, and the future of our children and grandchildren. He is level headed and a brilliant communicator. Bravo Mr. President. Go for it!

Stephen   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

It is certainly arguable that Obama has provided hope to millions of people. However, the lives of millions of impoverished, refugees and/or citizens of war-torn countries all over the world has not markedly improved. There are real heroes on the ground right now – humanitarian organizations, human rights activists, to name a few – that have shed blood, sweat and tears for in a life-long career to enact change and better the lives of people. What does this say about their contributions? That only the people that are in the international spotlight deserve consideration for this prize?

The Peace Prize is one awarded for merit of accomplishments. Roosevelt established the National Parks before he got it, Wilson attempted to establish the League of Nations before he got it. It's very possible Obama might accomplish something revolutionary and significant for world history in the next 3 – 7 years, but he has not yet. And hundreds of other people have spent their entire careers deserving this prize.

If they want to give the prize to someone who has provided hope and unified the developed international community, give it to Bono. Seriously. I think that this hurts the prize more than anything. And second, it hurts the activists on the ground.

This all coming from an Obama supporter.

Marco Riva   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

He desreves it very much. He is the only one who deserves it.

Mehboob Hudwale   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

He may but this is too early.

SFloridaJean   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

Absolutely – President Obama's efforts deserve the Nobel Peace Prize and I fully support him! I think he has done an excellent job in the international arena so far in his short term in office and he should be applauded and encouraged for his efforts!

I have absolute faith that he will continue to serve our country well – I believe he has the most challenging job, and I support him 100%!

Thank you President Obama for helping the lower and middle class Americans and for thinking of the Midwest for the Olympics! I am originally from Milwaukee and I think Chicago would have been an ideal spot. It is time to put the Midwest on the map with an important event.

And I believe Mrs. Obama shines in the White House as the First Lady - she is the picture of health - and I think it is important for the leaders of our country to promote health and wellness in the US especially now with the serious obesity problem that exists. I applaud both of you!

Don't forget your vision and keep your promises to the US people that voted for you – please keep the US safe and preserve our freedom!

Thank you!

jitin   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

Obama deserves to win because he has brought about a fundamental change in the way the world sees the key issues of war and peace of our times – climate change, non-proliferation, arab-israel conflict, iran, terrorism, health-care, race and so on. These are huge positions that he has staked out and claiming that he has achieved nothing on the grounds that all these problems have not already been solved is rather churlish.

The world needs leaders like barack obama who can raise the hopes and aspirations of the people and rise above the petty and petulant who have hitherto controlled the debate.

unknown   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

I congratulate President Obama. However, I respect him for his outstanding performances as a world leader, but it is too early decision.

Thassim Akbar   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

Looking at the contemporary scene its only Obama who stands out. Other players are not much heard. It would be interesting to know hwo the other candidates for this award were and the reason for Obamas selection. He has made a big change in US foreign policy and hence has had major impact on the world at large. Hence if anyone is to be awarded this it is Obama.

Gregory   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

My initial reaction was WHAT? I am glad he won! It just strengthens my belief in him as a great world leader.. one I VOTED for! Strange.. there are no comments on the other Nobel winners... strange indeed! Just suck it up (losers) and keep America great and stop your divisive whining about nothing.

johannes612   October 9th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

nobel peace prize??
hummm

fighting 2 wars, holding people in prison for years without a trial, torture people for information, spying on friend and foe ..... need I say more.

Graça Sena - Lisbon / Portugal   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

Too soon, but an investment.
Let's wait and see.
Rgs.
G. Sena

Allan Wolman   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

What exactly has Obama achieved since he entered the world stage to peace anywhere in the world other than talk a dam good game.
Not one single peace initiative has come to fruition anywhere so why the Noble Prize?

Armando from Costa Rica   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

Yes, the world has changed since he is in the White House, still there is much to do but there is no doubt he represents an inflexion point, hopefully more international leaders follow his path to create a better world.

john d   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

He was only in office for 2 weeks when nominated! He has absolutely no results for his efforts so far. I might understand if this was near the end of his 4 year team and Iran and Korea had given up their nuclear programs. Too bad the awards have also become political and ideological......or am I too naive and they have always been?

TATENDA   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

This has just reduced the Noble Peace Prize to an absolute joke. Shame.................

Karel   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

Not yet.

Sarvagya Jain   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

I am not able to understand rational behind this decision. Obama was nowhere in any one's radar till he start campaigning for Presidential election and suddenly he is Nobel Peace prize winner, while other leaders from Asia and Third world countries (Gandhi, Mandela etc) has to wait for their life time to get acknowledged by Nobel Prize committee. I afraid that fate of Nobel Prize should not become as that of Oscars.

mauske udo   October 9th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

yes, thanks to God, that the Commitee does not think like conservatives
in the USA, whose results are open for everyone to see.

Josh Wright   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

He deserves it a million times

Mike NJ   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

Is this April 1st already??? this has to be a joke....more people drinking the cool aid. . What the heck has he done to deserve this???

Sanjeev   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

I think it was way too soon. President Obama's effort seem extraordinary only because we had 8 horrible years under former president Mr. Bush. If we discount that period, then his performance is just about average.

Shu Q   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

Definitely not, at least for this year. There are many many more greater politicians than he has achieved so far. The award to President Obama is a very discouraging to the Noble Peace Prize.

Raheleh   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

He absolutely deserves it.

Sylvester Ikpotokin from Ireland.   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

It is now a big question around the world simply because Barack Obama is a black man and an America President.

TINA   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

You've got to be kidding me!He must have won for being the first black American President.That's all.

Adel Abuzenadah   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

Nothing achieved so far in any aspects of world peace.
So, the answer is no.

Shailesh Mehta   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

Nobel to Obama for Peace is a surprise. One wonders what his personal contribution towards world peace has been, except mooting a concept to reduce Nuclear arsenal mainly with Russia. Can he convince China to follow suit? Rajiv Gandhi for the first Prime Minister to raise this issue in United Nations.

Award to Obama for peace is a hog wash

Steve   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

In order to to deserve the Nobel peace prize, one has to turn "Yes We Can" into "Yes We Have" ..

Maria   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

World's love affair with Obama is showing signs of insanity. Make a little history, make a little friends, throw around some fresh ideas and less than a year in the office – BAM ! you are a Nobel Laureate.

This is soooo not the right time for the price.

I am sure that he won't end up being a misscalculation (like Yasir Arafat...)and I'm sure he would have been an outstanding and deserving candidate in the future, but right now he hasn't been awarded for his own credentials, but more for not being George W. Bush.

Also, giving hope to the world is a great achievement, but having a legacy of delivering on that hope – that would have been the stuff for the Nobel peace price.

I am happy, though, that the most recent laureates have been so called 'traditional' peace-makers instead of people/organizations that could have been awarded with another category of the Nobels. – I will always think that Muhammed Yunus should have received the Nobel for Economics, not Peace. Now, that would have been a remarkable statement!!!

This is not a statement, though, this is a crush!

Martin Curran   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

No. He didn't deserve to win the prize. I think this confirms what has been talked about for years. That when presented every year it make a mockery of the nobel peace prize. It should be given every five years and then maybe these people would think a bit harder about who to chose. One think is for sure.. this years awards ceremony will be a bit more high profile than usual. And they get to meet a celebrity. It's not Obamas' fault but he should have taken his name out of the hat while in office.

Cynical

Martin Curran
Ireland

Galaviz   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

100%

Jack   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

has he done anything allready? darn, just missed that....

JDQ   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

Wonderful! It is a recognition of President Obama's attempts to re-engage the United States on the world stage as an equal among nations, and that the way to world peace is to bring parties together for meaningful discussions. It's a wonderful award and I congratulate him heartily.

Rebecca   October 9th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

My theory is that the Nobel committee wants to encourage President Obama to live up to the Prize–it's a bold move, and I hope it works!

going anywhere?   October 9th, 2009 12:46 pm ET

Standing up politically to blood thirsty nations is good enough for me.

Tony   October 9th, 2009 12:46 pm ET

The is an insult to all the men and women who actually earned this award.

jon   October 9th, 2009 12:46 pm ET

yes, Obama definitely deserved it win this prize. Few men have inspired so many in the world as he has in recent decades. That is a positive impact on us all. This impact will felt in the years to come and that is the spirit of the Nobel Peace Prize.

Limey   October 9th, 2009 12:46 pm ET

No, he did not. there are so many men and women who have been selfless and dedicaded their life for world peace and made a big impact. He is a carrer politician that has not jet shown anything. You can not give someone the nobel price for hoping or believing he will do good for humanity. He has not proven himself over time as soo many athers have done

Irene (Sweden)   October 9th, 2009 12:46 pm ET

I think it's great that Obama gets the prize now, when he more than ever needs support for a foreign policy based on dialog rather than confrontation and bullying.

He has clearly shown a will to open a dialog with both muslim states and Russia, and to cooperate with the UN. It would be tragic if that ambition were to drown in American domestic squabbles.

I don't think Alfred Nobel meant his prize to be a trophy for achievements in the past, but a way to lend support to those working for peace here and now.

Robert R.Van Reed   October 9th, 2009 12:46 pm ET

Excellent choice. He has done enough work of unitin people in the world.President Obama continues to make me a proud American.

arieh woods   October 9th, 2009 12:47 pm ET

yes

Markus   October 9th, 2009 12:47 pm ET

I truly believe that he has deserved this prize.

I am excited to see such a man leading a country which shoulders a great responsibility in the world. A responsibility that he is aware of and that he does not take lightly. A man who tries to strengthen the values of diplomacy again and understanding between peoples. This is the kind of politician I would like to see in every country.

I am only saddened to see that there is so much negativity coming from his own country. A country that is blessed with such a president. I hope that these people will open their hearts and minds to see more clearly.

M.

Robert Thompson   October 9th, 2009 12:47 pm ET

Honesty, openness and engagement gives results. Thanks Obama. Thanks America.

Sunsetz   October 9th, 2009 12:47 pm ET

2009 Nobel Expectation Prize was newly established. The U.S. presidnts had been farthest position from the extinction of nuke weapon for several decades. However, Obama declared the extinction. Even though he has done noting actually, the declaration is great as the U.S. president. He deserves "Expectation Prize".

Galaviz   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

As a Latino, I agree 100%

Cristina Horta   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

I do not agree with this Nobel Prize.
Only if that is subtil way of pressuring him to end the wars the United States have been feeding.
Obama will give the world the best chance for Peace if he,indeed, is able to finish the wars the imperialist and self centered foreign policies of USA has created.
But a Prize like this should be given to someone that has brought a positive outcome to a process of war or inequality.
Obama, unfortunatly, is still in the process of resolving 2 very unjust wars, only maintained for the greed of the USA petrol interests.
I am sorry, if, indeed, such a Prize is awarded to him, now.
As a Mozambican that has lived twice in the United States as a student, I did all I could to mobilize my American friends and colleagues to, please, vote, and vote for Obama, during the last American Elections. But he has not yet won the right to a prize like this.

Monique   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

Yes, this is a great choice.
Of course Obama didn't get an award for "presidency".
Many people who are not presidents at all, received this prize for the different ways in which they promoted and influenced peace and cooperation in the world.

June   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

No he doesnt deserves to win it..what have done for world peace.. what have done.when gazans were getting slaughtered, Nobel prize has lost his dignity, its just a sham now, soon.. george bush will be awarded one.. for peace.. its a shame complete shame

salma   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

No! He has not done anything yet. Only talk. I agree with Suraj, if he is the image he likes the world to see him like, he should have refused the prize until he had done something. we need some action, what did he do?

Anwar Jamal   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

If he does, Then there are millions of others who do as well.

Jamshed K. Fozdar   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

I am afraid the Nobel Committee by awarding Obama the Peace Prize for his so-called "intense diplomatic efforts" which presidents and diplomats can engage in,but which venue is not open to the true champions of human rights such as Thich Quang Do or the Chinese Wei and others like him behind prison bars, who have suffered imprisonment etc. for their courageous stand for human rigths, has degraded the Peace Prize, if Mandela, Suu Kyi,etc. were also awarded the same prize, since Obama has done nothing for human rights except to avoid meeting the Dalai Lama at the "behest" of the Chinese President Hu .And,Peace itself, both in Iraq and Afghanistan is a mirage and Obama may not see it. Perhaps the Nobel Committee should have a separate "Prize for Human Rights" to distinguish it from the now much tarnished Peace Prize!

Elizabeth   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

Considering the Committee's reasoning, I believe it is justified. And while he hasn't had much time in office to accomplish his objectives, he certainly hasn't shied away from confronting all the issues in his path and taking the bull by the horns in so many areas.

Congratulations....this award gives further encouragement to continue.

An American in Italy

D Concepcion   October 9th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

Of course he deserves this. You can see he wants to find a way not to increase military presence. This is being critizied by WAR (White American Right).

Resistance to change is obvious in Washington and elsewhere.

We pray he can be succesful with an agenda for peace and prosperity for the US and the world!

Half Muslim in a US President, never heard of. Maybe we can now treat the Muslims with the respect they deserve. Daniel Concepcion, San JUan, Puerto Rico. (Son of a US Marine)

Martin Spantig   October 9th, 2009 12:49 pm ET

Yes, of course! Who else is looking for a different approach in using his given power?
Martin Spantig, Munich, Germany

Joseph Sherman   October 9th, 2009 12:49 pm ET

All Americans can be proud! U.S. foreign policy is moving in a new positive direction!

mali   October 9th, 2009 12:49 pm ET

I am from Turkey.exactly he didn't deserve the award.I wonder what did he do to deserve it.great numbers of people still are dying in Iraq and Afghanistan everday. I cannot see any difference between Bush's term and Obama's term.I mean if Bush is a devil, Barrack Obama devil too because his policy is the same policy with Bush.

Marcus   October 9th, 2009 12:49 pm ET

Quote:
"This is a joke"

Indeed

Tonya   October 9th, 2009 12:49 pm ET

Yes, yes and yes he deserves to win. And great timing too. Nobel Peace Prize trumps SNL spoof. Obama: 2 / SNL: 1

Mark   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

Too early. Right now there are so many people who risk their lives on a daily basis for more peace and security in the world - they are just not as public figures. It's sad to see that even Nobel prices are handed out based on celebrity status.

I should point out I am fan of Obama.. a couple of months ago I would have said BIG fan.. but 8 months into the presidency I am not too impressed any more.

vandecappelle guido   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

Dear sir,

despite my respect for the president i think it's to early to recieve this nomination.

Everything is still in process,nothing is realised

Vandecappelle guido

Alex   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

I cannot agree with the previous note – he deserves not 1mln times but ten mlns.. I think we all should sing some song to His name.. Every morning we wake up, or before going to beds.. I am so happy that I live on the same planet where Obama is executive..

Maya   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

It seems to me the Nobel Committee sought to make a political statement with its award to President Obama. And by doing so, has diminished prior award winners who have toiled and achieved before receiving an award. I feel for those unsung true heroes of peace who've labored in negotiations for years, who've risked their life for a cause and who, not by words, but by deeds have brought peace to the world. If anything, the award should not go to a person but if it must be for America's "new vision", then the American people who wanted change and elected this President should be the winners of the award. If it was meant to motivate it should have been a cadre of leaders, not just one for that again smacks of the USA be unilateral once again and giving one man an ego to do so.

George   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

Mr. Obama is 11 days in the office, gets nominated and wins over some poor Chinese dissidents who all their lives fought an oppressive regime.
Just a few days ago, he canceled a meeting with the Dalai Lama not to upset Hu Jintao. Is this the diplomacy he was awarded for?

George,
Germany

Dr. Ines Lehmann   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

I am very happy that Obama got the Nobel price ..... he ist the best president the us ever had... Now he should close GUANTANAMO!!!

Enayat   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

I believe that although he is a great man but it is too soon to judge about him whether he will really strengthen the peace and democratic relations or not?
So far, just he has talked about peace and democracy and diplomatic efforts much more than a practical step.Maybe he could win this prize after some years but not now. I would say that this year he did not deserve a Nobel Prize.
So, I congratulate this to him and Americans and I hope that he will pursue his efforts ,as he has already started, for peace especially as the president of the most effective country in the world.
Good luck Obama.

Sincerely
Enayat

Dandy Ahuruonye   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

It looks like Barak won this award because of trying to do things differently from past U.S presidents
Many remember his speech at the Cairo University where he called on Muslims and non Muslims to make peace.
Still this award should focus on sustained achievements over a period of time.
Has the president really achieved much in a year?
Due to the recession there seem to be a lack of the demonstration of ingenuity in the scientific world. The result then is that the organisers of the award looked painfully for a very suitable candidate, but looks like they struggled!

Summer Seale   October 9th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

I support Obama in many of his objectives and goals, and even some of his philosophies.

However, this choice is a travesty.

There are tons of worthy people risking their lives and the lives of their families each day fighting for freedom and peace with nonviolent means. This committee appears to be more interested in slapping George W. Bush in the face than actually awarding worthy people in the last few years.

I don't think Obama wants this or even thinks he deserves it. Thanks, Nobel Committee, for making his political life an even bigger hell than it was going to be in the first place. Thanks for giving ammunition to the extreme right wing who already thinks he's a narcissistic pig. Thank you for being the meddling critical idiots that you can be for sticking your nose in the local politics of a democratic nation. And thanks for being utter jerks who dismiss the hard efforts of people who risk everything and accomplish real things on the ground every day.

Obama didn't make me sick today – that committee's choice made me sick.

Rose   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

Fasil   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

I am afraid it is too early to judge him. My evaluation of him in the past 9 months shows ambivalent results. I give him A's for his effort to address international peace via negotiation and diplomacy. He resurrected what Bush has killed, despite he sometimes opts for the Stick diplomacy in the case of Afganistan and Pakistan. On the other hand he is still sleeping with African dictators like Zenawi of Ethiopia. He courted this blood soacked dictator to his dinning room , which is tantamount to an insult to those who have been perished by this very man for thier love of democracy. He is also too soft on the likes of Mugabie and Kibaki of Kenya. I think he achieved D's vis – vis making democracy the rule of the world.

Josiah   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

Nelson Mandela and Fredrick De Klerk of South Africa won the prize purely on the basis of the intent they had at the time of transforming South Africa and based on the progress they had made that far....

Obama totally deserved it!

Valentino   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

Yes. He deserves it.. It was said best by the Nrwegians. It is not about what he has done but what he will do... The world has changed since he came to office.. and it will be better

Richard   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

I support Obama and think he is one of very few wise leaders who really tries to make the world a better place. I thank the americans who were wise to elect him.. I agree that Obama already now has been able to do more for peace during the year than anyone else despite the few concrete results. Just by his excellent speeches he has managed to decrease the polarization in the world and make it a better place.

However, I have mixed feelings about giving him the price before his intentions have given the desired results. I fear it can make people who already distrusts him, dislike him even more. I hope he will get another Nobel peace prize, even more deserved, when he has accomplished his mission.

Krishna Venkatesh   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

I am flabbergasted!!!!! This prize should have clearly been awarded to Dick Cheney!!!!

Tom   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

For a president whose country is at war with two other countries, winning the nobel peace prize is a joke.
The nobel prize has lost its value.

Rgds,
Tom

Sam   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

This is completely premature! I think this could hinder him a bit more in the US. As this gets spun through the news cycles I fear it will further polarize America when we desperately need to be coming together. I have highest hopes for Obama but feel that he should graciously refuse this (poisoned) gift, as he has YET to earn it (and the right wing will have a field day). Not to mention there are people such as Mortenson or Mukwege who have worked YEARS on projects that are in need of the money awarded with this prize. I think it is a mistake to give this prize to any seated politician but even more of a mistake to give it to a president leading two wars, and having the worlds largest nuclear arsenal. Obama has lofty goals and it is great that the world wants to support those goals but this is not the way to do that.

Anwar Ul Islam   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

His strong peace initiatives add to his credibility. Wish him all the success through out his stay in office.

Jack Ho   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

Sounds to me like the people giving this award just feel the need to award it no matter what. It's a joke! Better give it Aung San Suu Kyi.

R.S.H. von Styggenein   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

NO

Sy   October 9th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

After 9 months of being president of the United States, Obama does not deserve this. This only goes to show how much of a joke the Nobel Peace Prize has become. Obama thus far has talked the talk, but has not walked the walk. He has become one of the most over-rated sensations this world has ever seen.

I do hope, however, he eventually proves me wrong by doing the things he recites and proving everyone of us 'naysayers' wrong by showing the world he truly is in fact someone capable of mending the rifts we often see in this troubled world.

Jim Neumann   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

While I did not vote for President Obama, I do respect him as my president and hope–since he is now the president whether anyone likes it or not–that he does well on all fronts. However, I do not at all feel that he deserved this award. My question is: what has Barrack Obama actually accomplished in the name of peace? I have seen a lot of talking about peace related issues, but I have seen no resolutions; that is to say, I have not seen where any of the talk has done any good so far, and see no indication that it ever will. The world is as violent and restless today as it was in Bush's second term.

I must also say, however, that I feel the Nobel Peace Prize has quite unfortunately become a joke altogether. It's nothing more than the political statement of one particular committee these days. The majority of those who have won the prize in recent years in my opinion did relatively little to advance peace in the world. In truth, those who are doing the most, who are pouring their lives out, for peace are likely people we have never heard much about, not people in the spotlight.

michael   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

Obviously Mr Obama has tremenduous potential. However, to give him this prize before any major achievement is not good for him, not for the Nobel institute and certainly not good for all those that won this prize with hard work and excellent results. It does not do justice to the value of the prize.

Rick S. Pinilla   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

I don't think Obama deserves the prize

Mo Wolf   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

A joke. maybe in 2 years when he has boruhgt peace somewhere he will deserve it but for tlaking about peace he gets the Nobel peace prize!!

Tenson Muchararadza   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

congrats to President Obama. I however feel that it could have gone to Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirayi, who has had a great impact on the lives of ordinary Zimbabweans, where as Mr Obama has said sweet things, even on nuclear, but he is yet to deliver. Not because he cannot but its just too early and it was therefore premature to give him that accolade.

Duke   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

I think it could be somewhat to early to say he should receive the award. Has only been office several months and to really see the whole effect of the work he is trying to do, it will take several more to see this effect.

Past winners have work for years to be able to receive this award.

ken   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

Obama has made policy declarations that have changed in a fundamental way the nature of U.S. dealings with the rest of the world, a quantum leap from the neanderthal administration of his predecessor. Declarations change the world. Whoever does not understand the power of declarations should revisit history and see how declarations of independence, for example, have shaped the world. Some say that it is all talk, and those that underestimate the power of talk don't understand how everything that we do gets done. Obama has in a short time understood where the starting point is and has declared that it is dialogue, mutual respect and mutual understanding. Who else on the world stage has hit the bulls eye so directly. We owe our thanks to Obama for declaring a profound change in U.S. policy. Let's hope he has partners around the world as serious as he is.

Diva   October 9th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

No I don't, afterall what has he archieved since he took office: nothing.

This price should terget those people working on medical and green projects, which tend to benefit all humanity not some imposing politician who was simply voted by you and me to be where he is. They should have assessed him after he has left office.

What if he turns around tommorow and start warring more countries that the 'boy from Texas, the record holding mighty mighty Bush'.

He is now sending his 40K child soldiers to go and kill more pregnant women and children in Afghanistan.

I suspect these clowns might have slected Obama after he had called them to the Whitehouse for some shots of JD. They should be given a sobriety test rightaway.

Rizwan   October 9th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

Initially I too had a question (????) why. But later found that some has strong desire, intention to see that " Love, let's love than “Either you’re with us, or you’re against us”.

Gandhi was always for peace and today he is remembered and liked by all but still a few dislike him as they do with all.

Craig   October 9th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

Well done, he deserves it. He is a true leader. I hope he continues doing the wonderful work he has been doing, the world needs him. I just people would focus on space exploration, instead of war.

Dilip August   October 9th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

Absolutely!!! Yes, for giving all the people in the world a hope of peace and harmony. Yes, for initiating belief and reforms in international institutions. He is a world leader and I am sure actions will follow from this visionary man and we shall remember then when we look back.

Karl Huffman   October 9th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

Someday no doubt but I believe it is too early in his administration to judge him fully worthy of the prize.

Joshua O.   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

Can anyone tell me who else is/was at Obama's position right now and has done what he's done.
He's the most powerful political figure right now. This is someone who could do exactly what Bush did but no. I think his motto is:
"If we succeed, we succeed together. But if we fail, then we fail together. So whether we succeed or fail, we'll remain together(if need be, then diplomatically)."
And i think his "we" doesn't just refer to all Americans, but to all humans worldwide.
I hate it when people can't see beyond their nose. Those saying he doesn't deserve it must realise that Obama has done in 9 Months what Bush couldn't do in 8years.
By winning this prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee is telling him:
"The world is watching, failure is not an option"
Now he can't afford to fail! Just as simple as ABC!

balan   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

I find this very ridiculous . What has he done to get Nobel Prize. Tomorrow i am going to ask my friends to nominate me for Nobel prize

tejas   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

why is obama given nobel prize. he does not deserve it.

Ivan   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

At best, this is a weird joke. Grotesque and surreal, and embarassing. Nothing against President Obama and his administration from my part – but where is the rationality in all this? On what basis? For which achievements? The guy has barely been one year in office! He may have demonstrated a thousand noble (pun inteded) intentions so far, but achieving them is a totally different matter. Maybe he'd be a good candidate for the prize in a few years' time – but this makes a mockery out of the whole Nobel prize idea.

Aakash   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

This is really a joke! I am a big Obama fan but lets get real please.

What has he done for peace other than make one speech in the middle east?

Where has he acheived peace?

Obama is a big talker, lets get to seem some action now ... and most importantly some results.

Stevie   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

He hasn't done ANYTHING for peace in his time in office. Maybe later on he will. Who knows. But this is certainly an error.

Very disapointing for Nobel Committee.

Elad   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

I think President Obama does not deserve the prize becuse he is a man of words and not action. There has been no progress in the peae process in the middle east, global warming, and other things.
He is a person who goes to talk shows and being charming but that is all to it

Laurent Lévy   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

This is completely unwarranted and undeserved. What the hell has Mr. Obama done for peace ? He has promised to try and correct part of the evil done by his predecessor and that's all. Not seen the results yet !! The Nobel Committee must have gone crazy !

Tracy   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

Giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Obama when he has not yet accomplished anything of substance weakens the prestige of the Nobel Prize and is a smack in the face to previous winners and overlooked candidates who have made geniune gains in international cooperation.

Gibril   October 9th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

Too soon. Obama declared intentions only. However, his administration buckled in front of Israeli Lobby when dealing with the Goldberg report. A golden chance to send a firm message to Israel to pursue peace.

Jared Miller   October 9th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

Put simply.........
Yes, the President is deserving.

maria joão mendes   October 9th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

YES

Graham   October 9th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

President Obama deserves to win the Nobel Peace Prize because he has a vision for world peace and is the person most likely to bring it about because of his position.

Others may have a greater passion for peace and an active agenda but they lack the means and influence to make it happen on a global scale.

Clearly there is a marked difference between the aproach of Obama and Bush towards peace, the latter prefering war as a means to an end. Perhaps the contrast between presidents was the thing that decided the prize in Obamas favour.

Ron   October 9th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

No...just because he is the 1st african american president?
I think anybody that would have come after bush would have taken a nobel peace prize without moving a muscle...

Paula Defensor   October 9th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

It is too premature to give Obama the peace prize. There is no exceptional achievement and he is still on top of waging wars. It is a very bizarre choice considering that so many heads of state and international figures dedicate their entire lives for world peace. If climate change and poverty agendas are to be included in the evaluation, his achievements cannot be much better than many other heads of state. It is a mediocre choice.

sandy   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

I believe in todays world, hellish world, President Obama has shown some light, some hope. And personally to me it matters most. I think its very important to encourage people like him if we want to see any good happening in the future. To me it is appropriate and well deserved.

Steven   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

Since the Nobel committee is apparently giving away Nobel Peace Prizes, I would like to be one of the first to ask to be nominated for 2010.

I don't understand how the leader of a country still involved in TWO wars (one of them in violation of the conventions of war), which has attacked targets in a third country (Pakistan), which STILL hasn't closed Guantanamo where it is detaining people illegally (not even permitting access by Red Cross members), how can such a person qualify for a "PEACE" prize? Did he get a prize for NOT attacking Iran? Why not give the prize to China for NOT invading Taiwan? Or North Korea, for NOT ending the cease fire with South Korea...

The Nobel committee has devalued and debased the Peace Prize with this action. Congratulations. My only hope remains that this was done to place a burden of conscience upon Mr. Obama to attempt to restrain his future actions. However it seems that the Peace Prize has fallen from being the noble and prestigious award that it once was, to a political bauble. I don’t think that “calling for dialogue” should qualify a politician for this prize. THAT SHOULD BE THE NORMAL, SANE, RATIONAL CHOICE. Prizes should be given to a politician that has actually DONE something other than maintain the status quo, for all the rhetoric.

Florescu   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

Obama deserved the Nobel for oratory, not for peace. It's very strange that he won, because the woman who won the prize for literature was mostly chosen for having lived under dictatorship and written about political oppression during communism. They should change the prizes and give Obama the Nobel for literature for his talent for discourse and give Herta Muller the Nobel for peace.

Irene Hoogmoed   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

Yes He deserves to win the Nobel Peace prize.

iche   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

Nice word like "yes we can",..and the same are not enough to deserve a nobel price.
I Alfred Nobel would know he certainly would be very unhappy ih his grave.

If Barack Obama (or Hussein Obama when he is in Cairo) for a problem he cannot solve in the Middle East, choosed to resign to one party by forcing the other to accept the conditions, i cannot call that he deserves the Nobel Peice

ACap   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

Strange...it's not April Fool's day today....

Peter   October 9th, 2009 12:56 pm ET

I don't think Obama deserves at this stage. He has been doing alot of talk but we are yet to see the fruits of his efforts.

I thought Nobel Peace prize is for accomplishment not mere efforts. But i truly wish him the very best and will support him where i can

The Sceptic   October 9th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

Obama MAY deserve this prize 2-3 years on. May.
But, for now, what has he done?
The Nobel peace prize was devalued a long time ago – this award is simply one more nail in the coffin, unfortunately not a final one.

Robert   October 9th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

yes i beleive he does deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, his slogan "Yes We Can" and "Change" have sparked emotions all over the planet.
For the global crisis he cannot be blamed for, i doubt if any leader could handel this crisis in a way to satisfy all....
Robert from Switzerland

Nilda Gonzalez   October 9th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

Great "for President Obama, Yes I am so glad for our President Obama he is what our world needs PEACE on EARTH and GOODWILL to ALL. WE SHOULD TRY TO LOVE MORE STOP THE WAR LETS HEAL OUR NATION. May God bless him and his family , All good to him we pray everyday at our office for you Mr.President so that God may guide you .Mr President God is with you. All the best.

Just from someone that you may not know in person but in my heart I do care very much for you and your family. our country America the best.Thank you so very much
Go USA..We love you
Nilda Gonzalez from Doardo ,PUERTO RICO

Alex   October 9th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

Noble Peace Prize should be guaranteed to any US President.. They all deserve it.. Especially for their peaceful solution of Afghanistan problem.

Nick   October 9th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

I can absolutely understand why they did it, but it's a risky decision after all. Maybe in one or two years he will be able to justify the award. If not ... well, as I said: risky decision.

Alex Cybriwsky   October 9th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

Yes, Obama definitely deserves the prize.

Just look at pre-Obama American policies on things like Iraq, terrorism, and Russia. Before he was president, Obama was in the minority in opposing the invasion of Iraq. Before Obama, the U.S. was in a situation where the country's leaders would lie about what was then an all-encompassing term, "terrorism," to cook up all kinds of immoral policies including torture and "murder." Before Obama, the U.S. had a harder line with Russia as was building a missile defense shield in Eastern Europe.

Obama has not only changed these violent American policies, but he has brought the country along with him for the ride. Obama has accomplished a monumental shift for not only American policies, but for American cultural values. Perhaps this change is more evident from an outsider's perspective than from inside the U.S., but I, as an American, am willing to attest that things are very different now, and are much improved. Thank you President Obama.

J. Shor   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

The Nobel committee obviously didn't have anyone better to give the award to.

What did Obama do? He is barely into his tenure.

I guess he deserves the prize, since he didn't start any wars (yet).

Salman Shoaib   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Frankly speaking this is amazing that a guy who is still an untested commodity and who has no recognizable achievement to his credit (after becoming the President of USA) can get a Nobel Prize. This puts a serious question mark on the authenticity of the awards. Peace prize has always beeen a point of contention and the same is not rectified here as well. Simply speaking this award is a politically motivated.

John   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Yes he deseve this for sure. For all they think not. Bush is would be the right one????? You guys still lives in the Bushland ;-0)

Vicky   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Yes I do, he has given hope to a nation and to the world and there is much to be said about someone who can give hope in such troubled times. Well done.

Eric Wilson   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

I don't believe so – he has done nothing to merit this award. He talks a lot but has achieved absolutely nothing of significance for American People whether they be black or white or democrat or republican. Time will judge Obama and maybe he will surprise us however on his current performance I believe he will struggle to get re-election both by his party and above all the American People.
Its OUR country- keep them honest and worthy of your vote

Ely Figueroa   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Magnificent and deserves it more. God bless him

Micke   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Yes. He represents such a huge and meaningful change in governing of the most powerfull nation on earth, that this fact in it self is enough to reward him with a Nobel prize. Eventhough he hasn't had a chance to fulfill al he's promises yet. Let's hope he's allowed this chance! Here's to you, Obama!

Lorraine, Oakland CA   October 9th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Yes, without question he deserves it.

He's changed American foreign policy from preemptive war, to diplomacy. He's made every effort to end torture, secret prisons and extraordinary rendition.

Considering the US had bee a major destabilizing force in the world for the last 8 years, Obama's efforts to bring us back to our values of peace and prosperity have probably done more to make the world more peaceful than any other single individual on the planet.

To all the disrespectful posters on here I have this to say: you people are a national disgrace, and you have the insight and intellectual firing power of algae.

And to CNN – with your "does he deserve it" BS: You're the biggest disgrace of all. Take a stab at delivering news some time, why don't you.

Luigi   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

I think he does.

lei   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

I think from the past Nobel Prize winner list, we all should realise one thing, there isn't really any consistancy in the requirement. I am sure Obama is not the first winner that created controversay. 1.2 billion Chinese didn't like the choice of Dalai Lama, they gave it to him anyway. Obama did little to this point, but he did bring some fresh air in the US politics. The world needs US to take the lead, and having Obama is far better than Bush. FOR that, why not give him the award? It is just an award, from Norway.

Helle   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

I think that Barack Obama is a good and obvious choice for the Nobel Peace Price. He is doing what so badly needs to be done in order to acheive peace – move the world in a direction of mutual understanding and collaboration.

Ciiku   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

I think the prize is a prize for of hope. And it may seem premature but hope is never comes later than it should. His presidency has helped all of us to change our focus on so many things and if we all look at what he is looking at and what he is trying to do and join him in doing it then in that sense we may learn to sit and talk before we fight. And for that he is worthy of the prize. The greatest task is to change the minds of human beings and he has begun to do that not just this year but even through his campaign.

Amit   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

What? Someone pinch me please? The Nobel committee didnt find any one who has already proved himself ? Is he the best contributor to world peace? Where has he brought peace? For once it seems Words have spoken louder than actions.

Evelyn Apitzsch   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Congratulations to president Obama.
most people who haven´t really followed what this president
has done during his adult lifeare critisizing this win. no one deserves this at the moment more than him.
it´s only a pity that his coleagues are determined to make him fail.
Evelyn
Germany

Racso Zevetse   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Definitely!

Thomas Lane   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Pretty odd,what did he do?

Steel   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

The first thing that came to my mind when I heard this was "For what?". The man was in office a total of 12 days when the nominations for the prize were closed. 12 days! He's accomplished nothing but push America further in debt, weaken the dollar and has divided America to a point not seen since the Civil War. On the international stage he has "bowed and cowed" to every dictator and tyrant he meets and spewed little more than words. Anyone that thinks he deserved this is clearly out of his or her mind. The Nobel committee is undeniably nothing but a joke!

Frank Eanes   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

I have read on this a lot about Obama impacting the Muslim world. Let's face it; this award is about the beliefs of the committee. They believe in direct talks and conversation. When Jesus walked this earth and talked to other faiths, it was not about conversation, but conversion. He has turned his back on the people of Israel. He is turning his back on the forefathers of America who loved the idea of “In God we trust”. If he was telling Americans these things 100 years ago, he would have been deported. Obama is a great speaker. I believe he is a good man. But his radical ideas are not the basis of a Nobel Peace Prize.

david   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

A fan of the president's.....But I was shocked to see him selected as the winner. I'd prefer to see him accomplish something that deserves being recognized. So no, I don't believe it was a good choice. Beauty pageant contestants talk about world peace....talking and achieving are two different things.

BombardierBob   October 9th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Being that I am an American, I have to say that this award has become a joke as of late cause he has yet to prove peace when we are at war period. He has yet to prove all his good will and hope till his four years are up so to be giving this award is a slap to all that have received it already.

bart   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

22 student belgium. he inspired me more than anyone, got me reading his book (in english), and i even hate reading.
thats what the comittee means with changing the world, inspiring ppl all over the world. hes not just the president of the usa, he also is a leader for the world

Ero   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

Obama has the courage and desire to make this world a better place when the last president did everything possible to destroy it.
If there is anyone better who could be given this award I would think otherwise but now I think it was 100% justified.

Pedro D'Ardis   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

The fact that the American People, let alone a leading news media conglomerate like CNN has to even think about asking this question, speaks volumes, in my opinion, about the current state of American society and the little awareness it has on the impact that the actions of American Government has all over the world.

The W administration led America, still the leading nation of the world (although many would love to see its demise) to war. Taking the world into an economic recession and undermining civic liberties in the country that we all hailed as the beacon of democracy.

I don't want to downplay Obamas actions or accomplishments, but after 2 terms of that, even PeeWee Herman as a president would have gotten the Peace Nobel!

Trygve Alger   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

As a born Norwegian, and visiting the country every year, I can only say the nobel price commity is a publisitiy- popularity seeking bunch. The event of nobel price presentation, is more important then finding a person worthy of the honor. Obama is beeing used as a drawing card for event, and he should demand payment, over and above the price, like any good speaker would.

eric won   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

Obama is smart, eloquent, and most of all, has come through great odds to become the first African-American president of USA. This is what he is and this is what he has done so far in his career. If those achievements (qualities would be more accurate) are the guidelines for winning a Nobel Peace prize, then he deserves it more than anyone. However, I feel that his 'qualities' doesn't deserve same recognition as someone like Mother Teresa. Maybe 20 years from now he may deserve it. Not now.

Fred   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

From my european point of view, Obama's been drawing bridges. Compared to the previous president who basically said "you are whether with us or against us" it's a far more constructive and peaceful approach. The iron-hand policy only creates more and more opponents. Obama's one is more likely to bring peace through his velvet glove. We don't need a war with Iran or North Korea. These regimes will fall apart in due time just like the communist one did.

Antoine Hue   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

President Obama definitely deserves the Nobel Peace prize for his efforts to replace the disastrous failing “big bully stick” policy used by the previous administration by an acknowledging and showing respect to other countries with divergent point of vue.
He has changed the international US policy from a fundamentalist and disastrous approach of "You are with me or get our of my way" which marginalized America and put it on the side of the International community. Obama put back America where it should be, a leading force for Worldwide peace. The world need a strong America it can work with, no one who tries to bully everybody who does not agree.

v-w   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

I believe he COULD be a plausable canidate. but what most people dont realise is that he in NO WAY deserves it. Because if you look at the deadline for submissions for the peace prize it was Febuary 1st.. So please enlighten me, what did he do in those 11 days before his name was put into the hat to deserve even nomination.

Yes he is the first african american president but that should not matter at all. I believe it is, no offence to the Norwegians, but it seems like more of a suck up move... Just my two cents

DENNIS   October 9th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

He deserves it a million times more

Francisca   October 9th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

Definitely. He has tried hard to bring peace on many fronts. And he has restored hope that peace is possible and faith in the US. But peace needs a helping hand from nations too not just the efforts of one man. And Israelis and Palestinians, for example, aren't helping a bit. So, if that fails it will be their fault. Obama addressed the issue almost from day one. For those who say he should first get results at least in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict... (and seem to forget what he has already done) why don't they demand from Israelis and Palestinians governments a real effort to bring peace?

Guillermo Serna   October 9th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

What a big Joke! This is incredible.

Hank   October 9th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

This must be a joke! People are putting their life on the line promoting freedom and peace every day around the world and this guy get it for being what? There must be more to awarding Obama the prize then the press is letting onto.

Ben   October 9th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

NO!!!!
This prize doesnt mean anything anymore! All he did was make a million promises he has yet to fulfill even one! (see SNL skit). I mean seriosly, wheres Kanye West when you need him???

silvia rasched   October 9th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

what a wonderful day

Iuri   October 9th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

Yes he deserves. Closing Guantanamo would have been enough.

brian   October 9th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

Obama is a great leader but he still needs time! To award the prize so early in his career is neither good for him nor the prize.

Seymour   October 9th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

Why not? Some might think the prize is for complete success, however what about the world leader willing to take that big step early on rather than playin the game of doing something at the end of their term to preserve their fame (or face). An example exist in the United Kingdom of a former Prime Minister (unelected by the people) who now tries to look like the 'new leader' (?) on the apparent campaign trail for a new and even more lucretive paycheck. So let's give peace a chance!

stefanie   October 9th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

He deserves it, so many people look up to him for a reason and the reason is because he is trying to do as much as he can to streighten up the whole world.

Rodrigo   October 9th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

only one thing to say,

It's better than Al Gore.

nuff said.

Ingmar Hansen   October 9th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

Absolutely! No question! His policy approach is deeply ethical. No one promotes progressive policies towards a better future on this planet than he does. Given all the hatred from the political right at the moment this is the right sign of encouragement for him to continue his path!!

Alfred B.   October 9th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

You can't blame Obama, blame the Nobel Prize Committee!

I suppose Barack is a lot better than Bush as I believe he will do more for peace in the future and maybe the Committee realised that this prize will motivate the number 1 person of the most powerful nation on earth to do something about peace.

I personally think it is too early but I believe he will eventually deliver on his promises because I believe he is an ethical person.

More should be done to withdraw military troops from Iraq, Afghanistan and also reduce the number of military bases around the world if he is really serious about world peace

Jennifer Munsie   October 9th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

I wish to first and foremost say that I am a supporter of President Obama, I believe in him and believe in his potential to do great things. While I agree that he is the first world figure in a long time to rally the support of a diverse many and do so expediently, I am not certain that he has yet reached the point yet deserving of the award. I consider that his persona in contrast of what came before is so stark, that it may appear this way but I believe he still has much work to do. I am sure that he would agree with that last statement himself.

Isabel   October 9th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

I think its a kind early to win such prize but I wish him good luck for the long way ahead and all he stands for ....

Tobi Adetayo   October 9th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

Congratulations to Mr President, and congratulations to the committee on your remarkable judgement...Like everyone else it was a surprise, however mine was a pleasant surprise.

I read comments about this being too early. Its good people aint't saying he doesn't deserve it, but rather that it was too early. The issue here is that they fail to see what the award is about as Alfred Nobel stated in his will.

Obama deserves it for the fact that he genuinely wants a peaceful world. A president facing so much problems at home that still gives so much of his time to seeking peace in Isreal/Palestine, nuclear disarment, Iran/North Korea and even has so much passion about making healthcare available to all in his country. He deserves it.

If the most powerful man in the world has so much passion for peace, then he deserves it. A man whose decisions can bring great destruction chose to be humble in his search for peace. This man will attain even greater heights

Arfan   October 9th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

I do not feel he has had any affect on world peace, he has not been in the job long enough and niether has he had any peaceful outcomes to any of the pressing global matters.

melissa   October 9th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

No!

Claudius   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

Obama deserves to be Nobel Peace Price winner for all his efforts in trying to lead the world in a different direction. Few of us can see the good things that Obama is trying to achieve , but because of the color of his skin, many will not appreciate. It is clear with the way the white world has been reacting that they are afraid that black people whom they have treated badly over the years are beggining to become powerful. Let the man be, Bush started all these fires that Obama is putting out and you are not willing to give him credit for his effort. Wake up and face the truth world, Obama is here to stay and change the world.

Austin   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

Its a cop out like when Al Gore won it

KHADIM   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

I was expecting many people to go "No way he didnt achieved anything...he doesnt deserved it" And most of them of course are those Anti-obama from the US...poor people you will never understand the WORLD...I sometimes think that your "narrowed minded esprit" cant definitely not get it! Sad but reality.....But sorry We the "Rest of the World" Know exactly and understand the MESSAGE behind the Nobel commitee decision to Honor the philosophy and approach of Mr Barack Obama...we need peace and your President is a sign of HOPE for that...like or not we dont give a damned....Salute and "go take a hike" if you dont like....

MOHAMMAD MOHAMMAD   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

HE DEFINITELY DESERVES IT. HE IS THE BEST PEACE WORKING MAN ON EARTH IN THIS ERA.

GOOD LUCK MR. PRESIDENT. GO FORWARD.

Dumitru   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

I think he deserves the prize. Obama managed to reduce the huge tensions with Russia (by giving up the European part of the missile shield). He also clarified and largely rationalized the relations with Iraq and Afghanistan (even though a lot remains to be done, including **sending more troops to Afghanistan**). The Iran situation is being treated in a rational fashion after long years of scare propaganda (and if in the end Iran gets sanctions and maybe war, it will be their responsibility). So, yes, Obama deserves the prize, by all means. I just hope he continues in this line and does not get intimidated or sidelined.

Miguel   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

Come on!!!
Who nominated Obama? Nominations are due on February 1st...By that time the President could not do anything to deserve it as he was in power for 11 days!!!!!!!
I ca only see this award as an incentive to the hard work he has ahead of him.
Nevertheless, is also fair to say that we have other names that also deserve this award in 2009, probably much more than Obama.

Amiad   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

if talking about peace qualifies one to win the noble peace prize, I know many people that have been talking about it for years. Obama, has done nothing to deserve this.

The Dutchman   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

I think it is right and the American House should act like it.
The world has a leader, the peolple only need to listen.
Congratulations

Donald_Keith_Davidson   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

No.

weiheng   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

for what?

giusy cardaci   October 9th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

he absolutely deserves it for his commitment in reconciliation and peace either in the u.s and outside. Even if you don't see the results now, he can do a lot for the entire world ; he has charisma, he is an example of integrity and honesty and anyone can't avoid paying attention to what he says. I wish I had a leader as Obama in my country, too. giusy Italy

Keston Wright   October 9th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

What has Mr. Obama done in his time in office that is significantly different to what past U.S. presidents have done as it relates to the peaceprocess?
Mr. Obama is a great man but this is pandering to populariyy. The Nobel Peace Prize has been devalued this year.

Michael   October 9th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

Hello!

I think it´s great that Obama won the Nobel peace price. First of all he is the first black president. he did a lot for the feeling of self-worth of the black community in the USA and worldwide. That price honors evryone that voted for Obama and who is not a citizen of the USA, likes Obama.

He is Pro reducing carbondioxyd and an environmentalist. He gives hope to the whole world.

He works on making the world free from atomic weapons.

He works on better relations between the cultures (muslim, christian and judaism)

He gives hope to the whole world for a better and more peaceful future.

On the one hand i thougt it´s to early, because he has been president for just one year. On the other hand I now think it´s a fantastic decision. It´s hard to say NO to a Nobel peace price winner if he is asking you to agree to something.

And finally I think this Nobel peace price will motivate Obama to follow his way and work harder on his own goals.

Dankeschön to the Norwegian peace price comitee for this surprisingly and perfect decision!

Greetings from Germany

P.S. Our News channels in Germany are full of coverage about this but i see only pumpkin compertitions and market news..whats wrong with you?

Sameer Khan   October 9th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

I don't think he really deserves this award as he has not really ended any major conflict nor has yet been able to take out American economy out of recession. The dollar is still losing its value.

On the other hand he promised to take out American forces from Iraq as soon as he is elected but I don't see it happening for another few years as no timetable for withdrawal is provided by his administration.

And for the case of Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands of civilians have already died. The american commander few days back said "we need more troops to finish the work in Afghanistan" by more troops he meant atleast 40,000 more.

Now some Americans are saying that we fighting an unending war. And above all the government is also thinking of starting a conflict in Iran.

So now you tell me does he really deserve "The Nobel Prize for PEACE "? Does he really understands the meaning of PEACE ?

I think he should visit countries where there is a presence of American forces, and where they claim to go for establishing peace & democracy and ask the civilians there what the word PEACE meant for them. And if THEY say that Obama has really brought in peace for them, then this Peace Prize has got some value.

Otherwise giving speeches on stage in front of TV cameras & innocent Americans, with a lot of promises embedded in them is very easy but to really bring them in their lives is what they are waiting still for.

Kiran Jeevan   October 9th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

Well this is too early for Obama to get the Noble Peace Prize.....of course he is doing a great job and he has indeed making a bog change, this award came toooo early.

Ryan the Palestinian   October 9th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

There is no denying Obama has put tremendous effort and has the will to do alot for peace around the world, however, should that be enough to win the most prestigious and honourable award in the world? By awarding Obama the peace prize, the committee seems to have lowered its standards on who can get the award. I think there were others that were alot more deserving of the award this year. Perhaps the committee should have waited a few years to see concrete results from Obamas visions before handing him such an award. On another note, considering the nominees were picked as early as february,my question is who at that time felt Obama deserving of the price as to nominate him so early in his presidency?

Oh well, congratulations Obama. I hope you make the most of it and bring peace to the Middle East. The guy before you didn't do a good job on the matter.

Wil Maui   October 9th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

I do not think so. I cannot see anything different or significant change from where I am from and looking at the whole world. A little more time will tell.

Allison   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

I do think Mr. Obama deserved to win the Nobel Peach Prize...since before he started in Office he has worked diligently to foster and engage in peace talks around the world...it is one of his main concerns and I can tell he does it from the HEART. Mr. Obama has also changed the image of our dear country, the USA; and continues to encourage other nations that peaceful communications and engagements are the way to go. We as a global environment have suffered enough because of decades of war and antagonism. I am very proud of our President...he truly embodies a global, responsible icon and I thank him for continuing the conversation of PEACE so that my children and grandchildren will have a better tomorrow and Earth!

Regards,

Allison J.

ANorwegian   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

If Obama was a chef & Nobel Peace Prize was Bocuse d'or he would have won the competition with promises (of a menu), but no food.

John   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

What??? He's not done a thing except apologize for America. I don't see that this promotes peace.

Will   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

Remove the political position from the equation and examine the evidence for granting this award? The integrity and validity of this award is in question.

I would suggest that previous recipients deserve an apology for calling into question their true merits.

Shannon   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

I was surprised, but after reading the decision I agree. Obama instilled hope in a lot of people when it absolutely seemed like a hopeless time.

Aftab Khan, Quetta Pakistan   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

This is so Funny What obama did in 10 months are just some sweet speaches nothing more . but any way i am not surprised that he was awarded because we know very well that few year ago one bangladish banker Mohammad younis won this nobel price for peace but He did nothing for peace he was Ecnomist and he did banking help to people.

Who knows next year this blind Nobel prices selecter will select Bush for nobel price of peace or may be Osama bin Laden for peace price hahahha .

Any way i wish Barack Hussain obama Good luck and i hope what he did speak about peace and what he is awarded for he will also profe it by action .

Aftab Khan Quetta pakistan.

Aeges   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

This is a shocker!

Obama is yet to fulfill his promises to America and he is already being lauded by the world and for WHAT? this is ridiculous. I like Obama but i think this award is premature and there are others who are more deserving than Obama. Even Bill Clinton did more to help resolve the Middle East crisis but he was never rewarded and ofcourse he blew it with that Monica Lewinsky episode. Obama has only been in the office for 10 months and has no significant achievment. He should turn down this award and instead work on his promises. Giving him this award is like extending his already extended HONEYMOON.

I think this award does more damage to his reputation. He portrayed himself as a super achiever during the election campaign and is yet to live up to that name. He needs to do more clearly.

Match   October 9th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

I'm for peace. Where's my award? I could use the cash right now.

AliensAlice   October 9th, 2009 1:07 pm ET

I am sorry, but you cannot compare Obama to the likes of Pope John Paul II, Mother Theresa, or Nelson Mandela. He did NOT deserve this award. It has made a joke out of something that was once very highly respected.

Merilyn Jackson   October 9th, 2009 1:07 pm ET

Congratulations Mr. President! Accept it with humility and go on doing what you are doing Mr. President.

He absolutely deserves this honor and as Americans we should all be proud.

Abhijit Mitra   October 9th, 2009 1:07 pm ET

Nobel Prize for Lifetime non achievement! looks like the norwegian nobel prize committee either got bribed – or got affected by southern neighbour holland's unrestricted drug use policy. What's beyond doubt is that they weren't in their right state of mind. This clown wouldn't know "HUMILITY" if it hit him in his face .... that condescending sneer on his face attributing false greatness and gravitas to every meaningless word he utters ... designed to warm the cockles of every new age european left wing guy type. Good for them cuz this will be the greatest achievemnet of his so far dismal, underperforming, zero achievement presidency. Irony is that this comes on the back of SNL's parody of him that hit the nail on its head! But congrats to the both Obama and the Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee for phenomenal incompetence! If the committee had any shame they would have comitted collective Hara Kiri – Must be the norwegian winter that froze out their brains

RAMAN KRISHNAN   October 9th, 2009 1:08 pm ET

The short answer is 'Yes'. You forget that Obama is trying to right what was done wrongly in all those Bush years. Obama's job as the world's most influential country's leader is to lead the way towards world peace and he is doing it. Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan were not his doing. Yes he is leading the war there but on what purpose ? To give the peace-loving and peace wanting people of those countries a chance to beat back the extremist and terrorist elements which includes Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Peace wouldn't break out if you do the Dalai Lama or the Gandhi. Sometimes you need boots on the ground to help it along. He also scrapped the ridiculous missile plan for Czechoslovakia and made peace with Russia. He is giving Iran another chance at a peaceful resolution of the nuclear problem. He is working hard to make the Palestinians and the Israelis to sit and talk. He is trying to close Guantanamo. What ? You think all these problems will go away with a swish of a wizard's wand ? No. Obama and other leaders can only show the way to peace. It is the people of these countries that should and can do the actual realization of peace. Give him a break will you ? Plus nobody seems to know that the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded not only to people who had changed the world for the better but to give people who are trying hard to change the world a big boost.
And to all those shallow negative comments on Obama winning the Nobel Prize being highlighted on your channel and the smug smirks on people like Jonathan Mann who think they can do better than the Nobel committee – give Obama a chance. Give Peace a chance.

Makabongwe   October 9th, 2009 1:08 pm ET

OK then if President Obama doesn't get it then who will?

No other single person is fighting for piece and unity then President Obama.

Will done Mr Obama, wish you all the best.

Rebel44   October 9th, 2009 1:08 pm ET

WTH did he do to get it? He dint do anything. I wouldnt mind for him to get it for something significant (solving Israel-Arab conflict or something similar) but ATM there is lots of people who deserve it much more than BO.

Sharon D   October 9th, 2009 1:08 pm ET

YES! I wish his grandmother were alive to see it!

Richard   October 9th, 2009 1:08 pm ET

He deserves it ABSOLUTELY, since he is in Office I am again proud to be an American.
Just don't let the lobbies block him in the long awaited reforms that this country needs.
Specially don't let the lobbies block him for imposing a just peace in the Middle East .

David G. Sharma   October 9th, 2009 1:08 pm ET

Future will tell

Mahkno   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

The Peace Prize should be given based on a results. While I think Obama is on the correct course, but the seeds being sown have yet to ripen.

The Nobel committee came to their decision on February 1st, 2009. Obama had only been in office a couple weeks.

I think this will potentially hurt Obama in the long run versus the GOP. It is a sort of jumping the shark on Obama mania. They will pounce on it, especially if no results are forthcoming before 2012.

Brian Shore   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

No! What Did President Obama do to earn that reward? He turned to the Arab nations and apologized to them for The United States of America be so great! Others in recent years who have received it have put their own careers and even lives of the county they served. Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres both had been threatened by those same Arab Nations with death and annihilation to Israel on a daily basis. They went and signed a pact to end the ages old conflict between The Arab nations and Israel, and I ask you again what did Obama do to deserve this prize.

Topcat   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

This proves that like the UN the Nobel Committee is a F-A-R-C-E. How shallow, we should use the dynamite to blow them up.

Ahsan-ul Morshed   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

Wow!!! I am extremely happy to hear this news . I was thinking that he will get it one day but I was not so sure of this year. My best wishes to Obama for his vision of future world.

Norman Harris   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

Thus far, as president Obama has not accomplished a single thing, other than run down America repeatedly and destroying the American economy! No the man does not deserve any award. Shows just how nuts this world has become!

Tony D   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

Absolutely ridiculous! But given who Obama is, he needs the pats on the back and the celebration from people around him. Like a little boy that constantly needs encouragement. I must say, for the first time in my life I'm actually embarrassed by our president.

Marian Atkinson   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

I think it is wonderful that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. This will provide added attention to his efforts towards peace , detente, and the elimination of nuclear proliferation, and eventually nuclear disarmament by all countries.

Edward   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

The answer is no

Don   October 9th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

The Chairman of the Noble Committee stated "His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population," confirming that this is just a popularity contest. Could somebody please remind me what exactly he has accomplished? As a friend of mine said, they should just call it what it is – the "Prize For Not Being George W. Bush".

Nan   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

Absolutely not! He has not brought about world piece nor focused on the issues at home.

Josh   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

How can anyone be rewarded for doing nothing?

Jasso   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

The Commander in chief of an army fighting two or more wars deserves the Peace Nobel Prize?
Hell, no.

Håkan   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

I think it's great! Obama have given the world a new hope. Sure he have not proven himself yet. But this could hopefully make it easier for him. Håkan from Sweden

Frank   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

Of Course President Obama should receive the Nobel Prize, He actually has done things to make the world a better place reaching out to people the past administration would never do, he is such a humble president, I feel that he does his work from the heart. Long Live President Obama :)

r.bell   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

I am thrilled that the Nobel committee selected our president to receive the highest of honors. One may question Obama's direction with our country but I have no doubt of his sincerity in attempting to open new horizons in diplomacy. The old confrontational ways simply did not and will not succeed. Now, If he will just get us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, and Germany, maybe we can fix some domestic issues.

Michael   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

It´s not for what he has done..it´s for what he will do and for what he stands.

He is a unique SYMBOL for a better future!

muhammad yusoph b. ramos   October 9th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

President Obama deserves that award.

100% he made a full intention to bring peoples together, and He is indeed doing all he can to accomplish that intention. With him the world has been inspired, with him i found hope to strive for change.

Observing the Americans, some of them are so antagonist to their own President. Americans should be proud, should celebrate that the HEAD of their country had been labeled with a NOBLE PEACE AWARD.

Congratulations President Obama.
Let us make Change happen...

Vache Kahramanian   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

A man who does not keep his promises should not be awarded such a prize. Recognise the Armenian Genocide as you promised Mr President!

Sam Mckinely   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

Obama has given eveyrone hope, & i'm a supporter of the guy, but this is really premature. 9 months into his term he gets this????

Deeds speak louder than words, so the prize should go to people who have done something, not talk about things they want to do. As much as i am of a supporter of Obama, he has'nt done anything significant to deserve this yet. Its really a shock and makes a bit of a joke of the NPP.

adam   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

No: what has he done to deserve it? Words are one thing. Actions are another. And positive results would only decide the matter. History will be the judge. Not the Nobel committee which just made a complete farce of the prize.

ROLAND KUBLER   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

NO – NO-NO.
But I really like Mr Obama, but nothing is achieved by him yet.
He did not deserve to be nominated...........he might one day in the future ??????????
Its too early to make this judgement now.

roy ray   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

Wilson, Carter, Gore, now this clown....what a joke this group is.

Nico   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

Embarrassing to be norwgian now!

Girmay mesfin   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

To all pease lover !Remember that the world has been in a pretty dangerous phase,
And anybody who can contribute to getting the world out of this situation deserves a Nobel Peace Prize."
the decision to honor Obama was unanimous.
Obama's award shows great things are expected from him in coming years.
"It's an award coming near the beginning of the first term of office of a relatively young president that anticipates an even greater contribution towards making our world a safer place for all, "It is an award that speaks to the promise of President Obama's message of hope."
"The exciting and important thing about this prize is that it's given to someone ... who has the power to contribute to peace," Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg

Former Peace Prize winner Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, said Obama has already provided outstanding leadership in the effort to prevent nuclear proliferation.

"In less than a year in office, he has transformed the way we look at ourselves and the world we live in and rekindled hope for a world at peace with itself," ElBaradei said. "He has shown an unshakeable commitment to diplomacy, mutual respect and dialogue as the best means of resolving conflicts."

The Nelson Mandela Foundation welcomed the award on behalf of its founder Nelson Mandela, who shared the 1993 Peace Prize with then-South African President F.W. DeKlerk for their efforts at ending years of apartheid and laying the groundwork for a democratic country.

"We trust that this award will strengthen his commitment, as the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, to continue promoting peace and the eradication of poverty," the foundation said. Obama attempt to change U.S. political direction and renew diplomatic engagement to the world! YES he did he is extraordinary world needs people like Obama!
MR. OBAMA ......SO HE DESERVE THENOBEL PRICE ! Congratulations to the US for having chosen a visionary President – Congratulations to the Obam ! Thanks for The Norwegian Nobel Committee... beautiful and wonderful observation!
God bless him!

Jacopo   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

I think there is a profound conflict of interests in awarding the peace Nobel prize to an acting head of state (and commander in chief of an army).
There is a real risk that the credibility of this prize will be significantly diminished if Obama, acting as president of the US, will take actions (however legitimately) which is contradictory with the spirit of this award.

Abhay Ashtekar   October 9th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

I was very surprised at first but a few minutes of reflection made it abundantly clear to me that Obama richly deserves the prize. ;e has given hope to millions across the world that peaceful solutions to complex problems are possible; that the world could be free of all nuclear weapons, that trust and diplomacy can be mightier than missiles and bombs; and, that the planet as a whole has to care for its environment. Reshaping the overall attitude and mindset world-wide is an enormously difficult but noble task. It takes great political courage and inner strength to undertake it. Obama has both.
I applaud the Nobel peace committee for its decision.

Jens from Germany   October 9th, 2009 1:12 pm ET

The Nobel Committee gave Obama the prize for his approach of world wide shared values in politics, not his merits.

When Al Gore got his prize, the Nobel Committee gave it also to a green organisation. The Man as the Face and the Organisation as the worldwide Movement.

Here we have only the Man, the Face, but no Movement. It is maybe the hint, that we need a worldwide organisation symbolising a Movement, which propagates a similar approach of shard values.

Unfortuantly the UNO is not this Movement.

Marianne   October 9th, 2009 1:12 pm ET

According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Obama has encouraged and started dialogue between east and west, and works for nuclear disarmament in the UN. The peace prize will be an encouragement and an obligation for further work for world peace.

Sani Jabsheh   October 9th, 2009 1:12 pm ET

That was the last person I expected to win. I voted for Obama, but in the recent month, I am starting to think he is nothing more than pretty speeches. He is quiclky loosing respect around the World as he has not acheived anything yet, and his famous backdown infront of Netanyaho on freezing settlements and the arm twisting the Palestinians on the Goldstone report. You reward people after they have achieved their goals, and not based on their potential. It is really sad, there were much more deserving people.

Michael Onyango   October 9th, 2009 1:12 pm ET

Without mincing my words...No he doesn't! But all the same, this is just a good example to depict the fact that Image triumphs over Logic! Clearly Obama has the global image...I just wonder if the committee even tried to apply logic to this controversial pick!

Arnold   October 9th, 2009 1:12 pm ET

Yes,he deserves.He is directing the world to a soft system approach to issues that affect us.
Well done Mr. President.

Ruth weder   October 9th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

I am very happy to hear that Mr. Obama was selected for the Noble Prize.

HE DESERVED IT INDEED.

Bell   October 9th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

The Nobel price is clearly also a stimulus package, and therefor easy to agree on:

Nobody with a clear conscience of world policy wants to see the raised expectations to see watered down.

Long live the United States of America
Long live Nobel price recipient President Barack Obama

agata   October 9th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

absolutely not! He does not deserved such a briliant prize. There were many people who did more important things than he. Obama only talks but does nothing....

james langenberg   October 9th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

A ridiculous question...of course not. A president in office for eight months hardly has a body of work. This is an embarrassment to President Obama I am sure.

moiz vahgjipurwala   October 9th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

No he doesnt deserve the award at all.....i think it will hurt him unless he declines to accept the award.....

This is an insult to all previous deserving winners of the award and to the Great Father of Peace and Non Violence- Mahatma Gandhi. I dont think i will ever trust or respect the Nobel prize ever again!!!

Steve   October 9th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

How ridiculous. The Commander in Chief of invading forces in two major conflicts wins a peace prize? The President of a country that makes land mines and nuclear weapons wins a peace prize? They must be kidding.

I looked forward to the day when he deserves it by stopping these things. Perhaps in 2014 but certainly not now.

akhil sharma   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

He is trying is best bring usa back to world ,but i dont now if his country realy care about mixing up with the world.

James Dennis   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

YES, President Obama deserves nothing less than the Nobel Prize.

david   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

No ,No, No

Danilo R.   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

This is a joke. It's like giving an Academy award to a movie in pre-production.
The Obama show is making the USA look ridiculous. What a shame.

Iyiola Yinka - Nigeria   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

The peace award to President Obama is quite stunnig. There is no doubt that he longs for peace internationally but most of his efforts are yet to yeild positive results.

This award would have been applauded, say 4 years to this time, when he had actually contributed to international peace.

Award given on potentials and hope building is not realistic. The judges should be more careful and objective in their selection in the future.

Knut   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

Well deserved for creating a new and more optimistic tone in the world, and an America we can believe in again as a force for peace and progress

Brian C.   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

I think Obama won for not being George Bush. I'm not George Bush either, why didn't I win?

I expect that even Barack Obama is a bit confused at the moment. I really hope that one day he will completely deserve it and he won't win it again because he already has one.

Elizabeth Browne   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

President Obama is a clever, decent man who really deserves to win. After all the negativity regarding his health care plan, you can't help but admire this man. It's hard to believe some of the horrible things that have been written about him and his family and shame on you CNN for asking such a ridiculous question!

Christopher Allen   October 9th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

At least receiving the prize will cut President Obama's work out for him. He sincerely hope he lives up to the sense of hope he has instilled in hearts around the world. Yes, I believe he will earn the prize...in time.

Bakari   October 9th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

It is difficult to tell if Obama deserve this award as it too ealry for peope to justify. But make no mistake! time will tell.

Hold on! How come Obama was inaugurated on January 20 and then applied for this award without any proven foundation for his diplomacy.

Ibrahim Farah   October 9th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

President Obama certainly deserve to win the Noble Prize because of his efforts especially and lately in the Middle East to prevent a deadly conflict between Iran and Israel. He also has an astonishing personality since he doesn't stop on formalities and superficiel issue and he took the inititative to shake his rivals hand.

Jill   October 9th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

No. This isn't a plus for Obama nor for his efforts to broker peace. Obama is terrific, but he's not Mother Teresa or Jimmy Carter – yet.

Ayoo Omondi Meck   October 9th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

That's a notable achievement.Bravo!

kristoffer bakke   October 9th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

Tthis award is given to Obama, the the most powerful person in the world, as a challenge. The commitee says "you talk the talk, now show us you can walk the walk!" Will it work? we will have to wait and see.

nyash   October 9th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

These past few week various Nobel prizes have been awarded in various fields and in all of them the winners had made achievements of note in their fields. If the potential achievements of an individual were to be awarded in each of those fields, then some of the awards may be given to people with ideas that seem to be out of this world now and that have not been reviewed by their peers. I wonder what the current peers of President Obama would say if they were asked off the record their opinion of the award is.

Christopher Allen   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

At least receiving the prize will cut President Obama’s work out for him. I sincerely hope he lives up to the sense of hope he has instilled in hearts around the world. Yes, I believe he will earn the prize…in time.

virgo bon cruz   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

By prematurely awarding the Nobel Prize to a President who still has to find his way and fulfill his campaign promises, the Nobel committee clearly is trying to help Obama make up his mind on whether to ratchet up America's involvement in Afghanistan or gradually tone it down. Just like the Miss Universe contest the Nobel Prize deliberations have been politicized.

lambergh   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

Something is still missing, it is too early. What has he done that the previous President has not? What significant value did he add?

ravi shankar   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

Yah, since he is the president of America.

Qasim   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

He deserve to receive the prize for allowing bombing in Pakistan , Afghanistan and Iraq, allowing killing of hundreds and thousands of people and mr bin ladin and other are still at large enjoying support and love of americian cia and finding means and ways to kill civilians and bringing anarchy to iraq and afghanistan and now planning anarchy in pakistan.
but still good work for the americians in proving cheap and continued supply of oil.

Athanasios   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

To the critics of the choice: No other individual of good will–which Obama certainly has–has the power to influence the world on such an internationally wide scope. View the award as the spring board for things to come by a great humantarian..

sarosh ahmed   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

I wouldn't say he didn't deserve it but definitely it was a little too soon. But you never know now he would be more eager and ambitious to fullfil what he had promised during his campaign. Congratulations Mr.Obama , and this one comes from a Pakistani.

Jil   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

YES

Andres   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

It is still to be seen!!!! It's a surprise... Defend Honduras, before Chavez gets hold of it!!!!!!!

Andrew Buttress   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

No. President Obama appears set to escalate his country's military involvement in Afghanistan and its trrops are still fighting in Iraq. America is also in conflict with Iran and North Korea over nuclear weapons proliferation. Once these wars and problems are resolved he might well be a worthy winner. It is too early to judge his role as peacemaker.

Charles Linden   October 9th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

I seem to remember Arafat received the Nobel prize too, er, does the word "SHAM" come to mind? And what will happen when Obama´s fett are put into the fire? What will he be doing in three years?
Congratulations, but I hope you prove you deserve it!

Deniz   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

The question is very silly. Of course he deserved to win the nobel peace prize. Nobody else derservs the prize at the moment but President Obama.
Obama has given the lost hope to billions of people around the world to live in peace .
I have a bad feeling that some people have been trying to cast doubts on Obama's efforts for a better America and a better world .
Nobody can change this "ugly" world in a few months but Obama has a vision how our world has to look like.

gila   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

Congratulations Mr.President.You deserve this and even More.May God bless you and your family abundantly.You are in our prayers

Salman   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

This is not just ironic but comic as well. Obama is being given peace prize when he is the one who has been supporting Israel against Palestanians. He is being awarded for murders of so many afghan and Pakistani muslims. He is being awarded for suporting repressive govts and thug kings/presidents in muslim countries, especially Saudi, Pakistan, Afghanistan etc, just to push US agenda.

So NO he shouldn't have been awarded this prize but then who am I to say that, it is awarded by vested nterests to vested intrests.

R.S.H. von Styggenein   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

NO he does not!

Aqil Ahmed   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

WOW!!!!Whats happening to the committee... it ruins their credibility and the whole Nobel institution.....Obama has brought change but nothing that deserving a prize like the peace prize….a shocker….

Isaac Singh   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

Yes He does! He is our only hope ! He has made a start ! Allow him to complete the job! He is just an another american who is saying " I have a dream! " A safer nuclear free world. He deserves all the support and encouragement that the whole world can give !
GO Obama Go!
God Bless You !

Ali   October 9th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

If you have the power then you can do what you want to ........................BUSH Proved it.

BUSH lead a nation to influsence other nations to stand at war against each other....

OBAMA had the same powers and abaility to use in the same way but avoided that option to every extent possible.

Even getting US Adminstration against him.

Obama is good but still its too early to Judge his intentions and caliber

Dr.Gerd Schmidt, Frankfurt, Germany   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Great choice!

We all need hope that we will be able to deal responsibly with the challenges ahead of us.President Obama is our new symbol for this kind of reassurance.
To live up to this challenge- he needs all the help he can get- also a well deserved Nobel Peace Prize- even ahead of time.

john   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Well, let's see. President Obama insisted that the Isralies must stop building the settlements, and they told me to go stuff it. He caught Iran making secret nuclear processings sites, and told them if they don't stop that he will hit them with sanctions like they have never seen, he can't close Gitmo, is losing in Afganistan, and his best answer to a peson who totally insulted a law officer for no good reason was to support the person and then invite everybody to the White House for a beer.
Boy, if this guy doesn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize then who does?

Peter Nwokolo   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Obama more than deserved the Nobel peace price. Perhaps, Americans do not quite appreciate the level of damage that the Bush era had done to the image of America as a country that the whole world looks up to.

The emergence of the Obama administration was the tonic needed to change the perception of many, who saw America as a bully nation under the Bush era.

The Nobel peace price will certainly propel the Obama administration to pursue an agender that will engender peaceful co-existence among nations and will make America the once big brother that we grew up to know. It is indeed a price for the whole nation of America.

Vips   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

For what???? Useless selection....

ANGELA PARDO   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Obama deserves have won that and others prizes, because the answer is obvios, he is the best!!!!!!!!

winberg   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Its a joke!, what was they thinking at the Nobel committee?, i would not dare to look the king in the eye when i taking the price from the king, will Obama?, what have Obama done so far, just talk!?.

The authority/prestige of the Nobels peaceprice is gone now.

Winberg -Sweden

SuperRog   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

I was a little surprised that he got it, but I feel that the committee knows he is going in the right direction with diplomatic resolutions to global unrest and this award was to encourage further efforts to resolve the conflicts in the Middle-East and bring nations together for working together.

Sugestiv1   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Yes, Obama defintely deserved the prize!! He brought a new model in international relations and a new hope for the future. Congratulations!

Greg   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

What did he do? I guess it doesn't matter, in a few years no one will be able to find any record of it anyway!

Rizwan   October 9th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

To early to suggest a world recognition. I don't see any thing change since he is at office except he tour World to give speeches on Peace. If they think that Iran has allowed Nuclear sites visit b/c of Obama peace effort then I think it is a mistake. It is very very clear that going for war into Iran will be a big disaster for USA and Israel.

I don't know Americans are gaining respect or not but definitely not in Pakistan or Afghanistan or Iran or China. Only money has respect.

zsu   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

yes.

Ernesto Castellanos   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

I think he does deserve it. In a world surrounded by opportunities for conflict, and with options to follow up on a international policy created by his predecessor, the president of the most powerful country in the world chose to shift away from that.

jean-noel   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

yes, President Obama is an excellent choice.
The peace nobel price will greatly strengthen his hands as he enters difficult negotiations that are critical for the world peace: Iran, Israel and Palestine, Afghanistan in particular.
His moral standing is now greater than ever.

EDWIN SIMULILIKA   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

Yes the man deserves it. He's preached dialogue daily just like the preacher in does every sabath. He is hard working and he needs every one to help him complete the job.

Trond   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

OBAMA – YES U CAN!!!

Excellent choice – and excellent timing! (Took me by surprise, even being a Norwegian)

Obama is a WORLD LEADER. Many sees to him, listens too him and he will make people join forces, rather that work against each other.

A lot of people will say that this was too early I think it is excellent that he already now is acknowledged for his efforts and visions. Hopefully it will ensure his path forward, and make him committed, motivating him and remimber him that he is not only a US. leader but a WORLD leader.

For the US critics: See this to the benefits for your country. Not only do you have an inspirational leader willing to make a change, BUT you have a leader who will (inspite of the economic state of your country) make sure that you still will be listened to abroad. If you had 4 more years like the previous governing under Bush I am uncertain how your standing internationally would have been

Marc   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

I admire President Obama. But awarding him the Nobel prize, for such a vastly political figure (job), is denying the intend for which the Nobel prize
was invented.
The intention was to point to the spotlight, to nearly unknown people and
their efforts to make peace in several situation.
In effect, this award reduces the moral impact in the world, of the
meaning of the Nobel peace prize, and it is a typical result of an overwhelming media-regulated-world.

Marc

Drew   October 9th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

Suraj – not likely it's a nordic conspiracy to make him feel better after losing the attempt to get the Olympics for Chicago.

Whatever international reasons they cite for his win, he really deserves the prize for winning the US Presidency. That in itself is a major breakthrough for peace. All the racist vitriol that's been thrown at him by certain segments of the right is nothing but proof of that.

Kristjan Fridjonsson   October 9th, 2009 1:20 pm ET

Yes, yes – he deserves it – great decision.

Victoria   October 9th, 2009 1:20 pm ET

President Obama is a great man however, this award is clearly premature and if I was in his position I would feel unfortunate receiving it.

Electra   October 9th, 2009 1:20 pm ET

He has all the best intentions to solve international problems and bring peace, but I don't think nominees of the Nobel Peace Prize should be awarded based on their intentions. I wholeheartedly support his efforts but I don't think he deserves this award right now, as he has not yet fulfilled his intentions.

Ali   October 9th, 2009 1:20 pm ET

If you have the power then you can do what you want to ........................BUSH Proved it.

BUSH led a nation to influence other nations to stand at war against each other....

OBAMA had the same powers and ability to use in the same way but avoided that option to every extent possible.

Even getting US Administration against him.

Obama is good but still it’s too early to Judge his intentions and commitment.

Carlos F. Meave   October 9th, 2009 1:20 pm ET

Yes, he deserves it.
He is the freshest blood world leadership could get after a nonsense GWB era. He has to live up to the expectations though. Shaking hands with the current devil is hard to see right now, but he can achieve it. The world needs to enter an authentic peace era -a real era- within Obama's presidency (ies). Of course, as it has always been, big guy hits first, and Obama needs to hit a grand blow sooner or later.

Fahud Mohamed   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

That’s Obama, he deserves it. Its heard to believe. But it’s the truth . . . he the only great leader who knows the peoples of the world. Not only USA

Chuck   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Who ever decided he deserved this is HIGH on something and it is not brains. Now its a big joke

Al Kellar   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Fully deserved. Listen John ...if he spends the next 8 years apologizing from US crimes it still wont be enough. Try asking the parents of Pat Tillman for example just what the GWB junta was like. If they treated a US football hero so you can imagine how the rest of the world was treated. Go on, ask if you have the gut.

Bell   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

The Nobel price is clearly also a stimulus package, and therefore easy to agree on:

Nobody with a clear conscience of world policy wants to see the raised expectations to see watered down.

Long live the United States of America!
Long live Nobel price recipient President Barack Obama!

Baja   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

The Peace Prize should be earned.

Also, let some other countries have the Olympics over the next 20 years.

svtmangalore   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Obama getting Nobel for peace is better then him getting Nobel for Economics.

João Leon   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

For the first time in many many years, America sounds like a reasanable country, with policies that make sence and the world is not afraid of some stupid decisions like George W. Bush used to take.
Yes, he deserves the price

Gastón E. Nusimovich   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

That was really an unexpected outcome, but President Obama trully deserves the award.

Congratulations Mr. President!

Jessica   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

I think this was a bit premature, especially considering that he's considering sending 40,000 more troops into Afghanistan. Overall, his one distinction as President is being logical enough to employ diplomacy first, before shooting – which is not typical of American foreign policy. He is peaceful in that he can actually articulate the need for discourse between nations, and he seems to think that every American should be healthy. So yea, for that – he does stand out. Not sure if that's Prize worthy, though. Perhaps we have set the bar so low for Americans that our first concientious leader surprised the world; so much so that he was awarded the Noble Peace Prize.

Victoria   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

President Obama is a great man however, this award is clearly premature and if I was in his position I would feel uncomfortable receiving it.

Jeff Randolph   October 9th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Re: Obama Nobel Peace Prize
For extraordinary efforts to achieve world peace?
The prize committee should have given that award to the hundreds, no, thousands of people who have actually made extraordinary, selfless, and truly sacrificial efforts toward that goal.
This further erodes the legitimacy of the Nobel Peace Prize, almost to the point of irrelevancy.

jbroski   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

When you are the Commander in Chief of a country who is at war, you refuse to meet with the Dalai Lama in favor of not wanting to upset China, you refuse to honor your commitment to closing Gitmo and you do not call out the brutal tactics used against innocent Americans at the last G 20 meeting, then you do not deserve anything that relates to an award for peace. A poor choice.

Tayo   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

The other side just sucks...They are all out to judge him in his achievement so far, even on SNL cos they felt his administration is not too young to be assessed. NOW THEY ARE SAYING IS ADMINISTRATION IS TOO YOUNG 4 HIM TO BE GIVEN A NOBEL PRIZE FOR PEACE.

This people doesnt just want this guy to be successful. No wonder their defacto president(Rush Limbaugh) wants the President of the United States to fail. Obama should better grasp this, the Republican/Conservative Party/folks will never work with him and dont wish him well.

Kelly   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

He definitely deserves a Noble Price. He is actually making decisions without any reservations. In the first place, those people who mostly helped him financially with his candidacy were artists and Oprah, not big companies with hidden agendas, so he does not need to protect any of the latter. So right now, Obama is functioning well. It is just sad that he is there to clean up the mess Bush did. He could have been more productive without this mess.

Ana Oliver   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

He has done nothing to deserve Nobel prize.
How many lives has he saved ? None.

I am democrat, but all about Obama is becaming patetic !

Aeges   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

I want one too :) Apparently the Nobel Peace prize is being awarded to just about anyone.

Anja   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

YES!
Greetings from Germany!

r.nacpil   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

yes .he"s really deserved to be a novel peace prize.he needs to change the whole world mistakes.

Kris   October 9th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

How wondrous that President Obama receives this encouragement and global affirmation to his ideals, now that the lustre has dulled from Election Day for many disgruntled Americans.

Hang in there, Mr. President! We still believe, and the world believes with you.

Jay Cee   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

Yes, his message of hope ,change and peace is resonating world wide.
Congrats, Mr. President .

Luis Chavez   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

Many will support this decision but for the wrong reasons, the Nobel is supposed to be given to someone who has made an important contribution in the field and that has a trajectory. Mr. Obama may deserve it in the future IF and only IF he became the president that many expected to become, but only time will tell.

Edward   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

If a terrorist like the late Yasser Arafat can be awarded this prize, it's irrelevant whether someone deserves it...

Carla   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

Yes! He deserves it! Now he has more than ever the obligation to create peace on earth!

George   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

Good decision. He has already transformed the global perspective of the global peace. Firstly it shows what powerful people can achieve by talking the right tones. That is solid achievement in the case of Obama because he used every platform he had to project the way to more peace. secondly it paves way for more peace than war.

Mkut   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

Too early, too hasty and just too much of nonsense – this one. Very poor choice

Michael   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

He might deserve it in a couple of years. We have to wait and see what he does and what impact it will have. Today definetely not.

May be there is no point for the question about " deserving " since it is a highly political prize as e all know. It is more a question wheather it fits to your political views or not

oscar de la fuete   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

well deserved.

janet breien   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

yes, I do think obama was the right choice. The great philosopher, Confucius once said, ¨ He who excerises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the North Polar Star, which keeps it's place and all other stars turn toward it¨. we have that star now leading the way!!

First, Obama must visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki!   October 9th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

This is one stupidity of the Nobel Prize History. The Nobel comittiees must be able to have some common sense. Or none of us would appreciate people who got the prize. Obama has not done anything concrete yet for eliminating the nuclear weapons. And they should know which country has ever used the nuclear weapons actually in our human history. He must visit Japan and make us convinced that his resolution is truely done. Show the concrete results! This decision is so stupid. Out of question!

Linda   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

have read some parts of President Obama's books and I have respect from the day he became President of US and I was very content by the decision that American people made.

The war is not over yet, and the tension Is there around us. We don't see a person who is qualified to carry the Peace Nobel Prize so neither is President Obama qualified.

The committee has made a mistake its like they didn't try to see the reality going on.

Its not a serious decision it seems like a joke .

Dr Andrew Azzopardi   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

undoubtedly.....he brings hope – he has an ideal that he managed to sell to people

joaomiguelfigueiredosilva   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

YES.

Anja   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

YES!

BMC   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

I think its way too early in the game for him to get such a big award. I would have agreed that he deserved if he was really able to reduce the nuclear war head count, not just talk about it. I am really disappointed with the committee.

Vijay Chauhan   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

I should confess that I am a little surprised that Mr. President was selected for Nobel. I am not sure if it is the right choice. I have respect for our president but it would be a good exercise to see who all where contenders for this and why our President was considered to be the right choice.
Has the Nobel prize become not so nobel anymore? No offense Mr. President, I will vote for you again next election but will hold my reservations on this award decision.

Somek (Kenya)   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

It sounds pretty early for Obama to receice such an award but I guess the Nobel Committee wanted to encourage him to strengthen peaceful world relations of which Obama truly is even before he was selected as president. Afterall by the words of the Nobel founder it should also reward someone who focusses on peace.

Obama is for peace... he derserves it

Christian   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

This would certainly, in my humble view, prove that the award allocation via the Norwegians is out dated and does not serve the needs of the legacy of Mr. Nobel. In the aftermath of this shockingly unjustful decision, the governing statues of the prize must clearly be taken into questioning, and quite possibly be changed altogether.

Cynthia Russell   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

NO HE DOESN'T DESERVE TO WIN THE PEACE PRIZE. WHAT THE HELL HAS HE DONE?

hnasen j   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

why not ? sooner or later he's bound to earn it?
just the timming was little off

donkeyandshrek   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

No disrespect, but nominations were due Feb 1. What did he do in 11 days as President. Its a joke. Lets rewared economics and medicine where we can see tangible results. We all know now, why the President delayed on sending more troops to Afghanistan – "I cant do that until I know if I won or not"...hmmm. To quote a famous literary scholar, "there is something rotten in the state of Denmark", except for its Oslo and DC this time

Peter Nwokolo   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

America is the leader of the free world and must be seen to be towing the path of peace, freedom and equality for all nations.

amit yadav meerut india   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

this guy (Mr Obama) certainly has the vision for a peacefull tomorow and also trying hard to achive it which certainly stands a better chance of being achievable after the near end of cold war. If he is able to bring together countries against islamic terrorism he certainly deserves the noble for peace. (amit yadav meerut india.)

Siva and Mohana   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

His efforts towards bringing peace among nations and a world free of nuclear weapons certainly deserves a lot of appreciation and encouragement. He has been a symbol of hope.
Although unexpected and litte early, I am sure it will encourage and inspire the President and everyone of us to work towards peace and goodwill among nations!
Congratulation Mr Barack Obama!

Ashamed   October 9th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

NO. I am another American living abroad who has heard for years the Bush haters. This prize is only given to Obama because he is not Bush. Come on. The deadline was Feb 01, 2009. BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA was in office for 2 weeks!

Alberto Sibrián   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

I really don´t believe that President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. He has been President for only 9 months! He has not been tested, his international policy has not produced any results yet. He hasn´t taken any desition regarding Afganistan. So I don´t see any achievements so far. I believe that President Obama has a great Public Relations Team that make him appear as a great person, a great leader and a great President, but so far he still has to fill those shoes. I believe Obama is a nice person, a good politian and a great dad / husband; but he has yet to show the world his credentials as a World Leader. I believe he can become one.

Sonia Martinez Ferreiro   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

If Mr. Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize? Of course he does!!! I dare to say that Mr. Obama is one of the Nobel prizewinners that carries with him not only this prestigious Prize, but also the international "consent" and contentment for it. Congratulations Mr. Obama!! America, you can be so proud...

joe black   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

in just 9 months in office, President Obama has changed the face of global diplomacy and cooperation amongst institutions and people. There is a lot to do yet....but it is well deserved.

Soon Hock Chiam   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

President Obama truly deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. He is the most outstanding leader of the world today and had made tremendous efforts to make our world a safer place to live.

Abdul Rauf Moid   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Has Obama made peace with the Taliban?

Per   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Is this a Norwegian joke? What has he done to deserve this honor??

Bhaskar Bhattacharya   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Well Obama certainly is making great efforts at making and sustaining peace.He certainly has the right ideas.But and that's a big BUT,no tangible results have yet come of his considerable efforts.And without that the Nobel certainly feels a bit hollow.I do hope he goes on to achieve something real in the coming days.

Lorrain   October 9th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Yes he does. He gives us hope for peace and he represents peace. Its on his face.

Reality check   October 9th, 2009 1:26 pm ET

The Peace Price is awarded by people who is appointed by the Norwegian government. So the peace price are all about POLITICS.

Esteban L (Dom. Republic)   October 9th, 2009 1:26 pm ET

No, I don't agree, this is a joke? I admire Obama very very much, but is way tooooo early to give him this award, wait until his work is finished and then we can all evaluate it, to me he has done anything yet to deserve this award.

I think the Nobel Prize comitte really put a number on this one!!

Osman Bangura from The Netherlands   October 9th, 2009 1:27 pm ET

Based on his approach towards global peace and environmental challenges, i strongly believ that he deserves this award. Eventhough he hasn't done tha much yet but he is a big sign of hope. He has gone to exxtreme lenghts to bring peace and make the world a safer place not just for Americans but for all of us.

May god continue to guide him towards the right path that would lead to global peace......

Peace...

Edmond   October 9th, 2009 1:27 pm ET

Yes, I think so. especially when he wasn't even expected. as an American and an Airman i'm very proud of his achievement.

Tasin J   October 9th, 2009 1:28 pm ET

Whoa...he could have as well gotten one for pioneering work in physics...
wat a shame...

Niall Firinne   October 9th, 2009 1:28 pm ET

As Obama has pursued the same general course and policies of GWB, does that mean GWB was in the running. Really what has he done and achieved? He even finds the thorny issue of Guantanamo impossible to resolve.

Michel   October 9th, 2009 1:28 pm ET

Year after year the choice of the Peace Noble Price winner is getting more and more lousy. How can it be possible to attribute a price to hot air, simple promises? Not one result has been achieved yet. Is that the end of the Nobel Price?

Johan Andersson   October 9th, 2009 1:28 pm ET

Do not deserve. Prize should be for achieved results, not intensions. Then he should get also award for finance crisis. Too much, too early.

kazeem   October 9th, 2009 1:28 pm ET

What we not forget is that the price, just like its winner is a symbol. In this case, a symbol of peace. President Obama is a world wide recognised icon of Inspiration, Hope and Peace.

He deserves the award. His policies have been geared towards getting conflicting parties to discussion tables around the world.

They couldnt have taken a better decision. Lets learn to celebrate people when they are in their prime and not they can impact positively anymore....

Nathan Ramos   October 9th, 2009 1:28 pm ET

NO..Pres. Obama does'nt deserve it..At this early stage of his presidency there's still a lot of problem he needs to resolve..firstly is the US recession..

Daiva   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Yes I do agree.... he is a visionary leader.

Congrats Mr President

williams   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Yes he deserved the honour, you should know that right from his campaign, he gave hope to the hopeless people, he speak for every one. When he became president he continue preaching for peace on earth. He speak the truth and appologies where he needs to. He accept his mistakes and America mistakes in the world and promise not to repeat it again, he made the youth to stood up and work harder, he call all other nation friends and allies and not seeing them as kid brothers. He is working with world and he paid America fees owned to United Nation and speak for the world free of nuclear and also he speak for world green energy, which other person has done this in our life time. Thus congratulation mr president, you made us all proud and as a black man in Netherland, i can lift my head up with smile on my face. That i live to see these happening.

annie   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Yes l do he deserves it.
Go man!

global citizen   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Too much Too soon...... Obama has not yet achieved any peace in any part of the world, he is not a deserving candidate. I think the commitee that decides the nobel peace prize should stop making decisions based on media hype and biased opinions and judge people on their actions.

R4   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

YES !!!

Zoe Khan   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

I am a big fan of President Obama but he didnt deserve to win The Nobel Peace Prize. There are are other indfividuals wjho have served their whole lives in order to get rid of hatred amongst humanity and have done so much not only for their countries but for the cause of humanity too. Think the prize is before its time.

Reed Altman   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

While I respent him as a person and as the Commander in Chief, he is no way deserves the Nobel Prize. A plethera of leaders have been charismatic and done MUCH more for their countries than Obama has done within this one year. In no way, shape or form are these ridiculous bailouts or this healthcare plan worthy of getting him even nominated. This award disgraces and slanders all past winners of the Nobel Prize, and it further disgraces the idea of the Nobel Prize. If there was no one in the ENTIRE world more worthy of this than Obama, than this world has become a pitiful place indeed.

Bob   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

He has accomplished absolutely nothing and the award is poltical. How much can the award mean if Yassir Arafat won it.

George   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Good decision. He has already transformed the global perspective of the global peace. Firstly it shows what powerful people can achieve by talking the right tones. That is solid achievement in the case of Obama because he used every platform he had to project the way to more peace. Moreover, being the architect of Iraq pull back, he had already achieved the biggest peace initiative of the last 10 years. Secondly it paves way for more peace than war.

Azra Kovacic   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Yes he diserved, he is best president, thank you Obama.
Congratulations from Sweden.

Ladi from Nigeria   October 9th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

I like Obama and all he is trying to accomplish but i struggle to justify that he deserves this. I really do not think he has done enough to win this.

Not Necessary   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

This really does discredit the entire Nobel committee. What a farce!!

Ahmed Alian   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

No, I don't think he should be a Nobel awarded, because even if his intentions to heal the world are good, it is the deeds that count. In his short office term since last January, President Obama failed on more than a level; he failed to fulfill his promises to America, such as improving the economy and closing Guantanamo, and failed as well to get out of Afghanistan, Iraq, and even to push the peace talks in the Middle East. I can recall his own words during the campaign: "Yes, We Can", but the question keeps nagging on my mind: Can what?

Jules Bisong   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

In less than a year, President Obama has proven to be peace maker, has promising goals for the future, especially a nuclear-free world, and the relaxation of tension between the Muslim and the Christian worlds. With all this, I'm comfortable enough to agree that he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.

Mahbub Manik   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

It seem too early for Obama but he is the right pick.

I think his main contribution is that he instigated a positive change in thinking about closing Iraq war, nuclear weapon, war, torture, Climate-change, mid east crisis, diplomacy, responsibility, hope, dream etc. No other US president could do that ... He has just initiated ... today the relationship between USA and outer world is better than any time in the history.
The award will also work as a booster for his commitment. He'll do more for this world.

Beauboeuf, Claude (Haiti)   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

He deserves it because of his unprecedented background, his recent electoral victory, his global stategy, his pro-multilateral and UN standing, his mixture of firmess and moderation.

Obama has presently the most critical leadership position. He is the most influential international political leader able to rallying positive energies on this planet for forging sustainable peace, reducing unacceptable exclusion, and boosting prosperity for large fractions of humankind.

Adegbite Adesegun   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

The choice of Barack Obama as the Nobel Prize winner was "a premature judgment".......I can't recall any serious"PEACE MOVE" he made after his inauguration that was LESS THAN 2 WEEKS to the nomination deadline to deserve the Prize.

I guess the committee that selected him were "lead by the nose" for his oratorical prowess....they were satisfied with the talk, rather than wait to see the walk.

I hope that the world at large is not seeing Obama as a "christ" of some sort. He is no different human than any of us.........

George   October 9th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

It's a bad-taste-joke, forget Nobel prize, OBAMA IS NOT OUR GOD !

Sanyati   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

This is probably one of the biggest problems we have in our world today. We reward mediocrity and politcal correctness.........not real achievements. Can anyone name one single thing that Obama has achieved that can merit the Nobel prize? I can name many things he would LIKE to achieve, but then all political leaders have aims & goals. Talks & wishes don't merit the Nobel prize.

Mohammed   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

""MOHAMMAD MOHAMMAD October 9th, 2009 1304 GMT

HE DEFINITELY DESERVES IT. HE IS THE BEST PEACE WORKING MAN ON EARTH IN THIS ERA.""

ARE YOU SERIOUS?? best peace woking man on earth in this ERA?? i guess you dont read alot of news.

No he does not deserve it, I would like to know what did he do? and in most of his decisions, please read the fine print.. shocked that he won to be honest, to compare him with Nelson Mandela, Al Gore, Mohamed ElBaradei and Amnesty International..Maybe if the prize came later on and we have seen actual results, I would have been more accepting and many others.

paul Kingsley   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Obama's diplomatic skills have already been described as "shock and awe"; until now I did not think they would garner the same recognition as dropping big bombs on people. The Noble committee has recognized his already significant skills, with so much hope to come.

RENATO LUTI   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Yes.
President Barak Obama deserves the Peace Nobel prize by his efforts to reduce nuclear weapons and to look for peace between jewish and arabs.

Amir   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Prize is for achievement not promise.

sadık   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

mr. president deserve everytihing.to me he is the best good heart man in the world.i love obama from kurdistan.

Najeeb S   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Obama may deserve the award but not now

SaidPeace   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Indeed, for reversing the US hot pursuit for bloody wars and repairing the American vulturous and bullish image that was ceaeted under the Bush Administration. Few months ago the US was spiralling out of control in search for touture and killings under the same slogan of war on terror regardless of moral and human considerations. America now is in honeymoon with rest of the world!

Bubb   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

I felt it is bit early for Obama to receive the prize now.
He hasn't go to do that much...has he?

Carol Herman   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Eloquent that's all he is. Fancy, empty words. Obama has done nothing to deserve this award. Shame on all those who are being duped by his rhetoric.
This choice portends of something coming and coming fast which does bode well with the word.
Noble Prize indeed... not so noble now.

Derek Quackenbush   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

NO! He has only been in office for a year, he hasn't effected change that much. Right now he is in his big talk now I have to back it up. It seems to me this year they just went after him hoping to bring attention and people to the cause. 2 years ago nobody outside of Michigan knew who Obama was now he is winning the Nobel Peace prize? Come on there are many people out there that deserve it alot more then him. Heck look at former President Clinton he has been all over the globe in the last few years trying to put out small fires and make peace work.

JR   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

He absolutely not deserve this: this cheapens the Nobel prize concept (will the Literary prize be awarded to someone who had a good idea for a book... etc?).

I add that this really places him in a difficult position: how can a Nobel prize winner decide this week to ADD to troop levels in Afghanistan? Perhaps the Nobel panel had this in mind...

chen china   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Yes, he can. He infuses new direction and new perspective to the world.

Susan Michael   October 9th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Contrary to one opinion posted above, I do not think it is too early for Obama to receive the Peace Prize. The Prize, as I understand it, is not awarded to someone who can point to specific results of his advocacy of peace. It is awarded to someone whose EFFORTS to forge peace and cooperative relations are extraordinary. Obama meets this standard and then some. The reason? He has changed the international conversation about nations working together, about nations respecting each other's point of view. He is an amazing man and deserves this award big-time.

António Mesquita Cruz   October 9th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

Congratulations to the American People.
Finely you have a gentleman and a clever politician guiding your destiny.
I think the stupidity of Talibans; Alqaeda and for instance Amadinedjad is losing the motives of is existence.
God bless the entire world, we are only one people, the globalisation is the future.

Noureddine   October 9th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

No,

Too early in my opinion. This is not a litterature prize. It should reward acts for peace and not words.

waiting to see what kind do for israel and palestine

Sara Delgado Silva   October 9th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

I don't think that he should have even be a candidate to this prize, because he didn't do anything relevant for the world peace. Not yet, anyway. Some pleople consider this to be an encouragement. If that's the case, I'm astonished for the Nobel Academy's criteria. Give Obama time. And...was there a lack of candidates...?

Shashank   October 9th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

As one of my german friend reacted, "All he has done to date is that he has showed that he is not going to do what Bush did"! Does that deserve a nobel?

Pedro Borges, Portugal   October 9th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

YES

Well is it to early? Maybe and i do agree that there is alot do be done

So why YES?

Because

Yes we can ... believe in better times for future
Yes we can ... hope for a better world
Yes we can ... trust an American President after 8 years
Yes we can

Prof Dr Leonard Amaral   October 9th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

For the first time since the fall of the Berlin Wall, there is hope in Europe that there is an alternative to hostility. And that alternative is President Obama. The negative comments concerning the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Mr. Obama is but a whisper in comparison to how well this award has been received world-wide. America is, for the first itme, on a moral journey to lead the world free from nuclear threat. And this journey has been chartered by a single man whose vision of the world as it should be and not as it is, may perhaps most accurately reflect the teachings of Jesus. And it is most shameful to know that in my own country, the USA, it will be those who consider themselves to be the holiest of christians, the christian right, who will be most aggravated by the award bestowed to Mr. Obama.

Patrick W.   October 9th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

He does not deserve it. Not at this moment. What has he done so far? The Nobel for Peace achievement is a prize for your past work in promoting peace. Obama sure has the future to prove that, but has done nothing yet in his past to win it. I want to see the Nobel committee's face when Obama orders the increase the number of US troops in Afghanistan.

Jean M. Nehm´e   October 9th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

Sorry, no! At least, not yet. He should be awarded N-P. only based on
his accomplishment, & not his promises/wishes. Some people are
using him in the very same way "Arafat/Peréz & Co." so to force & so in-
fluence them to, against their will, to accept a dictated Peacesolution
to their M-E.problem. Mr. Obama needs at least one term so to be judged by his deeds. Therefore, I´m against today´s decision.

JMNehmé

blog.urbanaut.org   October 9th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

Wow!

And greets to everybody who says it's to early. Grand things can be done in short times. And in the poisend athmosphere in the US it is such a grand symbol. Words and speeches do matter! Change is possible. A better world is possible if we want it!

This prize goes not to the American President it goes to the American people for having the strength to change course in such a dramatic way. I'm just simply exited!

Give peace a chance! ;-)

Vinayak   October 9th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

Nobel will loose its shine if it gives away prizes like this.
Mahatma Gandhi.. who worked for getting freedom for India from the British through peace and non violence for almost 2 decades was never considered for this prize, where as Obama who has been on the forefront with war every where is given the prize.

Unfortunately Nobel committee will leave millions disappointed and lose its importance.

Amal Al-Binali   October 9th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

I like Obama. However I believe its too early for him to win the Peace Noble Prize. The world is still the same people are dying in Iraq, in Palesine, in Israel etc...

surya   October 9th, 2009 1:34 pm ET

I lost faith on Nobel prize

Derek   October 9th, 2009 1:34 pm ET

Wow, it's interesting that someone can win the Nobel Prize for not being George Bush.

Ron   October 9th, 2009 1:34 pm ET

YES

Stevie Dawson   October 9th, 2009 1:34 pm ET

Gordon Brown deserves it more. He doesn't get the credit he deserves. Obama is doing a good job though but I think we should actually see results before giving someone this kind of award.

hj   October 9th, 2009 1:34 pm ET

No,

This U.S. president has done nothinf except parade about. he has not helped the U.s. let alone the world. As of today he has not helped the U.S. except help himself and his cronies.

I feel that instead of sending a committee to obtain a worthless prize, Obama should be taking care of the business at hand. Trying to fix our some what broken system.

Nunajer   October 9th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

...awarded for what? sending more troops to Afghanistan? for refusing to meet with the Dalai Lama in favor to red China?

Sarah   October 9th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

Though I am a huge Obama fan and have no doubt that he will keep his promise to the U.S, I think it was too early for him to receive this award.

Would have been nice had it been a few years from now, when more results would be visible, It's difficult to get excited about something peace related, when we're all still a work in progress. The result is not there yet or close to it, but will eventually.

Just my own personal thought.

Dr. Joseph Southern   October 9th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

President Obama in my opinion absolutely deserved to receive the Nobel Peace Prize without question. For those who don't understand or refuse to accept this fact have not lived through the agony that I have of serving as a US Marine officer both in the United States and Vietnam and experiencing the racial discord in the Marine Corps. To this day I still remember what a newly arrived Black Marine said to me. "Sir the only reason I was drafted into the Marine Corps and sent to Vietnam is because I am Black" I simply told him what he said was probably true, but while you are here you may as well make the most of it. He did, he was a fine Marine. He was bitter for leaving behind his wife and his baby girl, but in the end he was a fine Marine. President is bringing the Nation together, and when he was elected, to me the agony was over.

Cecilia Crawford   October 9th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

NO WAY... What a joke this ranks right up with this health care program that will cost middle class and seniors citizens more than anyone. I will not vote again for this man . People work for years to win the Noble Peace Prize not some man that can not keep one promise he has made. wins that is a joke by itself. This is a joke to most Americans, but than again CNN can not see the forest for the trees. News today is sad, sad. We never get the facts and I believe we are losing our basic Freedoms. What a sad day what a sad year for this Nation..

Debbie M   October 9th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

Outrageous and disappointing. This means the Nobel committee actually believes Obama has done more for world peace in the few months he has been in office than all other top contenders and their lives' work – people who have been their entire lives and are still living under threatening situations but nevertheless still work towards peace. This choice certainly questions the integrity of the whole concept behind the prize. I know I will never again take in news of any of the Nobel Prizes without wondering what political machinations were behind it, regardless of category. Sad day for world peace.

cristian   October 9th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

The President already has his hands full trying to solve a host of difficult problems. Why do these Nobel Committee people have to push him along? He is gonna do whatever his is trying to do without you people pushing him into doing it. You should have used your brain a little. Obama doesn't need additional pressure, since clearly this prize is not for what he has achieved, but rather for what he might achieve.

Darn!

daniel   October 9th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

God Bless Obama! Peace on Earth.

Hap   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

Unbelievable and totally undeserved...

Walker Hester   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

No I don't think he deserves it. Then again Arafat received the Nobel Peace Prize as well so I guess it is far more a political award than a humanitarian one anyway.

Matt   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

As an American living in Europe I have to admit that this is a surprise, and will invest some time trying to understand exactly what he did. Either some of his work has gone unrecognized or the Nobel Prize Committee have become very lenient..

Marvis   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

Yes, most definitely.

Parsi   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

Yes. He is the only person during the recent years that has changed the negative view of USA towards a prositive one. I think only the order to close down the Guantanamo prison is enough to get this award, even thought it can be delayed.

Reg /Parsi form Sweden.

Abebe   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

Can somebody tell me who deserve this award than Pres. Obama? Rather than commenting that Obama donot deserve, we better mention that Mr/Mrs X deserve! But, to the best of my knowldege, every xs are next to Obama.
Abebe

Please_decline_it   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

There is a simple and very elegant way solving this mess:

Obama should decline the price and ask for more time to proof that he deserves it. He should give one of his great speeches and tell that he is really honored but there are people that have fought for peace for decades deserving the price right now.
That would be generous, everyone would agree and the Nobel committee still would have achieved their goal of making him politically stronger!

Michael West   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

The prize was awarded to the aspirations espoused by our new president. The whole world wants change, improvement, dialog, a willingness to deal with real pressing issues. The pseudo issues – gay marriage, Darwinism, stem cell research, anti-muslim-anti-emigrants pandering of the previous 8 years are being shunned by logically thinking people from all over the world. Obama could be a pivotal figure in a pivotal age – if we help him to be.

Sunny Makoge   October 9th, 2009 1:37 pm ET

This is a great day for America and an even greater day for the President and I join him and millions of other happy Americans in celebrating this win. He more than deserves it. We should celebrate his winning not to be cynical about it. The question is phrased wrong. Why question if he deserved to win? In only 9 months in office, it does not take a rocket scientist to realize what this man has already achieved. I would rather have this intellectual running this country for the next eight years and than, you know who. The tone, the approach, the diplomacy. Saving this planet? Have you forgotten what he inherited from the former president? In only 9 short months! Give me a break! I stand shoulder to shoulder with this President, four more years and he hasn't even finished the first four.

Annie   October 9th, 2009 1:38 pm ET

President Obama deserves this Nobel peace prize. In the mist of all the downfall and past heartaches, disappointments and lack of true concern about the American people, he is a true leader and patriot.

He definitely deserve this and more

Guy Bahati   October 9th, 2009 1:38 pm ET

I definitely think that he deserves to win. Nobel prize is not about the USA it's about the world. Obama helped people around the world to look at each other differently white or black, we value what we value each other a bit more than before than before isn't enough? Climate change, non-proliferation treaty, nuclear shield in Poland, we around the world that he can do more than what he's doing now.

And knowing that he did ask for, wasn't the front-runner it makes it even more sweeter, enjoyable. Congratulation Mr. President.

Nate   October 9th, 2009 1:38 pm ET

No! Not yet anyways....

Ulla Laage   October 9th, 2009 1:38 pm ET

A huge CONGRATULATIONS to President Barak Obama for being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize !!! He certainly deserve it !!! In the short time he has been the President he with his dignity and kindnes has given the world hope for a better future.
If people open up and understand what President Obama is about, the world indeed will be a better place to live in !!!

Ulla Laage,
Haslev, Denmark

Christian   October 9th, 2009 1:38 pm ET

Yes, he deserves it so much. Each and everybody knows that the challenges, he has to face are mutiple, and complex. Actually, it's the best encouragements for him, for the united States and for the whole World.

French congratulation to President Barack Obama !!!

Christian Meyer
Habsheim, France

Rama Govinda   October 9th, 2009 1:38 pm ET

When all these nobel prizes were awarded these few days, I was thinking about the one for peace. I was thinking about who will qualify for this. The only person that came to my mind was Pres. Obama. Then, I thought, Did he really achieved something ? But I'm sure good deeds would do. He has really initiated some really some good discussions. He has also given some hope for good. In this world, where leaders try to show their might, our president is really trying to make a difference. It's not just America's perspective we are worried about. We would like to see about N Korea's perspective, Iran's perspective and many other countries. We don't necessarily agree and they may not be good. But let's talk..Think about how Russia feels about USA today?
I believe Obama is not awarded for what he did. But for his true and honest good intentions.. People may want things to be done. But they don't understand it's not that simple.
Congratulations, President... We are proud of you...

Sasha   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

Yes, he does. You Americans may not notice the peace development in the world is, considering you don't have wars or almost any tension overseas. Obama has restored the communication between russia and the west, which is reliving for the countries here in eastern-europe. Obama has given me hope that my children can grow up in a world without climate change and nuclear weapons.

John Duizenberg   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

The nobel institute has once more proven to be a bogus institute.
America and Obama are fighting two known wars, and you reward him with the nobelprice of peace?

Have you all gone nuts?
No seriously, have you all gone nuts!
That's like giving the nobelprice for freedom of speech to Vladimir Putin.

How can one give a nobel price to someone only in power nine months saying he made a difference.
There are people spending their entire life to further peace in their country or otherswho deserv it and need it with the molion bucks that goes along with it.
If this is a scam to promote the image of America as a peaceloving nation it truly failed as such.

Which people at the Nobel institute decided obama deserved it?
these people should be relieved of their duty and never be allowed to make any serious judgement on anything ever again.

NB: I am a Obama supporter, but this rediculous.

Rose   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

I find it incredibly sad that people from outside the U.S. realize what a GREAT man Obama is. Americans, wake up and see the great leader you have in this man. Look beyond his skin color and see his soul. He is a good man, a man of peace. He will bring the love for America back in other parts of the world. Look at his humbleness and realize that it does not signify weakness. It is a sign of strength.

President Obama, I congratulate you and I wish every day that you could be the president of my country too.

AB   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

Remember, results of pivotal decisions are not always immediately visible. He has made some important decisions to remedy GWB's momentous mistakes, and there will be more of them to come. The impact of them will until their fruition be visible to only a farsighted few, like I think the Nobel Committee members are.

So I think the Committee has done a relevant and courageous decision in their award, lauding him for his wise decisions so far and prompting him for carrying on as he goes.

Kudos unto him and all those who are presently and past working for his administration.

Matthew   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

He won not because of what he's actually done, but how he's made people feel. It's not easy to remember when surrounded by the extreme hatred some people have for him here, but the man is universally loved and supported throughout the rest of the world. To people in many countries, his election itself was a fulfillment of change, and as long as he is president they will have hope. That was more than enough for the Nobel prize committee.

Vitalis Ozorji   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

I believe that Mr. Obama won the Nobel Peace Price not because he is the president of USA but because of what he stands for and what he has accomplished as a person. Who would have thought that a black man would be in the white house even three years ago? That in itself is a statement to all nations and peoples that we are all equal.

With all the attacks on his personality and background during the campaign, he maintained a poise that was too difficult to fault. To this generation, he inspires hope and conquest of human spirit over historical adversities and divides. He deserves it.

Bryan   October 9th, 2009 1:39 pm ET

Let's see. He's made no move to get out of Iraq or Afghanistan, he's offered only a tepid response to the coup in Honduras, he's done nothing to get the Israelis and Palestinians talking, he's done nothing to reduce our nuclear arsenal, and Iran and North Korea are still building up their nuclear programs. He's going to be President for at least four years. Why not wait three years and then evaluate his efforts on behalf of peace rather than giving him the prize prematurely?

Frank fugar   October 9th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

If is possible to award him all the awards in the whole world, please do. I am intoxicated by this family.

Deji Akinsemoyin   October 9th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

It's great that Obama won the prize even though it's unexpected. He did inspire a lot of people. His presidency transpired race, color or ethnicity. Just look everywhere he goes, people trrop our in their thousands. He is not representing himself or his family. He represent America and the values America represents.
Long live Obama !!!! Long live America !!!!!!!!!

Mark Wools   October 9th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

I think they gave it to him because he is a black American President. The world is sure acting like he is God after Nelson Mandela. What a joke. People are going to get a rude awakening one day.

Mike   October 9th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

Mr. Obama is trying to do good things but has yet to achieve any results. As the commander of two wars and as the warden of Guantanamo (yet to be closed as promised during his campaign) he hardly seems to be deserving of a Peace Prize. Unfortunately, this is further evidence of politicizing Nobel prizes. Arafat won one, as did a woman from Iran for no other reason than she is from Iran and they were trying to bring attention to an issue, same thing with Arafat. People should be rewarded for actual accomplishment and not for what they want, or say they will do. The Nobel Peace Prize has become an annual farce and has lost all hope at actually doing any good.

Pete from the Philippines   October 9th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

You know what, i like Obama... but this is a joke... he's just starting his presidency, so many dividing issues right now in the u.s. that he can't solve. There's the war in Afganistan and in Iraq. So stupid in the part of the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee.

Tomas   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

Very cruel joke played by the committee on Obama's expense – they emphasized that he has done nothing and probably will do nothing also in the future (otherwise they could safely wait with the prize until he actually accomplishes something...).

They put him in a company with terrorist Arafat and hypocritical fanatic Al Gore. Well, when I think of it, he probably belongs there...

I imagine what would it be like if the prize was given to people who in fact contributed the most to peace and prosperity: Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher – for standing firm on the side of enslaved nations, for destroying the evil empire and freeing millions of people from dictatorship...

Marilena   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

Mr. obama absolutely deserves the prize – none more than him

Hank - Swedish   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

Yes he does deserve it. In his first year as president, he has already done more good in the world than "W" did in 8 years.
Hope and willingness to negotiate means more than military strength.

Rose   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

Compared to the previous US President who not only started 2 wars, laughed at the impending recession (that eventually happened), I do believe President Barack Obama deserved to be recognized and given this award. He was left with a tremendous job and so far he is doing good. His commitment alone is laudable.

Maybe, everyone should look at his example and help him attain that unattainble peace (for now). I would also like to mention on climate change, just look what happended to all those countries affected by flooding.

As a citizen of the world, I want peace,

nnodim   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

The US President, Barack Obama, amply deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. For me his humility, level-headedness, and willingness to listen to both friends and foes make him a good leader and a role-model. I do hope that this Prize will illuminate these qualities a lot more and probably persuade more leaders around the world to seek and cherish JUSTICE and PEACE!

JR   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

To Michael from Germany – see Caps below:

I think it´s great that Obama won the Nobel peace price. First of all he is the first black president. he did a lot for the feeling of self-worth of the black community in the USA and worldwide. That price honors evryone that voted for Obama and who is not a citizen of the USA, likes Obama.
NOT A VERY SIGNIFICANT REASON: EVERY PRESIDENT IS A "FIRST" AT SOMETHING...

He is Pro reducing carbondioxyd and an environmentalist. He gives hope to the whole world.
SO ARE 70% OF THE REST OF THE WORLD, MOST WITH EVEN MORE CREDENTIALS AND LEADERSHIP IN THE FIELD.

He works on making the world free from atomic weapons.
SO IS THE POPE IN HIS OWN WAY... AS WELL AS PUTIN (DID HE DESERVE AN AWARD?)

He works on better relations between the cultures (muslim, christian and judaism)
SO DO MANY OTHERS... WITH MUCH MORE TIME AND RESULTS IN THE MATTER

He gives hope to the whole world for a better and more peaceful future.
WOW!

On the one hand i thougt it´s to early, because he has been president for just one year. On the other hand I now think it´s a fantastic decision. It´s hard to say NO to a Nobel peace price winner if he is asking you to agree to something.
OK: PER MY EARLIER MESSAGE – WILL IT BE HARD TO SAY NO IF HE SAYS THAT NATO SHOULD SEND 60,000 MORE TROOPS TO AFGHANISTAN?... OR BOMB IRAN, ... ALL FOR THE SAKE OF PEACE IN THE WORLD?

And finally I think this Nobel peace price will motivate Obama to follow his way and work harder on his own goals.
OK: GIVE A PRIZE TO ANYONE WHO CAN MAKE A GOOD SPEACH AND PRESENT NICE IDEAS, SO OTHERS WILL (MAY?) FOLLOW...

Dankeschön to the Norwegian peace price comitee for this surprisingly and perfect decision!
"PERFECT"? HOW ABOUT THE PRISONERS OF CONSCIENCE WHO ARE MAKING SACRIFICES EVERY DAY AND FOR MANY YEARS FOR PERSONAL LIBERTY AND PEACE IN THEIR COUNTRIES? AUNG SAN SUU KYI IN MYANMAR COMES TO MIND. MANDELA WAS A PERFECT CHOICE, YES.

MS Bradford, Russia   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

No, too premature and debases integrity of the award and truly worthy recipients. Words are words, and Obama has talked the talk. But deeds alone – often accompanied by long suffering / commitment - ought to be the measure for bestowing such an award. Only time will show whether Obama's overtures for peace will manifest in deeds and overcome historical ethic, cultural and religious divisions. Even failing to bind the wounds of peoples and nations, if over time he steadfastly, honestly stays the course suggested by his rhetoric, he will have met the measure based on deeds. To be sure, he will have injected a new mode under which the powers that be may deal with national and cultural differences - a dialogue based on a search for understanding, cooperation and coexistance, rather than a self-centered dialogue intent on serving ones own self interest. Such dialogues would blow a wind of hope that a new enlightenment could prevail in the halls of power and, more importantly, into the hearts of the people of the world. Achieving actual peace would truly merit the Nobel Peace prize, but that failing, so too would a relentless offering of the olive branch, guided by enlightened action in pusuit of enhancing understanding between civilizations, nations and cultures and, ultimately, narrowing contentious divisions and ushering in peace. Obama's words are promising, so let them be tested and may they manifest in deeds - then he will have merited the Nobel.

Chris Maes   October 9th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

Hello,

I was at first surprised to learn about president's Obama's win; but after all I think his fresh approach to world problems does deserve encouragement.

Chris

blue leverett   October 9th, 2009 1:42 pm ET

I love having Obama as our President, but he is the commander in chief of one of the largest armies, currently waging wars in 2 countries, in which innocent civilians, including children are getting killed every day.
No, I don't believe the commander of any military organization should receive the Nobel Prize unless he has concretely brought about the end to a long standing conflict, and in doing so has moved the entire world closer to an end to war forever.

Firefly   October 9th, 2009 1:42 pm ET

I think its too early for Mr. Obama to get a Nobel Peace prize.

Danny Marinus   October 9th, 2009 1:42 pm ET

Definitely. Previous selections went to individuals for what they have done in their country. What makes this unique; is not because of what he has done for his country alone, but his efforts to bring about peace to the whole world and all it's people. It is on an equal scale to what the UN is doing for peace world wide.

Marton R   October 9th, 2009 1:42 pm ET

There are many worthy candidates but only one can win the prize. Obama is worthy, he has cranked back the obsessively militaristic policies of the previous administration, he has reached out to the people who have been alienated by those policies, namely three-quarters of the globe, he has even managed to make Ahmedinejad look very silly with his nuclear toys. It's an excellent beginning, and one that deserves a great deal of encouragement. That's the point of a prize. Those who think otherwise should never play lottery, winning will destroy you.

So why don’t the rabid naysayers take a few days off, get away from the LCD or the TV, get some fresh air, when you return, the same professional hate machines will be there earning money off your adulation and waving mentholated vapors in their eyes to pretend they are really crying.

Charles   October 9th, 2009 1:42 pm ET

No..no...no...this is just too much.

It seems the rest of the world wants to force us to make of Obama a new God!!

Let´s resist this absurd and empty marketing

Louise   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

Again, the American people don't have the slightest idea what someone needs to do to achieve world peace. President Obama is doing just that. Just look at the comments – a majority of non-Americans agreed with the award of Nobel Prize. Most of those who disagree are Americans or those who have never set foot outside of their country. The Nobel Prize has nothing to do with progress in the United States. Wake up America – there's a whole world out there. Congratulations, President Obama!!

Rogelio   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

I have a deep respect for him but i completed disagreed in give him the Nobel peace prize. Many inocent people is kill every day in Afganistan and Irak by US troops that are under his command and I don`t see a big efforts to stop this.

Jon (From Sweden)   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

Yes and no

Yes – he deserves due to what he has done in improving dialogs in the world in the last year (the last year is the time to take into account, according to the will of Alfred Nobel)

No – he is in charge of two wars – that is troublesome.

Sara   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

Yes, yes and yes. Nobody more than President Obama deserved it. He is a man of peace and if his opponents give him a chance, he would bring peace in the whole world. We, his freinds are delighted and his enemies, which CNN is one of them are furious.

Isabel Miranda   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

Yes he does deserve it for all the efforts he has done to try to unite countries to establish peace talks and conrol of nuclear weapons in our world. I just hope now he can establish a consensus and peace of mind for the American citizens over issues such as health care and especially over the wars in Iraq and Afganistan which have cause so much restlessness and no peace for those whose sons, fathers and husbands have died in those wars.

Laszlo   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

He deserves it absolutely.
He looks cool, has a self-confident way of talking, and most of all: has a black color of skin. What other qualities do you need for a Nobel Peace Prize?

Anja, Germany   October 9th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

YES so much!

I know anybody who deserves this more. He is a noble peace price winner in the best sense!

Congratulations!

Zimran Ndifor   October 9th, 2009 1:44 pm ET

This is very amazing. It has never happened to anyone since my birth in 1972. Again, let history judge and see how far the leader compared to his predicessors and others in the world has thrived within a period of eight months.
All my very best wishes to him (President Barack Hussein Obama), and I pray for world peace. If the world and the Middle East region in particular can have peace for a year and then another, and another, and.............
I will be forever greateful for the world.
God bless Barack Obama and the world.

Harald Alfons   October 9th, 2009 1:44 pm ET

I do not think that Obama at this time has shown a lot of peace earning projects that would earn him the nobel price. It would have been much better and more prestige's for Obama if he had results in his work as the most powerful person on this earth.

Mikael Lemon   October 9th, 2009 1:44 pm ET

Yes, but others to. It's important to "help" the good people in power – so they keep up a good work in a good mood.

/ Mikael, Sweden

Heidi Andersen   October 9th, 2009 1:44 pm ET

I know I speak on behalf of the majority of the Danish and presumably of the Scandinavian population when I say that nobody deserve the Nobel Peace Prize more than Obama.
We see him as an intelligent hybridization of Nelson Mandela, Ghandi, Martin Luther King John F. and Dalai Lama!
The world will be a better and more peaceful place because of him.
Congrats all you Americans with you new president who fortunately is the closest you get to the whole world's president.

Regards
Heidi,
Copenhagen Denmark

Ashley   October 9th, 2009 1:44 pm ET

in all respect to President Obama and everything he has done so far, I still don't think it was necessary to award the Nobel peace prize to him. The definition of the prize, as stated, is awarded "outstanding achievements [...] and economics and for the promotion of world peace." So, it emphasizes "achievements". But based on the statements of the committee, the prize should work as a further "encouragement" for Obama's efforts in the international community. So, it doesn't really conform with the actual meaning of the prize. When I told a friend of mine in the U.S. about the news that Obama was awarded the Nobel peace prize, and his reaction was "for what?!" Not that Obama hasn't done anything for his country or the world so far, but not to the degree that he needed to be awarded the prize!

Alfred   October 9th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

Obama needs to show results before any prize or recognition can be awarded. There are many more people who deserve this award by the simple fact that peace is not based on talk, but more on actions.
I think the Nobel committee awarded this prize because Obama is the first African- American President and is a slap on the face on the old administration.
Please, remember that when Obama came to office, there were only two weeks left to summit candidates to the Nobel committee.
K now the preasure is on Obama to deliver since talk is cheap.
Regards,
Alfred

Chris   October 9th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

I don't think that his charisma and good will alone were enough to qualify him for Nobel Prize. The actions he has vowed to undertake are yet to produce tangible results. Giving him the Nobel Prize might make his job even more difficult because the USA must take decisive actions against countries like Iran and a Peace Prize might make him appear as dovish in front of those countries.

Mary   October 9th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

First of all, congrats to Mr. President..
But I really have to say this..

I'm a bit concerned about the decision of the Nobel Peace Prize committee.
I know that the President has a lot of goals related to world's peace but I havent seen much news about the plans actually acted out.

Also it was only 8 months ago that Mr. Obama became a president.
I don't think people can decide on nominating him as a Nobel peace winner because it is really too early for a new president.

I've heard that the committee did this to promote his effort, but...
I thought Nobel prizes were for people who have actually done a lot of things to change the world (in a good way) not to promote it before it actually takes place.

I think this is a mistake.

Somchai S.   October 9th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

Yes, he deserved for the world but not for American if racism still existed in this country

Robert in DK   October 9th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

For those who dont agree that Obama deserves the peace prize:

Who then deserves it... ?

Perhaps George bush. For declaring pre-emptive wars on the basis of threats that only existed in his fantasy. Fantasy is entertaining. And an entertained world is a peaceful one!

Dick Cheney for mixing oil & blood (perhaps dick should also get the prize for chemistry) ; for engineering the deployment of fireworks that shocked & awed all accross the Iraqi night sky (dick should get the prize for physics as well); for seeing in Iraq biological weapons that could not be seen by anybody else's naked eye (biology too?)

Donald Rumsfield? For entertaining the precious American troops with bizzare prisoner abuses. For arrogance so unimaginable that it can only lead to peace!

Of course Obama deserves that award.. Think people.. think!!

Chrishana   October 9th, 2009 1:46 pm ET

Obama does deserves winning the Nobel Peace Prize, I couldnt think of anyone that deserves it more.
Congratulations Mr. Obama.<3

Yusuf   October 9th, 2009 1:46 pm ET

I believe that the President deserves this wonder prize. He has changed so much for the short time he has been President. The suspecion between faiths and peoples are improving around the world. This award shows that the rest of the world appreciates and respect the President more than the Republicans and some segments of American soceity. Congratulatins, Mr President!!!!!!!!!!!

Yusuf , Oslo, Norway

Charles   October 9th, 2009 1:46 pm ET

No..no…no…this is just too much.

It seems the rest of the world wants to force us to make of Obama a new God!!

Let´s resist this absurd and empty marketing

Ian Copple   October 9th, 2009 1:46 pm ET

To me the question is: Who else?
The competition seems to be a little sparse.

Tommy   October 9th, 2009 1:47 pm ET

Probably one of the more bizarre selections since the Norwegians awarded the price to Henry Kissinger in 1973. It only goes to show that the committee is deeply committed to shallow expressions such as words and rhetoric rather than to essential things, such as action and deeds.

The committee makes a mockery not only of the Nobel name but also, more importantly, of the word peace.

Shantharam Kamath   October 9th, 2009 1:47 pm ET

WOW! congratulations..
It is a suprise to Mr. Obama as well..

A girl from Sweden   October 9th, 2009 1:48 pm ET

Maybe Obama is the new Messiah? Seriously, this is a very very strange choice.

Ami   October 9th, 2009 1:48 pm ET

YEAH!!!!
Perfect decision
For those who said he does not deserve it, please name at least one person who would be more appropriate
YEAH!!!! OBAMA

Ami

Sheikh Mujibur Rahman   October 9th, 2009 1:48 pm ET

I think he deserve this price because, after he become the President of United State Of America, He close that jail where Human are torturing like Animal. So it’s a good step for showing peace for mankind. He also try to make a good relation with Russia by stopping missile defenses in Europe. he is fighting for Terrorism in Afghanistan increasing solder there to win, He is preparing to hand over Iraq to their people and leave that country after 10 year US Army Invention, He is trying to reduce the stock of nuclear bombs,
He also said making world peace is not only job for USA every country should do that so he is trying to encouraged people for peace.

After he becomes a President If he doesn’t do this work nobody is there to ask him but he did this work what good for mankind,

Congratulations Mr. president. Hope you will keep this good work in future.

Vinaya Singh   October 9th, 2009 1:48 pm ET

Crisis time brings best in people. Crisis bring in change.
Obama epitomizes hope world wise in current time of crisis.
His personal upbringing in diversity brings in capacity for unity.
He has potential to unify world and bring in promise of democracy (by the people, for the people , to the people) to the world.
I has miles to covers but has potential.

May   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

Nobel Prize has lost all its credibility.

Thomas J   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

Fun for Obama himself. But the simple true is that Barack Obama doesn´t deserve this award. What has he done so far? Nothing more than talking., just simple talking as politicans always do.

Barack Obama is as president superior to George W Bush. But there are many people arround the world working att "grass-rooot" level that deserve the Nobel peace price much, much more. It´s a shame!

Monica V   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

I disagree with this winner. Don't get me wrong, I support Obama's presidency, but I think is premature to award him this prize at this point and time. Maybe at the end of his mandate, once we get to see what he actually did, it would of made more sense than now. For me this award is just an expectation of what he wants to do, not what necessarily will do.

Enklebert   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

Some prizes come too late in a person's life. When they are finally awarded recipients often wonder if they couldn't have done better. Well Obama will have to work even harder to make sure that this prize maintains its worth. However after all is said and done it is only a prize and not a litmus test. Well done. Hopefully one day all mankind will jointly deserve this prize!

Biren   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

Did Obama deserve to win? I feel that he is clear in his mind about what he needs to do to make our world a safer place. However, his hands are tied and his acts are limited due to the fact that he has to fight against his own establishment and critics in the congress to implement his decisions. Besides, dealing with leaders of North Korea and Iran, stubborn Talibans etc is very difficult as these people hardly understand the language of peace. The award might boost his future efforts to secure global peace, but there are also chances that he will fail at the end of his term and then this untimely and very bold decision might seem to be an April Fool joke played by the Nobel committee.

jamie   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

No! So many better deserving people have devoted their lives to bring people together and promote peace. It is the President's job to "strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples". I do not see a reduction of standing armies either! Just because he believes “Yes we can” does not mean plans have been implemented and have made ant impact on international ties.

Kevin   October 9th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

First of all Obama is not black... He's mixed!! I'm sick of every placing so much empahsis on him being african american when he's not...

Second, anyone who thinks that just because he will not place a missile shield in Poland means that America reducing it's nuclear inventory-your completely ignorant... Sorry, but America has NOT said that it will reduce its inventory...

Third, Sucking up the the worlds muslim population dose not merit a Nobel....

Matthew   October 9th, 2009 1:50 pm ET

Absolutely.. I think that receiving such an honor that is valued so highly will pressure Mr. Obama to follow through with is initial actions throughout his term. … In short a good move by the Nobel committee .. Let’s not forget that the 2 wars that are under the control of the president were both inherited from the previous administration…

Rowland Orr   October 9th, 2009 1:50 pm ET

This is a great moment in history. The rest of the world have a great sence of hope in President Obama not just as president of the United States but as a true World leader. Peace is need in so much of the World today at a time like no other. The timming is critical. President Obama appears to really be pushing the US and the world in a direction of peace and understanding. The Noble Peace prize comes as a world endorsement and a trust in what he is doing. It comes with a huge burden to fulfill the direction that he is taking the US and the World, but also gives a huge endorsement and momentum to to carry out this new direction of peace. I take my hat of to those who have given him this award. May it fullfill its intent.

Petr   October 9th, 2009 1:51 pm ET

No. The president has a lot of work ahead of him and I have no reason to question his good will and effort. But he stands against strong opposition in his own country and his achievements so far are almost invisible. The Peace Prize should be awarded for significant contribution to – what else – world peace and Mr. Obama has yet to seriously contribute in this field. It takes time and the president only had a few months. The award could serve as encouragement but over the past decades it got so much "good purpose" political background that a lot of people aren´t taking it seriously.

Kenn B. Færch   October 9th, 2009 1:52 pm ET

Obama won the price due to his 'extraordinary work for peace
and efford to strengthen the international diplomacy' in particular.

By 'strenghten international diplomacy' it means:
For not interfering with the Iranian regime and its nuclear ambitions, nor intervening when the regime without doubt arranged the most recent Iranian 'election'.
(makes me wonder – who will now save the peoples of the world
whenever they suffer from the hardships caused by dictatorships all
around the world if not the US will anymore?)

Yes, I'm sure that the Iranians who were beaten, raped etc. because
of their desire for democracy – a desire that didn't get any support
from the Obama Administration – all agree:
Obama really made a difference.

Obama won a price – I'm happy for him.
I hope he'll look at it and smile from time to time
- while the Guantanamo Prison Camp is still operating
- while the Iranians keep working on their nuclear project
- while the Afghan president gets re-elected despite as many as
perhaps 20pct fixed votes
- while the people in Myanmar still suffer from an intolerable regime
emloying death squads and other (much more) terribel tools for staying in power
- while the coptic christian minority in Egypt keeps getting harrashed by the authorities and killed by fellow-egyptians now and again
- while women in many arab countries are still denied their basic rights
- and while the conflict in the Sudan runs for its 20th year or so.. ect.

I know he's a busy man – but I just hope he'll have time for solving at
least some of these issues.. perhaps when he's on his way to an olympic committee or some conference in connection to the global climate hysteria.

Thoughts from Denmark, cold Northern Europe

Athanasios   October 9th, 2009 1:53 pm ET

To those who argue that the Nobel peace prize cannot be given to a man who is leading two bloody wars: he is winding one down which he vehemently opposed at the run-up to it and all along, and is agonizing over the strategy of how to handle the war in Afghanistan which he inherited by his predecessor and in which the US and the world were knee-deep when he became president.

Brian Hardy   October 9th, 2009 1:53 pm ET

Barack does not deserve this award. He has done nothing. This is a terrible day for people who actually do things and don't just say things. Barry, give back the award; by accepting it, you will come across as a man with an ego the size of the Atlantic Ocean. This is truly bizarre.

Babak Djalali   October 9th, 2009 1:53 pm ET

I think he deserves that prize more than anyone else in these days, for there is absolutely no political character in which so much hope has been invested throughout so many peoples of different ethnicities. This fact determines a reflection of the heart beat of mankind. How could it be wrong to distinguish some one with the noble peace prize who bears more hope for peace than anyone else? This prize is a statement of hope. Cheers

D. Leite   October 9th, 2009 1:53 pm ET

Well, when the Nobel prize committee can award the Nobel Peace Prize to Arafat, who was a terrorist, than awarding Obama is small potatos. I have absolutely no respect for the Nobel Prize committee today. What once was a fine, noble and honorable prize has become a lobbyist arena – wonder how much Obama's men paid to be awarded that prize...

Crystal   October 9th, 2009 1:54 pm ET

Granted, not all the previous winners have had significant accomplishments, but to join the ranks of Mother Teresa and Nelson Mandela, surely Obama had to have done something! Oh, wait, no–he hasn't accomplished anything of significance during his term other than traipse around the globe, making speeches that sound nice but do nothing.

Way to go, committee–maybe the next prize should go to Paris Hilton?

J H Hogato   October 9th, 2009 1:54 pm ET

He deserves to be awared the peace prize.he shows his intention of peace to the world community but occuppied are undermining his effort in middle east.

congradulation Mr. President

Jenny   October 9th, 2009 1:54 pm ET

NO, how can this commitee ever give an award for words and not actions. How many more times will the US goverment be tricked by countries making false promises to lay down arms. Time will tell us all the real truth.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that Obama had won the illustrious award for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

It's a consolation prize for not getting Chicago in the Olympics! He should donate the monies to Green Peace or to the orphanges that are going to be filled with kids of fallen troops!

Proud to be an american, but perfer living abroad for the time being.

Central America

juliusmalema   October 9th, 2009 1:54 pm ET

Americans don't understand what Barack Obama represents to the rest of the world.

It's excellent that he's won it. Congratulations from Copenhagen.

yoshi   October 9th, 2009 1:55 pm ET

yes, the peace prize is for the world as well as USA.

shaweta,India   October 9th, 2009 1:55 pm ET

Really surprised to know that Mr. obama has won the Noble peace prize. Noble prizes are most prestigious prizes in the world but now I have some doubts about their credibility.Though I am an admirer of Mr. Obama ,I admire his meterioic rise but to award him with noble prize is not justified.He has been in office only for nine months and has not achieved anything credible yet. Though he has tried to reach muslim world but his interaction with them has not converted into actions.Afganistan and Pakistan are still safe havens for al qaeda and talibani terrorists and their seems to be no end for war in Afganistan. USA is giving billion dollars to Pakistan as millitary and non millitary aid and they(pakistanis) are making fool of America in the name of fighting terror.
Now that Mr. Obama has won Noble prize,he will have work more to justify his win . He should lead the world in fighting climate change without impacting the interests of developing countries,war in Afganistan should be brought to its conclusive end and this can be done by keeping checks and balances on Pakistan, NPT will be signed by all countries if its discriminatory nature is removed,so this treaty should be revisited and discriminatory clauses which pose threat to developing countries like india should be removed.

Annette Parker   October 9th, 2009 1:56 pm ET

Of course he deserves to win. HE WON DIDN"T HE!!!! The haters in this country is amazing.

Willy4   October 9th, 2009 1:56 pm ET

Absolutely incredible. The man may, some day, be worthy of this but come on, he has accomplished nothing except apologizing for George Bush and hundreds of years of American accomplishments. For Rahm Emanuel to claim that this "win" is more important than getting the Olympics is shameful. When the cult of glory for one man trumps what's best for America, there is something radically wrong with this administration.

Austin   October 9th, 2009 1:58 pm ET

ABSOLUTELY, YES!!! . . . and if you think Obama does not deserve it, then lets try the underlisted:
Bush . . . – for leaving the world in confusion
Tony Blair – for supporting the Bush man
Berlusconi – for passing childish and inappropriate comments
bin Laden – for bombing New York
Charles Tayor – for defending himself at the Hague
Mobutu Seseseko – for looting D.R. Congo
Slobadan Milosovic – for abusing human rights
Adolf Hitler – for his nazi adventures

Kristian Pasini   October 9th, 2009 1:58 pm ET

Way, WAY too early! I´m pretty much pro-Obama in world affairs... but he didn´t do anything yet! You first do something really worthy and THEN get a Nobel Peace Prize! They are trying do create the myth FIRST so he may do something AFTER?

George Denikian   October 9th, 2009 2:00 pm ET

Mr.OBAMA does not deserve at all the Nobel Peace Prize, he did not achieve anything...andsadly the Nobel Committee did a big mistake with this light decision creating a sens of disregard to those who worked, fought and tried hard to defend a nobel cause such as PEACE, even to some extend risking their lives and those of their loved ones, without having most of the time neither thefunds nor the necessary backings for the cause...For me it's a big deception.

Reggie Veggie   October 9th, 2009 2:00 pm ET

This Noble prize is tricky. It reminds me of an old StarTrek (DS9) episode where central character, Dr. Bashir, was to be awarded the equivalent "Space Noble prize" He strongly hoped he didn't get it, simply because he was too young and felt it was too early in his career, to get a prize that actually defines a crowning peak (and down the other side) in a lifetime. Hopefully this Swedish flattery will not distract from global main issues, with people taking the Noble prize as your main defining characteristic in life. Obama has plenty other virtues.

Paul   October 9th, 2009 2:01 pm ET

The only reason that Obama get the award is he is American president :-(

Bill Wong   October 9th, 2009 2:01 pm ET

It's deserved to have the award to him – Obama. As everyone know, He just in the President for several month, so we can't see too much thinge that he has done. But his way is right. This award comes to him just in time. In the following time, I think people will see more things he dose for the peace of the World. The Norwegian Nobel Committee dose the right thing.

"Only in the peaceful evironment, human can amass their riches and enjoy it" this is my word.

From: Hong kong China

Shimon   October 9th, 2009 2:03 pm ET

I was astonished to hear it, but most disturbing was when I read that nominations for the prize closed a mere ELEVEN DAYS after Obama's inauguration. Does anyone really believe that the Nobel committee saw in just 11 days that Obama is a leader in making world peace???

Mondher   October 9th, 2009 2:03 pm ET

The members of the committee are not as stupid as some people think they are. They are engaging a world leader to be pro-active in shaping policies that will benefit our world in the not too distant future. The nomination fills a leadership vaccum on the world scene, by a man who inspired and gave hope to millions. Who did you expect them to nominate? Michael moors? Putin? Sarkozy? or netenyahu?

Khaled   October 9th, 2009 2:04 pm ET

Yes, definitely he deserved the prize due to his charisma, and his approach to all different nations. As Muslims, We have felt that approach when he leveled the barriers and speaks toward peace and prosperities of all.

Richard Smith III   October 9th, 2009 2:05 pm ET

Honestly, what has he done to win this award. He was nominated after being in office for less than 2 weeks. The president has become a rock star. I feel that eventually he will possible deserve this award, but not right now. Just because he appears better than Bush doesnt mean he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. All of this written by a BLACK man that has supported President Obama. I just dont see him deserving of this award.

Sai   October 9th, 2009 2:05 pm ET

Barack Obama is a great guy, possibly will turn out to be a Good President. I voted for this guy.

But.... Is this for real that he won the Nobel Peace Prize????

Obama might deserve a nobel prize in future if he does have a real positive impact on peace in the World. However, Nobel Prize, I thought is awarded for verifiable achievements. Not a future potential.

My respect for the Nobel Proze as a non-polarized, equitable award just took a nose-dive. It has become a run-of-the-mill award that can reward celebrities with no real achievements (yet).

Very disappointed.

Penny   October 9th, 2009 2:05 pm ET

Awarding a peace prize for potential? The man hasn't done anything to deserve this yet. This severely depreciates the honor of the Nobel peace prize.

GG   October 9th, 2009 2:07 pm ET

No way did he deserve it! The Nobel Prize is supposed to be awarded for someone's accomplishments, not your potential to accomplish something! This cheapens the prize. It would have been better to award it to all soldiers who have laid down their lives for peace. What a joke!

Pacelli Gonsalves   October 9th, 2009 2:08 pm ET

I think It's a shrewd move by the peace committee, this way Obama will have to prove that he is really worthy of the noble peace prize, he has stretched his hand in peace to the many, howver there is a saying give a man your hand and he will take your arm, he must be careful.
let us hope for the best and I'm sure given time President Obama will sucecced in showing the right path towards peace even if he does not achieve it this is more than enough.

H   October 9th, 2009 2:09 pm ET

Hell, yeah! He's the Ghandi of our times.

Rob   October 9th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

MLK, Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa, Menachem Begin, Anwar Sadat, the Dalai Lama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Aung San Suu Kyi-all the aforementioned actually effected change and increased peace. What has Obama done to put himself on the same level as these great people who helped shape the world and the paradigm through which we view it? Obama certainly has the ability to one day be mentioned in the same breath as these great leaders, but as of now his actions have yet to justify this loftiest of awards that has been bestowed upon him. This is proof that the favorable light in which the media has portrayed him has spilled over and influenced the international community.

dennis cheeks   October 9th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OF COURSE, HE DESERVES IT!! he is a man of peace

karen walker   October 9th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

Yes, he does. He made us all believe peace is possible when we were sure it was not. He made us believe the world could change. A lot of people around the world still believe.

Carlos   October 9th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

I love Obama, but I have lost my respect for the Nobel prizes...

amit yadav meerut india   October 9th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

Lets all hope Mr Obama is able to bring Russia & China together working with USA against religious fanatism then there is no reason why peace cant be achieved this way the noble peace prize will also be justified.

Toby   October 9th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

This award is a sad joke on the American people. Obama has been in office for almost a year now and he hasn't accomplished anything other than tripple the U.S. deficit and flip on his promise of not raising middle-class taxes.

With regards to world peace, the Guantanamo prison camp is still open (he promised to close it), the U.S. has not pulles out of Iraq (he promised that too), the U.S. is sending more troops into Afghanistan (he promised to end the war). Also, he has not initiated bilateral talks with Iran and Venezuela, or tried to tacke the Israel/Palestine issue (all those things that he promised in his campaign and was called a naive novice by Clinton and McCain). Score so far: Promises – 6; Actual Accomplishments – 0. As recently as 2 weeks ago at the G20 meeting he was snubbed by China, Russia and Germany, who clearly regard him as inexperienced and incompetent. Even Britain is distancing itself from Obama.

When will people wake up and realize that the emperor has no clothes on? Please, lets focus on actions and concrete evidence, not intentions and soundbites! Obama is the ultimate politician and PR person – he promises everything (whatever happens to be popular at that particular time) and delivers only what he can . . . or nothing at all.

What is most scary is that Obama clearly believes that his government knows what's best for all American people, and that the average American is too dumb to make his own decisions. Wake up people and reject the populist and socialist tyranny that Obama represents.

David   October 9th, 2009 2:11 pm ET

cut off day for submssion was Feb 1st – who submitted his name and for what? what did he do leading up to Feb 1st other than make speeches?

Zinash Bizuneh   October 9th, 2009 2:11 pm ET

Well, as an African born black woman who voted for the Barak Obama I am happy that he did win, but as a realist and in all fairness, I don't think he has done enough to deserve it. Though he has done a lot to acomplish a lot of respectable things in his life, he has not sacrificed anything visible like the past winners, example: Nelson Mandela, MLK Jr., Desmond Tutu etc.... I'm just being honest, but I love Barak Obama.

Chris   October 9th, 2009 2:12 pm ET

No, I don't think he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize at this time because I don't think none of his seeds of peaceful ambitions have materialized yet. Other than his few successful overseas diplomatic efforts. He hasn't accomplished much on the domestic front. But neither has any of the last 8 sitting presidents either. If Mr Obama passes a real health care reform in America. Hands down, he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize because of the peace of mind he will bring to the millions of people without health care coverage. But I do want to congratulate Mr Obama on winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

Tom   October 9th, 2009 2:12 pm ET

Today I awarded my seventh grader his high school diploma and made him valedictorian since he promised to make straight A's and study hard. He has so much potential.

I also asked my boss for my bonus a year early since I have some great plans...

What a joke.

Ruth Lopez   October 9th, 2009 2:14 pm ET

I am totally shocked and speechless! It just doesn't make sense how he can be awarded something so great when he has accomplished nothing.

This definitely was given out prematurely.

The Nobel Peace Prize just lost its luster!

Billy Griffin   October 9th, 2009 2:14 pm ET

If Barack Obama doesn't deserve the Peace Prize.....then who does??? Who has done more to change the climate of the Bush Family's "John Wayne, kill first and then try to be friends later" routine.
It's funny to me...
if a white president was given this award for just trying to disarm the nuclear race...
and making an effort to extend the olive branch to the Islam world in his first 9 months of office...
he would be considered a genius.

Daniel MD   October 9th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

GREAT!
Pres. Obama received a crumbling country that was misled to an oil war,
with all green initiatives suffocated,
and a population increasingly poor and with no health care coverage.
Pres. Obama did an amazing job in such short time because he is an outstanding leader, loves people and peace.

Mithun Mathew   October 9th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

Having read the comments "does not deserve" made by many people, i think its wrong to think so since, Barack Obama after his ascend to the presidency has immediately started to address the most important problems plaguing the world today and engage in global diplomacy with such finesse . I think its this vision plus channeling the energies of his great office towards the greater benefit of humanity which has caught the attention of the Nobel committee. This is definitely NOT a "PR" stunt as somebody suggested, the Nobel committee is not chaired by a bunch of fools !

Congratulations Mr. President and may God bless you and your endeavours to make the world a better place to live in.

Muthyavan.   October 9th, 2009 2:16 pm ET

A deserving choice for the right person who is decorating the world biggest position and achieved many steps towards achieving world peace during a very short time in his office. Though IOC decided to choose another country to host 2016 Olympics against his thrust for Chicago on the grounds of giving another country in a another region for the first time for this international games. Norwegian Nobel committee has no other person suitable in the current list for their contribution toward world peace, it is completely two different international issues.

Doug Rovang   October 9th, 2009 2:17 pm ET

Are you kidding?

leo benson ogiegbaen   October 9th, 2009 2:18 pm ET

its very shocking and makes mockery of the whole idea of a nobel,Obama has just barely assumed office as us president and honestly should have been given more than enough time before such a highly valued award be given to him,he is full of ideas but these ideas are yet untested ,the nobel peace comitte does appear to be loosing focus ,ccause one begins to wonder if they were asleep with names like human rights lawyer,Chief Gani Fawehinmi,who died in the struggle for justice and many more who have laid their lives in the course of the struggle for peace ,equality and justice accross the troubled world.Obama is no less a personality but such award is like giving the answers before asking the question,no wonder obama would become the 1st nobel whose award is greeted with a lot of divided opinions,the us president should in the interest of good conscience rteject the award.

Tim   October 9th, 2009 2:20 pm ET

Oh, I get it now. The prize is awarded based on your intentions to do good. The world is getting crazier and crazier.

Satish Singhal   October 9th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

Nobel peace prize is awarded for peace efforts by a person in the year of declaration of award. Can anyone really claim that they have done more for peace in 2009 than President has? The award is well deserved. It is kind of ironic that when Al Gore won the award, Bush white house made fun of it saying that "they could not care less because presidency is much better than winning Nobel prize". Here is a democrat who IS PRESIDENT and HAS WON NOBEL PRIZE. This goes to show to Bush white house that capable men can be presidents and win nobel prize as well.

Let us look at the trend of last few years. Three democrats won noble peace prize and all republicans have done is to demonize every single one of them. Wake up to the reality republicans! It is a new world out there.

Abba Ade Adebisi : Nigeria   October 9th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

Yes, too early, but the concept behind the price is great.
This Nobel peace price is a kind of trick for him, we are looking at him as a peace loving president and we want him to do more. Unlike Peace is the only tool that can unify the world. We all know, America is a great country, dynamics with allot of power, but don't use it excessively
Nigeria.

Joe   October 9th, 2009 2:22 pm ET

While we have not reached Peace on Earth the leader of the free world is expressing Good Will to ALL not just those who we like.
Terrorists and RushBeckians wont ever embrace Obama but at least he will reach out to those who are opressed all over the world in Iran Iraq Pakistan Afghanistan.
All they are saying is give Peace a Chance..

PS Why do republicans love to spend more and more on Weapons and less and less on education ?

amit yadav meerut india   October 9th, 2009 2:22 pm ET

All those critisizing Mr Obama for receiving this prize and questioning his war tactics should understand one very important thing that it is near impossible to council religeous fanatics because they are just not ready to understand the other persons point of view .Come on lets all give him a pat on the back and wish him all the best for what he is trying to achieve .

MMonteiro   October 9th, 2009 2:23 pm ET

I think his potential as a Future winner is outstanding, but it is too early. If you look at the normal criteria for winners of this award, their efforts were for a period of YEARS. Yes, it is inspiring in one sense, but generally the award is for efforts already accomplished, not efforts just getting started. It is a curious result.

renato from holland   October 9th, 2009 2:23 pm ET

2007 Al Gore

2009 Barack Obama

2010 Michael Moore?

It's All About Political Correctness

erik   October 9th, 2009 2:24 pm ET

I was under the assumption that this is given for accomplishments not tries....

Abba Ade Adebisi : Nigeria   October 9th, 2009 2:24 pm ET

Yes, too early, but the concept behind the price is great.
This Nobel peace price is a kind of trick for him, we are looking at him as a peace loving president and we want him to do more. Unlike Peace is the only tool that can unify the world. We all know, America is a great country, dynamics with allot of power, but don't use it excessively
Nigeria

Ahmed Samir Yahia   October 9th, 2009 2:25 pm ET

I think the prize is awarded for the attitude not the person. Obama sets new ideas, speaks different language and promotes new kinds of relations and diplomatic trends based upon mutual co-op and respect though. this is academic and hard to be implemented, but the presence of the idea is a power itself!

Gsiberger   October 9th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

I am Austrian and a big supporter of President Obama, I feel that he started many good things and does need all the support he can get.

This is surprisingly early, but I can see the committee's point, when they say they want to support the peace process, and that also Helmut Schmidt and Michail Gorbachev have got the prize early in their political peace projects.

I'd say he should accept the prize and regard himself a "laureate on probation", and I hope is even more encouraged and strenghtened by the advance trust.

Good luck, Barack!

Gregg in Iraq   October 9th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

Since he was submitted for this either prior to taking office of just after with the dead line on 1 Feb 2009, he did nothing to deserve the nomination or be selected. He has not kept one of his campaign promises, since taking office, he has found out how absurd they were once he was initially briefed as president. Yes he has made good speeches and humbled himself to dictators, tyrants, has said that extremist Muslims can be talked to and they will truly honor their word when they believe that lying to and infidel if it serves their cause is righteous. He is so naive in the world of politics; he has his dreams none of which have even come to fruition.
He did nothing before he was nominated to earn this and has done nothing substantial since taking office to deserve this. He is a great orator but that is all I have seen.

I am proud that an American won the award, but am ashamed that it was not deserved.

Peter Ford   October 9th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

Absolutely insane to award a peace prize to a person who has not accomplished anything, except to divide the country and puting our children and grandchildren in deep debt. Obviously awarded with political left leaning bias. There are many others who would be far more diserving of this award. How come he was nominated after only two weeks in office? What had he accomplished then, and by now? NOTHING

Mujwahuki   October 9th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

Bravo Baraka H. Obama!! You deserve it, indeed show the world that you are infact entitled for such yearly prizes (if they can be granted more than once for the same human being!!).

I'm very happy that whatever we do in our area of influence, the Norwegian Nobel Committee is looking!

Yes Baraka is everywhere, but his committment "...for the abolition or reduction of standing armies.." (yes: nuclear arsenals are the worst standing armies the Universe has ever seen) entitle him more that teh Nobel!!

As such nuclear arsenals can potentially take us back to pre-dinosars era!!

Thanks Alfred Nobel!!

Adam K.K.   October 9th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

President Obama does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize considering the candidates nominated along side him. This is not to say that at a future date he may not deserve it. I believe this just tarnishes the credibility of the Nobel Institute in Oslo. This just proves that hysteria and hype of a popularity contest can effect the decision making of one of the worlds most prestigious institutes and thus make a mockery of their decision. As of yet, President Obama has promised much that if achieved when he leaves office would make him a legitimate candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize, however considering the many individuals nominated or those who aren't but are renowned globally for their efforts for peace. The Nobel Peace Prize symbolizes the recognition of work that is a hope for peace, but a hope that is built by those who have acted and sacrificed so much to make a difference be it so little or so big. What has President Obama accomplished? Calm an international political system that is inherently distrustful? Returned confidence to the United Nations, an organization that is idealistic in a world of realists? Most importantly is President Obama being awarded this because he hasn't invaded another country or started another war? To do this for these reasons alone is ridiculous. President Obama may not lead the U.S. into another conflict or war but should that outweigh the fact that he has the ability to end a conflict and may not do so? As cliche as it sounds, actions speak louder than words and more importantly hope don't float.

Yvette Law   October 9th, 2009 2:27 pm ET

I am inspired by the moral standards Obama has and his vision for our country and world. However, it is unfortunate that this prize was given to him for just those "visions" and moral character NOT actual accomplishments. He deserves much praise but not the Nobel Peace prize.

Nelson Alexander   October 9th, 2009 2:28 pm ET

Why not? He deserves it for his books, his speeches on race relations, his efforts to unify, and the hope he has given Africans, the African diaspora, and racial minorities the world over. He leads powerfully by personal example and that too can be seen as an accomplishment.

It may be an odd choice and will certainly be a burden to Obama, but only the American right wing, the Taliban, Al-Qeada, the Glen Beck Tea-Party, White Supremacists, and other hate groups could truly resent the choice. Let them wail and gnash their teeth.

PG   October 9th, 2009 2:29 pm ET

This is insane! Of course he does not deserve it! But it is hardly surprising given the group of people doing the voting. It is really embarassing and quite disturbing as an American to have the rest of the world believe that someone like Obama is worthy of what should be a prestigious award. If Obama had any integrity he would refuse the award on the ground that is is undeserved, but he doesn't strike me as someone with any humility at all. It is too bad that those of us who work and carry the country must be saddled with the "it doesn't matter what you actually accomplish in life, as long as you hope and feel and dream, you're a winner!" group that comprise the Obama supporters. People want something for nothing, and that is exactly what they are getting with Obama – someone who rose to the Presidency based on slick pep talks without having any kind of record to point to. For the first time in my life I am (almost) ashamed to be an American. I say almost because I am sure that things will get even worse in my beloved country. We are coming to an end if Americans no longer believe in achievements but in empty words.

Will   October 9th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

Just as many have already said, intentions do not deserve such honors. He has accomplished little to nothing to actually deserve the Peace Prize. Sure he preaches all of his promises and change and world peace, but Miss America aspirants always want world peace, and they didn't win this prize. It would be like me saying I intend to write the most influential, meaningful, well-written book of all-time, and then win the Nobel Prize in literature before I could even start writing it.

Gsiberger   October 9th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

just adding:
It was of course Willy Brandt and not Helmut Schmidt who, as German chancellor won the Nobel Peace Prize for his effort towards better relations with eastern Europe.
I don't know if the prize helped much, but it certainly didn't hurt the process.

Georgina   October 9th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

I think it is great Mr.Obama has received the Nobel Peace prize
and every one should say congratulations to him not dismiss it
as not being important. It takes one min.to say great, of course
he has other things to do and he will do them as time permits.

thank you
Georgina

Diana   October 9th, 2009 2:31 pm ET

Yes, I do believe he deserved this prestigious award. He is working hard to ally us with countries that would never even have given us a second thought under other presidents. Let's give him a chance to prove his worthiness. He is a good person and race should not enter into his politics. I am so disappointed in some of my fellow Americans and relatives that look at him only as a "black president". Get over it! Work with him and not against him!

Donald Ludlow   October 9th, 2009 2:31 pm ET

I like president Obama and what he is attempting to do but I, like many, feel that this award has been granted far too prematurely. I do congratulate him on his accomplishment but it may turn out to be more of a curse than blessing to him if he is unable to live up to the
"great expectations" that so many have. Let's consider next year's award for a Congress that can pass health-care legislation that is truly available to all.

Certified   October 9th, 2009 2:32 pm ET

Though President Obama is going to great measures to to ensure international peace, I feel that it is to early for him to be awarded The Nobel Peace Prize. Its the issues in his country that needed to be panned out before receiving such an honorable award.

Richard Holl   October 9th, 2009 2:33 pm ET

No, absolutely not! Indecision, stumbling and letting things drift should not be confused with other people's hope that Obama can conjure peace – but has not done so – just because he is so eloquent at international meetings where he is blindly adored.

Mike Guthrie   October 9th, 2009 2:33 pm ET

He has, in a few short months, changed the tone of international relations, completely altered the US standing in the world, and lowered the risk level for all of us. His biggest problem is an opposition rooted in Bush-league thinking and hysteria. This prize recognizes effort and intent as much as accomplishment, though, and we can only hope his own country recognizes the seriousness of peace as a primary focus of foreign policy.

Mary   October 9th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

Preident Obama has maintained honesty and integrity rarley seen anymore on the political stage He is detirmined to be a peaceful and hopeful example for Americas future and for the world. Do I think he deserves this honor? YES I do.

Mary
Norfolk, VA

Chase   October 9th, 2009 2:36 pm ET

He has created more issues then he has fixed.

Lily   October 9th, 2009 2:37 pm ET

Definitely NOT!!!!!! There are more people who deserves it. look at Zemababwe´s Tsongara, he deserves it more. For Obama, he has done nothing yet. That remains to be seen!!!!

The Nobel Prize Selection commitee this time lost their cridibility as well as the organization. You are playing favoritism.

Ruben   October 9th, 2009 2:38 pm ET

I am Honduran, and I am completly shocked by this waaay to early award. In Honduras were we have a polarized society, violence problems, and I am very dissapointed at this award. Its way too early and he has taken a very shaky and ambiguous position on our situation, Clinton does all the talking... Its like Obama doesn't want to get dirty... I believe HOW someone can handle a complex situation like this one, gives enough credit for him to win the nobel prize. What about Afghanistan?? Politics on Iran?? This award is early and I don't think he has done enough to deserve it...

Natali   October 9th, 2009 2:39 pm ET

No, I don't think that President Obama should have been awarded such a prestigious peace prize. He has not been in office long enough to accomplish what he has preached. It is impossible to say that he will ever accomplish it. Recognition for this award should be for those who have spent their life or a large portion of their lives working for peace. I think it was improper for this award to be given to such a new US President that has not yet accomplished anything to do with peace. In my opinion, it only alieniates the US further from the rest of world, rewarding the US President for beign who he is.

jolly.paily@gmail.com   October 9th, 2009 2:40 pm ET

Amazing news.. my intuition came true. .I was think just the day before when I heard all other Nobel prize announcements. who would win this years Nobel peace prize.. and It did occur it could be Obama for some reason and that stuck in my mind.. I think he deserves, for the things he is trying to accomplish. On the flip side, he is now under tremendous pressure to live up to it..eventually, He will succeed. Give him some time..

Cheers to President Obama!!....
Jolly Paily

Eastern Shore Barb   October 9th, 2009 2:40 pm ET

He certainly does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. He deserves to be impeached. However, since they were stupid enough to give it to Al Gore for false science they are stupid enough to give it to Obama. The whole thing is meaningless. The last deserving recepient was Mother Theresa.

Bella Heyrend   October 9th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

This is a joke. He was nominated 2 weeks after he became president, on the hopes that maybe he would do something deserving of this? Should we also award him a Medical degree on the hopes that one day he might go to medical school? No, he doesn't deserve this, he hasn't done anything to earn it. He should never have even been nominated, that whole process is suspect now. It dimishes the award to have someone who has done so little in comparison to previous recipients.

Sally   October 9th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

Absolutely, I think Obama is worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. While I am as surprised as anyone and also recognize that not much actual progress has been achieved yet, I think that Obama's sincere efforts to reengage the rest of the world and to promote dialog and diplomacy are hugely deserving of recognition. It is absolutely critical that Americans and all other nations and people of the world recognize that other people and nations do have legitimately differing views that need to be acknowledged and taken into account. We don't necessarily have to agree with other views but we do need to respect those views just the same as we want other's to respect our opinions and views. The Nobel Prize committee is trying to point out to the world that this approach of respect, dialog and diplomacy is the way to go, even if results aren't immediate. The world's conflicts took years to develop and aren't going to be solved overnight, but Obama's efforts are a huge step in the right direction. If more of the world took the same respectful approach towards others, there most definitely would be great progress towards a much more peaceful world.

DaveB   October 9th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

So far, I have not seen President Obama accomplish anything worthy of a Nobel Prize. I believe President Obama has many plans, but talking about something and getting it done are very different. Even if his plans do get implemented, the results may differ from expectations. At some point, President Obama may deserve a Nobel Prize, but awarding it to him at this time reduces the prestige and honor of those who have truly earned it.

Henrik   October 9th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

Yes, yes he does. You can't fight war alone, and Obama knows that. He has united Europe and the US in a way that is crucial if we want to fight war. How long will it take before he unites the world?
/Norway

Jennifer Yong   October 9th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

Rightly so, he deserved it! This only means that the world is behind him to what he can possible and potentially do for world peace.

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Molly   October 9th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

No. I do not think that Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. He has done nothing extraordinary so far and is not even in the same league or ballpark or universe as past winners. What Peace deal has he brokered?
I think he should fly down to South Africa and give it to Nelson Mandela and say they gave it to the wrong guy!!!

José Truda Palazzo, Jr.   October 9th, 2009 2:43 pm ET

Mr. Obama deserves the prize, and many US citizens seem not to realize what a blessing it is to have a leader that has principles and understands how the world works beyond your own borders. Give the man time to work. Or else if you don´t want him I´ll gladly trade our banana republic clown here in Brazil for him!!!!!!!

Joab   October 9th, 2009 2:43 pm ET

Those who say things like "Mr. obama absolutely deserves the prize – none more than him" make me laugh. You really don't think there are more deserving people, like people who actually DONE something for peace in their lifetime as opposed to a rookie leader who talks about peace but haven't done anything yet? What a mockery. Obama's naivity may in fact cause great harm to the world (postponing sanctions on Iran with his good belief that "everything will be okay" is just one example). I still hope he will be able to somehow fulfill his fairytale-like "world peace" dream eventually or at least make some concrete steps in this direction, but for now he's all talk, no action. Big words don't impress me much.

peeved kiv   October 9th, 2009 2:44 pm ET

Mr. Obama is ALL talk...NO do. He does not deserve this award!! He has not done one thing for this country or this world to promote "peace"; not even in his hometown of Chicago. Gang killings are amond the highest in Chicago. Has he done any peaceful resolution here???? NO, he's too busy entertaining a large group of his adminstration in Denmark (costing we the taxpayers in the millions of dollars) to even comment on the horrible killing of the honor student bludgeoned to death just last week in Chicago. The sooner we vote out of office this egocentric, shallow man, who loves spending our money and protecting thieves and law-breakers like Senator Rangel, the better this country will be!!

John Duizenberg   October 9th, 2009 2:45 pm ET

Giving Barak Obama the peaceprize is as rediculous as giving Vladimir Putin the nobel price for promoting free speech.

A leader of a country fighting two wars, of wich one the legality is disputed across the world, may never receive such a prize.
The reasons why Obama got the prize makes me question the capability of the nobel commission. Especially when he got nominated 11 days before the nomination deadline. he has not done anything of significance within those 11 days.
The reason that the award is meant as a stimulation for his ideas is a bad reason. One could award Ahmadinejad for his research into nuclear energy if this is the reason the nobel commission gives.

Alexei Simonov of the Glasnost Defence Foundation or any of the few hundred journalists killed by Putin would have been better.
For it focusses attention to a real problem.

Ryan the Palestinian   October 9th, 2009 2:45 pm ET

There is no denying Obama has put tremendous effort and has the will to do alot for peace around the world, however, should that be enough to win the most prestigious and honourable award in the world? By awarding Obama the peace prize, the committee seems to have lowered its standards on who can get the award. I think there were others that were alot more deserving of the award this year. Perhaps the committee should have waited a few years to see concrete results from Obamas visions before handing him such an award. On another note, considering the nominees were picked as early as february,my question is who at that time felt Obama deserving of the prize as to nominate him so early in his presidency?

Oh well, congratulations Obama. I hope you make the most of it and bring peace to the Middle East. The guy before you didn’t do a good job on the matter.

JW   October 9th, 2009 2:45 pm ET

The value of the prize has been lessened!

CHunt   October 9th, 2009 2:45 pm ET

No, I do not believe Obama deserves the prize. To select a man who has not accomplished anything in the short time he has been in office demeans the prize itself. I for one will not look favorably at the Nobel Prizes in the future. They once meant something – today the committee proved the prizes are worthless. Don't give a prize for "potential" – give a prize for success. Obama has achieved nothing to date that qualifies him for any awards. He is humbled? We are embarrassed.

Markus Bolte   October 9th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

Interesting, a physicist has to be lucky to still be alive to receive the Nobel prize for his research, in the most recent case forty years AFTER the effort, for something that changed the world in a way as significant as the internet. President Obama got the Nobel prize for something he has not yet done. That's like giving my kindergarten-age child her high school diploma because she can already draw well!

Billy Christ   October 9th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

Why indeed!? The Nobel organization puts their credibility in serious doubt.

Michael   October 9th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

I know plenty of people with great ideas and an enormous passion for world peace.

Do they deserve it too, considering they have achieved about as much as Mr Obama?

What an absolute joke. I'm embarrassed for him.

Joyce Victors   October 9th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

Mr. President,
I am a fan of yours and think your Presidency has so much potential. But you need to reject this award. The last thing this world needs right now is another wrong decision made by someone in power. Mr. President, you do not deserve this award. Yet. Please give it to someone who really deserves it at this point in time.
Thanks.

Wendel Kuo   October 9th, 2009 2:48 pm ET

I don't see any solid proof that President Obama did anything to help the world peace. (Even if he did, it's only a few month.. I don't think there are any results yet)

Jeni   October 9th, 2009 2:48 pm ET

I definitely do not think Obama deserved to win this award. The Nobel Peace Prize is usually given to individuals who have dedicated their lives to making discoveries or creating changes that enhance the world in which we live. While Obama may also one day follow through on his inspirational promise of change, it is currently just that – a promise, and not an actual result or change.

E.R. Haire, Jr.   October 9th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

While I greatly support Obama and voted for him, I do not see any reason for him to win the Nobel. His agenda is far from being completed and words about peace do not equate action. The war in Iraq needs to shut down and it still rages. It took Mother Teresa years of amazing work to win the prize and Obama gets it in nine months? Something is wrong here...

Mo A. A. Batein   October 9th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

One emotion
:(

Reida McDowell   October 9th, 2009 2:50 pm ET

There are many kinds of peace. I grew up in the American South amid terrible discrimination and racism against African Americans. Barak Obama in great wisdom worked during his campaign not to negate the problem or use it to his advantage but to bring a great healing to America. He deserves the Nobel Peace Prize if for no other reason than the peace he brings to America. My hope is that peace and the work of reconciliation may spread to the world.

Tom   October 9th, 2009 2:50 pm ET

Nobels are generally awarded for major breakthroughs, for a body of work over many years, or for groundbreaking political and humanitarian efforts.

Mr. Obama's selection seems very premature. He's been in office less than one year, and while he has delivered some great speeches, he has not actually achieved much yet in terms of measurable results.

There are so many other deserving candidates and organizations.

With respect, Mr. Obama is just not in the same league as: Doctors without Borders, Amnesty International, or the UN Peacekeeping forces (all former winners).

Keith   October 9th, 2009 2:50 pm ET

The article says he was awarded the prize for his "efforts". A lot of people make efforts. A prize of any value should be given for accomplishments. This award has forever deminished the credibility of the Nobel Prize.

ami   October 9th, 2009 2:52 pm ET

Of course he deserves it. He did a U turn and changed the whole international climate. And the act of asking does he deserve it implies he does not- that question fits in to republican meme of trying to de-legitimize our president.

Another Jessica   October 9th, 2009 2:52 pm ET

This is absolutely rediculous. Obama won because he is the first black president, and because he's a liberal. He hasn't even done anything yet. Sure, he's said a lot, but he needs to DO something to be eligible for the Nobel Prize. What a joke.

Jacob   October 9th, 2009 2:54 pm ET

Are you kidding? What has he done for peace? somebody tell me? nothing.. he has failed at everything he has done EXCEPT to basically bankrupt the U.S. with the stimulus garbage. Seriously, he has bowed down and kissed the ring of every evil dictator and henchmen the world has to offer. This is horrible.. I will no longer consider The Nobel Peace Prize as anything but an award similar to what celebrity's give to themselves.

Best Joker!   October 9th, 2009 2:55 pm ET

I unanimously award BEST JOKER OF THE CENTURY to Nobel Committee for its spectacular decision of awarding a pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia leader of the corrupt western world.

really   October 9th, 2009 2:56 pm ET

really? he won the peace prize for doing what? listening to people talk about their side of the issue and then accomplishing nothing.

Mase   October 9th, 2009 2:57 pm ET

Obama is well deserve of a Noble Peace Prize because of what he's done in life to effect people around him. As a president, still much to prove but if you deny that the man is working towards a better world for all. He said 2010 for the wars to end so let the man get an opportunity to stick to his word. He said things won't be easy but if you let him, he will deliver

Steve RI   October 9th, 2009 2:58 pm ET

What exactly has he done? The Nobel awarding commitee seems to have given this award prematurely.

Ruth De Souza Guedes   October 9th, 2009 3:00 pm ET

Yes!!!!

Rebecca   October 9th, 2009 3:01 pm ET

The amount of work he has done and the number of project she has initiated in 8 months is mind bogging. No one expect shim to complete anything in 8 months when he first had to deal with the system at the brink of collaspe.

If I have to travel to any part of the world, I am no longer scared and worried. There is a sense of peace and hope. That is priceless.

Alan RUdman   October 9th, 2009 3:01 pm ET

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat! I like many ppl like Obama very much, but hang on a sec? hes only been in the job 5 mins, is the middle east sorted = no, is Somalian piracy sorted = no, are the troops out & Afghan and Iraqi nations stable.... no!
This seems to me to have been awarded based on personality!

Wafic Said   October 9th, 2009 3:02 pm ET

President Obama historic speech in Cairo set the stage for his foreign policy based on conciliation, mutual interests and mutual respect. The 2009 Peace Prize is awarded to every American who voted for a "change" from the policies of the previous administration and to "Yes we can" have peace in the world.

Mary Strong   October 9th, 2009 3:04 pm ET

He deserves the award period! He has done in this day and time what no one else has.

Jeff   October 9th, 2009 3:04 pm ET

By the Nobel own rules, all nominations that must be postmarked no later than February 1st each year. So he comes into office on Jan 20th and had 11 days to prove his worth to be a Noble Prize winner....

Norma in Houston, Tx.   October 9th, 2009 3:04 pm ET

No, I don't think he deserved it. It has been given to him too soon. He hasn't accomplished anything yet. If the prize is given for just having dreams and thoughts of a better world, then maybe, but it's not my understanding that this is the case. When he accomplishes what he has set out to do, then and only then, should he be deserving of this prestigious honor. I respect him as our President and hope he can make good on his campaign promises, but I'm not blind to the fact that the man "Talks the talk, but can he Walk the walk?"

Yvonne   October 9th, 2009 3:05 pm ET

We are America! Built on the Backs of others!!! What President Obama is trying to do is like trying to carry a stove up the back steps without any assistance!!!
Do we have to agree with him to help? No, you do it every day in your jobs! If we're honest, most of us think our bosses/co-workers ideas are ludicrous! We don;t agree, but we get on the team and help push the stove! We are America, what a chance to show the world, the WORLD, WHAT WE ARE REALLY MADE OF!!!

Proud Army Brat of Doc Allison! I'll help you push the Stove P. Obama!

Karen Welch   October 9th, 2009 3:07 pm ET

I am appalled that President Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize – for what? This has obviously been a set-up nomination done by his
hencemen. What an embarrassment. I don't know how he can accept such an award for nothing. The corruption of this administration runs even deeper than I suspected. Each day brings another horror.

Janice   October 9th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

It's sad that our president is respected by non-Americans more than those that live here. It's because our country is still filled with racism, greed, and the need for instant gratification (the problems he has to fix can't be done in less than a year). Obviously, intelligent people see that he is planting the seeds for a better tomorrow (many seeds). We now have a president that world respects. I commend President Obama and I am enjoying this historical experience. Keep up the good work and I support your efforts despite constant criticism.

james meyer   October 9th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

absolutely......these times are unlike any other and the changes he has brought are real and inspiring..........

frederick   October 9th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

as much as the Bush/Blair years meant well for their respective nations, the web of lies that characterised their administrations opened the US/UK to extreme suspicion, distrust, apathy and outright hostility. Obama has in a short space of time, changed this perception; not so much by concretized action, as by inspiring hope, trust and a willingness to give peace a chance.
For this he certainly is deserving of the honour of the Nobel Peace Prize. Where he goes from here will be determined by how others on the world stage respond to his overtures.

Treena   October 9th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

Yes I believe he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. I believe President Obama has made great efforts to restore good foreign relations, and to bring peace to regents where their is unrest. What he is attempting to do will not be an overnight effort. He can make requests, and reach out to leaders however, he can not force these leaders to respond positively. He is operateing in a different place then form Presidents. The United States is know for bullying other country. In the past if a country rejects what the United States requires of them our response has always been the same in the past; we attack or place penalties against them. President Obama is coming from a different place and I believe he will be successful. Also I want to know where were all the voices when President Bush was making a mess of this country. I don't understand how the republicans can open their mouths to speak on anything regarding this country. They sat around for years and watch as Bush make one bad decision after the other. And Michael Steel is a joke, and sounds as foolish has he looks. Where was his big mouth when Bush was in office.

Kay   October 9th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

Wow. All you Europeans gushing over a do-nothing, slickster who gives pretty speeches and accomplishes NOTHING except lies. What a freaking joke. Man, if you are giving out awards in HOPE of someone accomplishing something go ahead and sign me up! In the future I am going to rid the world of all mean things, unicorns are going to fly around and fart glitter, rainbows will be everywhere and we all get to eat pie all day and not get fat.

Today the wonderful thing the Peace prize used to be came to an end. Today the Peace Prize is now the joke of the world
You might as well award it to Pol Pot now for his thorough effort to reduce CO2 emissions.

What a joke.

T Williams   October 9th, 2009 3:11 pm ET

First of all, I fully support everything Obama is trying to accomplish. But I beleive the award seems to more of a vote against Bush's international approach and policies than Obama accomplishments.

It also shows how important the US approach to internatinal diplomacy is. A simple gesture of peace means a lot.

Jim Nuziard   October 9th, 2009 3:12 pm ET

No, he absolutely does not deserve this award. Disarming America and giving "hope" to our enemies is not an accomplishment worthy of an award decided ten days after his inauguration.

When the panel gives the Peace Prize to recipients such as Obama, they lose credibility and it lowers the esteem for being chosen for the award.

Joyce Dirkzwager-van Slee   October 9th, 2009 3:12 pm ET

Yes there is real change happening in the world, and I can only agree that President Obama deserves the great Nobel Peace Price for Peace. He is the human being that has stood up to the world with so much impact to create change and collective hope for a better world. A world we should not forget is in the move of just crawling out from a dark warrier era of terroristic rage and fear.
I cannot think of any other leader or citizen in this world to have created such a breakthrough in collective awareness toward change and peace as Mr. Obama has done and is doing. Who else but Mr. Obama, as an individual, has shown courage and insight to wake up all of us.

MJB   October 9th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Nobel Peace Prize. He does not deserve it as yet. This is for past achievements. He has not done anything yet but go over to other countries demeaning the citizens of the United States. Saying we are arrogant. Really! Whos first into all these countries with Aid that we arrogant people are paying for with our taxes, that of course are still going to go up. Who do they call first to fight their battles and the list goes on. Arrogant, Mr Obama is that!!!!

EdaK   October 9th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

This award in 100% undeserved!

Laurentheren   October 9th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Doesn't matter what we think. He received it, get over it, it is done!

Dave   October 9th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Kool-Aid – Norwegians love it too!

Maina   October 9th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Mandela got the Nobel Peace Prize after spending 27 years in prison for his beliefs, seeing his people's rights violated and still insisting on reconciliation and non-violence.
Obama has promise but I think the Nobel Peace Prize if it has to retain value should be for a lifetime of work and results. Also given that the Nobel Peace Prize is often given to people who would benefit from having it in order to advance their work, it looks like it would have made more sense to go to someone else who needed the spotlight that is brought by having the Nobel Prize to accomplish their work.
Obama is already POTUS he doesn't need the Nobel Peace Prize yet. This award brings to mind the USA trying to get Chicago to be given the Olympics when Latin America and Africa had never hosted. How about Ann Syu Kyi or Morgan Tsvangirai?

Melanie   October 9th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

While I understand the skepticism, Barack Obama is a symbol world wide.
A symbol of what faith, hope, and belief can accomplish.
A symbol of overcoming past differences and suffering.
A symbol for intelligent and common sense thinking.
A symbol of integrity and responsibility.
If for this and nothing more,
Barack Obama, as one who stands for these virtues remains a symbol for the Nobel peace Prize.
I, for one, am thankful for the arrival of such a symbol.

Martin Blankenship   October 9th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Nominations for the prize had to be postmarked by February 1 - only 12 days after Obama took office. The committee sent out its solicitation for nominations last September - two months before Obama was elected president.

This is off of your website!

Rose   October 9th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

He is trying so hard to bring our country and the rest of the world together in peace. Every turn he makes someone is trying to knock him down. As they have always done to the Black man. He focuses on the poor and needy. What is the Republican party doing for the needy? NOTHING AT ALL, THEY ARE MAD BECAUSE THEY ARE GETTING HIT IN THE POCKETS. CONGRATS TO OBAMA!

Marc   October 9th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

The decision deadline was two weeks into his administration. Considering what little he has accomplished even at this point I can't
conceive what merits this is based on.

Marilee Burczyk   October 9th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Barack Obama has not earned enough home and/or world accomplishments – only speeches. The American people invite him, as our President, to be more engaged with the us and our desire to be heard. On the world stage, the Nobel Peace Prize winners have either spent a lifetime or considerable efforts to earn this award. I am dissapointed in the committee's choice in 2009.

NINA YIRDAW   October 9th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Congradulation Mr. President Obama. You deserve the noble peace prize. Hope everything you do works out for our entire nation. Lets accept and try to process his ideas with respect and without being skeptic just because he is black. Peace for Mr. President and America

Tu Khanh   October 9th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

If Obama is self-respected, he should thank the Nobel Committee and tunn down the prize. The question is simple: What's his contribution toward the world peace? Just lip services. Many a man and woman in depotic nations have fought for peace, physically and spiritually. Yet their quiet fight is neglectd. We are ashame!

Jacqueline Montgomery   October 9th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Absolutely not. I am completely stunned at this decision. I see no objective assessment of his contributions to world peace. This decision has destroyed the value of winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

Kiaina Phillips   October 9th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

It's not a matter of whether Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize or not! Any person who has been honored, recognized or awarded anything is based purely on opinion. Each individual holds a track record, whether it be good or bad. Now, so many people have an opinion, but do nothing on their own time. Let Obama's award BE and let it serve as an example to all.
There's no effort without hope and when applied effort is in hope of a desired result. So, why is he being faulted for something he didn't ask for. To say he's done nothing is a PURE LIE!

Jusfiq Hadjar   October 9th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Now that he has received the Nobel Prize, Obama has the moral obligation to ask and to talk about Israel's nuclear weapons.

Jusfiq Hadjar

VM   October 9th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

He deserves this prestegious award (100%). In just approximately, nine months, Obama has changed US world perceptions from a "hardline go-it alone...damed the rest of the world" to a friendlier nation willing to engage and converse on peaceful efforts. This is a very significant accomplishment. He also beat all odds to become the first African-American President (very historic and significant). For all the naysayers in the US, that critize his current lack of accomplishments...hogwash! He was elected to a four year term and you will see significant domestic accomplishments (Financial, Healthcare etc.) in year 2 (not after nine months). Considering the extensive mess left in the country by the Bush Presidency, do you honestly think, he's going to turn things around after nine months? Ridiculous!
Congratulations on the award Mr President...100% deserved.

samuel   October 9th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I am proud of Pres. Obama, proud of his what he said in his speech this morning, proud of his deep humanity and proud of his profound humility.

Kenneth Callahan   October 9th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Obama deserves the prize. Read his early speech on race relations (during campaign); reflect on his turning the other cheek on so many personal insults from the right wing. I am particularly impressed with the thoughtful caution he takes in the midst of two wars.

John   October 9th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

yes

Zan   October 9th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Greg Mortenson deserved it. Give Obama some time to make some change and then award him.

mark fleming   October 9th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

The american people are going backwards theve had there day! the transition of power has begun. With no money and china having the power to sell every reserve dollar to fold yr economy further i c no way back and regards to his noble peace award its just a smoke screen to keep this weak leader agreeing to be friends with every1 when the fact is the moment the USA become weak they will be knocking at its door to destroy it once and for all. Bush kept his promise (911) he protected yr people and its soil till the moment he left the world crash was not his doing.

chris   October 9th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Mr. Obama is a person of the future, yes he deserves that and much more.

Tina   October 9th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Does Obama deserve the Peace Prize? Abso-friggin-lutely!!!!

Linda   October 9th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Congratulations to the President and to America! Mr. Obama embodies the hope and the will for a better future for all humanity, therefore he absolutely deserves the Nobel prize.

reuben   October 9th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I think bush and osama were much more deserving ..

Kristi   October 9th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I am completely astonished that Barack Obama has won the Nobel Prize. We are actually placing him in the same ranks as past winners such as Kim Dae Jung (2000), Nelson Mandela (1993), Aung San Suuu Kyi (1991), Mohamed ElBaradei (2005), and Mikhail Gorbachev (1990); just to name a few??? The once revered prize has now taken a nose dive and I can imagine that the great leaders who have been honored with this label are shaking their heads in disgust... I am positive that an earlier winner and former US resident, Theodore Roosevelt (1905) is rolling over in his grave. There is now a dark cloud over the Nobel Peace Prize...

Blake Melton   October 9th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Hell no! Naming him for this award on devalues this award for all previous & future winners.

idar   October 9th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

i would say that i mean that Barack Obama should not get this price at this time i mean he need to have some more years in office before they can actualy give that importent price.
I like the president but he have to show wath he is made of first.
But still i would like to gratulate him :)

best regards from norway

Calee   October 9th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I don't think he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. It is great he is discussing peace but another to actually be putting it into action. If he was accomplishing these things already I might feel differently

Rudy Norton   October 9th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

He deserved it as much as Dr. Martin Luther King Junior. He also received the award before his "dream" became the reality that is President Obama.

Lei   October 9th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

I think a lot of have vision about peace, but without actions. it is meanining less.

Kathryn Winkler   October 9th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Yes, I believe President Barack Obama deserves to win the Nobel Peace Prize for his "efforts to strengthen international diplomacy" and for his "vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons." In regards to the first point: When George W. Bush was president, one of the reasons I felt ashamed to be an American was because of the way his administration alienated the rest of the world with their unilateral approach to foreign policy. In contrast, because of President Obama's efforts to engage the international community in solving the world's problems, I now feel proud to be an American. I woke up this morning with tears in my eyes when I heard the news. On the second point: I believe it is obvious that a world without nuclear weapons would be a better place, as the use of these weapons would be catastrophic, evil and inhumane. I am also extremely grateful that our current president can at the very least, correctly pronounce the word, "nuclear!"

Matt Hagen   October 9th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

I want one too! Where do I sign up?

Nikky   October 9th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

It is sad how POLITICAL the Nobel Peace Price has become.
No, he does not deserve it just because he is the first black presidente of US and said he would do wonders that be are yet to see.

Renner Avaheli   October 9th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

I can understand why some people postulate that Obama's win is premature given the daunting tasks that he has undertaken, but not accomplished. But I'd like to ask those who would strip him of this award, who is more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize?

I don't ask this to support Obama, I'm asking because I really don't know. Who is more deserving than Obama?

Rob from Cuba   October 9th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

It appears to me that the nomination committee has regressed to high school antics, not voting on actual accomplishments, but popularity. Mr. President has some high expectations to live up to now, let's see if he can change in 4 years and let history judge him.

bob   October 9th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

He is reaching out to all people around the world, if that's not working for peace i don't know what is?

jane   October 9th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

yes he does

Tina Freund   October 9th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

I find the news to be a bit shocking. Why haven't all the other presidents' received one? They all do about the same thing...granted, they each may have their "own" cause to find relief for, but really, isn't it all about the same? =)

Emily Virgona   October 9th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

I believe any person who stands for social justice and takes action for peace deserves the nobel peace prize. Obama stands for peace, and this year he got the prize. This is fabulous.

Marilyn   October 9th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

The awarding of the Nobel Prize to Barack Obama is indicative of the hunger for peace and hope in our world. I think people are tired of the constant negativity that bombards us every day. One reason that Obama resonated with so many is that his was a different tone. He had the "audacity of hope" and talked about finding common ground and working together. These are long-held, yet somewhat lost, values once strongly associated with the US. This president inherited a grim economy and two wars; we need his voice of hope. It's time to stop playing politics with such difficult issues, and to come together to help this president achieve what is best for all of us. We, the people, voted him into office for those very reasons. The Nobel committee recognizes the hunger for a different focus. Congratulations, Mr. President.

Kumal   October 9th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

In true conspiracy theory style, the peace prize too might have been engineered by the CIA to enable Obama to justify his capitulation to the Afghan Taliban under the garbs of peace talks as expected of him of his new status and guess what by giving nobel prize rest of the world bought insurance against US as under Obama US will never go on offensive ...think about it!!

Lara   October 9th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

The fact that Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize just continues to reiterate the idiocy of so many! I feel for those who have appropriately been awarded in the past....the suffering, the endurance, the strength, and the amazing accomplishments....now we simply award the Nobel to someone who "talks" of peace and does that very well, yet there is nothing to show on his report card to prove he has done anything but TALK. This is completely embarassing for our entire Nation!! We no longer hold our leaders to any kind of measurable standard...we simply follow his hypnotic words blindly into the FIRE!!

Nicky   October 9th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

I frankly applaud the efforts Obama is putting in trying to achieve world piece but until all these effort materialize i think this prize came way too fast .

Jan   October 9th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

I am not sure if he deserves it but I think it will enable him to do more on international stage f that is the case I commend it. However I think the decision was unfortunate in respect to credibility and prestige of the price. I think Obama is doing great job and I think even trying hard should be rewarded , but maybe in a few years. To answer who should get nobel price when not him I would say Vaclav Havel.

Jeromy Cummings   October 9th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

This is really a shame, the previous winners have devoted most of their lives bringing peace to the world. People like Jody Williams who helped with the banning and clearing of anti personnel mines. Large organisations like Doctors without borders consisting of doctors who volunteer to go to some of the worst spots in the world to provide free medical care. President Obama has devoted 9 months to talking about doing some things with some people in some places. To me this is like a guy getting a Purple Heart for a paper cut.

MelowMel   October 9th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

Congratulation President Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.The Norwegian Nobel Committee was correct when they stated "only very rarely has a person captured the worlds attention and given it's people hope for a better future"

john   October 9th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

i just fell odd for pres.obama to recieve this award..wouldnt it be better for him when he achieves peace in the middle east and by the way i heard mahatma gandhi never got the award ie quite hard to follow

Sandy   October 9th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

Nobel prizes seem to almost be given posthumously - after a lifetime of work. From that view, Barack Obama may not have earned the award yet, but the world certainly deserves it. I see the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Obama not only as acknowledgement and appreciation for the direction he is taking, it is also tangible support to help him - to help us all - in efforts for political, economical, social, and environmental peace. The award is to the hope and action that he symbolizes and leads.

Roxanne Lenahan   October 9th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

Our President, Barack Obama, obviously deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. These prizes are not given lightly, and are given a great deal of consideration prior to their being awarded...and clearly, President Barack Obama was the best choice! He has made great strides in bringing people around the world together with a message of hope and prosperity – and his work in accomplishing those lofty goals goes on every day. His diplomacy has been evident – hardly a day goes by that we do not hear about his efforts to speak to world leaders in an effort to halt nuclear proliferation and bring peace.

I am very proud that our president has received such a prestigious award.

Joanne H.   October 9th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

Absolutely NOT. He has done nothing to earn an international prize.

barua,sanjoy   October 9th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

obama creating conditions for the safety of future genarations

mike snyder   October 9th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

After listening to the Nobel judge it is apparent that the Nobel committee is using this in an effort to influence world politics.

No No No   October 9th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

Why?? For what accomplishments??? No No No

Godwin   October 9th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

yes he deserves it....he is trying to get american people out of ignorance,selfishness..they should be pround of him..

BKnight   October 9th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

I'm not sure how Mr. Obama could achieve such recognition with so little to specifically show for it. If all that is required is that people feel better about the peace efforts, then the award is richly deserved. If the Nobel Prize goes to those who show proven results from their efforts, then no, he most assuredly does not deserve it.

Richard Lake, CWO, US Army (Retired)   October 9th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

It is very clear from the posts that there are Republican hate-mongers posting and voting in the quick poll who still do not respect the fact that the majority of Americans voted for Obama.

Will the Republicans ever get over it? Probably not! They want to divide the country.

Today I am so proud to be an American and of our President. He earned the prize, without question.

Doordoc54   October 9th, 2009 4:09 pm ET

George Bush spent 8 years screwing foreign relations up interfering in other countries right to exist. And no I don't support terrorism but I don't agree with creating fictional terrorist threats simply for the purpose of imposing our way of life on other nations.
President Obama has made great strides to repair the damage done by the "Bush Bomb Them Administration". Guess that's why he received the Nobel Peace Prize and Bush did not!!!

Suzy Diamond   October 9th, 2009 4:10 pm ET

RIDICULOUS!!! What has he done? We are in such debt that we will be there for generations and generations. The ecomony is sputtering and the unemployment will no doubt reach over 10%. He has promised transparency. That has not happened. Half the people under his administration have not paid their taxes! This absolutely makes no sense!

JMcCoy   October 9th, 2009 4:12 pm ET

Yes. He has done more for diplomacy across the board, including the US, He has tried to work with both sides of congress. he is working with world leaders to try and stave off any additional wars. He has a vision of hope for peace. Can it be achieved? If not, its not his fault. Its those that persist in doing things the old way, listening to the naysayers. If you listen, really listen, you can hear the hope.....

Casey Cooper   October 9th, 2009 4:15 pm ET

I am pleased to see President Obama win the Nobel Peace Prize, especially after this country enduring eight years of a warmongering administration that did serious damage to our country's reputation. Like many others, though, my first reaction was to question what he did. Many other laureates won the prize based on years of accomplishments. So what did President Obama accomplish?

A peacemaker is one who unites people and focuses on why people are alike than why we are different. By being the first African-American to be elected President, he showed all the qualities of a peacemaker. He united people across this country like few others have. More important is how having the Peace Prize as a credential will enable him to continue the work he has started. As this site reported, officials from both the Israeli government and Hamas have praised his selection. That kind of credibility is what it takes for any chance of peace in the Middle East.

President Obama will need to heed his own words and really take his selection as a call to action. I feel his nomination is a sign this country is on the right course again and I feel a renewed pride in being an American.

Mark   October 9th, 2009 4:15 pm ET

I like Obama and support many of his efforts, but this is EXTREMELY premature. The Nobel Peace Prize is not something you should be able to win on good intentions, and since Obama hasn't had time to actually DO anything yet, that is exactly what just happened. In mind, this decision has diminished the prestige and sacredness of the Nobel Peace Prize.

Lisa   October 9th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

YES. President Obama deserves the Noble Prize for Peace even in such a short time, not only as President, but as a public servant. Being the man he is, he is going to see this award as a starting point not an end point.

Sindi Day   October 9th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!! Are you guys out of your mind?
Not only has Obama NOT achieved any 'peace' he has the US on the verge of riot over his policies! Israel is about to bomb Iran and Iran is about to nuke half the world! Who did Obama pay off to get this?
Sindi

abraham   October 9th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

WHAT DID HE DO, A SPEACH, WHAT A JOKE

John Ward   October 9th, 2009 4:18 pm ET

This is an embarassment to Nobel and other Peace Prize winners.

Obama hasn't done anything yet to be deserving of this.

Hopefully, he will someday but all he's done so far is get elected and gotten started on things.

Jimmy Holmlund   October 9th, 2009 4:18 pm ET

President Obama definitely does NOT deserve the peace prize. He has not shown us anything yet for him to deserve it. The Norwegian Nobel Committee who decided on this must be out of their minds!!
The reason why Norway distributes a part of the prize is that at the time of Alfred Nobel's death, Norway and Sweden were joined together in a personal union known as the Swedish-Norwegian Union.
This is what Alfred Nobel wrote in his will: "It is my expressed wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration whatever shall be given to the nationality of the candidates, so that the most worthy shall receive the prize, whether he be Scandinavian or not."
If the Swedes themselves had decided I'm sure it would have been some other deserving person.
An angry Swede.

Jimmy

Karoline   October 9th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

I can not believe this – approval ratings are falling and he hasn't done a thing in office. he has only been in office for not even 9 months now – I just don't get it. I feel for the previous winners of the Nobel Peace Prize. This pretty much does it for the Nobel Peace Prize. Isn't a lot of consideration supposed to be put into this decision? Sounds like a bunch of leftist to me... No rational thinking

E. Lartonoix   October 9th, 2009 4:22 pm ET

For what? For what he promises to do? What prestige is there in that?!! Whether one is a supporter of Obama or not, the decision seems completely premature. The Nobel Peace Prize is about action. Let's "hope" it will be justified.

Wendy Crews   October 9th, 2009 4:24 pm ET

Hurray, Obama most certainly deserves this honor. As a former Republican, I am absolutely appalled at our peoples' reaction to President Obama. He is taking constant heat and it all boils down to –he is black. I am fearful of all the mean-spirited people in our country. It shouldn't make any difference what color we are.

President Obama is doing everything in his power to help our ailing country, and all he gets is criticism. I am white, a former republican, and hopefully this President can help us through this crisis that George Bush put us in, and he deserves all of our support.

Wendy Crews
San Antonio, Texas

Chris   October 9th, 2009 4:25 pm ET

President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize about as much as my big toe. What has he accomplished other than starting his efforts to socialize America? Wake up people...

Sally Rice   October 9th, 2009 4:25 pm ET

I am proud of Mr. O. He is one of four presidents of the USA who have won this award. I am sure there are many people in the world who have done more. Nevertheless, he is in the position of exposure. He has made some positive steps to connect, heal, offer and extend hope for less war and more understanding. Being in his position, following negotiation and being positive in his behavior has won him this award. He lost the Olympics, a costly, bloated, political event because Chicago is not Rio. He won the Nobel Peace Prize because he is competent, shows he has class, and repect. I would say it is a good trade off.

David   October 9th, 2009 4:25 pm ET

This is a shock, but I do think that it is deserved. Obama has shown a willingness, both in his campaign rhetoric and in his actions since the elections, to work towards understanding. In the election campaign, he served to remind Americans of our claim that this is a free and open society. Since then, he has worked hard to try and foster international talks and understanding. Because of his willingness to even start looking for a mutually agreeable solution, I think that he does deserve some applause. Also, if nothing else, I think that this is likely an expression of gratitude from a world which is very tired of Bush's "kiss my gun" approach.

Hope   October 9th, 2009 4:26 pm ET

Way too early

Sindi Day   October 9th, 2009 4:26 pm ET

Absolutely not!!!! Are you guys out of your mind? Not only has he NOT achieved any 'peace' he has the US on the verge of riot over his policies. Israel is about to bomb Ira and Iran is about to nuke half the world. Who did Obama pay off to get this?
Sindi

nate   October 9th, 2009 4:27 pm ET

ARE YOU KIDDING ME????? you don't get one for making promises! He hasn't accomplished anything!

Zack   October 9th, 2009 4:28 pm ET

With all due respect, he is a very popular person and it shows total disregard for the years dedicated by the other nominees..

** Nobel Popularity Prize **

Stefanie   October 9th, 2009 4:29 pm ET

NO! He was nominated for the award back in February...what had he accomplished in February??? Nothing, he had just taken office. I am a proud American, but THIS is embarrassing and ridiculous.

Wischmann Terry   October 9th, 2009 4:31 pm ET

Yes he does, he brought hope to the world riddled with war and hatred. whoever doubts this has hidden motives thank Obama international diplomacy has been installed. And to the Americans i say without Obama yould be the most hated nation in the World.long live peace

Winona D.   October 9th, 2009 4:36 pm ET

As I said before, President Obama has opened the door for diplomatic communication between the United States and countries that would have otherwise snubbed us. Peace is hard to obtain if country leaders are refusing to talk to each other. That is action, particularly action that is VERY deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize. In Mohamed ElBaradei's words: "He has shown an unshakable commitment to diplomacy, mutual respect and dialogue as the best means of resolving conflicts. He has reached out across divides and made clear that he sees the world as one human family, regardless of religion, race or ethnicity."

Sharian Olive   October 9th, 2009 4:37 pm ET

Absolutely, yes!!!

If not Obamo, then who?

Arelene   October 9th, 2009 4:37 pm ET

He doesn't deserve it. Not yet. The Nobel Peace Prize should be given for deeds, not intentions.

Ron Matthews   October 9th, 2009 4:39 pm ET

Maybe now that President Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize he can stop waging war on the American people by trying to foist a health care system on us that only benefits the drug companies.

Yoav   October 9th, 2009 4:39 pm ET

he doesnt deserve any award at all-not only did he not make any peace in the middle east,he also tried to kick out israelis from their homes in the west bank which is in their own SOVEREIGN country.
he treat israel like it is the 51 state of the united states and the israeli prime minister as his OFFICIAL.
no president in usa acted in such a humiliating way to israel and the jews in it,more then that i think obama exaggerated EMBRACE is very suspicious and might be cause of obama's secret ISLAMIC RELIGION identity that he is hiding from the world and his own nation.
but obviously he will get a peace price from scandinavia,the countried in europe that dont like israel the most in europe.

J Harrison   October 9th, 2009 4:42 pm ET

No I do not feel that he deserves this award.
- He was selected for this award with only a few weeks in office.
- He has done nothing but given nice speeches.
- It appears that this award was given only due that he was an African American elected to President, which is a great accomplishment in its own right, however, this lacks the requirements for this award.

C P   October 9th, 2009 4:48 pm ET

This award was obviously given based more on the contrast between the tone of the diplomatic arena before he took office versus today.

Obama should thank the hardnosed policies of GWB for the opportunity to appear to be the world's savior so soon into his presidency.

Candace   October 9th, 2009 4:48 pm ET

In response to Rose's comment, "trying to knock him down. As they have always done to the Black man."

WHO CARES THAT OBAMA IS BLACK? No one! Check the statistics – Obama was elected by white people. Period. Black voters comprised only a tiny fraction of his votes. White people don't care about his skin. Nor do most black people. Nor does President Obama, according to his statement on David Letterman's show "Well... you know, I was actually black before the election too."

And stop the nonsense about greedy Republicans who don't like the "Black man." That shows ignorance. The Chairman of the Republican National Committee is black. Abraham Lincoln (the first Republican president) freed the slaves. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson (Republicans) fought tooth-and-nail to have an anti-slavery clause in the Declaration of Independence, but couldn't find enough support!

Let's not focus on race here. Obama and his Nobel Prize don't have anything to do with him being black.

Ben n Dallas   October 9th, 2009 4:49 pm ET

In my humble opinion, it would be far simpler to enumerate his failures V accomplishments. Just another demented Carter.

Nanette L Harmon   October 9th, 2009 4:52 pm ET

I'm excited. To follow HIS thinking...we will ALL get a cut of the 1.4 million dollar prize! I mean...it's only "fair". Why should he have more than anyone else.

Abdur R. Azad, New York   October 9th, 2009 4:54 pm ET

Absolutely. During his short tenure in office he has shown the VISION and the WILL to change the world politics. Even IF he fails to achieve anything IN future, he is worthy of the award for his vision and for his heartfelt love for the mankind.
It is for the first time in American history that a president is consistently fighting for the working class against the corporate interest groups, against the vested interest. Corporate conspiracy can ruin his political career, even can kill him. But, we are lucky that Obama remains undaunting.
In the world stage, this is for the first time a western head of state, and that an American president is working for denuclearization and climate change.
May I ask a question to those who expressed surprise for awarding Nobel peace prize to Obama or those who feel Obama is not qualifed for this award? -Do you understand the meaning and implication of denuclearization in light of the interests of Americ an corporations? They make hundreds of trillions of dollars just by researching, manufacturing and keeping the nuke threat alive.
IT REQUIRES SOMETHING IN THE HEART TO SAY AGAINST NUKES AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES- LOVE FOR MANKIND AND COURAGE.
OBAMA HAS BOTH OF THEM.

unhappy american   October 9th, 2009 4:54 pm ET

obviously obama being awarded this great honor is a plus for America in these hard times, maybe raising hope for people who do not back the president by being able to observe the trust and confidence other citizens of the US and the world have in him. unfortuanetly, i think blinding faith in what obama "will" do has caused an premature nomination. anyone can have the best intentions of creating peace and be very convincing in saying so, but i thought this prestigious award was for more than ambitious ideas. past prizes have been awarded for accomplishing things such as: ending the cold war, creating peace in vietnam, countless anti and safe nuclear programs, creating civil rights, discovering particles in atoms. in no way am i saying obama is an inadequate president, but it is too much to award him with such an award and i think that he would agree.

Duane   October 9th, 2009 4:55 pm ET

No way. I like a few things he has done for education, but that is about it. He is wrecking the U.S. economy, which won't help out the worlds economy... We even thought he was eloquent at first, giving speeches and sounding quite egotistical. However, once his Milli Vanilli lip-synching,"can't live without a teleprompter" jig was up, he looks worse than someone who speaks from the heart, but stumbles on a few words. He talks a lot, but have not proven to make very many good decisions. Like I said, one of the only things I agree with him on is fixing the broken public school system in America, fund and support highly successful charters, like BASIS Tucson, and stand up to the corrupt teachers unions that are crippling our educational system. I do give him kudos for that.

Penny   October 9th, 2009 4:55 pm ET

I am so pleased for President Obama. He absolutely deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. He is the hope for a new vision for all peoples of the world, and this Prize will bolster Obama's efforts to win world peace.

ld   October 9th, 2009 4:59 pm ET

As Alfred Nobel indicated – the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses should be honored

I have the highest respect and admiration for President Obama, however his accomplishments to date appear to fall short of the original intent of the Nobel Peace Prize. Perhaps if he was given more time to achieve an end ......instead of receiving the prize for a vision.

Lizzy Lynn   October 9th, 2009 5:01 pm ET

Disappointed. There are so many others that are more deserving. He hasn't been president that long nor has he accomplished what the premise of the PEACE PRISE bears. Very disappointed.

Paul   October 9th, 2009 5:01 pm ET

Obama, Nobel Peace prize? What a joke. It's an insult to Mr. Nobel's beliefs. What has Obama done for world peace besides taking a good game, and very little meaningful on that subject.

Dianna   October 9th, 2009 5:02 pm ET

Why can't everyone be as gracious as he and let him enjoy the win...everyone is so quick to criticize and make comments I for one am glad to see the President receive this wonderful award, if it was
anyone else it would not even garner as much chit chat back and forth commenting on weather or not he deserves it....HE MOST CERTAINLY DOES

Pamela   October 9th, 2009 5:06 pm ET

YES!!! congrats!

John Fitzgerald   October 9th, 2009 5:09 pm ET

Alfred Nobel – "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, ... and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

Wiki – "Unlike the other Nobel Prizes, which recognize completed scientific or literary accomplishment, the Nobel Peace Prize may be awarded to persons or organizations that are in the process of resolving a conflict or creating peace."

As much as the critics are attempting to focus on the recipient as not being "deserving" of the prize, it appears that the award is consistent with the Nobel Peace Prize objectives.

The criticisms is really of the intent and purpose of the Nobel Peace Prize itself. But it was Alfred Nobel that defined the rules of the game, it is his award. The committee follows the rules set forth by Alfred Nobel. Yet, the critics focus on the recipient.

But then, that's fairly typical of these types of critics. They lack the ability to recognize the fundamental reality.

They blame the victim for the crime, the wife for being abused, the recipient for the rules, the thirsty for the drought, the unemployed for the economy, and the winner and the rules for their losing.

I recall one such critic blaming the plight of Katrina victims in New Orleans on their lack of having a college degree.

I recall one such critic saying that the cause of a hurricane in Florida was the fault of the people living in Florida, punishment by GOD for their sins.

I had to explain to one neo-Nazi that Hitler lost the war. That made him what? A Loser.

The critics lack the ability to tell the difference between the cause and the effect, reality from fantasy, what they want from what is fact, and what was from what can be.

Obama won “for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” And in a world of pessimism, it is often harder to stand for what is right than what has happened. Obama got an "A" for effort. He got an "A" for his audacity of hope.

Can't say that of the "so called conservative" anti-social republican crowd.

Funny how these "losers" blame the rules for being "unfair" and the winner for their losing.

fernando   October 9th, 2009 5:14 pm ET

Obama receives Nobel peace prize too early. Surely for his intentions
more than his results . Anyway Compliments and Good Luck !! The hopeness doors are open.

Sergio Currais [Portugal]   October 9th, 2009 5:16 pm ET

I hope that this prize may encourage President Obama to put an extra effort in his work toward a peaceful world. I'm glad he was the laureate this year.

Joe H.   October 9th, 2009 5:20 pm ET

President Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize do not surprise me. The Prize meant something at one time but after Carter, Gore, Arafat, ect. won it, its current value is equal to GM stock.
BTW- My church got the NO Bell Prize..... as you figured it has no Bells.

Mike   October 9th, 2009 5:24 pm ET

A bit premature. He has accomplished nothing but giving speeches so far. So unless this is a "Toastmaster Award" then what is it about? He seems to favor Islam above all. He is allowing US soldiers in Afganistan to be in harms way with out proper protection. Either we go at it with full force or get out. Indecisiveness gets people killed. Quit looking at the political implications, world approval, and do what is best for America. He was elected the American President, but seems to think he was elected to the UN.

Adam   October 9th, 2009 5:25 pm ET

Of course he deserves the Award I mean look what all he has done to earn it: He has ahhhhh?? I mean he ahhh well there has got to be something?

Oh thats right he inspired a (false) hope that the Gov't will save you.

This award has become about as big of a Joke as Obama himself and thats saying something.

Janice - Houston, TX   October 9th, 2009 5:29 pm ET

He won it. Let's celebrate and stop feeding on our leaders, whatever the party.

Roger Anderson   October 9th, 2009 5:34 pm ET

The prestige and honor of winning the Nobel Peace Prize has been substantially diminished by the Obama award. All other winners were result of accomplishments not "efforts". The Norwegian committee members should be ashamed for their action.

BCL   October 9th, 2009 5:36 pm ET

No. He deserves a prize for indecision and legalized plundering of the people. But that's about it.

Edwin   October 9th, 2009 5:37 pm ET

My name is Edwin and I support Pres. Obama, but I feel that he has been in office less than a year so there is no way that he could have accomplished anything that is worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. In time I believe that he would be a great candidate, but he was nominate for the award just 11 days after he won the presidency. This award is definitely pre-mature. He has started changes in different areas but awards are not given when something is going on, it is given when something happens and is measureable. Imagine if mid – way through the NFL Season a team that was 8 – 0 was given the Super Bowl Crown. There would be an out rage because the season is not over and there could be a radical change. Well that is what has happened with him receiving this award.

Truth B Known   October 9th, 2009 5:38 pm ET

Barack Obama absolutely deserves this kind of recognition. The wisdom of the four pillars he delineated in his UN speech alone should make us all recognize what a statesman we have in President Obama. What a wonderful opportunity the world has if it can rise above our petty racial and socio-economic partisanship, the corporate greed and the distortions of the health insurance companies of America, the cruel disfunctions of the America's right wing media and the doomsday machinations of the international military industrial complex. A new day is here if we can only grasp it. Open the doors to peace. Intelligent people must now shut off FOX News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and the hateful nay-sayers.

tellio01   October 9th, 2009 5:38 pm ET

this is a joke, totally outrageous. but, what do you expect, if they awarded it to Al Gore for his global warming farce. Obama does not deserve this award, he hasn't done anything yet! You mean to tell me that no other person(s) in the world have done anything to merit an award that used to mean something?

Jeff   October 9th, 2009 5:42 pm ET

I have told the people I eat with every day at work the news of Obama's award, there first reaction was the same as mine when I heard this morning: "For what!!!" For me, this is not political, whether I like or dislike the President's ideals and philosophies, he has not done anything to deserve the award. Offering hope is not enough for one of the most prestigious awards in the world. Offering hope, making promises, and fulfilling them with care and persistence would be if the promises produced peace. But as far as i can tell, he has done nothing but make promises, and if the promises he has made concerning certain types of peace are anything like the promises he made a little over a year ago in the U.S. elections; he won't follow up on most of them.

Adam Brubaker   October 9th, 2009 5:44 pm ET

How did he win? From what I have read it is for what he has talked about doing and for what he might be able to do someday. Well in that case i should be the next in line to get one. I don't know if the Nobel Peace Prize means anything anymore it just another patch for somebody's scout uniform.

Sarang   October 9th, 2009 5:45 pm ET

No way.

Chris Kenneth   October 9th, 2009 5:47 pm ET

NO! Pretend like you at least like your own country!

Jeannette   October 9th, 2009 5:49 pm ET

I would love to have your President in my country to what he is doing for his country, health, peace and education.

Most of you are ungreatful, I know it is not about color just having something negative to say and always opposing. tsk.......tsk. He needs support isn't the recession receding, yet no one says thanks for all he has done. Stop stressing him and let him do his work all the negative critic his for naught.

Go Obama you are a peaceful man.

Kwasi   October 9th, 2009 5:49 pm ET

The concrete achievement for the US through this president, amongst others the cooperative frame works already stated earlier today is that Barack Obama leads by example implementing ancient mystical thinking in and outside America. He introduced a law of morals in political and social life, those standards that foster trust among one another and lay at the basis of long lasting economical growth.
Besides the historical Jesus Christ, Joseph was one of the few I know who was able to apply a set of morals to life. Joseph onderstood this mystical laws in his relations with the pharaoh and led Egypt ultimately through the seven lean years.
Well done Mr. President! You have accomplished more than you can imagine. You are on the right mystical track. The Almighty God will finish the job for you.

Powell   October 9th, 2009 5:50 pm ET

Diana, of the above comment, he is not your son who you have to protect, he is the leader of the free world and one of the most powerful men in the world. He signed up for scrutiny. But to answer your comment on it being anybody else. When someone wins this award who most clearly has done nothing to deserve it; the NATURAL thing to do is critisize, not the man, but the choice and the watered down meaning that the award brings to the table as of this morning.

janet Bates   October 9th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

Yes he does.
The efforts he has made to bring peace to the US, to make progress on race relations and to bring the international community together through understanding and dialogue.

Bonfoh   October 9th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

He does deserve more than the Nobel prize! Only God knows what the man has and still accomplishing for our generation and the future generation. his heart and his dedication for cause for the poorest and less fortunated is enormous. God used Galilea/Copernicus to prove everyone wrong and get the to the knowledge that the Earth is ROUNDED. It took lot of risk for them to proclaim such thing and it will take Obama lot of undeserved criticism to help this world go in the right direction and be recognized what he really meant to do for us and accomplish for peace in the world. Go Obama....we love you more!!!

Congratulations!

Noah W   October 9th, 2009 6:03 pm ET

I am a political supporter of Obama's, and would say on the whole he has been an effective leader in the 7 some months he has been in office, but this prize is ridiculous and makes him look ridiculous. The reasons are too obvious to need stating, what exactly has he done so far to promote world peace except not be George Bush?

The Nobel prizes in the sciences really do capture how those fields work to progress all of humanity, and are probably the most prestigious prizes in the world. This year the Nobel committee has given awards to people who did breakthrough work in fiber optics, charge coupled devices(digital cameras), and antibiotics. The Nobels in literature and economics are more political, but still important. While the have been some unquestionably deserved recent Peace Nobels (Nelson Mandela, Muhammad Yunus), most have been pretty dubious (Kofi Annan, Jimmy Carter). Being famous and talking about peace a lot should not be enough to get you up there with the guy who invented the laser, or whatever. And that's not even getting into that Guatemalen woman who made it all up. This year's award is looking like another nail in the coffin .

Prince Oladimeji   October 9th, 2009 6:06 pm ET

I believe President Obama deserves the noble price award. Through his vision for a better cooperation among all nations, the feeling of hope has been spread all over the word. Of course, no result of any world peace yet, but anything founded on a strong vision, fortified by mutual respect and fairness, has a better chance of success.

Renee Bianchi   October 9th, 2009 6:06 pm ET

I absolutely believe that President Obama deserves this prize. He has created a climate of hope where once was despair and shame. Any time dialog begins and ideas are exchanged change will occur. It is work without shortcuts. small steps on a long path. It is not magic. It is respecting those who differ and working toward a common goal. On any side of an issue there are clear-minded, thoughtful people trying to overcome. Publicity is given to the extremes on any side, but at the core you will find wisdom, creativity and a hunger to uplift the lives of all.

David   October 9th, 2009 6:06 pm ET

Obama is a good man, I support what he stands for, but i really don't think he deserved it, because if its based on speeches and things we would like to do for this world, many of us would have won the prize. They should judge based on action. I think Bob Mortenson, deserved it, i watched his Christianne Amampour interview, i really think he personifies what a Peace Prize winner is. That said Congrats!! Pres. Obama. I hope you achieve what you've promised.

David   October 9th, 2009 6:16 pm ET

Lets face facts. Anyone who says he deserves it, is just an Obama fan. But people should face realty. I don't think he even expected it. What has he done other than very fine speeches. I'm an Obama supporter, but right now i'm forced to agree with Mr. Steele. This might do Obama more harm than good if he doesn't work it out well. Like his olympics campaign.

Shirley Lebato   October 9th, 2009 6:18 pm ET

What has this man done?? As an american I am ashamed he would actually use our tax dollars to fly to collect the prize. What was the committee thinking? His ego will be so big, there will not be room in Air Force One for anyone else.

Although, he has never governed, he was elected president. Now, he is being awarded a Nobel Prize for effort. I am in the Twilight Zone.

Anne Dodge   October 9th, 2009 6:18 pm ET

President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for his work to be inclusive and not exclusive both here in the US and around the world. He has a vision of how this country and our world can work together and create something better: addressing the climate crisis, nuclear proliferation, improved relations with the Muslim and health care for all in the US. He listens, a refreshing stance for an American president And we are back in the UN and in true dialog with other nations.

Brian 111   October 9th, 2009 6:20 pm ET

This is the result of an agenda being pushed by particular people in power. It is shocking. I voted for him, but why give him this honor? A look at who has received these awards in the past and it kind of puts this decision in perspective. Has he lived his life in such a way as to receive this? Mother Teresa dedicated her life to peace. She did well to deserve it. President Obama has much to do and accomplish. I just wonder what is the purpose of choosing him for this prize at this stage in the game? It does seem quite "off". I read the news and just shook my head. It just doesn't make much sense. He may deserve it one once his term is up, he may not, we'll see.

If people around the world were given 10 people to chose from that have brought greater peace to the world in the last 10 years, I think it is quite safe to say he would not be chosen.

Still, I only hear what the media tells me. How much is is being twisted from actual incident to when it reaches its intended audience, who knows? We have to be critical thinkers in this day and age. So much is not what it seems.

Demissie Belayneh, from Ireland   October 9th, 2009 6:21 pm ET

Yes, a big YES. To begin with, what his predecessor had messed with need time to clear up.So it may not be surprising for the brief eight months effort to have long gestation period to bear visible fruit.They never believe in dialogue but wish for peace hard- handedly and the result was obvious, chaos all over as one can not clap with one hand.

But Obama came with different vision and approaches- one that will not only pacifies the world but also earns the US its last hegimoney. Irans willingness to open its door for NUK inspection in recent time is one good start for this man's world -without -NUK ambition. And sooner or later, we shall see all the fruits. Viva Alfered Nobel, bravo the committee.

suzi   October 9th, 2009 6:22 pm ET

Nobel Peace Prize should be for peace..but what kind of peace did Obama achieve?!his speech is always amazing, but is full of empty promises. Moreover, the war in Afghanistan only sparks violence which would lead to another maybe bigger war and not to peace. But im not wondering that he got it, cuz the Nobel Peace Prize was given to the wrong people also in the past, so this Nobel prize medal is becoming more and more only a piece of worthless metal.

the h.   October 9th, 2009 6:22 pm ET

he gave us hope and insperation after eight years of hell. what you think george bush deverge it more.

suzi   October 9th, 2009 6:30 pm ET

he hasnt done anything extraordinary.. just empty promises which he wont fulfill in 1000 years..and due to his policies the violence in afghanistan – pakistan area is only escalating..but im not wondering that he received it, cuz the PEACE Prize was given to the wrong persons also in the past.

Katie Edmiston   October 9th, 2009 6:32 pm ET

No I do not! I thought the Nobel Peace Prize should be given for actions and accomplishments, not intent. Let him prove he can actually achieve something other than influencing the majority of Americans to believe in him as their 'Savior'. What a disappointment for those that actually deserved it this year!

Eric   October 9th, 2009 6:34 pm ET

Every single moment of every single day Mr. Obama does more than the entire populated world to achieve a peace like you wouldn't believe. That smile, that confident gate has Nobel Peace Prize written all over it. In fact I am stunned that some people think he needs to have accomplished something to have won this cosmic endorsement. I have just had to take a 14% cut in salary. My benefits are disappearing faster than a moon blaster. I am going to have to cancel my family's health care plan to remain solvent. See, most people are way too mopey, hanging by a thread, runnin' from the debt collectors, looking for hope under every rock, to have very much hope. But the world is united by the realization that Mr. Obama is the epitome of hope and future pleasantries. Hooray!

Thuy   October 9th, 2009 6:48 pm ET

Obama hasn't done anything to deserve this honor. Anyone can talk very well. Only action can tell who the person really is.

It is very unfair for many great people around the world who have fought, struggled, and been jailed all their lives for peace. they should be the ones who have won this Nobel Prize.

It is a very ridiculous choice. The selection committee should be reviewed and investigated. Moreover, they should be replaced for poor judgement.

Elin Bolann   October 9th, 2009 6:53 pm ET

The choice of awarding President Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize is a demonstration of constituting a pro-active rather than a re-active award policy. While a re-active choice would have reflected praise for the past, this pro-active choice reflects hope for the future. And that is exactly what the world now needs.

Sheila Hull   October 9th, 2009 7:03 pm ET

By awarding someone like Barack Obama an award that has long been one of honor, dedication to humanity, and integrity lowers the bar to the ground when you compare past recipients such as Mother Teresa who dedicated her entire life to improve the quality of life for those who could not do it for themselves, at the expense of her own comfort and health. There is nothing virtuous or praiseworthy about Obama that requires the mantle of leadership and honor he has been handed. Society has changed the values we once revered to ashes in the bottom of the pile of those who have gone before him who have actually earned the opportuntiy to be Noble Peace Prize recipients.

George Samani   October 9th, 2009 7:05 pm ET

I think President Obama deserve the Nobel Prize because of his intention to bring hope and peace to the every person in this world.
The Universe is compassionate and when your intention is pure it will give that back to you. Congratulation Mister President..

Deanna   October 9th, 2009 7:07 pm ET

Very impressive for Pres. Obama, but premature. He's got a wonderful vision but what has he accomplished in fullfilling that vision? I would much rather have seen Greg Mortensen get the award. He has really accomplished something by working with the people of Afgahanistan and Pakistan to build more than 130 schools for small villages where both girls and boys receive a good education. A shame he was not recognized for actually making his vision come true.

Mike Aldridge   October 9th, 2009 7:09 pm ET

As nominations have to be in by February, Obama was in for the award only two weeks into his presidency. This was before any mention of nuclear disarmament or anything else to be frank. This is very fishy!
I agree with Obama on many of his policies so if the award is made only for his thoughts and ambitions then I am hopeful of getting the award myself next year. Please let them know by February.

Lara Muller   October 9th, 2009 7:14 pm ET

I don't think he deserves it at all no. Einstein was given the Nobel Peace Prize for helping form Israel and all his peace efforts including refusing to be the Prime Minister of Israel as he wasn't a glory seeker. Obama hasn't done anything towards peace whatsoever. If they wanted to award an American it should have been Clinton for his global committment ti' change program/charity and for visiting North Korea. But definitely no President Obama.

Alexis   October 9th, 2009 7:15 pm ET

I believe Pres. Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, he has exemplified peace in his efforst to bring about positive international relations, he maintains his since of peace on a daily basis as Pres. of the so-called United States, when we are clearly divided by racial prejudice. Even in the senate, this year he has been called a "lie" by a senator, and yet he accepts the apology and looks forward to the surmounting political tasks that he must deal with in the midst of white racist equating him to "Hitler" and "Monkeys" Hell yea he deserves the NOBLE PEACE PRIZE it's not easy being black, or bi-racial in America. The sad fact is that that white folks haven't changed in over 300 years, particularly white men and its apparent in the way that America continues to search for anything negative about Pres. Obama. I have noticed in the news that reporters are so prejudice that they will not even show respect by using the term "President Obama" Racism is alive and well in America, the only difference is, that Whites have taken off their white sheets and resorted to newer tactics. No one can say that racism is obsolete for this day in age or that affirmative action is unnecessary. May God be with Pres. Obama because a unified America never will. Yet, I am saddened that of all countries, Americans are upset that an American president won, I am delighted that this has opened up a window for the world to see the plight of blacks in a country that is perceived as "great" where you can find "justice for all", "equality for all". Now the world knows that this is a "white lie", a myth, that was never meant to be extended to all people. For those whites that stand on the side line and say and do nothing, shame on you. You contribute to the problem if you don't help to solve it.

Larry Wallace   October 9th, 2009 7:16 pm ET

Based on the panel's reasoning, which is not pointed to any successfully completed action at this early "thumbnail" imprint in history. The NOBEL PEACE PRIZE is being awarded based on President Barack Obama's uniquely effective and focused diplomatic skills to bring leaders of the world together together, some for the first time, at the same table to discuss the numberous issue of the world together for as often as needed to reach the desired objective.
As an AMERICAN, matters not what leaning, or side of the toast or whether I prefer to purchase only top shelf, discount or both, I feel it is my duty to feel great pride in OUR young, positive, President. Obama "HIT THE GROUND RUNNING" dealing with each near critical mass as swiftly as possible, inspite of the "i HOPE YOU FAIL" sentiment still in evident today. President Obama is the President of the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". All of the nations are observing our, the Ameican Citizen, here, in the service, reaction to the great honour bestowed on OUR President BARACH OBAMA of only a little over 9 months and show the respect and support and civic pride
due this nations elected leader.
(ps: The Afghanistan war was an inherited war from the previous adminstration (a war of revenge) which has yet to accomplish the original objective: find the leader and bring him to trial for 9/11. The leader was still free to murder, recruit, finance and train more godless actions against mankind in the name of a lie. I understand it was costing the American people TEN BILLION U,S, DOLLARS-A-WEEK before President took office. It must cost a bite more now.
Since the Consitution guaranteees me the right of express my spiritual beliefs without fear of censorship, as it had been in the U.S.S.R (SOVIET UNION), It is with GREAT PRIDE AND RESPECT, I say "GOD BLESS AMERICA" and GOD BLESS PRESIDENT OBAMA

Paul   October 9th, 2009 7:21 pm ET

Why are you blaming the President for an award he has no control over?

josmariz   October 9th, 2009 7:29 pm ET

Maybe the world trip that President Obama took around the world asking for perdon for the United States and telling everybody that our country has been arrogant in the past was sufficient for the Nobe Prize Committe to award him the award.

How President Obama is going to handle the situation with the wars in Afghanistan and Irak ?? Is he sending more troops. ??? That action for sure will not look well with his Prize ....

There are a lot more people in the world with proven records working for the peace than President Obama... Definitely the Norwegian Committe needs to review their policies !

This is nothing but a joke !

Gail Knight   October 9th, 2009 7:29 pm ET

Excuse me Rick! What were you thinking when you had the two young women give their opinions on this issue? They are not even at his level of personal accomplishments or any of the baby boomers that could give you a better opinion on this issue.

Yes, President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. The response from White America and their representative (Michael Steele) respond with such venom, envy and jealousy. I say White America because all of the opinions that the media is receiving does not portray the actual American population that is much more diverse and it is time for you and the entire CNN newscast as well as other Media outlets to deal with that fact.

President Obama raised the level of American responsibility among all demographics to select a leader as the next President of the United States. He has earned respect and a willingness among global leaders to work for the betterment of the World, and is diligently and intelligently taking on the challenges that he inherited from the previous President and a Republican regime to dig us out of an unbelievable hell hole.

American citizens should be proud and not continue to display racial, party or political divides. It is highly embarrassing and these action only weaken our position and reduce respect for American Citizens among other countries. All his enemies just need to chill and get over it!

Marie   October 9th, 2009 7:33 pm ET

Whether one agrees with President Obama's politics or not, I think one needs to be realistic in assessing this issue. The decision regarding who the recipient of the Prize would be was made two weeks into his term. Two weeks. What can a person truly accomplish in two weeks? This was hardly an unbiased decision.

The President admitted in his press conference that he did not deserve the award. I feel that it would have showed greater class and decency on his part to then turn to award down, in recognition of what he admitted.

anna   October 9th, 2009 7:45 pm ET

I think this is to early to give a nobel price who is only nine months in office. Its an insult for the nobel price for peace. Hopefully in the future it is taken more seriously giving this price..

Shahzad   October 9th, 2009 7:57 pm ET

I used to admire Obama and have been watching closely his actions re: the world and this nobel prize is the joke of 21st century.

Vivien   October 9th, 2009 8:03 pm ET

YES he deserved it . No one has given the WORLD HOPE in a long time. He already in less than one year worked towards nuclear disarmament . He not only gave hope to every black child in America that they can do anything -but gave a new face to America politics world wide and a new hope to every youngster all over.

To the critics I wonder who instead they would have picked? And they are very UN AMERICAN for their rude remarks. Morning Joe Scarsbourgh should be ashamed of himself for his remark. These are not patriotic Americans ..they are fakes . We should be proud we have our president win this award. Shame on you who aren't who are using politics to destroy the moment.

Roger Lawson   October 9th, 2009 8:05 pm ET

Yet another institution that I have now lost complete faith in. What a joke.

Nanette Hayles   October 9th, 2009 8:11 pm ET

I feel that all of us as humans beings need to realize that it is not only our survival that depends on our ability to co create a new paradigm, but it is also our moral obligation to ourselves and future generations to do so. Obama represents this new voice, one of inclusion, tolerance and mutual respect. It's hard to change minds and hearts, especially during an economic crisis! I have never seen the world in such a mess, but this mess is just not his, it belongs to us all. I think as an individual, he has gone over and beyond the call of duty, have we?
Congratulations President Obama and thank you for contributing towards a new inclusive paradigm.

brenda   October 9th, 2009 8:14 pm ET

From the beginning, he has brought us hope, and it is that hope – that worldwide hope – that people can talk together, share resources, accept responsibility, and act for the good of all people, without ignoring our differences, that has changed the expectation of continued despair to one where reason and peace can exist. Yes, it's early. Yes, he deserves it.

Elaine Gottscalk   October 9th, 2009 8:27 pm ET

NO he does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize He has done nothing to deserve it He hasn't ended the war in fact he embraces the war pouring more $ into it

Nicole   October 9th, 2009 8:31 pm ET

I predict I will write the greatest piece of literature of our generation. So can I have my Nobel Prize for literature now, please?

What a joke. This is teaching our children that a man gets rewarded when he hasn't earned it. This is redefining the true meaning of the Nobel Peace Prize. Why not, when Obama and his team are redefining our constitution too. I am disgusted. This is disgraceful and wrong! I didn't think I could dislike this man anymore, but this has done it. He should have declined. It was undeserving and wrong to accept it.

Nicole   October 9th, 2009 8:33 pm ET

A total joke...just like the recipient.

Brittany   October 9th, 2009 8:33 pm ET

No, Obama does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. Pooh on Norway.

kman919   October 9th, 2009 8:36 pm ET

Mr Obama deserves that award after fighting (4) wars…battle of Hillary and McCain and winning those 2 wars and with the Iraq war nearly complete and Afghanistan war ongoing he deserves at least a medal of honor for all the crap he went with hillary and McCain. One thing is undisputed the man is at least trying to make a difference in terms of change. The stress alone has been mind boggling, look at all the gray hairs thats popped up on his head. Yea he deserves it with a passion.

the h.   October 9th, 2009 8:39 pm ET

he gave us hope and inspire the world for a common goal. PEACE. what? you want another eight more years of george bush?

dea   October 9th, 2009 8:41 pm ET

Are you joking

Kim   October 9th, 2009 8:47 pm ET

I don't Obama deserved the award, because there are so many people in this world who have done far greater things toward peace in this world who are not being recognized. Obama has a lot of good ideas and had the following of practically all of America's youth, but the most important aspects of his plan haven't been realized yet. Maybe it the end of his presidency, he will deserve this award. The only thing I can think that he's done is be elected as the first African American president. If that's the award, let it go to the American people.

Monte Schatz   October 9th, 2009 8:47 pm ET

I think that this award calls into question the entire credibility of the Nobel prize selection process. Never has the Nobel been awarded to a person who has accomplished so little substantively in his or her field of endeavor.

Regardless of your political affilization or leaning, any individual with any objectivity would have to find the presentation of this award to President Obama as nearly blasphemous to the Nobel prize. I thought the Nobel was given for accomplishments; not for generating good feelings. Perhaps next year they should give the award to Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny.

Mary Carlson   October 9th, 2009 8:48 pm ET

What a travesty! I think it is a slap in America's face, Obama being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Just what has he done toward real world peace? Who in the world nominated him in the first place? There is something rotten in Denmark....and it is whoever awarded him such a prestigeous honor.... which he DOES NOT DESERVE!

Emilia Bou   October 9th, 2009 8:54 pm ET

I would like to know what has Obama ,the president has really achieved to deserve such a prize .Has he perahps brought peace in some place,some country or in another world? Nobel prize for peace is less and less credible.What a shame!

Peg KLaas   October 9th, 2009 8:55 pm ET

Absolutely not. What are his accomplishments? Hope?! I think it diminishes the credibility of the award.

Award   October 9th, 2009 8:57 pm ET

Maybe they'll let him win the World Series as well?

JRO   October 9th, 2009 8:58 pm ET

Of course he does not deserve the Noble Peace Prize! As a African American, I am proud to see the first African American President of the United States recieve the NPP. But to be honest his record as both a Senator and the POTUS has not shown anything significant enough to be placed in such high regard as those who have recieved the NPP in the past. I hate to say it, but President Regan did more for global peace such as pushing Soviet Union to bring down the Berlin Wall and helping end the cold war. Mr.Obama has given a couple of promising speeches in the Middle East, along with ending a couple of George Bush policies. But in my opinion, it does not equate to recieveing the NPP. Don't forget, he has a responsiblity to the American people first as POTUS. And the war in Afghanistan is not going to end anytime in the near future! This will definetly disappoint many of his supporters that help put him in office. The NPP committee, which is more or less very liberal congregation, has placed thier hopes in Mr. Obama to help in Global Peace, but they may come to regret their decision in the future!

Michael Millerick   October 9th, 2009 9:06 pm ET

please REMEMBER that the purpose of the prize as established in the 1800's by Alfred Nobel ( of Norway ) was:

"......the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses".

Throughout Obama's campaign last year he worked boldly, courageously and with great energy to convey his belief and intention to lead our nation away from the 'bullying', "unilateral' and war inclined mentality of the Bush/Republican years and remake our image in the world community as a nation ".... devoted to fraternity between nations."

In his Presidency he has accomplished this and continues to lead and work hard to create an international community of nations who work together through collaboration and diplomacy toward greater fraternity between nations and " the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses".

It is NOT what he has accomplished, it is his 'work' toward the mission of peace through courage, leadership and policies which are largely reviled by conservatives who favor our nation being 'exceptional', above the law, and a bully in the world.........

Michael

Janice Clymer   October 9th, 2009 9:11 pm ET

Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Mr. Obama, who has yet to accomplish anything significant in this arena, devalues the award's impact. They can award it to whomever they choose, but was now clearly just used to make a political statement that they agree with Mr. Obama's vision as gleened from a few speeches. It is not reflective of an actual accomplishment of some greater good for humanity. I have lost a great deal of respect for the committee.

Elizabeth McKinley   October 9th, 2009 9:14 pm ET

I am a major Obama supporter and I think he is a wonderful leader. However, I'm a bit bewildered that he's being awarded the prize for peace. He has stated all along that he will up the ante militarily in Pakistan and Afghanistan if necessary, and it appears that he plans to follow through with those policies.

I just hate to have people hold this against him. Sort of elevates him beyond his accomplishments thus far.

No - He Doesn't   October 9th, 2009 9:40 pm ET

As a San Francisco "liberal" I'm actually appalled that they would give him the Nobel Peace Prize.... He's been in office less than a year, has no prior history of any kind of peace activism or service that would be relevant, and certainly hasn't done anything while in office to deserve even being nominated. You shouldn't win a Nobel because of campaign promises and what is essentially the marketing of "hope" – How totally naive of the Nobel people... embarrassing, really... Cheapens the previous winners, most whom have done amazing work, have endured hardship and sacrifice, and who are generally doing – rather than talking – about hope

Prem Nizar Hameed   October 9th, 2009 9:44 pm ET

Optimism is the essence in him/
Broadminded views of democracy/
And true spirit of humanitarian ethics/
Merge in his unquestionable diplomacy/
A wind of change emanates from him/

Let us hope that an American President holding the Nobel Peace Prize will not indulge in any war or atrocities at least for the next three years. I think the Nobel committee might have taken a thought provoking decision by looking forward to a peaceful world in the offing. Now the Prez will think twice, unlike his predecessor, before he orders his military forces to show a war mongering reality show on someone’s land. And let us also hope that he will control his spy agencies from fingering the external affairs.

On the other hand, his intentions are good. And if the past offers some inspirations to move forward or some lessons to learn, we should take them with us for the present and for the future. Otherwise leave them behind forever. Obama might have gone through this. And he seems to be in the White House to remove some black spots from the minds of people at home and abroad. Optimism is the essence of his speech. Abraham Lincoln once told he had destroyed his enemies by making them friends. And his bold step helped eradicate slavery. Obama seems to follow him. Of course any outcome is not expected overnight. In politics, political opportunism is dangerous. Even if he and his like minded are sincerely on the move towards peace and tranquility, the hardliners from every part of the world await chances of their wrong steps .Religious interferences some times deviate the process of a good proposal or they come as stumbling blocks. People who are committed to the peace initiatives must be brave to take up all such challenges, if they really want to translate their vision. All the peace loving citizens of the world hope that the long standing conflicts may come one by one in the funeral queue with an epitaph.

Anne   October 9th, 2009 9:49 pm ET

Apparently the Nobel committee is as happy as I am that the US finally has a smart president. Or maybe its for us for being smart enough to elect him. In any case I have great hopes for his presidency.

Theresa   October 9th, 2009 9:57 pm ET

Absolutely not. Can anyone point to an example where anything he has done (or in his case said) has actually brought about peace? Great that he's working towards peace between Israel and Palestine but so did President Clinton and I don't recall anyone nominating him for this honor. To put President Obama on the same level as Mother Teresa, the Dalai Lama, Nelson Mandela, and the Red Cross simply based on his intentions and "vision"? It's ludicrous

The Mommie   October 9th, 2009 10:06 pm ET

I am so tired of these negative comments about whatever President Barack Obama says, does, or receives. How long does a person have to fight for peace, change, or unity before they are considered as a candidate for peace, change, or unity? President Obama has worked tirelessly to effect positive change in Health Reform, a resolution to the war in Afghanistan, to heal our economy and help over 500,000 with mortgage debts, and to make our nation a forerunner for the 2016 Olympics. What more does this one man have to do to get some respect and support from the people of this nation? How can he "do" anything when the Republicans decreed that they "hope he 2fails", and have done little or nothing to work with our nation's President? If it were a group of militant black men who condemned everything President Bush did, would they be called "racists"? Give me a break. Can any of these political pundants ever come up with some solutions? I have always believed that...if you're not part of the solution, then-you're part of the problem. Each time our President takes two steps forward, the pundits try to knock him back three to four steps. I just would like to see how much could be accomplished by this administration if more people tried to work with him. Let's try this; then if nothing happens-Republicans could actually say...."I told you so" and have a valid point, for once. Shame on you!

The Mommie   October 9th, 2009 10:23 pm ET

Thank you Fareed Zakariyah. Thank you for saying it is more about an award that is for President Obama-but, for America after eight years of President George W. Bush. People who travel around the world respect our President because they witness the impact his policies and diplomacy represent. Ok. It sets the bar high for President Obama-but, our President has always set the bar for himself. Please give our President his "props"! His efforts have recognized and now he should be congratulated. He has had a lot on his plate-and he has moved toward change-this award tells him that he's doing a great job! Who else is on the American forefront putting forth any effort at peace? Rush Limbaugh? Come on people. The world is watching us! Your children are watching you. Are you teaching them respect? Or Hate?

Jodi   October 9th, 2009 10:27 pm ET

Thank goodness someone knows the President of the USA should be honoredl. No one is listening to the media...........
Who really caused the fiancial problems in the USA...REPUBLICANS
NOT Terrorist............and our President is trying to help people in the USA.............The USA should have insurance just like the Congressman in the USA but no the REPUBLICANS don't even want the middleclass/poor to have insurance for all ........
The Insurance company in the USA are making great profits, charging high payement, upping the price 2010 already planned and the people can't even afford to pay for the insurance that won't pay out for those people that are paying high prices. The President of the USA is trying to get Good Insurance for everyone...........
Obama could make USA a better place is the REPUBLICANS cared about the people of their own country..............its a shame these rude people yell the President is lying when they caused all of this........terrorist did bring the USA down, it was the the rude people on WALL Street, it was the creedy people in the USA and it is the insurance company, medicine company and banks making money and not helping the people of their own country.........shame on them..............Yes, I believe we would all be at peace if President of the USA got backing ...........................from the Americans in Congress

Birgitte Bruun   October 9th, 2009 10:37 pm ET

Congratulations to President Obama and to the American people!
Since President Obama took office, there is hope in the world again.
Americans who don't think their president has deserved the Nobel Peace Prize should travel around the world and see what a difference their democratically elected President has made in international peace negotiations already. With warmth, elegance, humility and intelligence, President Obama is letting everyone on the planet know that we must collaborate now, across countries, borders, religions and races- to save the planet from disaster.
When President Obama is travelling to foreign countries, his humanity and respect for the people he is negotiating with, is bringing a new respect from the world towards Americans.
We want to love America! We want to love Americans! That has been pretty near impossible during the Bush years.
Now, with President Obama in office, there is hope for the future.
Thank you , America!
Thank you , Nobel Peace Prize Committee, for your wisdom and courage to chose the right recipient.

Colleen Lavelle   October 9th, 2009 11:06 pm ET

Since when are we now awarded in life for the promises we make, rather than the accomplishments we achieve??? Awarding Obama with the Nobel Peace Prize makes reduces the award's intensity and honor. Obama has not accomplished enough in his short life to justify winning this prestigious award and those who life's work was honored by receiving the award now share an honor that has less meaning since they are just giving it out without proper review.

cdickinson   October 9th, 2009 11:08 pm ET

He has not proved himself and does not deserve this at all.

Gabe   October 9th, 2009 11:15 pm ET

President obama has a clear vision for peace and deplomacy in the world stage But the real peace in everyone is expecting is between Israel and the palestinians.Did he deserve the price? I will say yes.

Clara Plum   October 9th, 2009 11:20 pm ET

I want to very respectfully say this. How can a person receive a Nobel Peace Prize if they have speechwriters, advisors, etc. telling them what they should do? Shouldn't the prize be shared with them? Besides, shouldn't that be part of what the Presidential office should be doing anyhow? I believe many former Presidents of the United States have had a dialogue with other nations at odds with each other and us. Should they not have received one also? I join others in saying that I just don't get it. One good thing about it. President Obama will really have to live up to this prestigious award, even if it were given prematurely.

Como tu Quieres   October 10th, 2009 12:01 am ET

Who does Obama feels derserves this honour ?

It appears the Nobel peace prize is but hollow as more stretgic politicians seems to reveive this than the real peace makers.

"Gun in one hand and Peace award in the other? He has been caught in the Cross Fire. This Peace award must be reserved for the deserved &certainley Not Obama. "So please Pass it on Mr Obama."

With all due respect
Peace Loving &Longing to See A world with out Weapons of Mass destruction Used In Palestine, Afganistan and now on the Moon.

Gob   October 10th, 2009 12:35 am ET

the nobel prize has really lost all credibility anyway. ridiculous. they could have at least recognized someone who has done something charitable, like Toms Shoes.

dave   October 10th, 2009 12:37 am ET

WOW!! This certainly cheapens the award. They voted for him after he had been in office for only 12 days!! that is incredible!!!. Maybe we sent some stimulus money to Norway. He does not deserve, nor will he ever deserve this award. All of the hype surrounding the election of the first black president will eventually die down as well as his ability to blame the previous administration for all of the country's problems. When that happens, he will be hopefully be judged for his performance and when that happens, you are going to wish you had given this award to someone who truly deserves it. I would hope that there is someone in the world more deserving than Obama.

norwegian conservative   October 10th, 2009 12:40 am ET

What have he done for world peace? I can`t see any results. There`s alot of other more qualified humans fighting for world peace. Miss World is one of them..

James L.   October 10th, 2009 1:44 am ET

No. Lots of talk, no substance. Come back to me in a few years and let's see what he's accomplished.

alexis carter   October 10th, 2009 1:48 am ET

MY FAMILY AND I THINK BARACK OBAMA IS SO VERY DESERVING OF THE NOBEL PRIZE!HE IS CARING,RESPECTFUL,CAUTIOUS AND INTELLIGENT.HE HAS BEEN WEATHERING A CRAP STORM OF RESISTANCE AND SABATAGE FROM THE OLD WAR MONGERS.
HE IS DEFINITELY WORTHY AND WELCOME IN OUR HOME AND HEARTS!

Bob Glock   October 10th, 2009 2:29 am ET

I believe it is a travesty that Obama won the prize–a similar travesty as when ex-pres Carter won the award–in both cases for almost nothing. An award for "appearing" to have noble ambitions or intentions is something you award grade-school children. International "achievements" should be more of a criteria for a Nobel Prize–but apparently the committee is just another politically charged group–which is a farce and relegates the award in these recent times as a complete joke.

Candiace   October 10th, 2009 7:07 am ET

I think this prize should have gone to someone who actually accomplished something; not to someone who hopes and dreams to accomplish something....maybe someday but I feel too soon !

elizabeth strebel   October 10th, 2009 7:09 am ET

If we all spent more time focusing on the underlying causes of world problems (notably in the Middle East) as opposed to being obsessed with prizes, perhaps the world would be more peaceful.

Raj Rajendran   October 10th, 2009 9:36 am ET

I think the award was premature and not justified. The nobel peace committee should have compared the achievements of the past recipients in a better context. They have minimized the respect and dignity associated with this award and also all the past recipients of the award. He should have been nominated after about 3 years of work in the white house based on his accomplishments

Miguel Núñez   October 10th, 2009 10:59 am ET

It's as simple as obvious; no he does NOT deserve it

RR Shrestha   October 10th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

This is very good, this is the way to encourage such wonderful people. I am too happy !

Marie Cosgrove   October 10th, 2009 1:50 pm ET

It's disappointing that more deserving people were not chosen. I applauded the choice of Wangari Maathai,Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank,Aung San Suu Kyi etc. People deserving of our recognition. People like Al Gore, Barack Obama are not deserving of such a prize. They do not know people's suffering firsthand.
Barack Obama is on the right track to work for Peace but he does not need the 1million dollars prize. It should go to stop child labor in places like Ghana's cocoa bean plantations, Pakistan and Nepal.
It is disappointing that the selection committee could not find a more suitable and deserving candidate. Surely there are more deserving candidates. I hope Barack Obama will give the prize money to a worthy cause that will help make children's lives better. Let's stop
exploitation of children in this world.

Louis   October 10th, 2009 4:32 pm ET

The President of the United State( President Barack Obama) as been awarded a price for Americans and Africans( Two continents).His foot steps already tells us what is visions are for America and the World at large; People get qualifications or Noble price not only by their archievment alone but also by their quality of thoughts, level of understanding leading to the actualization of world peace. Once you can understand, then you can definitely archive or on the part to archievment.
Who ever is not happy about it even while the President was humble about it should wait for his/her turn.
This Price encourages all that embrase long lasting peace Continentally and Globally; assuring them that they are on the right track...

nuriya   October 10th, 2009 5:00 pm ET

ya, he deserve the nobel peace prize ..
he goon change the world.

Halabee   October 10th, 2009 5:03 pm ET

He doesnt deserve it. All he does is talk about peace. He didnt do anything to promote it, and hes thinking about sending more troops in Afghanistan – peace much.

sai   October 10th, 2009 5:04 pm ET

President Obama does not deserve the prize (at least as of yet). The Nobel Organization has lost credibility by awarding the prize to someone who has no verifiable accomplishments that warrants the prize.

CH   October 10th, 2009 6:00 pm ET

I think he deserves it.

But deserved or not, this will only serve to further inflame the Right Wing in the USA. When they calm down, I hope they see that the rest of the World does *not* think as they do. But....then you can't convince a 'True Believer' of anything. To them, the World is Flat, now and forever.

This is my 3rd blog, same point, same subject. Why is it that you refuse to post my opinion?

Esperifiel Solice   October 10th, 2009 7:15 pm ET

They should change the name of the award to the Nobel PR Prize. It unequivocally has nothing to do with peace.

diana maginot   October 10th, 2009 7:39 pm ET

NO ONE ON GODS' GREEN EARTH DESERVES THIS AWARD MORE THAN BARACK OBAMA...JUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE INCREDIBLE DISASTER HE INHERITED FROM THE EVIL TWINS. JUST REALLY, REALLY GIVE THIS SOME DEEP THOUGHT... IF THE PEOPLE OF THIS DEPRESSED AND SAD COUNTRY STILL HAVE THIS CAPABILITY.

greatvic   October 10th, 2009 7:44 pm ET

off all the events that have happened in recent times... two I will not forget first the Beer summit and secondly the way he handled a demand an apology by the Iranian leader... remarking I do not take him seriously (which of course is my favorite remark these days when someone tries to deliberately annoy me.) smiled and brushed it aside.

Obama is clearly a man of peace and deserves the award. please every one should follow this lead so we can have a peaceful existence in our time here on earth. ( religion is a fuction of your birth... it is devotion to God pls this should no longer cause unrest and terror ... Live and let live in peace.)

OLUMIDE, NEW YORK   October 10th, 2009 8:44 pm ET

PRESIDENT OBAMA REALLY DESREVES THE PEACE AWARD. HE HAS GREATLY CONTRIBUTED TO GLOBAL PEACE. HONOR SHOULD BE GIVEN TO WHOM IT DESERVES.

bijar khan   October 10th, 2009 9:03 pm ET

hey , i dont think obama deserves the nobel prize for peace at all . had it been for any other cateogry that would have been different . but peace ?? im sorry but all the wars are still going on and there are more to come from his side .

Ramona   October 10th, 2009 10:30 pm ET

No! Nobel Prize is "life-time achievement". Obama is "surprised" – thinking like many Americas with the merit award, "what have I achieved"? Most world leaders are hopeful for peace... many dedicated and died. Obama award is LOL!

nk from Middle east   October 11th, 2009 1:08 am ET

What exactly is the requirement for receiving a noble peace price these day?

Obama is a great speaker there is no doubt about it. And he is the first black president in United States.

But what exactly does this have to with peace.

All that was done was that American Soldiers are moved from Iraq to Afghanistan. From Fire to the Frying Pan as the expression.

The second thing is that he keep quite about the evil that countries such as Iran do to other countries as well as their own people.
Keeping quite and procastinating does not make some a Peace Nobel Price winner.

Oh wait that is what Clinton did and just left all the mess for George W Bush to clean.

But I guess sweeping things under the rug works since Clinton is still popular

K   October 11th, 2009 2:13 am ET

I am speechless. Not so very long ago no one even knew who this man was. What has he done to deserve this award – which no longer holds the same value as it has in the past. I think he got the Nobel Prize the same way he became president – by the ignorance of the people who voted for him.

I am entitled to my opinion just the rest of the world so you don't have to like it any more than I like some of the others I have read.

Danny   October 11th, 2009 7:53 am ET

What can you expect? President Obama is a politician. All talk, less action. Very vague action for that matter just like his very provacative speeches. But I do hope that I'am wrong and that he turns out what we expect him to be. A bright light at the end of the tunnel. Good luck Mr. President.

Larry Wallace   October 11th, 2009 8:15 am ET

Not being familar with e-mail protocal, my earlier attempt to comment was delayed because I used capital letters to express my agreement with the Nobel Peace Prize decision, So,once again, this time with out the capital lettering "no, no."
I'm proud "Our" President Barack Obama waa honoured with the
nobel Peace Prize.I join in agreement with all other fellow Americans who share my pride for this great honour bestowed our president and for our country. And express my personal, humble appreciation to the citizens of the World Community who shared the same opinion. President Barack Obama, the elected leader of America, has my respect, loyality and support. He "hit the ground running" before he took office to address the tower of issues left to address. I stand in support of President Obama to show the World Community our president does not stand alone. "Together We Stand; Divide We Fall".
With Great Respect, Larry Wallace, American Citizen

passion4word   October 11th, 2009 10:04 am ET

Given the prize to Obama is not just for free. It's more than prestige or accomplishment so far. It's simply a reminder to what he promised.

Princess Ayelotan

demetris   October 11th, 2009 10:06 am ET

Barack Obama's presidential campaign has been a hope for peace and his election a victory to all crying for it.

His acceptance of the Nobel peace prize is just a further commitment to this hope.

kali   October 11th, 2009 11:44 am ET

no.

George Thomas   October 11th, 2009 11:51 am ET

Everyone seem to ask one question, what has he (President Obama)done to deserve the Nobel peace price? Well the answer is, may be he has done nothing specific but with his election to office suddenly the the whole world seem to be at peace,may be percieved, may be fact but the tension has definitely diappeared. That's a big positive after 10 years of Bush administration. Therefore does he deserve the Nobel prize, yes, of course.

Mihir (India)   October 11th, 2009 2:01 pm ET

Yeah, Its wishing good luck to Obama who is on his holy moral mission to free the world from nuclear arms, the conflicts in the middle east, to end global warming, end wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, close down guantanamo bay and bring in a world of Peace and happiness!!... Duh!!

Its a bad joke that turned worse! But really does it matter what a bunch of Norwegians think anyways??!

omar   October 11th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Obama is deserved it.
we have been in needy of some who will revive and inspire this demaged world.

consumedspirit   October 12th, 2009 12:45 am ET

oh for the Love of the World...give Barrack OBAMA and his family some rest.
It is our Faith God needed to test.
It is perfect Faith you are having.
Stop complaining...
For Goodness' sake!
xD

Alexis   October 12th, 2009 12:49 am ET

Hooray!!! For President Obama.

Dianne   October 12th, 2009 2:35 am ET

If President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, then I deserve a nomination for the Nobel Prize for Literature....for the great novel I plan to write!

Brando   October 12th, 2009 6:19 am ET

President Obama deserved a Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar ,the Man made the earth stand still he touched and impacted people around the world like no single presidential Candidate in my life time .
I believe he won it because of what he stands for and the notion that it was awarded prematurely is absurd ,he is a great Man and he stands for Peace and Hope an inspiration to Many at a time when the world needs it the Most .Congratulations Mr Obama .Now when are you coming to Botswana ?

Worst President EVER!!!   October 12th, 2009 6:49 am ET

Nope does NOT Deserve The Nobel Peace Prize!!!!

You do NOT win the Nobel Peace Prize on good intentions!!! Nor on a few months work in the White House. What a JOKE!! Obama has not even established himself as the President. The United State of America has become the a Big JOKE and it PISSES ME OFF!!

You do earn or win the Nobel Peace Prize for only a few months of your work in the White House office.

Look at Mother Teressa or Gandhi, they won the Nobel Peach Prize for a life time of achievements!! Give me a break Obama, he should have graciously thanked the commitee for thinking of him and not accepted the Nobel and let a REAL Nobel Peach Prize winner accept that award. Then when he accomplishes "his so called mission" they could hae reconsidered him.

Also what other person has not thought about these things that Obama wants to accomplishs. So I do not understand why all of a sudden Obama should be the one to get the Nobel Peace Prize for stating the same thing that other Presidents have about Nuclear Bombs.

I plan to accomplish world peace and to have peanut butter & jelly sandwhiches with cold glasses of milk on ever table for lunch. So where is my Nobel Peach Prize?

Antonio   October 12th, 2009 9:22 am ET

Mr Obama is a grait speaker,but have done nothing.why giving him such honor? I say no,no,no.This is acepted in Africa,because they do not know beter.

Vivian Wildeboer   October 12th, 2009 10:07 am ET

I think he does deserve it. Because, despite his relatively short time in office, he has brought 'peace' to the world. And I mean peace as in, that the world has been less tense. People can relax now, that he is in power and people have been. Tension has decline all over the world. people aren't strained and scared anymore.

Davy   October 12th, 2009 10:39 am ET

Congratulations for Mr. Obama, I want you to win the prize again next year. I want to see "change" in America. I am waiting for your visit to Indonesia. I want to talk with you because I have a problem with Americans and France. Especially France. Maybe you can help me.
Thanks.

Amadi Innocent   October 12th, 2009 10:44 am ET

Barack Obama deserves the award, looking at his commitment on peace
in the world. He is the best thing that has happen in our time

insidiom   October 12th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

Whether or not you agree with the Committee's decision, do you think your opinion matters? There aren't any take-backskies with the Nobel Prize. At least Obama isnt a hypocrite and a child-killer like Al Gore, who, despite his support for sanctions in Iraq that killed thousands of children, won the Peace Prize for making a movie about an un-proven theory about climate change. Your opinion doesn't matter.

Charles Linden   October 12th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

Ladies and gentlemen, I propose that 1. We all start to think with a full "Deck of Cards". I mean after all, Arafat won the award too. The war in Iraq is escalating as I write, Pakistan, Afghanistan (where My daughter is serving with the Air Force), the activities there are escalating, My question is: "Where have things improved "peacefully" for the cause of Barrik H. Obama?
The economy- gets and "F". His chairisma gets an "A". The only problem is that it buys and changes nothing to our benefit. I weep (really I do) each day I see and am concerned.
You don´t need a Phi-Beta-Kappa to figure that one out, we are now trading our values for dollars. The would really "piss-off" our forebearers. We are a society based upon principals, at least that´s the way I was brought up. How very sad we have arrived here.

Charles Linden   October 12th, 2009 2:43 pm ET

Uh, to those of you who have not slipped into a comma, just where exactly is the "peace?" (Am I wrong?)

Charles Linden   October 12th, 2009 2:52 pm ET

And he placed out relations with China above the idealogical ideals of the Dali Lama? Uh , gee...I am confounded, China=$$$ Dali Lama =peace , er this is a "no-brainer" guys, the Buhdists won´t even squish a bug when they are sweeping, the Chinese, how many exceutions have they got programmed this week? Well, I must add, "O-devil" or O-bomba...at the end of his "rule" (for those suckers who follow him) we are going to be so deep in more and different problems than when he came into office. What blinded people so gravely? Thank God I´m not a reporter or polititian and can express my opions and obsevations, and then, others are able to soak them up or totally discount them.

adam   October 12th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

a shame that cnn censors comments.......wake up everbody, theres quite a bit more than what you see in front of you.

Hilde, Oslo, Norway   October 12th, 2009 9:15 pm ET

From Norway: Obama? Obama? Obama? For what..? The other half of the nation just said: Wow!!
I was in the first group…..But then, as one read and learn more about it, one also gets to understand…..
There is a Norwegian lawyer that only one year ago wrote a book (“The will of Nobel”), analyzing the will of Nobel, and explaining what Nobel must have meant with “the reduction or elimination of standing armies” and other terms in the will. A historical and legal analysis in his book shows that the committee is obliged to respect that what Nobel wanted was to settle a prize for active peacework, for a new international order of law, where the states safe could eliminate their military forces/system. The writer means it happens an abuse of the Nobel peace prize. The Nobel committee has done an elementary misunderstanding of its task when it has chosen to interpretate “peaceprize” instead of looking at the words Nobel used and his specific intention with the prize. It is then no longer Nobels peace prize, he writes, but the Nobel committees price that is being given.
The book doesn`t criticize the broad interpretation of the word “peace” but shows that Nobel wanted to challenge militarism and war machinery, and nearly half of the prices, especially after the second World War hasn’t been faithful to this, the book says. He then heavily criticizes the committees for many times throughout history having not followed the will of Nobel, in his opinion. Only a bit more than half of them get his recognition. Neither Mother Theresa, Amnesty International, Elie Wiesel, nor IAEA nor Doctors without borders (Medecins sans frontiers), ought to have got the prizes earlier, in his opinion, due to the will of Nobel.
So my guess is that the committee this year has adjusted their course after this book. It is the first time that they have got the chance to do so. Nobel didn‘t ask for who has devoted his life to work the most for peace, who has achieved the most in humanitarian work for a long period etc. He asked for the work of demilitarization in the very last year…not easy to fulfill…
The newly elected leader of the Nobel committee; Torbjørn Jagland likes the broad visions. He is also a newly elected leader of the Council of Europe (which has nothing to do with the European Union) and he also likes the greater agendas in many ways…..I don’t know if there had been so many other leaders of the committee to take this step and to lead the committee into such a decision, for the better or for the worse…
Something of the first Obama did was to go to Cairo and hold a speech where he reached out the hand to the muslim world, he has started a diplomatic contact with the regime of Iran (which hasn’t been for 30 years), he has gone into the conflict of the Middle East from the first moment, he has cancelled the plans of an army shield in Central-Europe and thereby improved the relationship to the Russians. An above all he has got a resolution through the Security Council in the UN, where the aim is to eliminate the nuclear weapons in the world. So on behalf of the committee Mr. Jagland describes how Obama has represented Nobels values anno 2009. He has given straight message that he will negotiate. He has reduced the temperature in the world, like Desmond Tutu says. Many says the president got the prize too early. The committee leader answers it could have been too late….(all according to the will of Nobel, is my guess..). So the response to some of the criticism from him is: Who has done more for peace in the world the last year than Barack Obama? Can anyone answer me on that? Interesting, yes.

So this is a splendid given Prize – due to the will of Nobel, I am sure… And we can be glad that the committee is able to wait till the last second to decide, because I think it was Obamas nuclear resolution in UN, late September, – which represents the beginning of the end for nuclear weapon-, that I guess was of the heaviest weight here…..

(Alfred Nobel, who was Swedish, lived in a time when Norway was in union with Sweden. His decision that the Peace prize was to be given in Oslo by a committe from the Parlament was sensible as it in those days were heavy discussions about the Swedish-Norwegian union future.)

Hilde, Oslo, Norway

K   October 12th, 2009 9:21 pm ET

You tell them Charles Linden. Well said!!

emmanuel petrakakis   October 12th, 2009 9:49 pm ET

for the first time the award is a message a statement,than the usual fait acomplis, it is saying the world affairs aqre so desparate and pathetic that this is the caliber statemansship necesaary to get us out of the mess, this caliber leadership has been missing for quite some time now adnd they are urgently welcoming it back...

Raymond Huang   October 12th, 2009 10:42 pm ET

My first reaction was that it was premature. However, on second thought I think Pres. Obama deserves his award now–not later.

He brought to the presidency a mind set that works on the premise that the US is part of the world and not above the rest of the world. This mind set alone, reduced the confrontational and imperial attitude and provided an atmosphere where countries and search for solutions to peace rather than have solutions to peace set and approved by the US.

The conditions and standard for peace should not be dictated by the US who previously tend to see "peace" in terms of their own interest.

So this change alone made the world a safer place. Hence makes him deserving of the prize.

Previous Nobel Peace Prize winners also did not achieve "peace" as it is a journey nor a destination. Nelson Mandela did not achieve "peace" as South Africa remains a violent country. Neither did Martin Luther King. Yet, they all strifed for peace and travelled down that road.

Pres. Obama deserves his prize and deserves it now.

Carleddy Saint Jean   October 13th, 2009 4:15 pm ET

I do not agree with this decision of giving obama a nobel peace prize. The Norwegian authorities who pick the winners should hang their head in shame because there ae a lot more deserving people out there then the president of the United States when it comes to the matter of a noble peace prize.Nothing against Obama, he is a great guy and is doing a great job as president of the US,but the nobel peace prize is a altogether different thing. He hasn’t done anything to deserve this (yet) that has affected the world from a personal stand point and not his presidental title.

Subrata Datta   October 14th, 2009 8:49 am ET

Don't take a myopic view of Obama;s achievements thus far to attain peace, His entire Presidential capaign was run on the theme of Change . No. politician from any democratic society has made this promise before. He has scrupulously avoided George Bush's cowboy language "If you ain't with us you are against us". He made promises which I am certain he will keep.. He is no pacifist but yet his body lingo is that of a man of peace.

Whitney Ivey   October 15th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

I think that he derseves the award because he is one of the most weell respected men to becaome president of the United States. Yes he has only been in office for only eight months so what. Yes some of things he says i do not agree with but i still think that he desreves the award. So just lay off Obama he got award now so leave it alone.

Uma Ganesan Asbjørnsen   October 16th, 2009 10:31 am ET

Yes, he deserves it. Peace is not just about the middle east, afghanistan or palestine. It's also about racism, discrimination against minorities, superiority complex with one's own religion/race and all that daily not-very-peaceful-things that takes place around us.

And President Obama has shown the world that all these are beginning to lose it's place on the face of the earth. He has shown millions of people around the world that there is a lot more in common among us citizens of Planet Earth than there is difference.
He has indeed lead the world to be more open-minded, less discriminating and more tolerant. That spells P-E-A-C-E to me!

Rasaq Seriki   December 9th, 2009 9:03 pm ET

Like my mother use to tells me when i was a teenager " today would give wise men the clue how tomorrow will be" President was honored based on his Humanitarian, Wisdom,Diplomacy,Manifesto, Personality and so on. I am very sure that Mr President will deliver more than what we are expecting if we may exercise patience and stay away from being politicize every steps of Mr President. Moreso "another man's meat is another man poison" so those behind the award know the rules. Congratulations more grease to your elbows.

Jeff   December 9th, 2009 11:55 pm ET

I believe the only reason the nobel prize panel awarded Obama the prize is to pressure him into not sending more troops into Iraq and Afghanistan. I think it's a blatant attempt to end the war in the middle east by putting undue pressure on a newly elected president that has the power to end it. That's the only logical reasoning I can think of to explain his receiving such an honor.

Charles Linden   December 10th, 2009 6:30 pm ET

Two words...not yet.

Peter Wilhelmsson   December 11th, 2009 9:43 am ET

He does not deserve the prize for creating better relations with many countries and for having charisma and people skills, but I hope that he works hard and earns it in the coming year: It is like giving the NBA title to the Lakers, a few games into the season, because they had an impressive start. The nobel peace prize is for tirely working for peace over decades and ashieving some successes. It is not the Nobel "Hope for Peace" prize.
Barack, you are in my prayers and hope you can contribute to make this world, peacer, more loving and achievements are made in health care, poverty, the environment, international relations and economy.

Mich Goocha   September 5th, 2010 2:19 pm ET

Comrade Obama should get it. He just needs to capture the Americans and keep them in step with the rest of the World. They should give all the help they can to preserve our Socialist gains around the World. His march toward Dictatorship has to be guarded. Support our new Dictator with our hard work and our souls.

Bob   January 26th, 2011 5:32 pm ET

There is not now or will there ever be peace in this world SO no one should get the NOW Dishonored Nobel prize!

Obama teleprompter   February 7th, 2012 1:48 pm ET

rEally does the girl elegant you or otherwise well it can be a actual daunting job trying to puzzle out regardless of whether a lady choices a person or not. This time around is actually interesting simultaneously receives a person ...mercury dimes

Obama kissing chavez   February 8th, 2012 10:14 pm ET

Suppose president barack obama enters rehabilitation * could the actual executive department manage next problems simply by puncture Winslowspilleautomater online

typeLith   February 12th, 2012 11:25 pm ET

sell imitation louis vuitton with confident

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


Connect with the show
Fusion Journeys takes six stars of the creative world on a journey to a location of their choice, where they will create something inspired by their experience. Watch the show every Monday, Wednesday and Friday on Connect the World.
subscribe RSS Icon
twitter
@beckycnn: In case you missed it, here's the link to my full interview with Pakistan PM Gilani.. http://t.co/L8kBpG5t #cnn
Updated: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:26:11 +0000
@beckycnn: Mandelson on Greece leaving euro: "The consequences would shake confidence in Greece and its economy for years to come" More on CNN 9p bst
Updated: Tue, 15 May 2012 19:05:56 +0000
@beckycnn: Lord Mandelson on the Euro: "There's not much more you could ask for in a currency...but the framework around it had flaws" - on CNN 9p bst
Updated: Tue, 15 May 2012 19:04:28 +0000
@beckycnn: Greek Banks See Deposit Withdrawals http://t.co/kjEVTu2V via @WSJ
Updated: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:57:22 +0000
@beckycnn: “@RhymeGuy: @BeckyCNN #MCFC's EPL title marks the beginning of #ANewEra in English football. As a Spurs fan, you must be pleased" DELIGHTED!
Updated: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:11:55 +0000
Categories
subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Connect the World takes viewers on a sweeping journey across continents, beyond headlines and into histories, possibilities and depths of the stories that are changing our world. Host Becky Anderson and guests will join the dots of stories and events by exploring how an event or circumstance in one part of the world can have significant impact and reach elsewhere. Weekdays at 2100 GMT.

Click here for the Connect the World Web site

Powered by WordPress.com VIP